Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fitting Your Bike
Reload this Page >

Am I over thinking the BB Drop & Chainstay?

Notices
Fitting Your Bike Are you confused about how you should fit a bike to your particular body dimensions? Have you been reading, found the terms Merxx or French Fit, and don’t know what you need? Every style of riding is different- in how you fit the bike to you, and the sizing of the bike itself. It’s more than just measuring your height, reach and inseam. With the help of Bike Fitting, you’ll be able to find the right fit for your frame size, style of riding, and your particular dimensions. Here ya’ go…..the location for everything fit related.

Am I over thinking the BB Drop & Chainstay?

Old 05-31-20, 05:02 PM
  #1  
simonsez
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Am I over thinking the BB Drop & Chainstay?

As my search for a new gravel bike continues I become more confused when it comes to geometry. I was able to drop by a local LBS that mainly sells Cannondale, I went in there to look at the Topstone Alloy 105, he has low stock so he wouldn't budge on price . He was, however, willing to knock $500 off a Topstone 105 Carbon which he had more inventory of. I did a bit more research on that bike and it turns out that there are significant differences in geometry when comparing it to the regular aluminum version. What sticks out the most is a BB Drop of 61 for the carbon vs 75 for the aluminium. Another significant difference was the shorter chainstay on the Carbon at 415 vs 430.

The other bikes that I'm looking at are the Checkpoint, Revolt and Diverge, all have BB Drops between 70 and 80 and their chainstays are between 425 and 430 similar to the aluminum Topstone. Seems to me that the Topstone Carbon sticks out when comparing it to the rest. I'm still a bit unclear as to how a short chainstay and low BB Drop affect the ride of a bike.

Does it make it more CX/Mountain Bikish? I'm looking for a gravel that leans more road then trails, would this be a good bike or a bad choice? I imagine it would be nice to have carbon and a bit of suspension with the Kingpin technology.

Thank you for any opinions on this matter.
simonsez is offline  
Old 06-01-20, 09:11 AM
  #2  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,811

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times in 3,262 Posts
I think the thought is that a bike with more bb drop will handle better. Partly because your seat will be lower and therefore your CG will be lower.

If you are going to use the old toe clips, you might want a bike with less bb drop. Otherwise, unless you have lot of roots and stumps you got to avoid or have hellatiously long cranks, it's probably not a big deal.
Iride01 is offline  
Old 06-02-20, 04:14 PM
  #3  
tangerineowl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oz
Posts: 931

Bikes: Curve Grovel v2 ti

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 257 Post(s)
Liked 84 Times in 73 Posts
Have a look at the latest version 3T Exploro. That is a pretty good example of frame dimensions which leans toward road.

You would want something with a shorter chainstay (415-420mm) for a gravel bike. Makes the rear end quicker to maneuver.

I'd say bb drop around 75mm or a little more, to keep you 'in' the bike.

The carbon Checkpoint is pretty suitable in my view for a mid-range bike like this.

BB heights around 60mm or less are what you traditionally find in a CX frame.
tangerineowl is offline  
Old 06-05-20, 09:05 PM
  #4  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,853

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 654 Times in 498 Posts
Originally Posted by simonsez
As my search for a new gravel bike continues I become more confused when it comes to geometry. I was able to drop by a local LBS that mainly sells Cannondale, I went in there to look at the Topstone Alloy 105, he has low stock so he wouldn't budge on price . He was, however, willing to knock $500 off a Topstone 105 Carbon which he had more inventory of. I did a bit more research on that bike and it turns out that there are significant differences in geometry when comparing it to the regular aluminum version. What sticks out the most is a BB Drop of 61 for the carbon vs 75 for the aluminium. Another significant difference was the shorter chainstay on the Carbon at 415 vs 430.

The other bikes that I'm looking at are the Checkpoint, Revolt and Diverge, all have BB Drops between 70 and 80 and their chainstays are between 425 and 430 similar to the aluminum Topstone. Seems to me that the Topstone Carbon sticks out when comparing it to the rest. I'm still a bit unclear as to how a short chainstay and low BB Drop affect the ride of a bike.

Does it make it more CX/Mountain Bikish? I'm looking for a gravel that leans more road then trails, would this be a good bike or a bad choice? I imagine it would be nice to have carbon and a bit of suspension with the Kingpin technology.

Thank you for any opinions on this matter.
If this is Bike Forums, you are most likely overthinking them.
Road Fan is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.