Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

Fast Gravel Rims: weight, aero, both?

Search
Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Fast Gravel Rims: weight, aero, both?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-18, 04:21 PM
  #26  
chas58
Senior Member
 
chas58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863

Bikes: too many of all kinds

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 335 Posts
Aero matters? Yeah, in our DK even (MI C2C) riding 212 miles due west at 20mph (or any speed) in the spring can mean an apparent wind of 40mph in an open farmland environment. Aero bars could be huge for a solo rider. Can't use them in a pace line, and I'm going to tend to ride in a pace line. Again, in that CGN video, wearing a tight fitting jearsy made a LOT more aero difference than deep section wheels. I don't remember the numbers but aero wheels were less than 5 watts. Yeah, If I'm doing a solo time trail at the velodrome at 30+mph its going to make a difference (and more than 5 watts at those higher speeds). But I'm skeptical its going to make much of a difference in a gravel race.

Yeah, lack of a butyl liner makes a difference - your explanation helps - thanks. Butyl liner is why my G-One tires are 100gr heavier than my Ramblers. Realistically, my latex makes a nice latex liner, so the butyl liners are a bit of overkill. The Butyl does allow my G-Ones to hold air when the latex is dried out. But on my Ramblers, when they stop holding air, I know I'm overdue to refill the latex. The G-Ones could dry out and I would never know.
chas58 is offline  
Old 11-26-18, 08:23 AM
  #27  
shoota 
Senior Member
 
shoota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 7,827
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1872 Post(s)
Liked 692 Times in 468 Posts
Originally Posted by chas58



Yeah, that is clear. Still, it seems off the charts. Most other tires in the 38-40mm range are closer to 500 grams. It is rare to find one under 400 grams. Near 300 grams is just about unheard of. Does anything else come close (other than the super light Compass tires).

For instance, Conti just came out with the Grand Prix 5000. Definitely a benchmark tire. But the TL 32mm tires weighs 370. Tyically that is a very light tire, but this 38mm weighs less than the Conti 32mm?

Most TL tires I see have thicker casings that add similar weight as an inner tube (often ~100gr for 40mm; 80 gr in the case of the 32mm 5000 above). 320g weight 38mm tire implies that the casing is much thinner than is traditional for a TL tire.
Good points. I wonder if it's a typo on their website.
__________________
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
shoota is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
loubikes
Classic & Vintage
12
11-13-18 07:24 PM
Banzai
Road Cycling
7
07-12-16 10:47 PM
ClevelandCylist
Road Cycling
17
01-31-13 07:44 AM
m4rx12
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
29
04-05-11 10:07 PM
Pkmnwill
Road Cycling
20
11-13-10 02:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.