2010 Specialized Tricross vs 1993 Trek Composite 2200
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 12
Bikes: 1988 Centurion "Dave Scott" Ironman Expert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
2010 Specialized Tricross vs 1993 Trek Composite 2200
I'm looking to get into cycling with my wife and wanted to get a entry road bike to start. On CL, I'm stuck between 2010 Specialized Tricross ($240) and 1993 Trek Composite 2200 ($260). The specs are as follows:
Specialized (link here)
Sizes: 54cm Tires: 700 x 32c
Components
Brakeset: Tektro Oryx, cantilever brakes with cartridge pads brakes, Shimano Sora, 8-speed, STI, flight deck compatible, with Specialized brake levers
Shift Levers: Shimano Sora, 8-speed, STI, flight deck compatible
Crankset: RPM forged alloy compact crankset, 48x34T teeth
Pedals: Composite body, alloy cage, with toe clips and straps
Bottom Bracket: Shimano UN-25, 113mm spindle
BB Shell Width: 68mm English
Rear Cogs: 8-speed, 12 - 25 teeth
Seatpost: Specialized carbon fiber, 27.2mm diameter
Saddle: Specialized Road Saddle, full padding
Handlebar: Specialized Comp handlebar, alloy racing drop, 26.0 Clamp
Handlebar Stem: Specialized 3D forged alloy, 10 degree rise, 26.0mm clamp
Headset: 1 1/8inch Specialized Mindset Plus integrated threadless, sealed
Trek (link here):
Carbon Frame
16 Speed
700c wheels
21 inch seat tube
54cm top tube
The question is, which one should I go for? With my limited knowledge, I come humbly before the BF. Thanks in advance.
Specialized (link here)
Sizes: 54cm Tires: 700 x 32c
Components
Brakeset: Tektro Oryx, cantilever brakes with cartridge pads brakes, Shimano Sora, 8-speed, STI, flight deck compatible, with Specialized brake levers
Shift Levers: Shimano Sora, 8-speed, STI, flight deck compatible
Crankset: RPM forged alloy compact crankset, 48x34T teeth
Pedals: Composite body, alloy cage, with toe clips and straps
Bottom Bracket: Shimano UN-25, 113mm spindle
BB Shell Width: 68mm English
Rear Cogs: 8-speed, 12 - 25 teeth
Seatpost: Specialized carbon fiber, 27.2mm diameter
Saddle: Specialized Road Saddle, full padding
Handlebar: Specialized Comp handlebar, alloy racing drop, 26.0 Clamp
Handlebar Stem: Specialized 3D forged alloy, 10 degree rise, 26.0mm clamp
Headset: 1 1/8inch Specialized Mindset Plus integrated threadless, sealed
Trek (link here):
Carbon Frame
16 Speed
700c wheels
21 inch seat tube
54cm top tube
The question is, which one should I go for? With my limited knowledge, I come humbly before the BF. Thanks in advance.
#2
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have a 2009 TriCross Comp (Mix of Ultegra and 105 components) and I love it! The ride is very compliant/comfortable and the bike is very versatile. It'll fit wider tires than the Trek you're looking at. I also own a Trek 2300 Composite that I have sunk a lot of money in and also really love. But for a beginner bike, I'd recommend the TriCross for it's exceptional value and versatility.
Ultimately, when looking at a used bike you need to consider how well it has been taken care of and what shape it is in. That might be the deciding factor in your case. If a $200 used bike needs a $100 tune up plus $50 in parts, it's not really a $200 bike.
Ultimately, when looking at a used bike you need to consider how well it has been taken care of and what shape it is in. That might be the deciding factor in your case. If a $200 used bike needs a $100 tune up plus $50 in parts, it's not really a $200 bike.
#3
Senior Member
I'll second the vote for the Tricross, and not just because I own a 2007 Tricross Comp.
Khoelsema is spot on about it being more versatile. Since you're a beginner you don't know exactly where you'll end up riding that you enjoy. Being able to put wider tires (probably up to 35mm) on the Tricross will allow you to ride rough roads, dirt and gravel, as well as regular paved roads.
I bought mine used in 2009 and have over 24k miles on it.
Khoelsema is spot on about it being more versatile. Since you're a beginner you don't know exactly where you'll end up riding that you enjoy. Being able to put wider tires (probably up to 35mm) on the Tricross will allow you to ride rough roads, dirt and gravel, as well as regular paved roads.
I bought mine used in 2009 and have over 24k miles on it.
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 12
Bikes: 1988 Centurion "Dave Scott" Ironman Expert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My hands were tied and I ended up getting the 1993 Trek Composite 2200. Besides the seat that's way too stiff and truing the wheels a bit, it's in a good condition. Just took it out last night for a 5 mile ride and it was a lot of fun! Thanks for all your help!
#6
6-4 Titanium
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 330
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 92 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 36 Times
in
31 Posts
I have a 2009 TriCross Comp (Mix of Ultegra and 105 components) and I love it! The ride is very compliant/comfortable and the bike is very versatile. It'll fit wider tires than the Trek you're looking at. I also own a Trek 2300 Composite that I have sunk a lot of money in and also really love. But for a beginner bike, I'd recommend the TriCross for it's exceptional value and versatility.
Ultimately, when looking at a used bike you need to consider how well it has been taken care of and what shape it is in. That might be the deciding factor in your case. If a $200 used bike needs a $100 tune up plus $50 in parts, it's not really a $200 bike.
Ultimately, when looking at a used bike you need to consider how well it has been taken care of and what shape it is in. That might be the deciding factor in your case. If a $200 used bike needs a $100 tune up plus $50 in parts, it's not really a $200 bike.
#7
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Not at all!!! Buying an older bike and upgrading it can be very cost effective and a great way to learn basic bike maintenance and setup. But if someone is buying a used bike for the first time, they aren't likely buying it with the intention of swapping out a bunch of the parts.