Women bicycle for the very short petite help.
#26
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 223
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 107 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I thought you were after an expensive bike since you mentioned the PRO model.
The Surly 650b is a HUGE bike. 26" mountain wheels are smaller and would be better than 650b. I know its confusing because 650C is a small wheel.
I don't really like the Diamondbacks either.
The islabike Luath24 had 145mm cranks which I did like. To be honest you will likely have to move the saddle rearwards on anything your going to buy.
The Surly 650b is a HUGE bike. 26" mountain wheels are smaller and would be better than 650b. I know its confusing because 650C is a small wheel.
I don't really like the Diamondbacks either.
The islabike Luath24 had 145mm cranks which I did like. To be honest you will likely have to move the saddle rearwards on anything your going to buy.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times
in
289 Posts
I suspect the seat tube angle on the luath models is 73 degrees which is not as relaxed as I recommend but better than the 75 degree angle that used to be standard on such a bike not that long ago.
Here's what you eyeball. Draw an imaginary line up from the centre of the Bottom Bracket (BB, Bearing the cranks run on) and asses how far behind this line the tip of the saddle is. Some small bikes have the tip of the saddle even with or even in front of this line. This is ridiculous in my view. It places a lot of weight forwards and makes riding very uncomfortable. The aim here is to get a good 4-5cm of setback from the line to the tip of the saddle if you can. Mt custom racing bike that I built around 650c wheels has around 7cm of saddle setback. The seat tube angle is 71 degrees.
Giant had some 24" wheel cyclocross/Mountain bikes that looked interesting but they aren't publishing the specifications I want to see. You could possibly test ride them if you see them.
What I'm looking at when making my recommendations on fit are. 1. Short cranks. 140-145mm is good. 150mm is getting long. Definitely no longer than 150mm. This will be one of the key problems your GF is having with adult size bikes.
2. A relaxed seat tube angle which moves the riders weight rearwards and off their hands/shoulders/arms. Again the small adult bikes have ridiculously steep seat tube angles which pushes the riders weight forwards. They do this so that on paper they can state a short top tube length.
Its a serious fudge. Small wheeled bikes allow for a short top tube length AND a reasonable seat tube angle. CHeck out the seat post diameter from the start and see if its possible to buy a long rear set seatpost in the size thats on the bikes your looking at.
Last edited by AnthonyG; 04-29-17 at 07:02 PM.
#28
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 223
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 107 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
https://www.diamondback.com/haanjo-trail-24
My gf tried out this bike at the shop today. She felt much more comfortable. Still deciding whether to get it or not.
My gf tried out this bike at the shop today. She felt much more comfortable. Still deciding whether to get it or not.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times
in
289 Posts
https://www.diamondback.com/haanjo-trail-24
My gf tried out this bike at the shop today. She felt much more comfortable. Still deciding whether to get it or not.
My gf tried out this bike at the shop today. She felt much more comfortable. Still deciding whether to get it or not.
The Diamondback has a 155mm crankset which is WAY better than 170mm but still long for her inseam. The seat tube angle on the Diamondback is 74 degrees which is better than 75+ degrees but still a little steep.
Last edited by AnthonyG; 04-30-17 at 05:05 AM.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 3,463
Bikes: Trident Spike 2 recumbent trike w/ e-assist
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1321 Post(s)
Liked 374 Times
in
288 Posts
I think you need to compare geometry, frame size, as well as wheel size. Surly has their full geometry for each frame size available: Straggler 650b | Bikes | Surly Bikes. A slightly bigger wheel - with a more proportional frame like a 38 - may or may not be better for the rider. Do the math and check the geometry. It's not just about wheel size, it is about proportional fit on those wheels. Get the islabike geometry info and match both to the rider's dimensions.
#31
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 223
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 107 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Its definitely going to be an improvement over an adult bike. I believe that the Luath24 will be better again but it comes down to how much effort you are prepared to go to to try them, and how much you are prepared to spend.
The Diamondback has a 155mm crankset which is WAY better than 170mm but still long for her inseam. The seat tube angle on the Diamondback is 74 degrees which is better than 75+ degrees but still a little steep.
The Diamondback has a 155mm crankset which is WAY better than 170mm but still long for her inseam. The seat tube angle on the Diamondback is 74 degrees which is better than 75+ degrees but still a little steep.
LOL, she is making this harder. The diamondback has claris 8spd. I could get used ultegra parts and swap out, but that opens a new can of worms. Prob need new hub/wheel. The ultegra crank doesn't come shorter than 155 length?
Starting to look like islabike pro line will make her happy the most, but too bad it is out of stock.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times
in
289 Posts
It can be a bit of a hassle yet ANY off the shelf bike is less hassle than a custom bike which is what I have. Yes the Clari and Sora shifter are difficult for small hands so it always perturbs me that these shifters are fitted to youth bikes. Just another example of the disregard that the bike industry has for youths/small people. The Shimano Tiagra, 105 and Ultegra levers should be pretty much the same however. A few years ago when I bough levers they were the same. Its a matter of fitting wedges or adjusting the lever travel. Also individual cabling on each bike becomes an issue. If the cabling is fitted poorly which adds friction then this becomes an issue. Also the size and curvature of the bars has a great impact on how the levers perform for small hands as well.
I'd be very surprised if you could get Ultegra cranks in anything shorter than 165mm. When it comes to short cranks just be thankful that you can get ANYTHING. I had to have my short cranks engineered.
I'd be very surprised if you could get Ultegra cranks in anything shorter than 165mm. When it comes to short cranks just be thankful that you can get ANYTHING. I had to have my short cranks engineered.
#33
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 223
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 107 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It can be a bit of a hassle yet ANY off the shelf bike is less hassle than a custom bike which is what I have. Yes the Clari and Sora shifter are difficult for small hands so it always perturbs me that these shifters are fitted to youth bikes. Just another example of the disregard that the bike industry has for youths/small people. The Shimano Tiagra, 105 and Ultegra levers should be pretty much the same however. A few years ago when I bough levers they were the same. Its a matter of fitting wedges or adjusting the lever travel. Also individual cabling on each bike becomes an issue. If the cabling is fitted poorly which adds friction then this becomes an issue. Also the size and curvature of the bars has a great impact on how the levers perform for small hands as well.
I'd be very surprised if you could get Ultegra cranks in anything shorter than 165mm. When it comes to short cranks just be thankful that you can get ANYTHING. I had to have my short cranks engineered.
I'd be very surprised if you could get Ultegra cranks in anything shorter than 165mm. When it comes to short cranks just be thankful that you can get ANYTHING. I had to have my short cranks engineered.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times
in
289 Posts
I think you need to compare geometry, frame size, as well as wheel size. Surly has their full geometry for each frame size available: Straggler 650b | Bikes | Surly Bikes. A slightly bigger wheel - with a more proportional frame like a 38 - may or may not be better for the rider. Do the math and check the geometry. It's not just about wheel size, it is about proportional fit on those wheels. Get the islabike geometry info and match both to the rider's dimensions.
I have just assessed the frame geometry linked above and its exactly what I expected from a large wheeled bike. The smallest properly proportioned frame was the 52cm. Everything smaller than 52cm is fudged with steep seat tube angle and short seat tubes.
This is what the Industry does. They fudge the geometry of large bikes so that short people can somehow fit on them but is not at all comfortable to ride these bikes any distance.
A bike designed properly for small people NEEDS smaller wheels. This is a fact. There is no way around it.
For the record. A standard 26" Mtn wheel has an ISO size of 559 and there is a wide range of tire sizes to suit. Fitted with a 25mm tire which are available is quite a small wheel and even with a 38mm tire its not that big a wheel. 650B has an ISO size of 584 which is bigger and there are only big tires for that size making it a big wheel. The 24" wheel size that I recommended and the OP is looking at has an ISO size of 507 and even with big tires its the right size to make the bike work properly for small people.
OK, in defence of the 650B (ISO 584) wheel it is smaller than a 700c (ISO 622) and typically with 700c wheel bikes they only work properly from the 54cm size. Still, its only one size better and the more common 26" MTN (ISO 559) wheel can do better still but its still not small enough for people around 5' or even shorter.
Last edited by AnthonyG; 05-02-17 at 05:40 AM.
#35
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 223
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 107 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Its definitely going to be an improvement over an adult bike. I believe that the Luath24 will be better again but it comes down to how much effort you are prepared to go to to try them, and how much you are prepared to spend.
The Diamondback has a 155mm crankset which is WAY better than 170mm but still long for her inseam. The seat tube angle on the Diamondback is 74 degrees which is better than 75+ degrees but still a little steep.
The Diamondback has a 155mm crankset which is WAY better than 170mm but still long for her inseam. The seat tube angle on the Diamondback is 74 degrees which is better than 75+ degrees but still a little steep.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times
in
289 Posts
Its good that she likes it. The next step is to move the saddle back as far as you can. The further back the saddle goes the less weight will be on her hands/shoulders. Buy another seatpost with more setback at the clamp.
#37
Banned
Bike Friday is probably too much of an investment, but a folding bike with smaller wheels solves
a common problem big wheels on small bikes creates, that is toes and the front wheel overlap.
And can touch , in slow speed turns.
a common problem big wheels on small bikes creates, that is toes and the front wheel overlap.
And can touch , in slow speed turns.
#38
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 223
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 107 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Which seatpost would you recommend? Current islabike one doesn't allow for much adjustment with setback
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Rochester , NY
Posts: 105
Bikes: 2016 Giant Roam 3 , 2001 Trek 700 Multitrack , 2017 Surly LHT
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Assuming she can standover fine with the current frame , take a look at the stem she has.
Mine was a 115mm 15 degree stem and I changed to a 90mm 15 degree stem , this made a big difference in reach.
A swept back bar might be something to try , reach wise and hand position might suit her better.
Mick
Mine was a 115mm 15 degree stem and I changed to a 90mm 15 degree stem , this made a big difference in reach.
A swept back bar might be something to try , reach wise and hand position might suit her better.
Mick