Training with a DUMB trainer...
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753
Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times
in
207 Posts
Training with a DUMB trainer...
I have 2 older mag trainers available. A Giant Cyclotron Mag, and an older Performance mag trainer that also clamps the fork as well. Both have remote controls for changing resistance.
I presently have an older roadbike on the Performance trainer. A 98 Cannondale R200 with 3x7 gearing. I ride 2 road bikes, both with 2x10 but one is a compact crankset. And a 3x9 29er...
I have Wahoo Blue SC on all 3 road bikes. Looking for a training app that has plans available for an enthusiast. No plans to race, but don't want to hold up a faster crowd if I go with them.
What app might work best for this? I tried Zwift last year, at 100 pounds heavier. Being honest with my stats, I was never able to get my avatar moving more than what looked like 5 mph... No fun to watch as everything and everybody goes by...
Planning to use my android phone and or a laptop connected to a TV. Laptop will have a wired network connection, not wifi so video should stream well... As a result of weight loss and the need for a cardiologist last year, I train with a Tickr HRM belt... Cardiologist has cleared me for all I want to do. But avoid over 110% of the 220- age scales... So I back off at 170...
I presently have an older roadbike on the Performance trainer. A 98 Cannondale R200 with 3x7 gearing. I ride 2 road bikes, both with 2x10 but one is a compact crankset. And a 3x9 29er...
I have Wahoo Blue SC on all 3 road bikes. Looking for a training app that has plans available for an enthusiast. No plans to race, but don't want to hold up a faster crowd if I go with them.
What app might work best for this? I tried Zwift last year, at 100 pounds heavier. Being honest with my stats, I was never able to get my avatar moving more than what looked like 5 mph... No fun to watch as everything and everybody goes by...
Planning to use my android phone and or a laptop connected to a TV. Laptop will have a wired network connection, not wifi so video should stream well... As a result of weight loss and the need for a cardiologist last year, I train with a Tickr HRM belt... Cardiologist has cleared me for all I want to do. But avoid over 110% of the 220- age scales... So I back off at 170...
Last edited by zjrog; 09-30-19 at 10:56 AM.
#2
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,534
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
I've been training on a set of resistance rollers with a HRM for over 20 years. I just acquired a hub power meter, which is a nice addition. Canned training plans are not all that useful IME having tried several.
Be that as it may, what has been extremely useful for me is some way of assessing training load and status. I've been using TrainingPeaks Premium for a few years and like it very much. Whatever you use for tracking your speed/cadence/HR, it needs to be able to upload to the web, either to TrainingPeaks or Strava or both, whatever you want to use. I happen to like TP. TrainingPeaks has a wide variety of inexpensive training plans for purchase, and also a long list of suggested training intervals, etc., which come with a Premium account.
I don't think I'd find network training all that useful for me. There's stuff I want/need to do, and I simply do what I need to do on my rollers. No fooling around. IME resistance levels are not very interesting. One can use gears to change resistance.
Main things you need are a powerful box fan and a sweat bra to keep your bike from rusting.
Be that as it may, what has been extremely useful for me is some way of assessing training load and status. I've been using TrainingPeaks Premium for a few years and like it very much. Whatever you use for tracking your speed/cadence/HR, it needs to be able to upload to the web, either to TrainingPeaks or Strava or both, whatever you want to use. I happen to like TP. TrainingPeaks has a wide variety of inexpensive training plans for purchase, and also a long list of suggested training intervals, etc., which come with a Premium account.
I don't think I'd find network training all that useful for me. There's stuff I want/need to do, and I simply do what I need to do on my rollers. No fooling around. IME resistance levels are not very interesting. One can use gears to change resistance.
Main things you need are a powerful box fan and a sweat bra to keep your bike from rusting.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Congratulations on losing 100 pounds!
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753
Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times
in
207 Posts
I've been training on a set of resistance rollers with a HRM for over 20 years. I just acquired a hub power meter, which is a nice addition. Canned training plans are not all that useful IME having tried several.
Be that as it may, what has been extremely useful for me is some way of assessing training load and status. I've been using TrainingPeaks Premium for a few years and like it very much. Whatever you use for tracking your speed/cadence/HR, it needs to be able to upload to the web, either to TrainingPeaks or Strava or both, whatever you want to use. I happen to like TP. TrainingPeaks has a wide variety of inexpensive training plans for purchase, and also a long list of suggested training intervals, etc., which come with a Premium account.
I don't think I'd find network training all that useful for me. There's stuff I want/need to do, and I simply do what I need to do on my rollers. No fooling around. IME resistance levels are not very interesting. One can use gears to change resistance.
Main things you need are a powerful box fan and a sweat bra to keep your bike from rusting.
Be that as it may, what has been extremely useful for me is some way of assessing training load and status. I've been using TrainingPeaks Premium for a few years and like it very much. Whatever you use for tracking your speed/cadence/HR, it needs to be able to upload to the web, either to TrainingPeaks or Strava or both, whatever you want to use. I happen to like TP. TrainingPeaks has a wide variety of inexpensive training plans for purchase, and also a long list of suggested training intervals, etc., which come with a Premium account.
I don't think I'd find network training all that useful for me. There's stuff I want/need to do, and I simply do what I need to do on my rollers. No fooling around. IME resistance levels are not very interesting. One can use gears to change resistance.
Main things you need are a powerful box fan and a sweat bra to keep your bike from rusting.
Truth is, I've lost 135 pounds in the last 18 months... It's been a wild ride...
#5
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
974 Posts
Honestly, I'd say watch the GCN show workout videos on youtube for free.
They're legit workouts, simple to follow, and keep you engaged. Before I got Zwift those were my "go to" when I got tired of doing workouts like 3x8's and super prescribed stuff.
Check it out:
They're legit workouts, simple to follow, and keep you engaged. Before I got Zwift those were my "go to" when I got tired of doing workouts like 3x8's and super prescribed stuff.
Check it out:
Likes For burnthesheep:
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753
Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times
in
207 Posts
Honestly, I'd say watch the GCN show workout videos on youtube for free.
They're legit workouts, simple to follow, and keep you engaged. Before I got Zwift those were my "go to" when I got tired of doing workouts like 3x8's and super prescribed stuff.
Check it out:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtkPs2tFx9I
They're legit workouts, simple to follow, and keep you engaged. Before I got Zwift those were my "go to" when I got tired of doing workouts like 3x8's and super prescribed stuff.
Check it out:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtkPs2tFx9I
In a different vein, if I were to use the Kurt Kinetic iNride sensor they sell to update their dumb trainers, any reason I couldn't do that with my own?
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Another vote for the GCN videos. That's a solid option.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
204 Posts
I love that channel. I've never noticed their workouts...
In a different vein, if I were to use the Kurt Kinetic iNride sensor they sell to update their dumb trainers, any reason I couldn't do that with my own?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fshgAc5SyQ
I realize this doesn't control resistance to the trainer, just provides data based off the flywheel and wheel drum.
In a different vein, if I were to use the Kurt Kinetic iNride sensor they sell to update their dumb trainers, any reason I couldn't do that with my own?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fshgAc5SyQ
I realize this doesn't control resistance to the trainer, just provides data based off the flywheel and wheel drum.
If you can afford it, just get a power meter for your bike. Then you can train with power both inside and out. Plus, you don't have to ride for 5-10 minutes before performing a calibration like you do with the sensor.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hacienda Hgts
Posts: 2,109
Bikes: 1999 Schwinn Peloton Ultegra 10, Kestrel RT-1000 Ultegra, Trek Marlin 6 Deore 29'er
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 822 Post(s)
Liked 1,960 Times
in
943 Posts
Matt Stephens, before he left GCN, did a masterful job on the HIIT videos. Solid workouts in the 30 to 60 minute range that worked well with my cheapo fluid trainer.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753
Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times
in
207 Posts
I used to have a Kurt Kinetic which I upgraded with the sensor. It worked fairly well. But, I don't think it would work with a different company's trainer if that's what your asking.
If you can afford it, just get a power meter for your bike. Then you can train with power both inside and out. Plus, you don't have to ride for 5-10 minutes before performing a calibration like you do with the sensor.
If you can afford it, just get a power meter for your bike. Then you can train with power both inside and out. Plus, you don't have to ride for 5-10 minutes before performing a calibration like you do with the sensor.
I understand the value of the power meter, but I'm not at a point in training just yet to NEED that versus my HRM, which is my data set of value to me presently. (but the nerd in me loves ALL the metrics available today) I can afford a PM, but don't presently NEED it as mentioned a second ago. Yes, I'd love to have a full wheel off setup and PM but just can't justify it to myself at present. My present needs are weight loss, heart health and strength. As the weight comes off, and the heart and strength improve, a PM may well be on my list of needs come springtime and outdoor riding again.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
204 Posts
Thanks for the input! Fairly well is good enough for me at this time. To my Engineering Tech mind, the sensor is only reading the frequency the magnet passes the sensor. The magic is in the sensor case (algorithms and fancy maths!), and the app. Designed around a fluid trainer, not a mag like both of mine. The fluid trainer builds resistance in a nonlinear fashion, as the mag trainer stays linear or has linear steps. The various metrics are quite different between the two. But since there is a needed calibration frequently of the sensor and app, there will likely be a "close enough" value output for my present needs. It could be an inexpensive experiment that may prove fruitless. Now, if the metrics are way out of whack, I'll look for a used fluid trainer. They are online and in the thrift stores pretty frequently.
I understand the value of the power meter, but I'm not at a point in training just yet to NEED that versus my HRM, which is my data set of value to me presently. (but the nerd in me loves ALL the metrics available today) I can afford a PM, but don't presently NEED it as mentioned a second ago. Yes, I'd love to have a full wheel off setup and PM but just can't justify it to myself at present. My present needs are weight loss, heart health and strength. As the weight comes off, and the heart and strength improve, a PM may well be on my list of needs come springtime and outdoor riding again.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Thanks for the input! Fairly well is good enough for me at this time. To my Engineering Tech mind, the sensor is only reading the frequency the magnet passes the sensor. The magic is in the sensor case (algorithms and fancy maths!), and the app. Designed around a fluid trainer, not a mag like both of mine. The fluid trainer builds resistance in a nonlinear fashion, as the mag trainer stays linear or has linear steps. The various metrics are quite different between the two. But since there is a needed calibration frequently of the sensor and app, there will likely be a "close enough" value output for my present needs. It could be an inexpensive experiment that may prove fruitless. Now, if the metrics are way out of whack, I'll look for a used fluid trainer. They are online and in the thrift stores pretty frequently.
I understand the value of the power meter, but I'm not at a point in training just yet to NEED that versus my HRM, which is my data set of value to me presently. (but the nerd in me loves ALL the metrics available today) I can afford a PM, but don't presently NEED it as mentioned a second ago. Yes, I'd love to have a full wheel off setup and PM but just can't justify it to myself at present. My present needs are weight loss, heart health and strength. As the weight comes off, and the heart and strength improve, a PM may well be on my list of needs come springtime and outdoor riding again.
I understand the value of the power meter, but I'm not at a point in training just yet to NEED that versus my HRM, which is my data set of value to me presently. (but the nerd in me loves ALL the metrics available today) I can afford a PM, but don't presently NEED it as mentioned a second ago. Yes, I'd love to have a full wheel off setup and PM but just can't justify it to myself at present. My present needs are weight loss, heart health and strength. As the weight comes off, and the heart and strength improve, a PM may well be on my list of needs come springtime and outdoor riding again.
I have one of those Kinetic trainers. It reads a little low compared to my Quarq, but it's consistent enough that I can just bump up the intensity in the Zwift app when I do the workouts. Close enough for government work, as my dad would say.
Likes For caloso:
#13
Senior Member
IMO, just get the Kurt Kinetic if virtual trainign is what you're after. I tried other fluid trainers and their resistance falls of drastically as they heat up. maybe 50w loss at 250w indicated output (in Zwift). I even tried a cooling fan; which helped but not enough.
All of the trainer program that work with 'dumb' trainers estimate the power based on the roller speed and the fluid unit characteristics - but they can't compensate for the heating issue.
I switched to a Kurt Kinetic and a PM at about the same time. The KK resistance does not fall off with heat (measured with my PM). I think due to the much larger fluid unit, and the fact that it's magnetically coupled to the roller.
All of the trainer program that work with 'dumb' trainers estimate the power based on the roller speed and the fluid unit characteristics - but they can't compensate for the heating issue.
I switched to a Kurt Kinetic and a PM at about the same time. The KK resistance does not fall off with heat (measured with my PM). I think due to the much larger fluid unit, and the fact that it's magnetically coupled to the roller.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753
Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times
in
207 Posts
@shelgame, thanks for the insight. There are a good number of KK fluid trainers in the local classifieds. I believe it in my better interest to just go that route, add the green inside sensor if it doesn't already have one.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753
Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times
in
207 Posts
That is definitely a risk you'd have to take. It may not calibrate properly since the algorithm is expecting a nonlinear rate of decrease in your speed. And that's assuming you can even mount the magnet on the trainer properly.
Well, do what you think is best for you. But, if it seems likely you'll get a real PM eventually, I'd just go ahead and get the PM for your bike. Once you have that, you'll never use this sensor again.
Well, do what you think is best for you. But, if it seems likely you'll get a real PM eventually, I'd just go ahead and get the PM for your bike. Once you have that, you'll never use this sensor again.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
204 Posts
IIRC, even most of the direct drive smart trainers calculate power this way. It's just more accurate and lower maintenance when the resistance isn't fluid based. I think only one of them actually has a real power meter inside. There's really no need for an expensive strain gauge when you're only variables are the speed and resistance of the trainer.
Definitely works. But, having to calibrate it 10 minutes into a ride (every ride) is a pain. If you're doing something like a Zwift ride/race, you're not going to want to do this once the ride has started.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Generally that's the idea. But, keep in mind it varies due to temperature of the fluid (which is why you have to re-calibrate it after 10 minutes or so, even the Kinetic ones change slightly as they heat up) and also how tightly the roller is against your tire. The calibration procedure measures how quickly you decelerate and plugs that into the equation. Using a different type of resistance may mess this relationship up.
IIRC, even most of the direct drive smart trainers calculate power this way. It's just more accurate and lower maintenance when the resistance isn't fluid based. I think only one of them actually has a real power meter inside. There's really no need for an expensive strain gauge when you're only variables are the speed and resistance of the trainer.
Definitely works. But, having to calibrate it 10 minutes into a ride (every ride) is a pain. If you're doing something like a Zwift ride/race, you're not going to want to do this once the ride has started.
IIRC, even most of the direct drive smart trainers calculate power this way. It's just more accurate and lower maintenance when the resistance isn't fluid based. I think only one of them actually has a real power meter inside. There's really no need for an expensive strain gauge when you're only variables are the speed and resistance of the trainer.
Definitely works. But, having to calibrate it 10 minutes into a ride (every ride) is a pain. If you're doing something like a Zwift ride/race, you're not going to want to do this once the ride has started.
#18
Senior Member
@shelgame, thanks for the insight. There are a good number of KK fluid trainers in the local classifieds. I believe it in my better interest to just go that route, add the green inside sensor if it doesn't already have one.
Likes For shelgame:
#19
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,534
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
I used to have a Kurt Kinetic which I upgraded with the sensor. It worked fairly well. But, I don't think it would work with a different company's trainer if that's what your asking.
If you can afford it, just get a power meter for your bike. Then you can train with power both inside and out. Plus, you don't have to ride for 5-10 minutes before performing a calibration like you do with the sensor.
If you can afford it, just get a power meter for your bike. Then you can train with power both inside and out. Plus, you don't have to ride for 5-10 minutes before performing a calibration like you do with the sensor.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
Likes For Carbonfiberboy:
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753
Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times
in
207 Posts
In the mean time, as soon as I figure out a way to mount the sensor unit that will be secure. It's just a nagging thing in the back of my mind that wants to know. Fully understanding the unit is designed to expect a certain diameter of rolller for a given speed/RPM. And the different resistance of fluid vs magnetic will skew the data. Hoping that the calibration process will correct the roller diameter differences to a larger degree. But if it show me putting out 1000 watts and I'm not working very hard, or busting my ass and only seeing 20 watts, then the experiment fails and highlights the need to upgrade anyway... I'm just looking for "close" right now. Very uncharted territory.
#21
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753
Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times
in
207 Posts
First experiment lasted 1 minute 22 seconds...
To me, not knowing any better, the cadence may have been off. I have my Schosche "Wahoo Blue SC" look alike connected to Rouvy as well as the inside sensor for the trainer. No idea if Rouvy is using the speed and cadence sensor or the inside for that data. I didn't get to try this long enough to even calibrate it...
Incidentally, Rouvy estimates my FTP at 249 before I even rode the bike...
First magnet flew off into the room. Found it. Really didn't expect it work. But had to start somewhere. Next magnet will be more secure. I can't use the grommet that came with the sensor kit. The hole is too small and not deep enough. On the other hand, I read a review DCRainmaker did years ago with an earlier version of this sensor, and he also lost a magnet.
Experiments that don't have failures aren't good experiments, right?
To me, not knowing any better, the cadence may have been off. I have my Schosche "Wahoo Blue SC" look alike connected to Rouvy as well as the inside sensor for the trainer. No idea if Rouvy is using the speed and cadence sensor or the inside for that data. I didn't get to try this long enough to even calibrate it...
Incidentally, Rouvy estimates my FTP at 249 before I even rode the bike...
First magnet flew off into the room. Found it. Really didn't expect it work. But had to start somewhere. Next magnet will be more secure. I can't use the grommet that came with the sensor kit. The hole is too small and not deep enough. On the other hand, I read a review DCRainmaker did years ago with an earlier version of this sensor, and he also lost a magnet.
Experiments that don't have failures aren't good experiments, right?
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753
Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times
in
207 Posts
Second magnet tried, not going to post the skewed data points. Worth the try. But no dice. Since the diameter of the trainer drums is an expected metric, anything else is skewed.
Now, if I were unethical, I could tear up Rouvy and Zwift. But why. I get nothing from that highly reduced effort.
So searching for a good deal on a Kurt Kinetic fluid trainer... And put in the honest effort with honest reward.
Yes. You told me so. But what I learned was worth the mild path to humility.
Now, if I were unethical, I could tear up Rouvy and Zwift. But why. I get nothing from that highly reduced effort.
So searching for a good deal on a Kurt Kinetic fluid trainer... And put in the honest effort with honest reward.
Yes. You told me so. But what I learned was worth the mild path to humility.
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753
Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times
in
207 Posts
So, lesson learned. Found and grabbed a Kinetic fluid trainer. Lucky enough to find one at about half what everyone else was asking. Kinetic's iNride sensor installed, up and working. I wrapped tape around the magnet after a few reads online.