Weight
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 2,465
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
Two things.
Don't use a bathroom scale, use a digital scale that hangs from a solid point. Bathroom scales are very inaccurate.
23.2 pounds is a decent weight.
Don't use a bathroom scale, use a digital scale that hangs from a solid point. Bathroom scales are very inaccurate.
23.2 pounds is a decent weight.
#27
Senior Member
SJX426, Thanks for reminding me, I forgot to include the frame size for the two C'Dales... 58 cm.
noglider, I guess I'm in the minority WRT detecting a small weight difference... I can feel the difference between a road frame and a touring frame, if I ride them back-to-back. I wonder if I'm insensitive to my two primary bike's weight difference because I weigh ~190 lbs.? Bike to bike difference is 16.492% while adding my weight to the equation it becomes a 1.506% difference. A 130 lb. rider would have an overall difference of 6.15% (My math is always suspect!)
Brad
noglider, I guess I'm in the minority WRT detecting a small weight difference... I can feel the difference between a road frame and a touring frame, if I ride them back-to-back. I wonder if I'm insensitive to my two primary bike's weight difference because I weigh ~190 lbs.? Bike to bike difference is 16.492% while adding my weight to the equation it becomes a 1.506% difference. A 130 lb. rider would have an overall difference of 6.15% (My math is always suspect!)
Brad
Last edited by bradtx; 08-20-10 at 05:01 PM.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
78 Posts
More or less yes. I like to use the gallon of milk analogy. Regardless of your body weight, which would you rather carry up 10 flights of stairs, a gallon of milk of a pint of milk? IMHO your own body is accustomed to it's own weight. Add something extra to lug around and your body has to work more than it otherwise would have had to do.
That being said, you'd be surprised at how easy it is to shed a few pounds off of a vintage bike without sacrificing durability.
That being said, you'd be surprised at how easy it is to shed a few pounds off of a vintage bike without sacrificing durability.
#29
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,492
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7341 Post(s)
Liked 2,439 Times
in
1,423 Posts
What are your most cost effective (money and trouble) ways of lightening a bike?
Number one for me is tires.
Number one for me is tires.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,128
Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times
in
27 Posts
Bike manufacturers have been selling "light weight" forever to the cycling public. Just look at all the catalogues from companies like Peugoet that carefully placed weight of their bikes at very noticable locations so it correlates to "the higher the model, the lighter the bike) It was weird though when the middle level model Super Vitus framed PSVs were easily beating the higher model Reynolds framed Peugeot bikes in the weight races during the 80's.....so I ended up with a PSV.........I guess I've been weenie for all these years!!
Chombi
Chombi
#33
Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington DC area
Posts: 335
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 57 Times
in
25 Posts
It's not my theory. I was shopping bikes years ago and the topic came up with the LBS owner. He explained this approach which I thought made sense. And he wasn't trying to sell the lightweights or carbons which kind of bolstered his credibility. Now I know he's kind of a local guru of sorts in cycling and collecting in the DC area for many decades.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Anyway, my new Ti Framed bike is 18.5 lbs without pedals. My finished Bianchi with pedals is 22.06lbs.
#35
Senior Member
I just removed the Syntace C2 from the CAAD3. My wrists just didn't like them as much as my Profiles on the other bikes... down 388 grams. I don't think I'll install any aero bars on it (just looks so good without them) so now to make the speedo wiring look decent without having to redo the whole thing... impossible I'll bet.
Brad
Brad
Last edited by bradtx; 08-23-10 at 05:16 PM.
#36
Bottecchia fan
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 3,520
Bikes: 1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo (frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame), 1974 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
8 Posts
Probably the biggest weight gain in my Bottecchia when I set it up to be comfortable and ridable was in the wheel/tire combination. Since this was a few years ago and nice polished box section clincher rims were extremely hard to come by at the time (no V-O stuff then) I ended up using NOS Rigida AL1622 rims. Those are meduim width and don't have hooked beads so that dictated using at least a 25mm wire bead tire. And since I was having trouble finding 25mm tires that were actually 25mm instead of narrower, I went with 28mm. So while I ended up with a quality wheel and good tires that are representative of what a decent touring or sport-touring style bike might have had at the time, they were also 420g each heavier than the tubulars. Today I would probably use a narrow hooked bead rim that would allow a 23-25mm folding bead tire and save quite a bit of weight. I weighed a set of rims/tires like that and they were only 120g or so heavier than the tubulars.
__________________
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
#37
Iconoclast
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: California
Posts: 3,176
Bikes: Colnago Super, Fuji Opus III, Specialized Rockhopper, Specialized Sirrus (road)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Rode a ten pound bike the other day (actually 9.86 lbs). I've ridden the same model several times before, weighing 16.5 pounds. There was no denying that the ten pound bike felt light while actually riding, and (are you ready for this?) ...it felt faster.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,128
Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times
in
27 Posts
Weenies live on!
An NOS Titanium Stronglight BB just went for 500 bucks at eBay! that's just nuts even in the weenie world. I was thinking 250 - 300 buck max for it. Imagine what else you can buy with 500 bucks out there?!...an SLX frame, or even a nice whole bike??
I don't even bother bidding against high roller items like those anymore even though the weenie in me long for them.........just wait till I win the lotto and I'll show them what a real high bid looks like!
Chombi
An NOS Titanium Stronglight BB just went for 500 bucks at eBay! that's just nuts even in the weenie world. I was thinking 250 - 300 buck max for it. Imagine what else you can buy with 500 bucks out there?!...an SLX frame, or even a nice whole bike??
I don't even bother bidding against high roller items like those anymore even though the weenie in me long for them.........just wait till I win the lotto and I'll show them what a real high bid looks like!
Chombi
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
78 Posts
Weenies live on!
An NOS Titanium Stronglight BB just went for 500 bucks at eBay! that's just nuts even in the weenie world. I was thinking 250 - 300 buck max for it. Imagine what else you can buy with 500 bucks out there?!...an SLX frame, or even a nice whole bike??
I don't even bother bidding against high roller items like those anymore even though the weenie in me long for them.........just wait till I win the lotto and I'll show them what a real high bid looks like!
Chombi
An NOS Titanium Stronglight BB just went for 500 bucks at eBay! that's just nuts even in the weenie world. I was thinking 250 - 300 buck max for it. Imagine what else you can buy with 500 bucks out there?!...an SLX frame, or even a nice whole bike??
I don't even bother bidding against high roller items like those anymore even though the weenie in me long for them.........just wait till I win the lotto and I'll show them what a real high bid looks like!
Chombi
#40
creaky old bones
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Springfield, Misery
Posts: 259
Bikes: Trek 7200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Fascinating thread, I think.
I'm gonna go out and say it right here - it's all a matter of proportions, perspective, and.....money. I'm a Super Clyde - right around 325 at the moment. Hold that thought. I got a '99 Schwinn Peloton, minus wheels, from a really skinny rider (he kept the rolf vectors, lol). It's a Reynolds 853 frame (probably made by the same folks that did the Lemond bikes), but I haven't stripped it to see what it really weighs. I've toyed with the idea of building it up with SRAM Rival, 3T stem/bars, Thompson Elite seatpost, San Marco Concor Light saddle, Look Keo Classic pedals. So I went to Competitive Cyclist and played with the build calculator (fun!) and for a whopping $1900 'built' everything but the frame/fork/headset. With a Mavic Askium wheelset, everything weighed 13.04 pounds. I'd figure the frame/fork/Ritchey headset couldn't weigh more than 7 pounds all told, so for a $2200 total investment I'd have a 20# steelie.....cool, eh? Well, not so fast! There's that little problem of the obvious foolishness of spending $2200 for a 20# steelie when you weigh so much yourself! Plus, would the wheels even hold up? Of course, I considered the SRAM groupset partly so I could move the Ultegra/DA stuff to another frame of some sort, but it would be so much cheaper and easier to just get a Mavic OP wheelset/cassette, and get to riding. At about $300 all told a much wiser investment.
Do you folks see where I'm going with this? Different people have different needs versus wants, but there's always going to be a middle ground with a fuzzy gray area on each end. Sure I like to dream of riding a 15# Pinarello, but that won't make me or anyone else healthier just because. Quite the opposite. If we all REALLY wanted to get a better workout, we'd ride Varsities! (btw - did you know that a 22" Varsity frameset, nothing else, weighs almost 13 pounds on the bathroom scale all by itself? Just about as much as everything I built up on that ride calculator? And to think people try to sell the darn things for sometimes absurd prices. But that's for another time
BTW does anyone happen to know what a '99 54cm Peloton frame/fork/headset DOES weigh? See, I'm getting a nice tax refund next year, and......
Tom
I'm gonna go out and say it right here - it's all a matter of proportions, perspective, and.....money. I'm a Super Clyde - right around 325 at the moment. Hold that thought. I got a '99 Schwinn Peloton, minus wheels, from a really skinny rider (he kept the rolf vectors, lol). It's a Reynolds 853 frame (probably made by the same folks that did the Lemond bikes), but I haven't stripped it to see what it really weighs. I've toyed with the idea of building it up with SRAM Rival, 3T stem/bars, Thompson Elite seatpost, San Marco Concor Light saddle, Look Keo Classic pedals. So I went to Competitive Cyclist and played with the build calculator (fun!) and for a whopping $1900 'built' everything but the frame/fork/headset. With a Mavic Askium wheelset, everything weighed 13.04 pounds. I'd figure the frame/fork/Ritchey headset couldn't weigh more than 7 pounds all told, so for a $2200 total investment I'd have a 20# steelie.....cool, eh? Well, not so fast! There's that little problem of the obvious foolishness of spending $2200 for a 20# steelie when you weigh so much yourself! Plus, would the wheels even hold up? Of course, I considered the SRAM groupset partly so I could move the Ultegra/DA stuff to another frame of some sort, but it would be so much cheaper and easier to just get a Mavic OP wheelset/cassette, and get to riding. At about $300 all told a much wiser investment.
Do you folks see where I'm going with this? Different people have different needs versus wants, but there's always going to be a middle ground with a fuzzy gray area on each end. Sure I like to dream of riding a 15# Pinarello, but that won't make me or anyone else healthier just because. Quite the opposite. If we all REALLY wanted to get a better workout, we'd ride Varsities! (btw - did you know that a 22" Varsity frameset, nothing else, weighs almost 13 pounds on the bathroom scale all by itself? Just about as much as everything I built up on that ride calculator? And to think people try to sell the darn things for sometimes absurd prices. But that's for another time
BTW does anyone happen to know what a '99 54cm Peloton frame/fork/headset DOES weigh? See, I'm getting a nice tax refund next year, and......
Tom
#41
Bike Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, East of Harris Lake, NC
Posts: 9,622
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Roubaix, Giant OCR-C, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 84 Nishiki Medalist
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 37 Times
in
27 Posts
I'm aware of what my bikes weigh because it makes a difference on hilly rides or when I'm trying to ride with a group that's faster than I usually ride. I found road bikes over 22lbs tend to slow me down, under 20 tends to make me feel good about the bike. I have one C&V bike, a Fuji Team that fits into the under 22lb club. I don't think any other can make that claim but I'm not sure about the 86 Ironman.
I'm also aware of what I weigh. So last year I set out to lose weight and I did. I'm down 37 lbs.
Think of it, I was carrying around a spare Schwinn Varsity......with chrome wheels!
I'm also aware of what I weigh. So last year I set out to lose weight and I did. I'm down 37 lbs.
Think of it, I was carrying around a spare Schwinn Varsity......with chrome wheels!
__________________
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
#42
Senior Member
rat fink, I wouldn't get within 10 feet of a bike that light for fear that something would happen and I'd have to buy it!
Brad
Brad
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,650
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2323 Post(s)
Liked 4,928 Times
in
1,762 Posts
Boy do I hear you. I started at 238 and last Friday was 188. So what if my Brooks B17 has some weight. It's given me the comfort I need to keep putting in the miles.
#44
perpetually frazzled
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Linton, IN
Posts: 2,467
Bikes: 1977 Bridgestone Kabuki Super Speed; 1979 Raleigh Professional; 1983 Raleigh Rapide mixte; 1974 Peugeot UO-8; 1993 Univega Activa Trail; 1972 Raleigh Sports; 1967 Phillips; 1981 Schwinn World Tourist; 1976 Schwinn LeTour mixte; 1964 Western Flyer
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
To put it in perspective for you, my '79 Raleigh Pro (Reynolds 531) with a B17, full campy Record/NR gruppo and tubular rims (with not-especially light tires) weighed in at 23 lbs. My '88 Nishiki Modulus (Tange #2) with full Shimano Exage parts and Cheng Shin 700X23c tires riding a pre-softened NOS Brooks Professional saddle is about 23.5. One is top of the line, the other is a mid-level bike 10 years later. I'd say that you have a good weight there. Besides, it's been my experience that going much lighter than 23 lbs on a steel bike is approaching nearly too light. Then again, I'm a masher who rides my bikes like I'd ride a redheaded adulterer...dropping spoke numbers and going with lighter (and almost inherently) lighter parts would just lead to breakage with my riding style. I find that for an everyday bike with fenders and a B17 running about 27 lbs is perfect - light enough to toss, heavy enough that I feel it's a solid, long-distance performer.
ETA: Remember, lightening your rotating mass is a whole lot better than lightening the bike itself. In drag-racing, there's a formula that lists something like 5 lbs from your wheels lowers your 1/4 mile time by a tenth. In bike terms - get a bike and swap from steel to aluminum rims - you'll feel infinitely lighter, even if nothing else on the bike changes.
If you're looking at losing weight, I'd start with the tires. With 700c, you can go anywhere from 500g (or more) to 250g. It might not sound like a lot, but trust me, it is. Also, although it sounds counterintuitive, don't worry too much about tire width if you're already running 23c tires...20c feels faster to me, but I can't tell a difference with any swap from 23c to 28 or even 32c tires, except for comfort, which will make you faster whether or not you are losing any weight.
ETA: Remember, lightening your rotating mass is a whole lot better than lightening the bike itself. In drag-racing, there's a formula that lists something like 5 lbs from your wheels lowers your 1/4 mile time by a tenth. In bike terms - get a bike and swap from steel to aluminum rims - you'll feel infinitely lighter, even if nothing else on the bike changes.
If you're looking at losing weight, I'd start with the tires. With 700c, you can go anywhere from 500g (or more) to 250g. It might not sound like a lot, but trust me, it is. Also, although it sounds counterintuitive, don't worry too much about tire width if you're already running 23c tires...20c feels faster to me, but I can't tell a difference with any swap from 23c to 28 or even 32c tires, except for comfort, which will make you faster whether or not you are losing any weight.
Last edited by mickey85; 08-23-10 at 07:25 PM.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,075
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
that said, i would say your bike is doing very well. weights not a huge deal. my modern aluminum bike is several pounds lighter and i cant tell the difference (other than ride quality obviously)
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,674
Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,747 Times
in
937 Posts
For those of you who do not understand the need to reduce the weight of a tool, try holding a pound of butter at arm's length. Keep your arm parallel to the floor and see how long you can hold it before the pain begins.
I offer this example of how weight of a tool, and a bike is really only a tool, can impact usability. Lighter bikes are faster and more agile, all other things being equal. It is simply a matter of math.
As for body weight? My guess is that a 100 pound woman (or man) will be able to hold the pound of butter just about as long as a three hundred pounder. But that is just a guess.
I offer this example of how weight of a tool, and a bike is really only a tool, can impact usability. Lighter bikes are faster and more agile, all other things being equal. It is simply a matter of math.
As for body weight? My guess is that a 100 pound woman (or man) will be able to hold the pound of butter just about as long as a three hundred pounder. But that is just a guess.
#47
Iconoclast
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: California
Posts: 3,176
Bikes: Colnago Super, Fuji Opus III, Specialized Rockhopper, Specialized Sirrus (road)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,650
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2323 Post(s)
Liked 4,928 Times
in
1,762 Posts
For those of you who do not understand the need to reduce the weight of a tool, try holding a pound of butter at arm's length. Keep your arm parallel to the floor and see how long you can hold it before the pain begins.
I offer this example of how weight of a tool, and a bike is really only a tool, can impact usability. Lighter bikes are faster and more agile, all other things being equal. It is simply a matter of math.
I offer this example of how weight of a tool, and a bike is really only a tool, can impact usability. Lighter bikes are faster and more agile, all other things being equal. It is simply a matter of math.