Is the conventional wisdom about hub maintinance wrong?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 144
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Is the conventional wisdom about hub maintinance wrong?
I have often seen the advice that one ought to keep hubs slightly loose when repacking them with fresh grease and new bearings. This is because they say that the axle will be compressed when the quick release is clamped down.
This doesn't make sense to me.
The lock ring should prevent that. You can clamp down the wheel as much as you want, but the force of the quick release is going to be hitting against the outer nut (lock ring), which is stopped by the cone that has been rotated out into it. That's the whole purpose of the lock ring. It ensures that everything stays in place exactly as you have adjusted it.
I just don't get it. Surely the force of the quick release can't be enough to overcome the threads on the axle, which it isn't even pushing against in the first place anyway. So why do so many people advise to keep the hub slightly loose when repacking it?
This doesn't make sense to me.
The lock ring should prevent that. You can clamp down the wheel as much as you want, but the force of the quick release is going to be hitting against the outer nut (lock ring), which is stopped by the cone that has been rotated out into it. That's the whole purpose of the lock ring. It ensures that everything stays in place exactly as you have adjusted it.
I just don't get it. Surely the force of the quick release can't be enough to overcome the threads on the axle, which it isn't even pushing against in the first place anyway. So why do so many people advise to keep the hub slightly loose when repacking it?
#2
Full Member
You can test that yourself. Leave it slightly loose, install the wheel, tighten the quick release. If it‘s still loose it‘s a myth if it‘s not it‘s not.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 144
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have tested it! I recently repacked the hubs on my road bike. That's why I think it's bull****. I expect to have to tighten the hubs later once the bearings have been worn down enough. Either that or I will just replace them again. It depends on how lazy I am am feeling at the time.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,073
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,857 Times
in
2,305 Posts
I have often seen the advice that one ought to keep hubs slightly loose when repacking them with fresh grease and new bearings. This is because they say that the axle will be compressed when the quick release is clamped down.
This doesn't make sense to me.
The lock ring should prevent that. You can clamp down the wheel as much as you want, but the force of the quick release is going to be hitting against the outer nut (lock ring), which is stopped by the cone that has been rotated out into it. That's the whole purpose of the lock ring. It ensures that everything stays in place exactly as you have adjusted it.
I just don't get it. Surely the force of the quick release can't be enough to overcome the threads on the axle, which it isn't even pushing against in the first place anyway. So why do so many people advise to keep the hub slightly loose when repacking it?
This doesn't make sense to me.
The lock ring should prevent that. You can clamp down the wheel as much as you want, but the force of the quick release is going to be hitting against the outer nut (lock ring), which is stopped by the cone that has been rotated out into it. That's the whole purpose of the lock ring. It ensures that everything stays in place exactly as you have adjusted it.
I just don't get it. Surely the force of the quick release can't be enough to overcome the threads on the axle, which it isn't even pushing against in the first place anyway. So why do so many people advise to keep the hub slightly loose when repacking it?
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#5
~>~
#6
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,985
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,808 Times
in
3,316 Posts
Because of the mass of the wheel and tire, it can be hard to notice when you simply put it in the bike and spin the wheel. If you set it up so you can tighten the skewer while it's off the bike, then you can turn the axle instead of the wheel and very easily feel the difference.
You can easily make something or find something to play the role of the dropouts. A couple oversize nuts or cut some thick wall pipe, or use a pair you cut off a wrecked bike frame.
You can easily make something or find something to play the role of the dropouts. A couple oversize nuts or cut some thick wall pipe, or use a pair you cut off a wrecked bike frame.
#7
Senior Member
You can also adjust the hub the way you think it should be adjusted, install it in the dropouts, turn the wheel a bit and feel the crunch.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
The hub does tighten up some slack when you tighten the QR, or axle nut as the case may be. We could argue about why (and some do), but it's a fact.
I don't know about the "conventional wisdom" method of leaving a little slack - I do that, but it's never perfect* and I wind up adjusting the cone nuts with the wheel on the bike.
*mechanics can probably get it perfect, having done hundreds of them, so that's probably where the rule of thumb comes from.
I don't know about the "conventional wisdom" method of leaving a little slack - I do that, but it's never perfect* and I wind up adjusting the cone nuts with the wheel on the bike.
*mechanics can probably get it perfect, having done hundreds of them, so that's probably where the rule of thumb comes from.
#9
Senior Member
The axle compresses a few tenth of a mm in a 10mm threaded axle. When I adjust the bearings I put a 7/16" nut on the right lock nut and install the QR as tight as if it were on the bike. I then adjust the bearing using the NDS cone and nut so that there is a slight preload. When the QR is opened there is a slight amount of play.
With the new larger rear axles the adjustment is to have no play.
Wheel Bearing adjustment by Jobst Brandt
With the new larger rear axles the adjustment is to have no play.
Wheel Bearing adjustment by Jobst Brandt
#10
Mechanic/Tourist
I have tested it! I recently repacked the hubs on my road bike. That's why I think it's bull****. I expect to have to tighten the hubs later once the bearings have been worn down enough. Either that or I will just replace them again. It depends on how lazy I am am feeling at the time.
What you don't understand is that this is not some obscure theory, but simple observation. I would bet that many on this forum discovered this accidentally, and only later understood the reason the adjustment changes when the q/re is clamped.
#11
Mike J
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 1,588
Bikes: 1975 Peugeot PX-50L, 1971 Peugeot PX-10, 1974 Peugeot PX-8
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
But, maybe I need to go back to bike school.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 144
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for all the replies, everyone.
Try not to take anything too personally. I think there is some of that going on.
Cheers.
I have done some further testing. I have security skewers, so I am able to more easily adjust the clamping force by simply wrenching it down harder. What I did was loosen the cones out to make them sloppy. I then cranked the skewers down hard, and I did notice a difference in the play (amount of wiggle). So there is some merit to the conventional advice. However, since I am working with cheap steel cones, steel bearings, and steel axles, I don't think the difference is too important. I think that if you have lighter more expensive components, it would probably be more important because they might be more delicate/sensitive.
On a personal note, the 5 post per day restriction for new accounts is very frustrating.
Once again, thanks for all the replies.
Try not to take anything too personally. I think there is some of that going on.
Cheers.
I have done some further testing. I have security skewers, so I am able to more easily adjust the clamping force by simply wrenching it down harder. What I did was loosen the cones out to make them sloppy. I then cranked the skewers down hard, and I did notice a difference in the play (amount of wiggle). So there is some merit to the conventional advice. However, since I am working with cheap steel cones, steel bearings, and steel axles, I don't think the difference is too important. I think that if you have lighter more expensive components, it would probably be more important because they might be more delicate/sensitive.
On a personal note, the 5 post per day restriction for new accounts is very frustrating.
Once again, thanks for all the replies.
#13
Senior Member
The axle bows slightly rather than compressing any other way. The correct adjustment is a barely perceptible amount of play that disappears when the skewer is tightened. This is easy to do and perceive on average quality parts on new bikes costing less than $500 new. It's easier to do consistently on higher end parts.
#14
Mechanic/Tourist
+1. As the effect is small, a sloppy adjustment is not a good test of whether it's important. Instead, try this: Adjust the cones so that they are smooth with no play. Then hold the wheel with your hands and allow it to rock back and forth to a stop just by the weight of valve or reflector. Now clamp in the bike and try the same thing. You will find that the wheel stops significantly faster when clamped.
#15
Mostly harmless ™
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
130 Posts
QR does increase bearing preload. It can be measured, as some have explained. Front axles seem to compress somewhat more - they are of a smaller diameter than the rear ones.
I use some old spacers when adjusting preload, so I can quickly and easily check for (the lack of) play before mounting the wheel in the frame.
I use some old spacers when adjusting preload, so I can quickly and easily check for (the lack of) play before mounting the wheel in the frame.
#16
Mechanic/Tourist
I can't speak for others but I did not take your remarks personally (though the expletive was not exactly respectful). Wry humor is hard to convey in text.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,025
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4377 Post(s)
Liked 1,552 Times
in
1,017 Posts
Thanks for all the replies, everyone.
Try not to take anything too personally. I think there is some of that going on.
Cheers.
I have done some further testing. I have security skewers, so I am able to more easily adjust the clamping force by simply wrenching it down harder. What I did was loosen the cones out to make them sloppy. I then cranked the skewers down hard, and I did notice a difference in the play (amount of wiggle). So there is some merit to the conventional advice. However, since I am working with cheap steel cones, steel bearings, and steel axles, I don't think the difference is too important. I think that if you have lighter more expensive components, it would probably be more important because they might be more delicate/sensitive.
On a personal note, the 5 post per day restriction for new accounts is very frustrating.
Once again, thanks for all the replies.
Try not to take anything too personally. I think there is some of that going on.
Cheers.
I have done some further testing. I have security skewers, so I am able to more easily adjust the clamping force by simply wrenching it down harder. What I did was loosen the cones out to make them sloppy. I then cranked the skewers down hard, and I did notice a difference in the play (amount of wiggle). So there is some merit to the conventional advice. However, since I am working with cheap steel cones, steel bearings, and steel axles, I don't think the difference is too important. I think that if you have lighter more expensive components, it would probably be more important because they might be more delicate/sensitive.
On a personal note, the 5 post per day restriction for new accounts is very frustrating.
Once again, thanks for all the replies.
If your wheel didn't, it probably would mean your QR isn't being tightened sufficiently for safe wheel retention.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,682
Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1163 Post(s)
Liked 442 Times
in
315 Posts
I have an add on question about Dura Ace 7700 (9 speed) hubs. Do these run forever or what? I have a wheelset that has ~13,000 miles on them. The rear wheel is on the 3rd rim. I have yet to “repack” the bearings. They’ve always rolled like butter so I have always procrastinated taking the axles out and repacking the bearings. I’ve ridden in the rain a moderate amount over the years BTW.
For the purpose of this thread, I will add my experience with my older Dura Ace 7400 hubs. YES, it is beneficial to set them up ever so slightly “loose” as far as the preload on the cones is concerned. It is very satisfying to know that you have them dialed just right for your frame - no play whatsoever yet free spinning with no resistance.
For the purpose of this thread, I will add my experience with my older Dura Ace 7400 hubs. YES, it is beneficial to set them up ever so slightly “loose” as far as the preload on the cones is concerned. It is very satisfying to know that you have them dialed just right for your frame - no play whatsoever yet free spinning with no resistance.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,893
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1062 Post(s)
Liked 665 Times
in
421 Posts
I have an add on question about Dura Ace 7700 (9 speed) hubs. Do these run forever or what? I have a wheelset that has ~13,000 miles on them. The rear wheel is on the 3rd rim. I have yet to “repack” the bearings. They’ve always rolled like butter so I have always procrastinated taking the axles out and repacking the bearings. I’ve ridden in the rain a moderate amount over the years BTW.
For the purpose of this thread, I will add my experience with my older Dura Ace 7400 hubs. YES, it is beneficial to set them up ever so slightly “loose” as far as the preload on the cones is concerned. It is very satisfying to know that you have them dialed just right for your frame - no play whatsoever yet free spinning with no resistance.
For the purpose of this thread, I will add my experience with my older Dura Ace 7400 hubs. YES, it is beneficial to set them up ever so slightly “loose” as far as the preload on the cones is concerned. It is very satisfying to know that you have them dialed just right for your frame - no play whatsoever yet free spinning with no resistance.
#20
~>~
Shimano DA, Ultegra, 105 and the new low spoke count hubs are cup & cone design.
Grease does not last forever regardless of how well adjusted the hubs are.
With regular overhaul all have a very long service life even in bad conditions and under heavy loads if adjusted properly as has been discussed.
-Bandera
Grease does not last forever regardless of how well adjusted the hubs are.
With regular overhaul all have a very long service life even in bad conditions and under heavy loads if adjusted properly as has been discussed.
-Bandera
#21
Senior Member
I have an add on question about Dura Ace 7700 (9 speed) hubs. Do these run forever or what? I have a wheelset that has ~13,000 miles on them. The rear wheel is on the 3rd rim. I have yet to “repack” the bearings. They’ve always rolled like butter so I have always procrastinated taking the axles out and repacking the bearings. I’ve ridden in the rain a moderate amount over the years BTW.
For the purpose of this thread, I will add my experience with my older Dura Ace 7400 hubs. YES, it is beneficial to set them up ever so slightly “loose” as far as the preload on the cones is concerned. It is very satisfying to know that you have them dialed just right for your frame - no play whatsoever yet free spinning with no resistance.
For the purpose of this thread, I will add my experience with my older Dura Ace 7400 hubs. YES, it is beneficial to set them up ever so slightly “loose” as far as the preload on the cones is concerned. It is very satisfying to know that you have them dialed just right for your frame - no play whatsoever yet free spinning with no resistance.
#22
Senior Member
The axle bows slightly rather than compressing any other way. The correct adjustment is a barely perceptible amount of play that disappears when the skewer is tightened. This is easy to do and perceive on average quality parts on new bikes costing less than $500 new. It's easier to do consistently on higher end parts.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
8 Posts
I have often seen the advice that one ought to keep hubs slightly loose when repacking them with fresh grease and new bearings. This is because they say that the axle will be compressed when the quick release is clamped down.
This doesn't make sense to me.
The lock ring should prevent that. You can clamp down the wheel as much as you want, but the force of the quick release is going to be hitting against the outer nut (lock ring), which is stopped by the cone that has been rotated out into it. That's the whole purpose of the lock ring. It ensures that everything stays in place exactly as you have adjusted it.
I just don't get it. Surely the force of the quick release can't be enough to overcome the threads on the axle, which it isn't even pushing against in the first place anyway. So why do so many people advise to keep the hub slightly loose when repacking it?
This doesn't make sense to me.
The lock ring should prevent that. You can clamp down the wheel as much as you want, but the force of the quick release is going to be hitting against the outer nut (lock ring), which is stopped by the cone that has been rotated out into it. That's the whole purpose of the lock ring. It ensures that everything stays in place exactly as you have adjusted it.
I just don't get it. Surely the force of the quick release can't be enough to overcome the threads on the axle, which it isn't even pushing against in the first place anyway. So why do so many people advise to keep the hub slightly loose when repacking it?
On a solid axle, the the tightening wing nuts are pulling the axle against the frame. The locknuts will prevent axle expansion, when the wheel is tight in the frame.
On a hollow quick release axle, the skewer pushes the frame against the locknuts. The locknuts will transmit this force to the cones, as the skewer is tightened. That's why it's necessary to compensate for this force when adjusting the bearings. Excessive over-tightening will push the axle until it starts bending.
The need to compensate for locking the cones in place isn't limited to hubs. The same is true for headsets. Bottom brackets are the exception. The adjustable cup is pulled away from the spindle, when the lockring is tightened. You want to slightly overtighten the adjustable cup with the expectation that tightening the lockring will bring the adjustment to it's "perfect" position.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Indiana
Posts: 74
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Steel can compress, but that's not what happens in this case. The proof against it compressing is that it relaxes when the QR is released. Compressed steel (plastic deformation) doesn't spring back to it's original shape.
Does the axle flex (elastic deformation)? If it does, that doesn't give me a lot of confidence in the axle integrity.
I would say the most likely culprit is: Thread tolerances of the cones, lock nuts and axle
Does the axle flex (elastic deformation)? If it does, that doesn't give me a lot of confidence in the axle integrity.
I would say the most likely culprit is: Thread tolerances of the cones, lock nuts and axle
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,025
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4377 Post(s)
Liked 1,552 Times
in
1,017 Posts
Steel can compress, but that's not what happens in this case. The proof against it compressing is that it relaxes when the QR is released. Compressed steel (plastic deformation) doesn't spring back to it's original shape.
Does the axle flex (elastic deformation)? If it does, that doesn't give me a lot of confidence in the axle integrity.
I would say the most likely culprit is: Thread tolerances of the cones, lock nuts and axle
Does the axle flex (elastic deformation)? If it does, that doesn't give me a lot of confidence in the axle integrity.
I would say the most likely culprit is: Thread tolerances of the cones, lock nuts and axle