GP5000 users: does it really make that big of a difference?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
GP5000 users: does it really make that big of a difference?
I'm not opposed to paying for quality, but I wonder if the difference between say, the UltraSport IIs that I'm riding on currently compared to GP5000s is big enough? Is it something I'll really notice? I've put thousands of miles on USIIs and they've performed reliably. GP5000 users: what makes them worth the extra $15 or so per tire
Likes For rubiksoval:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
They're definitely more supple and a more comfortable ride. Faster too. Depends on how you're using them. Personally, I have Gatorskins on my daily training/commuting wheels. They're heavy and dead feeling, but they're also practically bombproof and it's nice to have that confidence day to day. I save my GP5000 for my race wheels.
#4
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,116
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1790 Post(s)
Liked 1,631 Times
in
934 Posts
I'd put them on par with Rubino Pro Slick III's or Vittoria Open Corsa 300tpi cotton clinchers.
The ride nice. They grip well. They are more durable & less fragile than either of the above listed tires.
What's not to like? They are among some of the lowest rolling resistance tires on the market today & last a long time in relation to other similar competators. Amazon has 2-packs for ~$90 depending on season & market. A lot of tires of this calibre can cost $80-90 each. So why not GP5000?
Here is a link to the 3 tires I referenced that I have experience with. I compared them to the Continental GP5000 Tubeless, but it's not hard to select the tubed version if you'd like. (I've used both versions & the GP5000 in any version is cheaper that the Rubino or the Corsa's)
The ride nice. They grip well. They are more durable & less fragile than either of the above listed tires.
What's not to like? They are among some of the lowest rolling resistance tires on the market today & last a long time in relation to other similar competators. Amazon has 2-packs for ~$90 depending on season & market. A lot of tires of this calibre can cost $80-90 each. So why not GP5000?
Here is a link to the 3 tires I referenced that I have experience with. I compared them to the Continental GP5000 Tubeless, but it's not hard to select the tubed version if you'd like. (I've used both versions & the GP5000 in any version is cheaper that the Rubino or the Corsa's)
Last edited by base2; 07-02-20 at 04:31 PM.
#5
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,652
Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3093 Post(s)
Liked 6,610 Times
in
3,788 Posts
Bike Closet has 5000's for $70 per pair, plus shipping. Shipping to my location is $7.
Likes For cb400bill:
#6
In the wind
It's been a long time since I rode ultrasports, but when I replaced my last one it was with a GP4000. The difference was quite noticeable in terms of ride quality and speed. I'd even go so far as to say they last longer and get fewer flats too but I don't have any actual data to back that up.
If I was in the market for tires today, I'd probably buy a pair of GP5000s, but being the thrifty type, I stocked up on GP4000 and Pro4 when the prices were good and I still haven't worn through them yet.
If I was in the market for tires today, I'd probably buy a pair of GP5000s, but being the thrifty type, I stocked up on GP4000 and Pro4 when the prices were good and I still haven't worn through them yet.
#7
Senior Member
There is a graphic here that shows Continental's view of the difference in material between the two tires - less rolling resistance, more grip, some loss in longevity.
I've never used the Ultrasports but that graphic rings true in my use of two sets of GP5000s. Feel faster, I like the grip. I'm getting slightly less mileage than I did on previous Contintental tires (can't remember the type).
I hate changing flats on the road. The first set of GP5000s each tire got a wire shard flat towards the end of their life (as measured by the wear indicator dimple on the GP5000s) - both were "polite" leak-type flats where I didn't even notice on the ride, found out before the next ride. The rollingresistance.com test of the GP5000s said they were less flat-resistant than the GP4000s.
My bottom line - the speed and grip were worth a bit of premium and the GP5000s are on sale just about every week anyway. When it is time to replace, I may go back to Schwalbe tires I've used and aren't cheap and go on sale less often - but are indestructible - see if I really notice any speed difference.
I've never used the Ultrasports but that graphic rings true in my use of two sets of GP5000s. Feel faster, I like the grip. I'm getting slightly less mileage than I did on previous Contintental tires (can't remember the type).
I hate changing flats on the road. The first set of GP5000s each tire got a wire shard flat towards the end of their life (as measured by the wear indicator dimple on the GP5000s) - both were "polite" leak-type flats where I didn't even notice on the ride, found out before the next ride. The rollingresistance.com test of the GP5000s said they were less flat-resistant than the GP4000s.
My bottom line - the speed and grip were worth a bit of premium and the GP5000s are on sale just about every week anyway. When it is time to replace, I may go back to Schwalbe tires I've used and aren't cheap and go on sale less often - but are indestructible - see if I really notice any speed difference.
#9
Keep on climbing
There's a website: https://www.bicyclerollingresistance.com/ that purports to show the rolling resistance and other parameters of various tires. You can easily compare any two or three sets of tires.
Short answer: GP5000's have remarkably low rolling resistance -- by about five watts. Is five watts noticeable or important? That's up to you to decide. I can think of any number of scenarios where five watts is a meaningless improvement; likewise, I can envision scenarios where five watts is important.
Short answer: GP5000's have remarkably low rolling resistance -- by about five watts. Is five watts noticeable or important? That's up to you to decide. I can think of any number of scenarios where five watts is a meaningless improvement; likewise, I can envision scenarios where five watts is important.
#11
velo-dilettante
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: insane diego, california
Posts: 8,317
Bikes: 85 pinarello treviso steel, 88 nishiki olympic steel. 95 look kg 131 carbon, 11 trek madone 5.2 carbon
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1628 Post(s)
Liked 3,114 Times
in
1,683 Posts
i haven't ridden any contis for over a decade and dropped them due to durability/propensity for flats. succumbed to the hype and bought a pair for a
late 80's steel build (so not the lightest of bikes). only about 400 miles ridden on the new steed/conti gp 5k's but really happy with them so far.
current handlebars that came with the frame are vintage, look great and fit the build but they are slightly too small for me. results in the bike
being a little too "squirrelly" for me but my intuition tells me it's nearly all due to the handlebars. have gone up a few decent climbs and felt
awesome climbing while seated (and generally while standing). hope to swap out the bars in the next month but if i had to buy another set
of tires for one of the other 3 bikes tomorrow, it would be between the michelin pro 4 endurance's or the conti gp 5k's. and i'd likely go with
the gp 5k's.
that said...i occasionally like to think my road bike can double as a light dirt/gravel bike. haven't run the gp 5k's over any d or g and would possibly think
twice about doing so unless i absolutely had to. i know i can count on the michelin pro 4 endurance tires for the occasional shortish foray/expedition/fubar
segment.
late 80's steel build (so not the lightest of bikes). only about 400 miles ridden on the new steed/conti gp 5k's but really happy with them so far.
current handlebars that came with the frame are vintage, look great and fit the build but they are slightly too small for me. results in the bike
being a little too "squirrelly" for me but my intuition tells me it's nearly all due to the handlebars. have gone up a few decent climbs and felt
awesome climbing while seated (and generally while standing). hope to swap out the bars in the next month but if i had to buy another set
of tires for one of the other 3 bikes tomorrow, it would be between the michelin pro 4 endurance's or the conti gp 5k's. and i'd likely go with
the gp 5k's.
that said...i occasionally like to think my road bike can double as a light dirt/gravel bike. haven't run the gp 5k's over any d or g and would possibly think
twice about doing so unless i absolutely had to. i know i can count on the michelin pro 4 endurance tires for the occasional shortish foray/expedition/fubar
segment.
Last edited by diphthong; 07-03-20 at 05:06 AM.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,993
Bikes: Argon 18 Gallium, BH G7, Rocky Mountain Instinct C70
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times
in
306 Posts
I'd like to give the GP5000 tubeless tyres a go. But from the horror stories I've read regarding how difficult the tyres are to mount, I've kept my distance.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Likes For CeeDotA:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 262
Bikes: Trek Madone
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
Liked 76 Times
in
54 Posts
I like Conti’s overall. Now as to the 5000’s........well, to me they are performing as I would expect. To many riders (us wanna be’s) will never really notice a lot like that of a pro rider, but they do as stated for sure. I think using this tire may depend on your overall asphalt condition too. If you live in a area that has severely crappy roads, you may want to get some tire more bomb proof. But if you are riding the typical asphalt roads of the countryside, they certainly are good tires.
Likes For Germanrazor:
#16
Newbie
#17
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,338
Bikes: R5, Allez Sprint, Shiv
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times
in
295 Posts
I am one of the rare breed that isnt too excited about the GP5ks. They perform well - sure. I have them on my tri bike as I find them to be the best compromise between speed and puncture resistance.
But in terms of ride feel, i much prefer the Turbo Cottons and Veloflex Corsas. Both of them are rated to have a higher RR, as per BRR, though, so there is that. The Turbo Cottons and Corsas dont feel slower than the GP5ks, but obviously, this level of difference is going to be hard to judge just by feel. If running Corsa Speeds tubeless makes them perform reliably enough w/r/t flats, that may become my speed tire.
I also have a pair of Wolfpack tires waiting to be mounted - anyone here use them and can compare? Supposedly made by the same guy who invented Black Chili, Gripton and Addix.
But in terms of ride feel, i much prefer the Turbo Cottons and Veloflex Corsas. Both of them are rated to have a higher RR, as per BRR, though, so there is that. The Turbo Cottons and Corsas dont feel slower than the GP5ks, but obviously, this level of difference is going to be hard to judge just by feel. If running Corsa Speeds tubeless makes them perform reliably enough w/r/t flats, that may become my speed tire.
I also have a pair of Wolfpack tires waiting to be mounted - anyone here use them and can compare? Supposedly made by the same guy who invented Black Chili, Gripton and Addix.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 392
Bikes: 2018 Giant Stance 1, 2011 Trek Madone 3.1, 2004 LeMond Nevada City, 1980 Peugeot Course single speed, 1978 Peugeot AO-8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
No horror stories here. They were no more difficult than a pair of Conti 4000 clinchers. I'm not sure what all the fuss is about. I'm on my second pair of 5000 tubeless and have had no issues getting them on.
#20
Asleep at the bars
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA and Treasure Island, FL
Posts: 1,743
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 234 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times
in
135 Posts
Any tire with a 300+ tpi casing is going to ride better than the 180 tpi Ultra Sport 2's. The latter are probably more durable though, and seem to be marketed as a beginner tire. Beginners tend not to be very adept at picking lines or attentive to potholes and road debris, so a durable tire is probably a good thing.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 877
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 528 Post(s)
Liked 230 Times
in
161 Posts
So I went from 25mm 4000's to 28mm 5000's (with lowering the pressure, too I have to add) and the ride was smoother, more comfortable and I had more grip. I am not an aggressive (or at least not overall aggressive/risky) rider, but in a couple of corners on my first ride I immediately noticed better grip in the corners.
Likes For ZHVelo:
#22
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,647 Times
in
829 Posts
So I went from 25mm 4000's to 28mm 5000's (with lowering the pressure, too I have to add) and the ride was smoother, more comfortable and I had more grip. I am not an aggressive (or at least not overall aggressive/risky) rider, but in a couple of corners on my first ride I immediately noticed better grip in the corners.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,437
Bikes: SuperSix Evo | Revolt
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 733 Post(s)
Liked 815 Times
in
414 Posts
I run GP5Ks with latex tubes, fast, grippy, comfortable, and haven't had a single puncture. I don't agree with saving the good gear for race day, I want to enjoy the speed and comfort every day.
Likes For Rides4Beer:
#24
Senior Member
So I went from 25mm 4000's to 28mm 5000's (with lowering the pressure, too I have to add) and the ride was smoother, more comfortable and I had more grip. I am not an aggressive (or at least not overall aggressive/risky) rider, but in a couple of corners on my first ride I immediately noticed better grip in the corners.
BTW, the 4000 series all measured 2-3mm wider than stated, while the 5000 seem to be right on (depending on rim width, of course), so the 28mm 5000 is the same size as the 25mm 4000.
As for the original question.. it would be a shame to spend all the money on the bike, and all the time in the saddle, and then go cheap on the tires, which affect ride quality so much. I do like experimenting with tires, but I'm sticking to the popular high end models; Pro One, Fusion 5, GP5000, etc.
CeeDotA: Any reason you're sticking with 23mm tires? Narrow tires are slower and the ride quality is awful compared to wider tires. If you're just going with what's on the bike, then at least consider trying out some 25s. I think you'll be impressed.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times
in
446 Posts
I ink the original statement is just slightly ambiguously worded - the original meaning should GP5000 will save you 5W/wheel and that's with butyl tubes - using latex or going tubeless, you get an additional 3W/wheel benefit