Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Cycling Is A Poor Form of Exercise :-(

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Cycling Is A Poor Form of Exercise :-(

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-27-20, 07:37 AM
  #151  
steine13
Full Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: East Lansing, MI
Posts: 273

Bikes: See my albums. I find that listing them here messes up searching.

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 139 Post(s)
Liked 316 Times in 141 Posts
Originally Posted by Happy Feet
Endurance athletes like runners are generally thin, as are cross country skiers, as are long distance cyclists. As are triathletes, as are rowers.
When I read that, it made me think of an article I read a few years ago in the NYTimes (I think). I can't find it again; their search engine is lousy.

The author had gone to Spain on a cycling vacation and figured to run into lean mean hammerheads -- this wasn't touring, these were organized rides on some Tour stages, led by a former pro.

He found the hammerheads alright, but he was amazed at how many of them had sizeable bellies as well as great speed. There are basically no heavy runners, and the rest of the article delved into some of the sports medicine aspects. The short and not surprising version was that a bicycle doesn't have any of the up-and-down motion inherent in running, with the wasted effort involved. In the flats, weight is basically irrelevant.

On the weight loss front, I typically gain a pound for every 50 miles ridden on a multi-day tour. It's probably all muscle.
cheers -mathias
steine13 is offline  
Likes For steine13:
Old 09-27-20, 08:20 AM
  #152  
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,965

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,530 Times in 1,042 Posts
Originally Posted by raceboy
It’s all mechanics. Your gauge is the scale. Food and exercise are the levers that control the gauge.
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
Probably for most people the best device for checking for proper form is a full length mirror. It shows what most people are really interested in improving with exercise/diet regimens.
Originally Posted by raceboy
I’d put forth that your brain can distort its perception of what it sees in the mirror. The number is the number—and it never lies. At least that’s my experience as a lifelong fighter of heavy weight.
I put forth that most people would be happier if they could met the goal of being pleased when seeing their overall physical form as it appears in a full length mirror, rather than only meeting an arbitrary number on a scale if they still fail the mirror test.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 09-27-20, 08:33 AM
  #153  
AlmostTrick
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
 
AlmostTrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398

Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times in 504 Posts
Originally Posted by livedarklions
There's a substantial portion of the population where no one seems to be successful in advising them on how best to lose weight and keep it off. If you look at the scientific research, you will see that virtually no combination of diet plan/fitness program works for a lot of people. I have managed to lose and keep off 140 pounds, and I can't honestly tell anyone that what I do would work for them.
It's probably more likely that this "substantial portion of the population" that you say are unsuccessful at maintaining a healthy weight are not actually following said advice properly, not that it wouldn't work. There are a lot of factors holding people back from making real and lasting change. Likely what you did/do would work for most... if they actually did it.
AlmostTrick is offline  
Old 09-27-20, 09:02 AM
  #154  
wphamilton
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
I put forth that most people would be happier if they could met the goal of being pleased when seeing their overall physical form as it appears in a full length mirror, rather than only meeting an arbitrary number on a scale if they still fail the mirror test.
What you see in the mirror is filtered by what you think should be there. For almost everybody. If that arbitrary number is flattering, that mirror is going to be flattering as well.

"O wad some Power the giftie gie us To see ourselves as others see us!" I submit that the scales are akin to Robert Burn's "some power", and are more representative of how others see us than is that reflection in the mirror.

Last edited by wphamilton; 09-27-20 at 09:05 AM.
wphamilton is offline  
Old 09-27-20, 09:25 AM
  #155  
Danhedonia
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 394
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Liked 177 Times in 95 Posts
I-Like-To-Bike You are not correct - many pursue weight loss and fitness as a means to avoid death and suffering. I am wondering if you are under 30, the magical time in life when people are obsessed with their perceived appeal to their perceived dating pool.

Those who are older and overweight (that would be me) likely have a very different agenda.

livedarklions Race you to the next light pole for a piece of cake?
Danhedonia is offline  
Likes For Danhedonia:
Old 09-27-20, 09:54 AM
  #156  
gregf83 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by AlmostTrick
It's probably more likely that this "substantial portion of the population" that you say are unsuccessful at maintaining a healthy weight are not actually following said advice properly, not that it wouldn't work. There are a lot of factors holding people back from making real and lasting change. Likely what you did/do would work for most... if they actually did it.
There's much less variability in metabolism of food than some are suggesting. There is definitely a difference in how food intake satiates hunger and some people have a much easier time controlling their intake. People gain weight because they eat more calories than they burn.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 09-27-20, 10:31 AM
  #157  
Happy Feet
Senior Member
 
Happy Feet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times in 707 Posts
Originally Posted by AlmostTrick
It's probably more likely that this "substantial portion of the population" that you say are unsuccessful at maintaining a healthy weight are not actually following said advice properly, not that it wouldn't work. There are a lot of factors holding people back from making real and lasting change. Likely what you did/do would work for most... if they actually did it.
Yes. The problem is not with the basic principles of weight loss. Once we adjust for physiological differences, it's that people have varying degrees of psychological attachments to food - beyond its purpose as fuel, that makes it easier/harder to follow those principles successfully.

That doesnt make light of those issues. They are real and need to be addressed but they don't invalidate physical reality. Unfortunately, many people avoid looking at that by saying this or that diet didn't work and there is a whole industry willing to sell the notion of an easier, softer way.

Hey, you can still eat as much as you want, have a pound of bacon for breakfast and put a stick of butter in your coffee AND still lose weight.

I exaggerate of course, but surprisingly, not that much for some.
Happy Feet is offline  
Old 09-27-20, 10:41 AM
  #158  
Milton Keynes
Senior Member
 
Milton Keynes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947

Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Liked 1,710 Times in 936 Posts
Originally Posted by wphamilton
What you see in the mirror is filtered by what you think should be there. For almost everybody. If that arbitrary number is flattering, that mirror is going to be flattering as well.

Milton Keynes is offline  
Likes For Milton Keynes:
Old 09-27-20, 11:54 AM
  #159  
Happy Feet
Senior Member
 
Happy Feet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times in 707 Posts
Originally Posted by steine13
When I read that, it made me think of an article I read a few years ago in the NYTimes (I think). I can't find it again; their search engine is lousy.

The author had gone to Spain on a cycling vacation and figured to run into lean mean hammerheads -- this wasn't touring, these were organized rides on some Tour stages, led by a former pro.

He found the hammerheads alright, but he was amazed at how many of them had sizeable bellies as well as great speed. There are basically no heavy runners, and the rest of the article delved into some of the sports medicine aspects. The short and not surprising version was that a bicycle doesn't have any of the up-and-down motion inherent in running, with the wasted effort involved. In the flats, weight is basically irrelevant.

On the weight loss front, I typically gain a pound for every 50 miles ridden on a multi-day tour. It's probably all muscle.
cheers -mathias
We generally have see how opinions are skewed through the lens of perspective. Sure, on an organized tour of some stages of the TdF, one will see all sorts of body types. During the running of the TdF (the actual endurance event) you will not see any pot bellied overweight athletes. The event favors those who have less weight (but are still well muscled) and the output of energy in such events accounts for a lot of calories consumed. Polar explorers (endurance skiers usually) can expect to burn 10,000 calories a day. It's pretty hard to haul and consume that much food daily for several months.

Even the notion of putting on weight during a multi-day tour needs to be qualified. 500 miles in five days (5 consecutive centuries) will not add 5 pounds of weight. 500 miles over 30 days, stopping at lots of pastrie shops and beer halls probably will.
Happy Feet is offline  
Old 09-27-20, 11:56 AM
  #160  
steine13
Full Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: East Lansing, MI
Posts: 273

Bikes: See my albums. I find that listing them here messes up searching.

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 139 Post(s)
Liked 316 Times in 141 Posts
>> Hey, you can still eat as much as you want, have a pound of bacon for breakfast and put a stick of butter in your coffee AND still lose weight.

That's a pretty good description of my experience.
Maybe not "lose weight" but it doesn't tack on fat the way sugary foods do.
That sort of diet is great fun for a day or two and then gets old real fast.
steine13 is offline  
Old 09-27-20, 12:04 PM
  #161  
Happy Feet
Senior Member
 
Happy Feet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times in 707 Posts
Originally Posted by steine13
>> Hey, you can still eat as much as you want, have a pound of bacon for breakfast and put a stick of butter in your coffee AND still lose weight.

That's a pretty good description of my experience.
Maybe not "lose weight" but it doesn't tack on fat the way sugary foods do.
That sort of diet is great fun for a day or two and then gets old real fast.
Thats true. Sugars, starches and refined carbohydrates break down very easily and require little energy to do so. Proteins and fats require some of the calories consumed in the metabolic process. Sugars and refined carbs also create bloodsugar spices that set up a whole lot of issues with insulin resistance over time and pre diabetes that effects weight gain.

But it's still a pretty lousy diet. I think downstream, many will have their weight loss rebound and find their mental perception of healthy portion size and choices skewed. You just can't eat all you want of super flavourful food and expect weight control long term.
Happy Feet is offline  
Old 09-27-20, 12:13 PM
  #162  
Sorg67
Full Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 226

Bikes: 1991 Diamondback Apex, 2015 Trek Verve 3, 2020 Specialized Diverge

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times in 58 Posts
No form of exercise is good if it is all you do. I cycle, run, walk and strength train. I cycle more than any of the rest since I have Rheumatoid Arthritis and cycling is really good at a strenuous workout with minimal stress on joints.

Exercise is of minimal value for weight loss. It is mostly diet. I generally gain weight when I pick up the pace on my fitness since I am hungry all the time.

I have wondered if long fat burning forms of exercise train the body to want to store fat since you are training it to need fat.
Sorg67 is offline  
Old 09-27-20, 12:20 PM
  #163  
Happy Feet
Senior Member
 
Happy Feet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times in 707 Posts
We have to discern between single incidence occurrences and habitual trends. A single piece of cake or one pound of bacon will not unduly effect anyone, except perhaps brittle diabetics. Another exception being people who struggle with food control issues in which a deviation make create a relapse into unhealthy binge eating.

But many people who habitually tend towards those things probably also make other unhealthy choices which, when taken in combination, add up to poor outcomes. Always having desert, sugar in the coffee, cookies or muffins for breaks, snacks of sweets or chocolate bars, sugary sodas, calorie dense drinks from Starbucks, beer after work everyday... start ticking the boxes and for some consistent trends appear to develop.

That is why a period of accurate calorie counting is useful for some. It allows one to get a better understanding of one side of the equation ie. true calories in

Last edited by Happy Feet; 09-27-20 at 12:31 PM.
Happy Feet is offline  
Likes For Happy Feet:
Old 09-27-20, 12:26 PM
  #164  
livedarklions
Tragically Ignorant
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times in 5,054 Posts
Originally Posted by AlmostTrick
It's probably more likely that this "substantial portion of the population" that you say are unsuccessful at maintaining a healthy weight are not actually following said advice properly, not that it wouldn't work. There are a lot of factors holding people back from making real and lasting change. Likely what you did/do would work for most... if they actually did it.
Yeah, no. The biggest thing I learned from my experience was how worthless other people's advice was. Where it was right, it was obvious and I'm not an idiot. Where it wasn't obvious, it was either wrong, contradictory or completely contrary to my experience. You'd be amazed by how many well-meaning people want to talk you out of things that are working for you.

Study after study show that people can't adhere to diets developed by other people or that if they do, the results are usually quite underwhelming. There's a reason there's a weight loss industry --they can keep selling alternative plans because none of them really work.


I maintain a level of activity that really isn't achievable or practical for the vast majority of people my age. I'm happy to tell people what I'm doing, but I'm always clear that I don't give advice.
livedarklions is offline  
Likes For livedarklions:
Old 09-27-20, 12:29 PM
  #165  
Happy Feet
Senior Member
 
Happy Feet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times in 707 Posts
Originally Posted by Sorg67
I have wondered if long fat burning forms of exercise train the body to want to store fat since you are training it to need fat.
I think one thing that happens is that we become better adapted to particular forms of exercise the more we do them and burn less calories as our performance becomes more efficient. It's one arguement for cross training.

Cycling is a great cardio exercise because it is non load bearing and allows entry for those who may have weight, joint, impact issues. So is swimming.

But one needs to push the effort envelope to see cardio gains, especially with multi geared bikes. One can add hill climbing or ride a SS or FG to shake things up or.. as I am now doing, SS/FG hill climbing
Happy Feet is offline  
Old 09-27-20, 12:39 PM
  #166  
Happy Feet
Senior Member
 
Happy Feet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times in 707 Posts
Originally Posted by livedarklions
Yeah, no. The biggest thing I learned from my experience was how worthless other people's advice was...
Ha ha! What an excellent philosophy for life.

How that jibes with honest participation in a discussion forum is a curiosity though

FWIW, no one here is trying to talk anyone out of doing anything healthy (except the OP who left long ago). If anything, the thrust is to be more intelligent and fact based in those health choices. Of course, we now realize those concepts are worthless unless they originate from you.
Happy Feet is offline  
Old 09-27-20, 12:43 PM
  #167  
livedarklions
Tragically Ignorant
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times in 5,054 Posts
Originally Posted by Happy Feet
Yes. The problem is not with the basic principles of weight loss. Once we adjust for physiological differences, it's that people have varying degrees of psychological attachments to food - beyond its purpose as fuel, that makes it easier/harder to follow those principles successfully.

That doesnt make light of those issues. They are real and need to be addressed but they don't invalidate physical reality. Unfortunately, many people avoid looking at that by saying this or that diet didn't work and there is a whole industry willing to sell the notion of an easier, softer way.

Hey, you can still eat as much as you want, have a pound of bacon for breakfast and put a stick of butter in your coffee AND still lose weight.

I exaggerate of course, but surprisingly, not that much for some.
Where you're totally off the beam is where you assume there's a clear line between psychological and physiological. The brain isn't some rational calculator divorced from the body systems it's a part of. The brain and the gut interact in all sorts of ways through multiple pathways that are not particularly well-understood at this point.

I'm always amazed at the level of expertise people on bf seem to think they have on this subject
livedarklions is offline  
Likes For livedarklions:
Old 09-27-20, 12:54 PM
  #168  
Happy Feet
Senior Member
 
Happy Feet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times in 707 Posts
Originally Posted by livedarklions
Where you're totally off the beam is where you assume there's a clear line between psychological and physiological. The brain isn't some rational calculator divorced from the body systems it's a part of. The brain and the gut interact in all sorts of ways through multiple pathways that are not particularly well-understood at this point.

I'm always amazed at the level of expertise people on bf seem to think they have on this subject
No as you've already said, the problem is you think other peoples opinions are worthless. When you start from that POV its pretty hard to find value.

You also read a lot into what people say that isn't true so you can then attempt to discredit. Its pretty transparent.

I did not say there was a clear line between psysio and psycho logical or claim the brain was some sort of rational calculator divorced from the body. Quite the opposite. I said most issues arise not because the formula for weight loss doesn't work but because people struggle with the mental aspect of adopting it. This acknowledges the mind/body philosophy of health care.

Maybe if you had a higher opinion of your fellow man you might find more of them have ideas that are worthwhile to discuss
Happy Feet is offline  
Old 09-27-20, 12:55 PM
  #169  
livedarklions
Tragically Ignorant
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times in 5,054 Posts
Originally Posted by Happy Feet
Ha ha! What an excellent philosophy for life.

How that jibes with honest participation in a discussion forum is a curiosity though

FWIW, no one here is trying to talk anyone out of doing anything healthy (except the OP who left long ago). If anything, the thrust is to be more intelligent and fact based in those health choices. Of course, we now realize those concepts are worthless unless they originate from you.

There's certain subjects where people all seem to think they're experts and feel free to pass judgment on others. I'm pretty convinced your interpretation of those principles are quite worthless, actually. Not because it doesn't originate with me, but because you grossly oversimplify.

I do think people are going to be the best source of information on what will and won't for themselves for the rather obvious reason that they are the only ones actually capable of keeping track of what they're doing and the results. Sorry if that's a radical concept to you.

as to discussion, I'm good with people explaining what works for them, but when they start in on the "all people have to do" and "it's obvious" stuff, it always falls apart into well-meaning gibberish that assumes fat people are weak or stupid.
livedarklions is offline  
Likes For livedarklions:
Old 09-27-20, 12:59 PM
  #170  
livedarklions
Tragically Ignorant
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times in 5,054 Posts
Originally Posted by Happy Feet
No as you've already said, the problem is you think other peoples opinions are worthless. When you start from that POV its pretty hard to find value.

You also read a lot into what people say that isn't true so you can then attempt to discredit. Its pretty transparent.

I did not say there was a clear line between psysio and psycho logical or claim the brain was some sort of rational calculator divorced from the body. Quite the opposite. I said most issues arise not because the formula for weight loss doesn't work but because people struggle with the mental aspect of adopting it. This acknowledges the mind/body philosophy of health care.

Maybe if you had a higher opinion of your fellow man you might find more of them have ideas that are worthwhile to discuss

Nice backpedal on the physiological/psychological dichotomy you posted. You a fixie rider?

We're done here as far as I'm concerned. You're reduced to cartooning my position on this, and I'm not bothering to read any more of it.
livedarklions is offline  
Old 09-27-20, 01:11 PM
  #171  
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,965

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,530 Times in 1,042 Posts
Originally Posted by Happy Feet
We have to discern between single incidence occurrences and habitual trends. A single piece of cake or one pound of bacon will not unduly effect anyone, except perhaps brittle diabetics. Another exception being people who struggle with food control issues in which a deviation make create a relapse into unhealthy binge eating.

But many people who habitually tend towards those things probably also make other unhealthy choices which, when taken in combination, add up to poor outcomes. Always having desert, sugar in the coffee, cookies or muffins for breaks, snacks of sweets or chocolate bars, sugary sodas, calorie dense drinks from Starbucks, beer after work everyday... start ticking the boxes and for some consistent trends appear to develop.

That is why a period of accurate calorie counting is useful for some. It allows one to get a better understanding of one side of the equation ie. true calories in
During a six month work assignment in Afghanistan, I decided to change my diet in order to lose excess pounds. I didn't count calories or miss a meal and took regular portions of food at each meal, but did cut out all pastry , desserts, and sugared/sweetened drinks. Most importantly, I cut out all between meal eating or drinking; no snacks, no chips, no candy, no nothing. My exercise regimen, such as it was (several miles of bicycle riding per day) was less than I was doing previously. Result - I went from 224 lbs to 188 lbs and have managed to keep it off in the 8 years since then.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Likes For I-Like-To-Bike:
Old 09-27-20, 03:44 PM
  #172  
Sorg67
Full Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 226

Bikes: 1991 Diamondback Apex, 2015 Trek Verve 3, 2020 Specialized Diverge

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times in 58 Posts
I find other people’s advice is very often useful even though I rarely follow it. I find the rationale behind the advice is more useful than the advice itself. There is almost always some validity in the rationale behind opinions. Even if the opinion does not follow from the rationale or the opinion is not appropriate for my circumstances, it is often useful to understand the supporting rationale.
Sorg67 is offline  
Likes For Sorg67:
Old 09-27-20, 03:50 PM
  #173  
Happy Feet
Senior Member
 
Happy Feet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times in 707 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
During a six month work assignment in Afghanistan, I decided to change my diet in order to lose excess pounds. I didn't count calories or miss a meal and took regular portions of food at each meal, but did cut out all pastry , desserts, and sugared/sweetened drinks. Most importantly, I cut out all between meal eating or drinking; no snacks, no chips, no candy, no nothing. My exercise regimen, such as it was (several miles of bicycle riding per day) was less than I was doing previously. Result - I went from 224 lbs to 188 lbs and have managed to keep it off in the 8 years since then.
Similar experience. I have an interest in food from an endurance/exploration perspective. When I became a vegetarian 20 years ago I had to become more educated so as to make good food choices that would work in endurance sports. Each year as a thought exercise I conduct experiments to see the effects of different regimes on my body and psyche. Not as weight loss attempts.

Three years ago I ate only eggs for a month which, coincidentally, coincided with a pure keto diet. After that time I began reintegrating my beforehand food items but found I had broken several habits that I decided not to renew. No more sugar in my oatmeal and coffee, cookies and other sugary, carby coffee break items, and high carb meals like pasta and garlic bread.

Weight stabity since then combined with continued work into portion size which for me has been skewed by years of endurance sports where I could eat as much as I wanted without penalty.

Last edited by Happy Feet; 09-27-20 at 06:15 PM.
Happy Feet is offline  
Likes For Happy Feet:
Old 09-27-20, 04:19 PM
  #174  
Happy Feet
Senior Member
 
Happy Feet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times in 707 Posts
Originally Posted by Sorg67
I find other people’s advice is very often useful even though I rarely follow it. I find the rationale behind the advice is more useful than the advice itself. There is almost always some validity in the rationale behind opinions. Even if the opinion does not follow from the rationale or the opinion is not appropriate for my circumstances, it is often useful to understand the supporting rationale.
Sure. That's how most intelligent people make decisions. Listen to other peoples experiences, sift through what does or does not apply, and move forward readjusting as issues arise.

One might note that, contrary to one person's view, I have not suggested any particular food items someone should consume - other than in the most general terms. Low sugar, moderate carb (preferably the slow release complex variety if possible). Hardly preaching a particular diet.

If I were to get more specific the first filter one would have to run my ideas through would be that I am a long time vegetarian ( not vegan) so my food choices would be along those lines. From a dietary sense though, I don't think it matters if someone is one way or the other so I don't feel a need to be so specific.

It probably matters more when someone goes to the extreme spectrums of vegan or carnivore diets but, nutritionally speaking, I am not attracted to either as better than a more moderate/general approach.

If I were to offer such advise though, which I don't, I would tell someone my biases up front, as I just did without issue.

Last edited by Happy Feet; 09-27-20 at 06:10 PM.
Happy Feet is offline  
Old 09-27-20, 09:30 PM
  #175  
raceboy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: By theBeach and Palos Verdes, CA adjacent
Posts: 554

Bikes: One of each: Road, Hybrid, Trekking

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Liked 115 Times in 53 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
I put forth that most people would be happier if they could met the goal of being pleased when seeing their overall physical form as it appears in a full length mirror, rather than only meeting an arbitrary number on a scale if they still fail the mirror test.
So you are talking about body acceptance. I'm all for that. I never said what the number should be. My experience is that the scale is amore effective tool for keeping me at at my happy weight than a mirror.
raceboy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.