Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Is 200lbs too much for a carbon frame?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Is 200lbs too much for a carbon frame?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-03, 05:27 PM
  #1  
Avalanche325
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Avalanche325's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 3,162

Bikes: Litespeed Firenze / GT Avalanche

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Is 200lbs too much for a carbon frame?

I am considering getting a road bike and am curious about this. I am 6'1' 200lbs. I am a fairly strong rider (big legs, and I love to climb hills).

Since most cycling equipment seems to be built for the 165lb rider, would I have any problems if I go carbon?

I like to ride aggresive workout rides, not long distance, but will probably stretch that once I get a road bike.
Avalanche325 is offline  
Old 11-28-03, 05:31 PM
  #2  
RonH
Life is good
 
RonH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not far from the Withlacoochee Trail. 🚴🏻
Posts: 18,209

Bikes: 2018 Lynskey Helix Pro

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 522 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Probably not. I almost bought a Trek 5500 a few years ago. I was 6'-0" and 210 at the time. The service manager said my size was not a problem for the bike but suggested wheels with a minimum of 32 spokes.
__________________
The Lord is merciful and gracious, slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love. - Psalm 103:8

I am a cyclist. I am not the fastest or the fittest. But I will get to where I'm going with a smile on my face.
RonH is offline  
Old 11-28-03, 06:06 PM
  #3  
Kid-Cycle
Folsom Prison Blues
 
Kid-Cycle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 218

Bikes: '04 Trek 5200, '73 Raleigh Grand Sport "Fixie" & '94 Specialized Rock Hopper Comp MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Being 6'1" 230# I too was afraid of carbon until I spoke with two different LBS dealers who informed me that Trek and Giant are not concerned about rider weight until they approache 300#. After test riding several bikes I recently bought a Trek 5200 and quickly learned that carbon frames with Bontrager rims is not frail. I love the quiet riding road absorbing feel of the carbon frame. It is truely amazing how fast these bikes are.
Kid-Cycle is offline  
Old 11-28-03, 08:44 PM
  #4  
dtufts
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I picked up my 5200 when I was at 205 lbs. None of the local shops had any concern about this weight.

I've put 2,000 miles on it with no problems. Bontrager race lites are as true as the day I got them.

I'm now down to 170.
dtufts is offline  
Old 11-28-03, 09:01 PM
  #5  
MikeOK
Yo
 
MikeOK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ozark Mountains
Posts: 1,610

Bikes: 2003 Yeti AS-R, 2018 Waltly ti

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 429 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
A friend of mine rode a carbon Trek and weighed 250. Several thousand miles later he sold it and it is still going strong.
MikeOK is offline  
Old 11-29-03, 06:31 AM
  #6  
TrekRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Gambrills, Maryland
Posts: 2,717
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
At 6'3", 240lbs, I am glad to see testimonials for the Trek 5200 from other normal sized riders.
TrekRider is offline  
Old 12-02-03, 12:59 AM
  #7  
Wolfman
Rough Rider
 
Wolfman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 27

Bikes: Trek 9800, Trek 5200

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am 6'2" about 210 and have been riding Trek carbon fiber and OCLV carbon for the past few years with no problems whatsoever. In addition Trek stands behind their stuff as I sold my old olcv mountain bike frame to a roommate who broke it sliding it into a tree stump and they replaced it no questions asked! Anyways, I own a Trek 2300 and have had no problems due to my weight with the frame. I am currently upgrading to a Trek 5200 and expect the same to hold true.
Wolfman is offline  
Old 12-02-03, 07:26 AM
  #8  
DieselDan
Senior Member
 
DieselDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Beaufort, South Carolina, USA and surrounding islands.
Posts: 8,521

Bikes: Cannondale R500, Motobecane Messenger

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
My understanding is a carbon only frame, either lugged or monoque, will work fine with larger people with high spoke count (32/36) wheels. It is the hybrid aluminum and carbon frames that can create a problem.
DieselDan is offline  
Old 12-02-03, 09:30 AM
  #9  
bandaidman
go wake forest!!!!
 
bandaidman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 312
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
the reputation is that a carbon frame will not last as long for a 200+ person compared to other frame materials. i shied away from it for that reason although i am "only" 190

i do have a friend who is 6'7" and 265 who has ridden one for 5-6 years...no problems.
bandaidman is offline  
Old 09-02-04, 04:51 PM
  #10  
mcavana
the commutor / tourer
 
mcavana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: jacksonville fl
Posts: 626

Bikes: trek 6700 turned touring machine, giant TCR2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
i am 6'3'' 265 pounds and have had no problems at all with my 2004 giant tcr2
mcavana is offline  
Old 09-02-04, 05:06 PM
  #11  
Steelrider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 947

Bikes: Albert Eisentraut custom w/DA, Kestrel RT 700 w/Ultegra, Jamis Tangier

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm told by friends who have them that the Trek 110/20 OCLV carbon frame is warranted for life, aside from the fact that they give no caveats to sub-300 lb'rs. This isn't the same carbon fiber technology as when carbon was first introduced. I wouldn't be worried, especially if it's got a lifetime warranty...
Steelrider is offline  
Old 09-02-04, 06:24 PM
  #12  
T E X
Live STRONG
 
T E X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 43
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've seen a 250+ rider riding a 5900.
T E X is offline  
Old 09-02-04, 06:46 PM
  #13  
sydney
Senior Member
 
sydney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Steelrider
I'm told by friends who have them that the Trek 110/20 OCLV carbon frame is warranted for life, aside from the fact that they give no caveats to sub-300 lb'rs. This isn't the same carbon fiber technology as when carbon was first introduced. I wouldn't be worried, especially if it's got a lifetime warranty...
The warranty is for defects in materials and workmanship, and not abuse or fatigue. Anything beyond that is extra sprinkles and nothing but PR and good will. Don't go to the bank with it.
sydney is offline  
Old 09-02-04, 07:04 PM
  #14  
Steelrider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 947

Bikes: Albert Eisentraut custom w/DA, Kestrel RT 700 w/Ultegra, Jamis Tangier

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sydney
The warranty is for defects in materials and workmanship, and not abuse or fatigue. Anything beyond that is extra sprinkles and nothing but PR and good will. Don't go to the bank with it.
Yep, you're right. It is a "limited lifetime warranty", but know two guys who have had to take advantage of this (one aluminum, and one early carbon) and the Trek dealer, to their credit, took care of them. Another non-Trek warranty problem got jambed up by mfgr. on the "incidental damage" clause, citing other seemingly unrelated issues as voiding the warranty. A good LBS goes a long way toward feeling more secure about this. There are no guarantees in life, but some are definitely better than others...
Steelrider is offline  
Old 09-02-04, 07:55 PM
  #15  
hbstovfam5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 11

Bikes: 2004 Look KG386

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am 6'2" 195 and I have a Look KG386, this bike has been very good to me and there have been no issues with the strength of the bike.

Carbon is by far the most comfortable ride I have ever been on.

You will be very happy with a carbon bike.
hbstovfam5 is offline  
Old 09-02-04, 08:20 PM
  #16  
VeganRider
Just Do It !
 
VeganRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 852

Bikes: Litespeed Ti, Trek Carbon.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
[QUOTE=Avalanche325]I am considering getting a road bike and am curious about this. I am 6'1' 200lbs. I am a fairly strong rider (big legs, and I love to climb hills).

Hey guy, if I remember right didn't you just buy a new Litespeed this spring? hope nothing's wrong with it! didn't crash it did you? If not, could I ask you to please buy me a bike too? please? come on, wouldn't that be a good warm feeling? J/K. Bought my plastic Trek around the same time you got your Litespeed. Both are great bikes. Try one out, I bet if you will love carbon, if you can, find a brick road to test ride on too. The difference people report is no hype; it's not a dead ride, it's smooth and connected. I think it's stiff, but dont know if my opinion on the frame means anything because I'm rather light. But is it the same difference for bigger ridders since they get a bigger frame? Hmm.. So, anyhow, are you sure I can't talk you into a bike 4 me? you know a cyclist can never have too many bikes, I WILL MAKE ROOM! have fun shopping!

Last edited by VeganRider; 09-02-04 at 08:41 PM.
VeganRider is offline  
Old 09-02-04, 10:42 PM
  #17  
hollow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Missouri
Posts: 421

Bikes: Cervelo P2K, Cannondale R1000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am 6'3" and, until recently, I weighed around 235 lbs. I rode my current bike at that weight for about 2 years. I don't think that frame materials are as important as wheel strength. I have just about totally destroyed my rear wheel, it has cracked in about 10 places. I asked when I bought the bike if they thought I needed to upgrade the wheels, but sadly they misinformed me and told me not to worry about it. I'm ordering new wheels tomorrow.

Now I am 210 pounds, but I'm still going to order stronger wheels than when I was 235.
hollow is offline  
Old 09-02-04, 11:08 PM
  #18  
531Aussie
Aluminium Crusader :-)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 10,048
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 7 Posts
What I find interesting is that Viner is the only company that I know of with the guts
to put weight limits on their web-site:
https://www.viner.it/english/index.htm

All of their frames have a 90kg (198lb) limit, with one frame having a 75kg (165lb) limit.
531Aussie is offline  
Old 09-03-04, 02:11 AM
  #19  
fogrider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: fogtown...san francisco
Posts: 2,276

Bikes: Ron Cooper, Time VXSR, rock lobster, rock lobster, serotta, ritchey, kestrel, paramount

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I was in my LBS and the guy told me about this guy that had a trek and he rode it hard! crack it and trek replaced it...twice! with trek, they are betting the there are not many guys like that. most people take pretty good care of their bikes even if there is a life time warranty.
fogrider is offline  
Old 09-03-04, 06:55 AM
  #20  
Phatman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 3,602
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Liked 97 Times in 51 Posts
wow, this is an old thread...the original poster bought a litespeed firenze, I think.
Phatman is offline  
Old 09-03-04, 08:02 AM
  #21  
Bruco
Wind Breaker
 
Bruco's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: In the Dutch mountains
Posts: 802
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Phatman
wow, this is an old thread...the original poster bought a litespeed firenze, I think.
Was about to file a similar reply. Avalanche made the right choice.
Bruco is offline  
Old 09-03-04, 12:16 PM
  #22  
531Aussie
Aluminium Crusader :-)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 10,048
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 7 Posts
He's probably lost 50lbs by now
531Aussie is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.