Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Lowering SS gearing - smaller chainring or larger cog?

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Lowering SS gearing - smaller chainring or larger cog?

Old 09-24-20, 07:33 PM
  #1  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,028
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 830 Post(s)
Liked 1,063 Times in 512 Posts
Lowering SS gearing - smaller chainring or larger cog?

After doing some test riding on the Motobecane SS I built for a friend, I can tell the gearing will certainly need to be changed. The last time I did this I did 42/16 and it was perfect. This time it is 45/16 and it's going to be too steep for her.

Would putting more teeth in the back effectively give me the same result as dropping some teeth in the front? With a 45 up front how could I get closest to the feel of 42/16. I'm not very well versed on ratios. What I know for sure is she doesn't cycle much, wants the bike to get up to speed quickly and with minimal effort, and this is an upright setup. Flat surfaces only and not super long distances. Even for me, someone who rides regularly, this thing is a little tough to get going comfortably.

Said bike:


polymorphself is offline  
Old 09-24-20, 07:46 PM
  #2  
bwilli88 
Not lost wanderer.
 
bwilli88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lititz, Pa
Posts: 3,361

Bikes: In USA; 73 Raleigh Super Course dingle speed, 72 Raleigh Gran Sport SS, 72 Geoffry Butler, 81 Centurion Pro-Tour, 74 Gugie Grandier Sportier

Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 885 Post(s)
Liked 979 Times in 514 Posts
Go here and move the cogs around
Bicycle Gear Calculator
45x18 is 68gi
42x16 is 69.7gi
bwilli88 is offline  
Likes For bwilli88:
Old 09-24-20, 07:46 PM
  #3  
branko_76 
Senior Member
 
branko_76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,745

Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 701 Post(s)
Liked 667 Times in 417 Posts
this should help...

branko_76 is offline  
Likes For branko_76:
Old 09-24-20, 07:46 PM
  #4  
Reynolds 
Passista
 
Reynolds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,586

Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 866 Post(s)
Liked 711 Times in 392 Posts
45/17 is very close to 42/16.
Reynolds is offline  
Likes For Reynolds:
Old 09-24-20, 07:47 PM
  #5  
rustystrings61 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Greenwood SC USA
Posts: 2,340

Bikes: 2002 Mercian Vincitore, 1982 Mercian Colorado, 1976 Puch Royal X, 1973 Raleigh Competition, 1971 Gitane Tour de France and others

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 822 Post(s)
Liked 1,387 Times in 690 Posts
42x16 = 45x17, around 70 gear inches. In his 1936 Every Cyclist’s Handbook, F.J. Camm recommended a 65-in gear for single freewheel use for gentlemen. He recommended a 60-in gear for ladies riding a single-speed freewheel.

I recommend searching for the late Sheldon Brown’s online gear calculator and keying in the options. If you stick with the 45T ring an 18T cog gets you around a 67-in gear, 19T gets you to 63-inches, and a 20T lands you at 60 gear inches. My vote is a bigger cog in the back, both because it will be cheaper and because there is a case to be made that bigger rings and cogs run smoother and more efficiently.
rustystrings61 is offline  
Likes For rustystrings61:
Old 09-24-20, 07:48 PM
  #6  
branko_76 
Senior Member
 
branko_76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,745

Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 701 Post(s)
Liked 667 Times in 417 Posts
42 x 16 gives you 71 gear inches, choose any combination that gives the same or close to the same result
branko_76 is offline  
Likes For branko_76:
Old 09-24-20, 08:04 PM
  #7  
ShannonM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Humboldt County, CA
Posts: 848
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 430 Times in 286 Posts
For somebody who doesn't ride a lot, wants an easy-to-start bike, and won't be going fast, on an upright townie, 42x16 is way too tall, let alone 45x16. Like, if you don't think it's way too low, it's probably too high for your friend.

I'd go 42x20 to start with, or 45x21. 45x21 is 2% higher than 42x20, both work out to around 13 mph at 80 rpm. 45x20 gets you to 14 mph at 80 rpm, and is as high as I would go.

My bike is set up with a 1x6, 42 x 14, 16, 18, 20, 23, 26. I spend most of my time in the 20 and the 18, depending on the wind. (When I add a 45t outer ring for half-step, the 45x20 will split the 42x20 and 42x18... I bet I'll be in it a lot.)

--Shannon
ShannonM is offline  
Likes For ShannonM:
Old 09-24-20, 08:45 PM
  #8  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,028
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 830 Post(s)
Liked 1,063 Times in 512 Posts
Originally Posted by ShannonM
For somebody who doesn't ride a lot, wants an easy-to-start bike, and won't be going fast, on an upright townie, 42x16 is way too tall, let alone 45x16. Like, if you don't think it's way too low, it's probably too high for your friend.

I'd go 42x20 to start with, or 45x21. 45x21 is 2% higher than 42x20, both work out to around 13 mph at 80 rpm. 45x20 gets you to 14 mph at 80 rpm, and is as high as I would go.

--Shannon
To be fair, she doesn’t ride a lot, but that’s more due to her current bike. She’s pretty fit and an outdoors person so her legs see some good use, just not in cycling. My thought is that she’ll be riding a lot more and I’m hoping to find a sweet spot for her, but 45x16 definitely won’t be it.

Your advice seems sound though. I’ll try 45x21 to start. The cog will be easier and cheaper for me to replace. This also jives more with rustystrings61’s information above.

Is there any reason to choose even teeth over odd?

Last edited by polymorphself; 09-24-20 at 08:49 PM.
polymorphself is offline  
Old 09-24-20, 09:02 PM
  #9  
ShannonM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Humboldt County, CA
Posts: 848
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 430 Times in 286 Posts
Originally Posted by polymorphself
Is there any reason to choose even teeth over odd?
You know, I kinda think maybe there is.

The 14-26 Suntour I'm running is the first even-cogged cluster I've ever had, and, while I've been off the bike for 6-7 years, I like 14-16-18-20 better than the 13-15-17-19 that I always had before. It's a feel thing, and there's no obvious reason for it, but I like it a lot.

--Shannon
ShannonM is offline  
Old 09-24-20, 09:08 PM
  #10  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,028
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 830 Post(s)
Liked 1,063 Times in 512 Posts
Originally Posted by ShannonM
You know, I kinda think maybe there is.

The 14-26 Suntour I'm running is the first even-cogged cluster I've ever had, and, while I've been off the bike for 6-7 years, I like 14-16-18-20 better than the 13-15-17-19 that I always had before. It's a feel thing, and there's no obvious reason for it, but I like it a lot.

--Shannon
Well, I’m guessing it won’t be significant enough to matter in my current application.
polymorphself is offline  
Old 09-24-20, 09:24 PM
  #11  
ofajen
Cheerfully low end
 
ofajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,965
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 642 Post(s)
Liked 1,040 Times in 663 Posts
If it’s really flat surfaces only, a 45/18 might work That’s 67.5 inches. Since you need a freewheel, you will find low cost 18t and 20t more easily than 19 or 21. 45/20 is going to be pretty easy on flat rides Just my 2p.

Otto
ofajen is offline  
Old 09-24-20, 09:33 PM
  #12  
Salamandrine 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,287

Bikes: 78 Masi Criterium, 68 PX10, 2016 Mercian King of Mercia, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr

Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2317 Post(s)
Liked 597 Times in 430 Posts
Usually swapping out rear cogs is much easier and more effective. One tooth back there is worth 3 or 4 in the front, on average. I was going to say something about 45/16 but figured you picked it for a reason. Yeah, it's pretty high for a 1 speed. 42/16 is more typical, for fit bike enthusiasts...

45/20 or ~61 inches is a good starter gear IMO. Depends on terrain and fitness. 45/21 I feel is a little on the low side. If it's all flat terrain 45/18 is probably going to be better.

I used to ride 44/17 (70 inch) when I rode fix in winter as a young teen but very fit racer, but very hilly terrain. 45/16 would have been way too high. OK for flat terrain I suppose.

Last edited by Salamandrine; 09-24-20 at 09:38 PM.
Salamandrine is offline  
Likes For Salamandrine:
Old 09-24-20, 09:56 PM
  #13  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,028
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 830 Post(s)
Liked 1,063 Times in 512 Posts
Originally Posted by Salamandrine
Usually swapping out rear cogs is much easier and more effective. One tooth back there is worth 3 or 4 in the front, on average. I was going to say something about 45/16 but figured you picked it for a reason. Yeah, it's pretty high for a 1 speed. 42/16 is more typical, for fit bike enthusiasts...

45/20 or ~61 inches is a good starter gear IMO. Depends on terrain and fitness. 45/21 I feel is a little on the low side. If it's all flat terrain 45/18 is probably going to be better.
.
Another vote for rear cog and 45/20. 45/18 seems like a possibility too...
polymorphself is offline  
Old 09-25-20, 07:38 PM
  #14  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,028
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 830 Post(s)
Liked 1,063 Times in 512 Posts
Went ahead and picked up a 20t. But I got home and realized I forgot to get a new chain for it! Doh! Will test it out tomorrow.
polymorphself is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.