The Arithmetic of Hydroplaning a Bicycle ( per NASA )
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
The Arithmetic of Hydroplaning a Bicycle ( per NASA )
In a recent thread here, it came to my attention that many folks incorrectly believe that it is impossible to hydroplane a bicycle -- and, as a consequence, that bicycle tire tread is meaningless. Rather than bury this proof 3 pages deep in that thread, where it is arguably off charter, I am starting anew.
A 1963 NASA paper ( https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/...9640000612.pdf ) was offered in that thread as evidence that bicycles cannot hydroplane. Despite being 60 years old, it actually finds exactly the opposite to be true, as we will see.
That paper concludes that one can calculate the minimum possible speed for a vehicle to hydroplane with the following equation, Velocity = 10.35 * ( the square root of the tire pressure on the ground ) or V = (10.35 * sqrt(p) ). So let's apply that theory to the video evidence. The best example I have at hand is
-- not even the most delusional posters here can deny that his motorcycle must be hydroplaning in that video.
So, in that video, Martin travels 63m, or 205 feet, across the lake surface. In the video, he estimates traveling at around 30 mph. We can confirm that, by observing that there are 5 seconds of footage of his bike on the water -- so his travel time is at least 5 seconds ( perhaps more, depending on how it was edited, but we don't really care as 30 mph is an easily-achievable speed on a bicycle ). So, his average speed on water was ~41 feet per second, or just under 28 miles per hour. Let's be generous to the disbelievers and call it 30 mph.
Now, we flip around NASA's equation, and after some arithmetic that's left as an exercise for the reader, we find that sqrt(p) = 2.89. Hopefully we all know that the pressure inside a pneumatic tire has to equal the pressure of that tire on the ground ( and the paper confirms as much, if you didn't know ). 2.89 squared equals 8.35, and 8.35 psi is an entirely reasonable tire pressure for a dirt bike motorcycle tire.
That means, per NASA in 1963, Martin's motorcycle in that video had to have tires inflated to ~8.4 psi or less, in order to hydroplane at 30mph.
So, contrary to the belief of many here, even in 1963, NASA was finding that hydroplaning cycles are entirely possible.
Furthermore, using NASA's vintage equation ( which is not perfectly accurate, and more modern research lowers the 10.35 constant, which lowers these speeds ), we find that a bicycle with 30 psi in its tires can achieve total hydroplane at 56.7 mph -- again, a completely achievable speed while descending. And a really strong cyclist could potentially hydroplane a fatbike with slick 4" tires inflated to only 8 psi by reaching 29.3 mph on level ground.
Also, as noted in that Purdue paper, "total hydroplane" is not really the important threshold. On a bicycle, your front tire is probably loaded lighter than your rear, especially if you are descending. That means your front tire may very well hydroplane at a speed much lower than your "total hydroplane" threshold, and once you lose your front end, you are typically in a bad way.
Hopefully now we all understand that continuing to believe that bicycles cannot hydroplane is akin to continuing to believe that the Sun orbits the Earth. There exists both video evidence countering that belief, and it is disproven by science -- many decades ago. It would be better for all concerned if the folks who do persist with that inaccurate belief at least choose to discontinue spreading that falsehood to new folks here.
A 1963 NASA paper ( https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/...9640000612.pdf ) was offered in that thread as evidence that bicycles cannot hydroplane. Despite being 60 years old, it actually finds exactly the opposite to be true, as we will see.
That paper concludes that one can calculate the minimum possible speed for a vehicle to hydroplane with the following equation, Velocity = 10.35 * ( the square root of the tire pressure on the ground ) or V = (10.35 * sqrt(p) ). So let's apply that theory to the video evidence. The best example I have at hand is
So, in that video, Martin travels 63m, or 205 feet, across the lake surface. In the video, he estimates traveling at around 30 mph. We can confirm that, by observing that there are 5 seconds of footage of his bike on the water -- so his travel time is at least 5 seconds ( perhaps more, depending on how it was edited, but we don't really care as 30 mph is an easily-achievable speed on a bicycle ). So, his average speed on water was ~41 feet per second, or just under 28 miles per hour. Let's be generous to the disbelievers and call it 30 mph.
Now, we flip around NASA's equation, and after some arithmetic that's left as an exercise for the reader, we find that sqrt(p) = 2.89. Hopefully we all know that the pressure inside a pneumatic tire has to equal the pressure of that tire on the ground ( and the paper confirms as much, if you didn't know ). 2.89 squared equals 8.35, and 8.35 psi is an entirely reasonable tire pressure for a dirt bike motorcycle tire.
That means, per NASA in 1963, Martin's motorcycle in that video had to have tires inflated to ~8.4 psi or less, in order to hydroplane at 30mph.
So, contrary to the belief of many here, even in 1963, NASA was finding that hydroplaning cycles are entirely possible.
Furthermore, using NASA's vintage equation ( which is not perfectly accurate, and more modern research lowers the 10.35 constant, which lowers these speeds ), we find that a bicycle with 30 psi in its tires can achieve total hydroplane at 56.7 mph -- again, a completely achievable speed while descending. And a really strong cyclist could potentially hydroplane a fatbike with slick 4" tires inflated to only 8 psi by reaching 29.3 mph on level ground.
Also, as noted in that Purdue paper, "total hydroplane" is not really the important threshold. On a bicycle, your front tire is probably loaded lighter than your rear, especially if you are descending. That means your front tire may very well hydroplane at a speed much lower than your "total hydroplane" threshold, and once you lose your front end, you are typically in a bad way.
Hopefully now we all understand that continuing to believe that bicycles cannot hydroplane is akin to continuing to believe that the Sun orbits the Earth. There exists both video evidence countering that belief, and it is disproven by science -- many decades ago. It would be better for all concerned if the folks who do persist with that inaccurate belief at least choose to discontinue spreading that falsehood to new folks here.
Likes For TC1:
#2
Happy With My Bikes
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2,187
Bikes: Hi-Ten bike boomers, a Trek Domane and some projects
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 884 Post(s)
Liked 2,308 Times
in
1,118 Posts
__________________
"It is the unknown around the corner that turns my wheels." -- Heinz Stücke
"It is the unknown around the corner that turns my wheels." -- Heinz Stücke
#3
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,811 Times
in
3,319 Posts
Still you are disregarding in all your supposed video evidence, that the tires simply slipped due to other reasons instead of being lifted off of the pavement as is the requirement for hydroplaning even in the paper from NASA that you linked.
Likes For Iride01:
#4
Full Member
Thread Starter
If you want to pretend all those other videos do not show evidence of hydroplaning, you can bury your head in that sand, and I cannot stop you. So let's ignore them in this thread. I just provided with you mathematical proof that bicycles can hydroplane -- supported by NASA, and the NHTSA.
Argue with the proof -- if you can -- or admit that you are wrong.
#5
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,811 Times
in
3,319 Posts
Well first off, I don't see anything that doesn't look like fakery. To me it will seem that when the bike is going steadily across the water with a rooster tail, there is a solid surface just underneath the water.
As well his tires aren't bicycle tires. So why even try to bring this as evidence.
Unless the loss of friction is entirely due to the tires being lifted off the pavement by the water building up under them then it's not hydroplaning in my opinion. Or by any other definition I've read.
Even the scant sixty miles per hour he claimed in the video with his motorcycle tires, a person on a bicycle will have to be going way faster than that to ever hydroplane. And I don't think I can ride that fast even downhill. But I can ride fast enough for the lowered friction coefficient of a wet road to cause my rear or even front wheel, to slip out from under me.
Chill out dude! Is there a vein about to pop on your forehead?
As well his tires aren't bicycle tires. So why even try to bring this as evidence.
Unless the loss of friction is entirely due to the tires being lifted off the pavement by the water building up under them then it's not hydroplaning in my opinion. Or by any other definition I've read.
Even the scant sixty miles per hour he claimed in the video with his motorcycle tires, a person on a bicycle will have to be going way faster than that to ever hydroplane. And I don't think I can ride that fast even downhill. But I can ride fast enough for the lowered friction coefficient of a wet road to cause my rear or even front wheel, to slip out from under me.
Chill out dude! Is there a vein about to pop on your forehead?
Likes For Iride01:
#6
Happy With My Bikes
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2,187
Bikes: Hi-Ten bike boomers, a Trek Domane and some projects
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 884 Post(s)
Liked 2,308 Times
in
1,118 Posts
I'm not going to watch the video linked because I like riding bikes more than arguing about them on the internet. And because when riding on wet roads, tire spray is a bigger problem for me than hydroplaning.
__________________
"It is the unknown around the corner that turns my wheels." -- Heinz Stücke
"It is the unknown around the corner that turns my wheels." -- Heinz Stücke
Likes For Chuck M:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,380
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2488 Post(s)
Liked 2,957 Times
in
1,680 Posts
From this page:
That is a very interesting question as I designed and developed bicycle tires for a couple decades. I will assume going full speed (60 mph +) in a straight line on a paved road, on 700 x 28c tires (which is today’s norm/average road bike size). I will say “no”, because the contact patch is just too small with all the weight of the bike and rider bearing down on the two tiny contact patches where water easily gets displaced.
I will add, that a complete slick tire actually works better, then a tire with any type of tread pattern, again assuming the bicycle is going in a straight line at full speed. Now once the rider starts to turn, that is a whole different story for the tire contact patches to maintain grip on a wet road. This is where tire compound, air pressure, and casing construction comes into play, and some combinations will grip better then others, but still hydroplaning is not a factor.
That is a very interesting question as I designed and developed bicycle tires for a couple decades. I will assume going full speed (60 mph +) in a straight line on a paved road, on 700 x 28c tires (which is today’s norm/average road bike size). I will say “no”, because the contact patch is just too small with all the weight of the bike and rider bearing down on the two tiny contact patches where water easily gets displaced.
I will add, that a complete slick tire actually works better, then a tire with any type of tread pattern, again assuming the bicycle is going in a straight line at full speed. Now once the rider starts to turn, that is a whole different story for the tire contact patches to maintain grip on a wet road. This is where tire compound, air pressure, and casing construction comes into play, and some combinations will grip better then others, but still hydroplaning is not a factor.
Likes For Trakhak:
#8
Full Member
Thread Starter
From this page:
That is a very interesting question as I designed and developed bicycle tires for a couple decades. I will assume going full speed (60 mph +) in a straight line on a paved road, on 700 x 28c tires (which is today’s norm/average road bike size). I will say “no”, because the contact patch is just too small with all the weight of the bike and rider bearing down on the two tiny contact patches where water easily gets displaced.
That is a very interesting question as I designed and developed bicycle tires for a couple decades. I will assume going full speed (60 mph +) in a straight line on a paved road, on 700 x 28c tires (which is today’s norm/average road bike size). I will say “no”, because the contact patch is just too small with all the weight of the bike and rider bearing down on the two tiny contact patches where water easily gets displaced.
I hope you have a better counter argument than that.
#9
Full Member
Thread Starter
Guy Martin has a sufficient reputation that makes faking this video extremely unlikely. He holds or has-held many world records, certified by Guiness.
More to the point, his effort is confirmed by NASA investigations undertaken fifty years earlier.
Seriously? You can't understand the applicability?
Which is precisely what happens under Martin's bike... only the "road" is the ramp and the lake bed.
You clearly didn't watch the video, nor understand the proof. Please try to do both before commenting further.
More to the point, his effort is confirmed by NASA investigations undertaken fifty years earlier.
You clearly didn't watch the video, nor understand the proof. Please try to do both before commenting further.
#10
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,992
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6196 Post(s)
Liked 4,811 Times
in
3,319 Posts
Any idiot can comment.
Perhaps you can try to ride out in a lake and show us some of your proof on video.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,795
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3514 Post(s)
Liked 2,927 Times
in
1,776 Posts
My 140 psi 23 mm tires cut through water like knife blades. Pretty sure I couldn’t hydroplane on a lake no matter how fast I was going.
Last edited by smd4; 06-18-23 at 01:19 PM.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,380
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2488 Post(s)
Liked 2,957 Times
in
1,680 Posts
You omitted to mention his having spent over two decades designing and developing bicycle tires. That's beneath you, I hope. Some of the NASA people might have worked after school as grocery store baggers, but that doesn't invalidate their data.
#13
Full Member
Thread Starter
Please try to understand that isn't a bicycle tire, at least not a human powered bicycle tire. So until you have some evidence that a bicycle can hydroplane at speeds bicycles normally travel, even in bicycle races, that I'll comment whenever I wish. This is after all a bicycle forum and it's public.
And there is no meaningful difference between the construction of bicycle and motorcycle tires, sufficient to render one immune to hydroplaning, and the other not.
Yes, you certainly can comment, if you like -- but doing so with your low level of understanding here is not doing you any credit.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,380
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2488 Post(s)
Liked 2,957 Times
in
1,680 Posts
Likes For Trakhak:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times
in
1,314 Posts
I've done well over 40mph in heavy rain on my bicycle.
I am not quite dead.
QED
I am not quite dead.
QED
#16
Full Member
Thread Starter
Who the hell is still running 140psi in 23mm tires? If you are going to be that far behind the times, get yourself a Penny-farthing and be done with it.
Unsurprisingly, you are wrong. Your 140psi tires will achieve total hydroplane at 120.7 mph, per the NHTSA.
Unsurprisingly, you are wrong. Your 140psi tires will achieve total hydroplane at 120.7 mph, per the NHTSA.
#17
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,368
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6221 Post(s)
Liked 4,221 Times
in
2,367 Posts
Here’s a quote from Solid solutions.
thus a ski–like hydro blade was fashioned on SOLIDWORKS to sit beneath the rear wheel to act as a hull in order to steady the bike whilst moving at pace.
If you look at other videos of people crossing water on motorcycles, they are all using some kind of skid plate under the motor case to do it. Their tires are buried in the water up to the depth of the motor case.
If you want to pretend all those other videos do not show evidence of hydroplaning, you can bury your head in that sand, and I cannot stop you. So let's ignore them in this thread. I just provided with you mathematical proof that bicycles can hydroplane -- supported by NASA, and the NHTSA.
Argue with the proof -- if you can -- or admit that you are wrong.
Argue with the proof -- if you can -- or admit that you are wrong.
You’ve provided no “proof”.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Last edited by cyccommute; 06-18-23 at 01:48 PM.
Likes For cyccommute:
#18
Full Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by https://www.earthdate.org/episodes/why-is-ice-slippery
Once an ice skater gets going, friction between her skate and the ice creates a microscopic layer of water that allows the skate to hydroplane. But before she can get up to speed, and friction can melt the ice, it’s still slippery enough for her to start her glide. Why is ice so slippery? In the 1800s, scientist Michael Faraday conducted experiments to show that ice, even well below freezing, has a very thin layer of water on its surface. But the technology to see this layer did not exist. Nor did the scientific understanding to prove that it was there.It would be more than 100 years before scientists could finally see Faraday’s water layer using X-ray imaging. And still later that they could measure it. Turns out this thin layer is very thin indeed—thousands of times thinner than a sheet of paper. In fact, it’s just a couple of molecules thick.
edit: https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...1105104416.htm ( better article, same point )
Last edited by TC1; 06-18-23 at 02:04 PM. Reason: add'l source material
#19
Full Member
Thread Starter
it’s about 2’ wide…and just a little further on there is a wide shot where you can see that the hydroplane from the side. It’s about 3’ long and extends to the rear axle. He’s got a great big ski attached to the bike and most definitely is not hydroplaning on the tires.
To be clear, are you admitting now that they are hydroplaning, or are you still delusional?
I have provided investigations by NASA and the NHTSA, both of which confirm that bicycles can achieve total hydroplane. I have provided video evidence of that phenomenon occurring.
If that isn't sufficient for you to understand, I daresay nothing ever could be.
#20
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,547
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3674 Post(s)
Liked 5,441 Times
in
2,764 Posts
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times
in
1,314 Posts
Realistically, how fast do cyclists travel? How many ride fast in rain? Or even ride in any rain?
I'm a stupid, lazy engineer. I don't need no stinkin NASA arithmetic to tell me hydroplaning on a bicycle is moot. Ain't happening.
But my top speed to date is only 67 mph but in rain I try to keep it to 40-45 mph.
I'm a stupid, lazy engineer. I don't need no stinkin NASA arithmetic to tell me hydroplaning on a bicycle is moot. Ain't happening.
But my top speed to date is only 67 mph but in rain I try to keep it to 40-45 mph.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times
in
1,314 Posts
Ironically, you accidentally described how ice-skating works.
I'm sorry to say, but the level of technical knowledge on this forum is rather surprisingly low. Hopefully the knowledgeable people are just quiet.
edit: https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...1105104416.htm ( better article, same point )
I'm sorry to say, but the level of technical knowledge on this forum is rather surprisingly low. Hopefully the knowledgeable people are just quiet.
edit: https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...1105104416.htm ( better article, same point )
#23
Full Member
Thread Starter
Realistically, how fast do cyclists travel? How many ride fast in rain? Or even ride in any rain?
I'm a stupid, lazy engineer. I don't need no stinkin NASA arithmetic to tell me hydroplaning on a bicycle is moot. Ain't happening.
But my top speed to date is only 67 mph but in rain I try to keep it to 40-45 mph.
I'm a stupid, lazy engineer. I don't need no stinkin NASA arithmetic to tell me hydroplaning on a bicycle is moot. Ain't happening.
But my top speed to date is only 67 mph but in rain I try to keep it to 40-45 mph.
#24
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,547
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3674 Post(s)
Liked 5,441 Times
in
2,764 Posts
Likes For shelbyfv: