Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Framebuilders
Reload this Page >

Restoring A 1971 Marinoni

Search
Notices
Framebuilders Thinking about a custom frame? Lugged vs Fillet Brazed. Different Frame materials? Newvex or Pacenti Lugs? why get a custom Road, Mountain, or Track Frame? Got a question about framebuilding? Lets discuss framebuilding at it's finest.

Restoring A 1971 Marinoni

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-08-20, 05:07 PM
  #1  
GiovanniLiCalsi
Cobalto
Thread Starter
 
GiovanniLiCalsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 42

Bikes: Colnago, Marinoni, Columbine, Schwinn Paramount, Raleigh International, Raleigh Professional, 1893 Crescent Juno, 1896 Crescent No.1, 1899 Crescent No.18, 1896 Columbia 40, 1902 Pierce Special, 1903 Pierce Special, 1905 Pierce Special Racer,

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 8 Posts
Restoring A 1971 Marinoni

I’m restoring a 1971 Marinoni bicycle and would like to replace the rear brake bridge, at a slightly lower position. When new, it had a MaFac center-pull and I would like to use Campagnolo Nuovo Record brakes, so the original bridge must be replaced and a new one positioned lower.
Is there anyone that can supply me with a new bridge, with a Colnago style bridge, so I can use a recessed nut?
Thanks!
Giovanni
GiovanniLiCalsi is offline  
Old 11-08-20, 06:09 PM
  #2  
bulgie 
blahblahblah chrome moly
 
bulgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,987
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 2,569 Times in 1,073 Posts
Originally Posted by GiovanniLiCalsi
I’m restoring a 1971 Marinoni bicycle and would like to replace the rear brake bridge, at a slightly lower position. When new, it had a MaFac center-pull and I would like to use Campagnolo Nuovo Record brakes, so the original bridge must be replaced and a new one positioned lower.
Is there anyone that can supply me with a new bridge, with a Colnago style bridge, so I can use a recessed nut?
Thanks!
Giovanni
I have lots of bridges for recessed nut, but I don't know what Colnago style means. Can you share a photo or link? Colnago probably used different styles over the years, though I must admit I never really followed them, not my cuppa (after about '72, pretty nice before then).

Also, do you know about the drop bolt for the Campy brake, allowing it to reach 6 mm lower? There are other tricks too, to get even more drop, but the Campy drop bolt is the officially-approved way, done on a lot of nice bikes BITD. Less damaging to the frame, though replacing the bridge can usually be done plenty safely enough. It'd be a shame to repaint it just to get the bridge lower, but that's moot if you're repainting it anyway for other reasons.

Mark B in Seattle
bulgie is offline  
Likes For bulgie:
Old 11-08-20, 07:05 PM
  #3  
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times in 2,517 Posts
I agree with Mark, a drop bolt is a great idea.

I was thinking maybe a "Colnago style bridge" was the biconical ones, but then I googled for the term and it looks a lot like the ones that Paragon makes
https://www.paragonmachineworks.com/...ke-bridge.html
unterhausen is offline  
Likes For unterhausen:
Old 11-10-20, 03:47 PM
  #4  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times in 1,934 Posts
I agree, a drop bolt is the easiest way to address this, if you can find one or fabricate one.

Otherwise, I have some Gipiemme brake bridges that might be suitable:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
gipiemme-bridges.jpg (151.8 KB, 76 views)
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 11-10-20, 07:22 PM
  #5  
GiovanniLiCalsi
Cobalto
Thread Starter
 
GiovanniLiCalsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 42

Bikes: Colnago, Marinoni, Columbine, Schwinn Paramount, Raleigh International, Raleigh Professional, 1893 Crescent Juno, 1896 Crescent No.1, 1899 Crescent No.18, 1896 Columbia 40, 1902 Pierce Special, 1903 Pierce Special, 1905 Pierce Special Racer,

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 8 Posts
Marinoni Brake Bridge

Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
I agree, a drop bolt is the easiest way to address this, if you can find one or fabricate one.

Otherwise, I have some Gipiemme brake bridges that might be suitable:
I’m planning to strip paint and restore frame, so will silver-solder a new bridge in. I have many years experience silver-soldering, just new to the bicycle frame silver-soldering.
Silver Solder is more fluid than Braze and works by being drawn into the joint by a capillary action. ... Silver Solder is used with a Flux, which chemically cleans the metal and keeps it clean during the Silver Soldering process. Silver Solder is also know as Silver Brazing.

Kind regards,
Giovanni

Last edited by GiovanniLiCalsi; 11-11-20 at 04:53 AM.
GiovanniLiCalsi is offline  
Old 11-11-20, 02:40 AM
  #6  
bulgie 
blahblahblah chrome moly
 
bulgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,987
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 2,569 Times in 1,073 Posts
Originally Posted by GiovanniLiCalsi
I’m planning to strip paint and restore frame, so will silver-solder a new bridge in. I have many years experience silver-soldering, just new the bicycle frame silver-soldering.
Kind regards,
Giovanni
OK, as long as you know that soldering is not strong enough. Even silver-bearing solders are not strong enough for a brake bridge. You need to silver braze a bridge. But a lot of bikies call that silver soldering — it's sort of a traditional jargon in the bike world that's technically inaccurate, but it's fine as long as you actually braze it!

Most silver brazing alloys are a bit on the "runny" side for a brake bridge, but they can work if you're careful, with good fit-up, prep, cleanliness, the right flux and flame etc. The higher silver content fillers, 56% for example, tend to be the runnier ones, not good for fillet-building, so I would choose a bit lower silver content, say 45%.

Some bridges come with reinforcing plates that have a little spigot that goes up inside the bridge, like an inside lug, very much increasing the "wetted area" for the silver to grab onto. While that is not strictly necessary, I think with silver it's a good idea. It can help with the safety margin, in case your fit-up, prep, flux or brazing skill are anything less than optimal.

Mark B in Seattle
bulgie is offline  
Likes For bulgie:
Old 11-11-20, 05:53 AM
  #7  
GiovanniLiCalsi
Cobalto
Thread Starter
 
GiovanniLiCalsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 42

Bikes: Colnago, Marinoni, Columbine, Schwinn Paramount, Raleigh International, Raleigh Professional, 1893 Crescent Juno, 1896 Crescent No.1, 1899 Crescent No.18, 1896 Columbia 40, 1902 Pierce Special, 1903 Pierce Special, 1905 Pierce Special Racer,

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by bulgie
OK, as long as you know that soldering is not strong enough. Even silver-bearing solders are not strong enough for a brake bridge. You need to silver braze a bridge. But a lot of bikies call that silver soldering — it's sort of a traditional jargon in the bike world that's technically inaccurate, but it's fine as long as you actually braze it!

Most silver brazing alloys are a bit on the "runny" side for a brake bridge, but they can work if you're careful, with good fit-up, prep, cleanliness, the right flux and flame etc. The higher silver content fillers, 56% for example, tend to be the runnier ones, not good for fillet-building, so I would choose a bit lower silver content, say 45%.

Some bridges come with reinforcing plates that have a little spigot that goes up inside the bridge, like an inside lug, very much increasing the "wetted area" for the silver to grab onto. While that is not strictly necessary, I think with silver it's a good idea. It can help with the safety margin, in case your fit-up, prep, flux or brazing skill are anything less than optimal.

Mark B in Seattle
https://youtu.be/no-OWfC5-RY

Last edited by GiovanniLiCalsi; 11-11-20 at 05:58 AM.
GiovanniLiCalsi is offline  
Likes For GiovanniLiCalsi:
Old 11-11-20, 08:24 AM
  #8  
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times in 2,517 Posts
Originally Posted by GiovanniLiCalsi
That video shows brazing a lug, so it doesn't seem to contradict bulgie at all.

I also think silver is somewhat questionable for this application. There are high-build silver fillers, and they are plenty strong. Fillet pro is an example. These fillers are somewhat tricky to use properly. But it's much better to use brass for a bridge that has to withstand braking forces.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 11-11-20, 09:04 AM
  #9  
GiovanniLiCalsi
Cobalto
Thread Starter
 
GiovanniLiCalsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 42

Bikes: Colnago, Marinoni, Columbine, Schwinn Paramount, Raleigh International, Raleigh Professional, 1893 Crescent Juno, 1896 Crescent No.1, 1899 Crescent No.18, 1896 Columbia 40, 1902 Pierce Special, 1903 Pierce Special, 1905 Pierce Special Racer,

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
That video shows brazing a lug, so it doesn't seem to contradict bulgie at all.

I also think silver is somewhat questionable for this application. There are high-build silver fillers, and they are plenty strong. Fillet pro is an example. These fillers are somewhat tricky to use properly. But it's much better to use brass for a bridge that has to withstand braking forces.
I’m planning to order some Fillet Pro.
https://www.cycledesignusa.com/silver/fillet-pro
I have used lots of slfos. What do you think?

https://blog.lucasmilhaupt.com/en-us...r-and-plumbing

Last edited by GiovanniLiCalsi; 11-11-20 at 09:07 AM.
GiovanniLiCalsi is offline  
Old 11-11-20, 09:14 AM
  #10  
Andrew R Stewart 
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,073

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,857 Times in 2,305 Posts
There's very little advantage to use silver braze for a brake (or BB) bridge, compared to using bronze/brass. But if you know how to swing a silver hammer then use it. If you know how to swing a bronze hammer then use that. I suggest bronze. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Old 11-11-20, 10:59 AM
  #11  
GiovanniLiCalsi
Cobalto
Thread Starter
 
GiovanniLiCalsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 42

Bikes: Colnago, Marinoni, Columbine, Schwinn Paramount, Raleigh International, Raleigh Professional, 1893 Crescent Juno, 1896 Crescent No.1, 1899 Crescent No.18, 1896 Columbia 40, 1902 Pierce Special, 1903 Pierce Special, 1905 Pierce Special Racer,

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Andrew R Stewart
There's very little advantage to use silver braze for a brake (or BB) bridge, compared to using bronze/brass. But if you know how to swing a silver hammer then use it. If you know how to swing a bronze hammer then use that. I suggest bronze. Andy
The Fillet Pro looks very good. I’m going to order 1 troy oz. and try it. I’m going to buy a Meco oxy/propane torch kit. I have several torch combos, but like the Meco. I have the tanks and valves.
Aircraft chrome moly frame builders use this torch and also jewelers. I’m into both.
GiovanniLiCalsi is offline  
Old 11-11-20, 01:13 PM
  #12  
bulgie 
blahblahblah chrome moly
 
bulgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,987
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 2,569 Times in 1,073 Posts
Originally Posted by GiovanniLiCalsi
The Fillet Pro looks very good. I’m going to order 1 troy oz. and try it. I’m going to buy a Meco oxy/propane torch kit.
I'm also a fan of fillet pro. As @unterhausen mentioned, a little tricky to use, but done right it makes nice silver fillets, especially useful on stainless. The silver flux from Cycle Design is also top notch.

I just tried an older Meco Midget for the first time the other day. It came (well-used) with a gas fluxer I bought used a few years ago, but I never got around to hooking it up and sparking it until the other day -- I think I really like it. It's almost comically small. I got the longer tube from the handle to the tip, puts your hand a bit farther from the flame, good for the bigger tips like rosebuds.

I also got the propane tips from Paige Tools, recommended. They have multiple orifices arranged in a circle around the main one, which is supposed to keep the flame from blowing out. I haven't used them much yet, but so far so good, flame completely stable.

I also recommend the ultralight hoses from TinManTech. The hose is so light and flexible you hardly notice it's there, more dexterity and less fatigue on your torch arm. Not very durable though, so make sure you never walk on it or drop blobs of molten metal on it. I have heavy duty hose from regulator to gas saver, and ultralight from the gas saver to the torch, with the UL hose suspended so it doesn't even touch the ground.

I just noticed Smith makes different gas savers for acetylene versus propane. Mine's the acetylene model, got it used many moons ago (it was actually Mario Confente's originally) so I never realized how expensive they are — I'm seeing almost $200 new (ouch). So I won't be buying a second one for propane! Anyway mine works OK for propane, it's just a bit harder to get the pilot light lit. The flame blows itself out unless I set it really low, but once I get it burning it works %100 throughout the day, good enough for me. Super convenient if you frequently set the torch down between bouts of brazing, because the valves stay adjusted. Just pick it up, light it off the pilot flame, and your flame is already adjusted however you left it when you hung it up..

Mark B in Seattle
bulgie is offline  
Old 11-11-20, 01:47 PM
  #13  
bulgie 
blahblahblah chrome moly
 
bulgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,987
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 2,569 Times in 1,073 Posts
Originally Posted by bulgie
I just noticed Smith makes different gas savers for acetylene versus propane. Mine's the acetylene model,
Just a reply about my mention of a separate gas saver for propane — after a tiny bit more research I found this, just the pilot replacement part for the Smith gas saver, says it's for LP gas but I bet it'll work with propane too, and only $25 w/free shipping. I'll know soon.

Mark B
bulgie is offline  
Likes For bulgie:
Old 11-11-20, 03:09 PM
  #14  
GiovanniLiCalsi
Cobalto
Thread Starter
 
GiovanniLiCalsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 42

Bikes: Colnago, Marinoni, Columbine, Schwinn Paramount, Raleigh International, Raleigh Professional, 1893 Crescent Juno, 1896 Crescent No.1, 1899 Crescent No.18, 1896 Columbia 40, 1902 Pierce Special, 1903 Pierce Special, 1905 Pierce Special Racer,

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 8 Posts
Torch Setups

Originally Posted by bulgie
I'm also a fan of fillet pro. As @unterhausen mentioned, a little tricky to use, but done right it makes nice silver fillets, especially useful on stainless. The silver flux from Cycle Design is also top notch.

I just tried an older Meco Midget for the first time the other day. It came (well-used) with a gas fluxer I bought used a few years ago, but I never got around to hooking it up and sparking it until the other day -- I think I really like it. It's almost comically small. I got the longer tube from the handle to the tip, puts your hand a bit farther from the flame, good for the bigger tips like rosebuds.

I also got the propane tips from Paige Tools, recommended. They have multiple orifices arranged in a circle around the main one, which is supposed to keep the flame from blowing out. I haven't used them much yet, but so far so good, flame completely stable.

I also recommend the ultralight hoses from TinManTech. The hose is so light and flexible you hardly notice it's there, more dexterity and less fatigue on your torch arm. Not very durable though, so make sure you never walk on it or drop blobs of molten metal on it. I have heavy duty hose from regulator to gas saver, and ultralight from the gas saver to the torch, with the UL hose suspended so it doesn't even touch the ground.

I just noticed Smith makes different gas savers for acetylene versus propane. Mine's the acetylene model, got it used many moons ago (it was actually Mario Confente's originally) so I never realized how expensive they are — I'm seeing almost $200 new (ouch). So I won't be buying a second one for propane! Anyway mine works OK for propane, it's just a bit harder to get the pilot light lit. The flame blows itself out unless I set it really low, but once I get it burning it works %100 throughout the day, good enough for me. Super convenient if you frequently set the torch down between bouts of brazing, because the valves stay adjusted. Just pick it up, light it off the pilot flame, and your flame is already adjusted however you left it when you hung it up..

Mark B in Seattle
Brilliant!
Thanks for sharing your knowledge and experience!
Hope I get an opportunity to meet you.
I’m learning so much, on this thread!
Regards,
Giovanni
GiovanniLiCalsi is offline  
Old 11-11-20, 10:20 PM
  #15  
GiovanniLiCalsi
Cobalto
Thread Starter
 
GiovanniLiCalsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 42

Bikes: Colnago, Marinoni, Columbine, Schwinn Paramount, Raleigh International, Raleigh Professional, 1893 Crescent Juno, 1896 Crescent No.1, 1899 Crescent No.18, 1896 Columbia 40, 1902 Pierce Special, 1903 Pierce Special, 1905 Pierce Special Racer,

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 8 Posts
Fillet Pro

With Fillet Pro you can join stainless steel to chrome-moly and vice versa.
  • For fillet brazing at below 1200F.
  • Ideal for use with Martensitic SS (953) and XCR, Cycle Design SS Dropouts and G.P. Wilson 17/4. Paragon and other SS tips and parts.
  • Beyond any brass in finish strength at silver temps.
  • Excellent for tips and fork crowns or loose fits.
  • Capable of joining without support with 100% joint integrity.
  • Fillet Pro is being used Worldwide for SS and Steel fillet frames by Top Builders.
  • Joining with Fillet Pro results in distortion free construction.
Anything that can be done with LFB can be done with "Fillet Pro" and more...


https://youtu.be/w8rvcJ-6YYg

Last edited by GiovanniLiCalsi; 11-11-20 at 10:48 PM. Reason: Add Video
GiovanniLiCalsi is offline  
Old 11-12-20, 01:09 AM
  #16  
Doug Fattic 
framebuilder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Niles, Michigan
Posts: 1,471
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 615 Post(s)
Liked 1,914 Times in 655 Posts
I have a number of smaller "aircraft" style of torch handles for frame building class students to try including the Meco Midget. While the Midget is okay I'm not a fan because it takes more hand action (well mostly wrist action) to flick away the flame from the work. I can roll the round handled ones with my fingers. It is also the least likely torch handle for students to like after trying them all out. However those that like it really love it. Here are a couple of tips for improving the use of the Midget. John Clay suggested to me to turn the elbow so it is parallel to the torch body instead of being at a right angle. I found it easier to flick the flame (meaning less hand motion) when the elbow is at that location. My second suggestion is to increase the body length by putting flashback arrestors on the body. The Meco is pretty small and the addition of the arrestors (instead of the smaller check valves which otherwise should go there) made it easier for me to handle and keep my fingers away from the control knobs.

It should be noted that the best place for flashback arrestors is on the regulators in case the flame cuts a hose so the resulting flame can't reach the tanks. This should be obvious if one thinks about it but arrestors are made specifically to either attach to the regulars or torch handle, One made to attach to the handle can not be used on the regulator or vise versa.

I'll second Mark's suggestion of using TM Technologies light hoses. The less experienced one is, the more important light hoses are in helping with good torch control. No student has ever wanted to go back to standard rubber hoses after trying out light hoses. They make a difference.
Doug Fattic is offline  
Likes For Doug Fattic:
Old 11-12-20, 03:01 AM
  #17  
GiovanniLiCalsi
Cobalto
Thread Starter
 
GiovanniLiCalsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 42

Bikes: Colnago, Marinoni, Columbine, Schwinn Paramount, Raleigh International, Raleigh Professional, 1893 Crescent Juno, 1896 Crescent No.1, 1899 Crescent No.18, 1896 Columbia 40, 1902 Pierce Special, 1903 Pierce Special, 1905 Pierce Special Racer,

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 8 Posts
Hoses

Originally Posted by Doug Fattic
I have a number of smaller "aircraft" style of torch handles for frame building class students to try including the Meco Midget. While the Midget is okay I'm not a fan because it takes more hand action (well mostly wrist action) to flick away the flame from the work. I can roll the round handled ones with my fingers. It is also the least likely torch handle for students to like after trying them all out. However those that like it really love it. Here are a couple of tips for improving the use of the Midget. John Clay suggested to me to turn the elbow so it is parallel to the torch body instead of being at a right angle. I found it easier to flick the flame (meaning less hand motion) when the elbow is at that location. My second suggestion is to increase the body length by putting flashback arrestors on the body. The Meco is pretty small and the addition of the arrestors (instead of the smaller check valves which otherwise should go there) made it easier for me to handle and keep my fingers away from the control knobs.

It should be noted that the best place for flashback arrestors is on the regulators in case the flame cuts a hose so the resulting flame can't reach the tanks. This should be obvious if one thinks about it but arrestors are made specifically to either attach to the regulars or torch handle, One made to attach to the handle can not be used on the regulator or vise versa.

I'll second Mark's suggestion of using TM Technologies light hoses. The less experienced one is, the more important light hoses are in helping with good torch control. No student has ever wanted to go back to standard rubber hoses after trying out light hoses. They make a difference.
Everything ordered. Here is a photo of my MiniFlam micro jewelry torch and other jewelry tools I have. Jewelry working bench and lamp are circa 1906.










Last edited by GiovanniLiCalsi; 11-12-20 at 03:13 AM. Reason: Add common
GiovanniLiCalsi is offline  
Likes For GiovanniLiCalsi:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.