Should I replace my drivetrain along with my chain?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Should I replace my drivetrain along with my chain?
Hello,
I'm thinking about replacing my chain because I've been experiencing some grinding that I'm pretty sure is the result of chain wear. Do I need to replace the chainring and rear cog along with the chain as well? Will the new chain be compatible with the old cogs?
I'm thinking about replacing my chain because I've been experiencing some grinding that I'm pretty sure is the result of chain wear. Do I need to replace the chainring and rear cog along with the chain as well? Will the new chain be compatible with the old cogs?
#2
Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Liked 115 Times
in
78 Posts
First, check that your existing chain is clean and well lubricated, and that the chainring and sprocket are also clean. They can pick up road dust and grime which mixes with the lubricant and creates a paste that can make a grinding noise and cause wear. A good clean may get rid of the grinding noise.
Second, if you need to replace the chain, it does not mean that you automatically need to replace either the chainring, or the sprocket, or both. Look at them to see if they need replacing.
An aluminium chainring or sprocket will wear faster than a steel one.
Look at the teeth: are they still symmetrical, or have they started to to wear into hooks? If they have started to hook, then it is time to replace.
Chains are a routine item to replace; chainrings and sprockets less so.
Second, if you need to replace the chain, it does not mean that you automatically need to replace either the chainring, or the sprocket, or both. Look at them to see if they need replacing.
An aluminium chainring or sprocket will wear faster than a steel one.
Look at the teeth: are they still symmetrical, or have they started to to wear into hooks? If they have started to hook, then it is time to replace.
Chains are a routine item to replace; chainrings and sprockets less so.
#3
Senior Member
Invest in a $10 Park chain checker and check the wear in your chain. Cheaper to replace a worn chain than it is on a new cassette/chainrings.
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
First, check that your existing chain is clean and well lubricated, and that the chainring and sprocket are also clean. They can pick up road dust and grime which mixes with the lubricant and creates a paste that can make a grinding noise and cause wear. A good clean may get rid of the grinding noise.
Second, if you need to replace the chain, it does not mean that you automatically need to replace either the chainring, or the sprocket, or both. Look at them to see if they need replacing.
An aluminium chainring or sprocket will wear faster than a steel one.
Look at the teeth: are they still symmetrical, or have they started to to wear into hooks? If they have started to hook, then it is time to replace.
Chains are a routine item to replace; chainrings and sprockets less so.
Second, if you need to replace the chain, it does not mean that you automatically need to replace either the chainring, or the sprocket, or both. Look at them to see if they need replacing.
An aluminium chainring or sprocket will wear faster than a steel one.
Look at the teeth: are they still symmetrical, or have they started to to wear into hooks? If they have started to hook, then it is time to replace.
Chains are a routine item to replace; chainrings and sprockets less so.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PHL
Posts: 9,948
Bikes: Litespeed Catalyst, IRO Rob Roy, All City Big Block
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1332 Post(s)
Liked 398 Times
in
194 Posts
In addition to above, make sure your chain isn't tight/binding anywhere in the rotation of the cranks. Tight chains are loud chains.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 191
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
11 Posts
Some say that you should do this because your chainring wears to your chain, and a new chain will also try to wear itself in in it's own way, but I personally think it's way overkill.
Can you imagine replacing $1-200 (or more) worth of parts everytime you change your chain?
Maybe in extreme circumstances you will have problems like chains coming off the drivetrain because it skips a tooth or something, but I think this is one of those things that only pros worry about when/if they're trying to get the smoothest possible drivetrain for whatever reason.
Cogs/Frewheels are almost always made of hardened steel (not always, i've snapped aluminum ones that I assumed were steel) so there won't be much wear there for the most part (check anyways).
Chainrings are made of aluminium so will definitely wear when rubbing against steel. I'd say it's only an issue if your chainring is already incredibly worn after like several years of use or a couple of months of really bad maintanence (you shoudl be cleaning and lubing your drivetrain often).
I'd change the chain, then just kinda be aware of it and a taad more careful while you break in the chain. If you're not skipping around or it doesn't have too much play, you're pretty much good to go.
And like the other poster said, check for "sharktooth" (sprocket teeth worn down and thin to the poitn of being sharp).
That's the only reason I've ever had that really justified replacing a chainring.
Can you imagine replacing $1-200 (or more) worth of parts everytime you change your chain?
Maybe in extreme circumstances you will have problems like chains coming off the drivetrain because it skips a tooth or something, but I think this is one of those things that only pros worry about when/if they're trying to get the smoothest possible drivetrain for whatever reason.
Cogs/Frewheels are almost always made of hardened steel (not always, i've snapped aluminum ones that I assumed were steel) so there won't be much wear there for the most part (check anyways).
Chainrings are made of aluminium so will definitely wear when rubbing against steel. I'd say it's only an issue if your chainring is already incredibly worn after like several years of use or a couple of months of really bad maintanence (you shoudl be cleaning and lubing your drivetrain often).
I'd change the chain, then just kinda be aware of it and a taad more careful while you break in the chain. If you're not skipping around or it doesn't have too much play, you're pretty much good to go.
And like the other poster said, check for "sharktooth" (sprocket teeth worn down and thin to the poitn of being sharp).
That's the only reason I've ever had that really justified replacing a chainring.
Last edited by BicycleBicycle; 09-11-19 at 12:23 AM.
#7
Senior Member
I went through like 5 chains before I replaced my cog and chainring. I'm not saying to do the same thing, but I feel like it answers the question of "Do you need to". And my drive chain wasn't overly loud at all, you might need to spend hundreds of dollars before you get a really quiet drive chain sometimes even really expensive components end up not being quiet. So it's up to you if it's worth it or not.
Last edited by Philasteve; 09-12-19 at 11:37 AM.
#8
Senior Member
If you can, replace all 3 together will be the most quiet drive train.
You don't have to. Depends how much noise you are willing to put up with, and the quality of the parts.
I have a bike where the chainring and chain have worn together for 2-3 years, and then a cog (surly cog which seem to already be loud) which came from another bike with 3-4 years wear. Loudest drive train ever. But works just fine.
Also if you ever have to rotofix something off, don't ride that chain.
When I do change the chain on my main ride, I change the cog too since its cheap. Have a tree lite sprocket on that one which is still looking good so haven't replaced it. Drivertrain is very quiet on this bike. I change the chain every 1-2 years. Usually when it starts to pop its times for a new one.
You don't have to. Depends how much noise you are willing to put up with, and the quality of the parts.
I have a bike where the chainring and chain have worn together for 2-3 years, and then a cog (surly cog which seem to already be loud) which came from another bike with 3-4 years wear. Loudest drive train ever. But works just fine.
Also if you ever have to rotofix something off, don't ride that chain.
When I do change the chain on my main ride, I change the cog too since its cheap. Have a tree lite sprocket on that one which is still looking good so haven't replaced it. Drivertrain is very quiet on this bike. I change the chain every 1-2 years. Usually when it starts to pop its times for a new one.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
When the cog is worn it can be a little noisy with the new chain, but it quiets down after a little while. Go through several cogs, at least, before you need to replace the chain ring.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 54
Bikes: Mongoose Maurice FS 2011 fixed gear, custom 2017 Haro Master Flatland bmx, Contrast FL475 mid school flatland bmx
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
Apologies for bugging the thread; I was wondering whether its ok to have more than one link on the chain; the logic is to facilitate changing different cog / chainring sizes without having to cut the chain short via the pin or get a new longer chain for the purpose. Anyone been there? Tks
#11
Senior Member
Apologies for bugging the thread; I was wondering whether its ok to have more than one link on the chain; the logic is to facilitate changing different cog / chainring sizes without having to cut the chain short via the pin or get a new longer chain for the purpose. Anyone been there? Tks
Last edited by Philasteve; 09-19-19 at 05:55 PM.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 54
Bikes: Mongoose Maurice FS 2011 fixed gear, custom 2017 Haro Master Flatland bmx, Contrast FL475 mid school flatland bmx
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
What do you mean by more than one link on the chain? I used to always have my wheel pretty far back in the drop outs so I could put a bigger cog on if I needed to in the winter time, doing so by just keeping an extra 2 links on from where I would usually cut the chain down at. As long as the axle nut is contacting all metal in your dropout and your wheel isn't going to fall out of your dropouts when you tension your chain it's fine to have a little extra chain. If that's what you're talking about.
#13
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
Apologies for bugging the thread; I was wondering whether its ok to have more than one link on the chain; the logic is to facilitate changing different cog / chainring sizes without having to cut the chain short via the pin or get a new longer chain for the purpose. Anyone been there? Tks
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 54
Bikes: Mongoose Maurice FS 2011 fixed gear, custom 2017 Haro Master Flatland bmx, Contrast FL475 mid school flatland bmx
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
I'm comfortable with 48/17 on normal commuting, but there is a hilly loop nearby my place that deserves a more serious attention so am thinking about trying 49/18 & maybe 44/17 (based on what I have lying around). The chainstay bridge on my frame is also limiting the prospect. If I finally decided to cut them out will probably start a new thread on my so call experiment
#15
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
I'm comfortable with 48/17 on normal commuting, but there is a hilly loop nearby my place that deserves a more serious attention so am thinking about trying 49/18 & maybe 44/17 (based on what I have lying around). The chainstay bridge on my frame is also limiting the prospect. If I finally decided to cut them out will probably start a new thread on my so call experiment
#17
Senior Member
Yeah that's why I don't run a brakeless set up, a front brake is cheaper than new tires.
#18
Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Liked 115 Times
in
78 Posts
Not an argument that will ever be won. I would never ride on the road without brakes, and I stopped skidding when I started paying for my own tyres. However, those who prefer to ride brakeless will continue to do so. Me: I have brakes but mainly control the speed by anticipating the road ahead, and back pressure on the pedals, but the brakes are there when the unexpected happens or when a downhill gets too steep.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 191
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
11 Posts
Not an argument that will ever be won. I would never ride on the road without brakes, and I stopped skidding when I started paying for my own tyres. However, those who prefer to ride brakeless will continue to do so. Me: I have brakes but mainly control the speed by anticipating the road ahead, and back pressure on the pedals, but the brakes are there when the unexpected happens or when a downhill gets too steep.
You're not as effective at much of anything when you are suddenly frightened, and it really just mostly comes down to muscle memory in the worst situations.
If you're lucky, and it's a semi-familiar situation or you have just learned to relax really well (or you'r'e zoned out and similarly ineffective but at least you're relaxed), you can think through the problem.
I have had several incidents where quickly slamming on the brake injured me (one did permanent damage), and one other time I went headfirst into a truck.
The few times I had "close calls" while brakeless, I felt it was more natural to be brakeless because it takes so much force to stop, so all of your "panic motion" goes into skidding and once you're past that initial motion you're able to think and maneuver. The amount of force required to skid and be stable is more proportional to how you feel at that moment, which results in a smoother stop.
I've also been in situations where I wish I had a brake and being brakeless was not a good option.
You would be surprised at just how effective you can be if you're brakeless and you've gotten really good at it. I got to a point where only extremely rare and oddball situations would have been more effective with a brake (those things wouldn't happen very often normally).
Again, I haven't tried discs yet and I am yearning to try them because they seem to be that missing link between being able to go really fast and not worry about how you're going to stop.