Texans Against High-Speed Rail
#276
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,606
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 626 Post(s)
Liked 701 Times
in
418 Posts
Of course, in Germany, that's rather redundant, since the local metro bus/rail systems are always so good, even in the smaller towns.
We lived there 18 months and never even rented a car.
#277
~>~
-Bandera
#278
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
Yep, we will fight this misguided boondoggle all the way thorough the courts with considerable political organization, funding and the Texan ethos of individual rights over social engineering and will not be "steamrolled over" by the corporate greed that threatens our Heritage.
-Bandera
-Bandera
#279
~>~
There is no "choice" between theory and reality, unless one is delusional and/or wants to ride Amtrak.
That being said I would't mind seeing commercial dirigible traffic overhead carrying huge loads of freight and passengers between Houston and Dallas, if didn't spook the cattle.
-Bandera
Last edited by Bandera; 04-24-19 at 06:39 AM.
#280
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
I read some news today about how concerned Millennials are with climate change and how they're not wanting to have kids, how they're willing to sacrifice income, etc.
So I think what will happen if transportation/infrastructure continues down a path where everyone can't agree that the technologies are sustainable and climate-friendly is that people will go on using them to the extent they have to, but they will not be happy about themselves for doing so and they won't want to travel more than necessary.
If HSR or other transportation options were available, on the other hand, people would feel better about themselves for using them and so they would actually want to travel more. That might end up causing more problems in the long run, but it is something to consider.
So I think what will happen if transportation/infrastructure continues down a path where everyone can't agree that the technologies are sustainable and climate-friendly is that people will go on using them to the extent they have to, but they will not be happy about themselves for doing so and they won't want to travel more than necessary.
If HSR or other transportation options were available, on the other hand, people would feel better about themselves for using them and so they would actually want to travel more. That might end up causing more problems in the long run, but it is something to consider.
It it would be like paying to go camping to them.
#281
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,969
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times
in
1,043 Posts
Sounds like a fantasy plan to make passenger train travel even slower while cars are loaded and unloaded from specialized rail cars attached to passenger trains.
#282
What happened?
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 7,927
Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
255 Posts
You'd have to be able to buy a ticket on the HSR to "choose" it other long-distance modes, which is never going to happen since we are well organized and funded, politically solid and stand on our rights.
There is no "choice" between theory and reality, unless one is delusional and/or wants to ride Amtrak.
That being said I would't mind seeing commercial dirigible traffic overhead carrying huge loads of freight and passengers between Houston and Dallas, if didn't spook the cattle.
-Bandera
There is no "choice" between theory and reality, unless one is delusional and/or wants to ride Amtrak.
That being said I would't mind seeing commercial dirigible traffic overhead carrying huge loads of freight and passengers between Houston and Dallas, if didn't spook the cattle.
-Bandera
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.
#283
I'm the anecdote.
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 1,822
Bikes: '12 Schwinn, '13 Norco
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 1,176 Times
in
795 Posts
I read some news today about how concerned Millennials are with climate change and how they're not wanting to have kids, how they're willing to sacrifice income, etc.
So I think what will happen if transportation/infrastructure continues down a path where everyone can't agree that the technologies are sustainable and climate-friendly is that people will go on using them to the extent they have to, but they will not be happy about themselves for doing so and they won't want to travel more than necessary.
If HSR or other transportation options were available, on the other hand, people would feel better about themselves for using them and so they would actually want to travel more. That might end up causing more problems in the long run, but it is something to consider.
So I think what will happen if transportation/infrastructure continues down a path where everyone can't agree that the technologies are sustainable and climate-friendly is that people will go on using them to the extent they have to, but they will not be happy about themselves for doing so and they won't want to travel more than necessary.
If HSR or other transportation options were available, on the other hand, people would feel better about themselves for using them and so they would actually want to travel more. That might end up causing more problems in the long run, but it is something to consider.
EDIT: Ever seen the intro to the movie Idiocracy?
Last edited by FiftySix; 04-24-19 at 09:42 AM.
#284
Prefers Cicero
Where and when did that option ever exist at German train stations? I lived in Germany for 10 years and never heard of such an option being available, let alone ever saw it at any train station.
Sounds like a fantasy plan to make passenger train travel even slower while cars are loaded and unloaded from specialized rail cars attached to passenger trains.
Sounds like a fantasy plan to make passenger train travel even slower while cars are loaded and unloaded from specialized rail cars attached to passenger trains.
#285
Prefers Cicero
Yep, we will fight this misguided boondoggle all the way thorough the courts with considerable political organization, funding and the Texan ethos of individual rights over social engineering and will not be "steamrolled over" by the corporate greed that threatens our Heritage.
-Bandera
-Bandera
#287
~>~
Didn't have a dog in that fight.
HSR is Apples & Oranges vs an Interstate Hwy from a legal & political standpoint, we're fighting it in the courts and in Austin.
The difference between those actively fighting HSR in TX in legal and political organized opposition and BF-LCF who are just kibitzing at best is taking Action vs moving Air.
No point in endless back 'n forth w/ bystanders on this issue, we have work to do.
-Bandera
HSR is Apples & Oranges vs an Interstate Hwy from a legal & political standpoint, we're fighting it in the courts and in Austin.
The difference between those actively fighting HSR in TX in legal and political organized opposition and BF-LCF who are just kibitzing at best is taking Action vs moving Air.
No point in endless back 'n forth w/ bystanders on this issue, we have work to do.
-Bandera
#288
Prefers Cicero
There's no point in being on BF or LCF at all, unless you like debating with other people with different viewpoints. I have no influence on what happens in Texas, but I do find it interesting to discuss it.
#289
Prefers Cicero
No, comparing it to what I suspect would be a high volume rail, given the huge number of people who travel frequently between Houston and Dallas and the fact that the distance is ideal for this application.
#290
Senior Member
High speed rail between two low density cities doesn't solve many issues. It's an alternative to airlines, not cars. People would drive to the rail line, park their car in a lot for $X/day, take the train, and rent a car for $X/day and drive to their ultimate destination. If reducing car travel is the goal then the money is better spent on low speed rail inside of each city from the urban center to the suburbs. This HSR option will reduce car use about as much as one connecting Lubbock to Waco.
Using higher density countries with higher density cities on other continents is not a valid comparison. Germany is the roughly the size of California with twice as many people. Texas would need to get to around 200,000,000 people to have a similar population density as Germany.
Using higher density countries with higher density cities on other continents is not a valid comparison. Germany is the roughly the size of California with twice as many people. Texas would need to get to around 200,000,000 people to have a similar population density as Germany.
Last edited by InOmaha; 04-24-19 at 03:33 PM.
#291
I'm the anecdote.
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 1,822
Bikes: '12 Schwinn, '13 Norco
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 1,176 Times
in
795 Posts
I don't think the time for hi-speed rail is here yet for Texas. Perhaps when our population has doubled and the percentage of car owners drops immensely due to the increased urbanization of our big cities here.
Right now, our big cities are really built with suburbs upon suburbs. Urban sprawl has run non-stop for decades.
What I'm saying is that our population density isn't up to the level of places like New York, Boston, and probably even Toronto. Which means too many people are too far from a starting point for hi-speed rail here. On top of the fact that gasoline is still relatively low priced here in Texas, compared to places like California or Europe.
#292
~>~
"Discussion" ends when one party indicates that they are done like:
No point in endless back 'n forth
And now more Last Words no doubt, because @cooker Just Has To, an irresistible LCF-think itch that just has to be scratched.
-Bandera
#293
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
You'd have to be able to buy a ticket on the HSR to "choose" it over other long-distance modes, which is never going to happen since we are well organized and funded, politically solid and stand on our rights.
There is no "choice" between theory and reality, unless one is delusional and/or wants to ride Amtrak.
There is no "choice" between theory and reality, unless one is delusional and/or wants to ride Amtrak.
In that case, you're not really arguing for individual choice at all, but rather limitation of individual choice.
That's fine, but be clear about what you're actually arguing in favor of.
#294
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
Do you really think all those people driving to Disney world feel bad about themselves? Have you noticed how popular resorts are that are fed by Air and large parking lots? I can promise you people travel more by plane and car than by train. And from the Grand Canyon to Mount Rushmore people look pretty happy marching around with their car in the parking lot. I doubt that your hypothetical people that feel bad now about traveling will not feel bad about not traveling in the future.
So I think, yes, people are taking those Disney trips by plane and car, but I think they will taper as the baby boomer generation is dying off.
If options don't emerge that offer people a guilt-free way to travel, there is gradually going to be less travel. Your personal viewpoint allows you to imagine people indulging in whatever they want without thinking about harm caused, but there is research coming out all the time about climate change and many people want it to go away because it is raining on the their parade, but realistically it can only go away by coming up with truly sustainable technologies and not just by whitewashing or pulling the wool over their eyes.
#295
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
I agree that the distance would be good.
I don't think the time for hi-speed rail is here yet for Texas. Perhaps when our population has doubled and the percentage of car owners drops immensely due to the increased urbanization of our big cities here.
Right now, our big cities are really built with suburbs upon suburbs. Urban sprawl has run non-stop for decades.
What I'm saying is that our population density isn't up to the level of places like New York, Boston, and probably even Toronto. Which means too many people are too far from a starting point for hi-speed rail here. On top of the fact that gasoline is still relatively low priced here in Texas, compared to places like California or Europe.
I don't think the time for hi-speed rail is here yet for Texas. Perhaps when our population has doubled and the percentage of car owners drops immensely due to the increased urbanization of our big cities here.
Right now, our big cities are really built with suburbs upon suburbs. Urban sprawl has run non-stop for decades.
What I'm saying is that our population density isn't up to the level of places like New York, Boston, and probably even Toronto. Which means too many people are too far from a starting point for hi-speed rail here. On top of the fact that gasoline is still relatively low priced here in Texas, compared to places like California or Europe.
#296
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,811
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1591 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,018 Times
in
571 Posts
The ideal would be for any area, however low the density, to begin adapting to a future where land-use is intensive instead of extensive. Sprawl is something that people evolved into by living by car. When you start to realize how much time you spend sedentary while driving around sprawl, you realize it's wasting your time and health to live in such an area. People do it for the money or for other reasons, but it doesn't benefit them ultimately. Many are afraid of density for various reasons, but without that fear driving them to live in suburban sprawl, they wouldn't choose it because driving is a huge waste of time.
#297
I'm the anecdote.
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 1,822
Bikes: '12 Schwinn, '13 Norco
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 1,176 Times
in
795 Posts
My little two lane suburban street only 1/8 mile long must have 1000 cars go by it everyday since it is one of the entrances to my neighborhood. Drives me nuts, no peace at all.
I chose to live as close in to the city as I can afford for easier access to jobs for my family. Yet, downtown is still 20 miles away, and the closest city bus route is 6 miles away.
I am not alone. There are millions of us in this scenario in Texas.
#298
I'm the anecdote.
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 1,822
Bikes: '12 Schwinn, '13 Norco
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 1,176 Times
in
795 Posts
Anyway, this hi-speed rail isn't intended for people in the suburbs. It's intended for people near the city center.
In Houston, that will mean people that live within loop 610. Which is heavily gentrified* now, and still growing in that regard. So, in my opinion, mostly business professionals will be using Texas hi-speed rail.
The funny thing about gentrification here is a new 3-story condo will replace a small single story home built 60 years ago. Usually, the small single story home had more people in it than the new 3-story condo does now.
Which means that population density should be falling somewhat. However, many new condo neighborhoods are built on old manufacturing plant property, so the population density comes back up some.
*not all areas within the loop.
In Houston, that will mean people that live within loop 610. Which is heavily gentrified* now, and still growing in that regard. So, in my opinion, mostly business professionals will be using Texas hi-speed rail.
The funny thing about gentrification here is a new 3-story condo will replace a small single story home built 60 years ago. Usually, the small single story home had more people in it than the new 3-story condo does now.
Which means that population density should be falling somewhat. However, many new condo neighborhoods are built on old manufacturing plant property, so the population density comes back up some.
*not all areas within the loop.
Last edited by FiftySix; 04-29-19 at 06:45 AM.