Any experience or thoughts about Mg bicycles?
#1
Occam's Rotor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
Any experience or thoughts about Mg bicycles?
It looks like Magnesium bike frames are back:
VAAST
There was an Israeli company that made a racing bike a few years ago, reviewed by Bikesnob, but he didn't really say anything useful.
Is this a viable frame material, or will it just oxidize or explode into flame?
VAAST
There was an Israeli company that made a racing bike a few years ago, reviewed by Bikesnob, but he didn't really say anything useful.
Is this a viable frame material, or will it just oxidize or explode into flame?
Last edited by Cyclist0108; 11-16-20 at 10:54 AM. Reason: Added link to Bike Snob review of the Segal Mg bike
#2
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,474 Times
in
4,181 Posts
Ha, i just read about this bike about 30min ago because of a pushed article.
https://cyclingtips.com/2020/11/vaas...es-a-comeback/
The dropped chainstay yoke is visually brutal, and its apparently poorly designed as well since the company is going to change the design during production.
The frame material is neat- they seem to have put a ton of effort into figuring out how to force a corrosive product into a relatively inert product.
Its light, which is neat, but for $2500, I would buy a bunch of other bikes.
https://cyclingtips.com/2020/11/vaas...es-a-comeback/
The dropped chainstay yoke is visually brutal, and its apparently poorly designed as well since the company is going to change the design during production.
The frame material is neat- they seem to have put a ton of effort into figuring out how to force a corrosive product into a relatively inert product.
Its light, which is neat, but for $2500, I would buy a bunch of other bikes.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#3
Occam's Rotor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
I saw it on Jensen. I just added a link to the Bike Snob review of the Segal.
mstateglfr
Good, critical review. Thanks for posing it.
mstateglfr
Good, critical review. Thanks for posing it.
Last edited by Cyclist0108; 11-16-20 at 10:58 AM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,190
Bikes: Ti, Mn Cr Ni Mo Nb, Al, C
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 942 Post(s)
Liked 526 Times
in
349 Posts
Not sure if it's this bike, but I remember a Mg bike not too long ago that were looking for ambassadors. I believe a bike was sent to two people on this forum. It came in a road and cross version. I have not heard any update from those individuals.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 338 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times
in
252 Posts
Can't say it's a particularly appealing bike and the chainstay is visually, er, not quite right.
Also, if I'm buying a bike with a CF fork, don't see why the rest of it wouldn't be CF, too. That turns me off titanium and most modern steel roadbikes, too.
Also, if I'm buying a bike with a CF fork, don't see why the rest of it wouldn't be CF, too. That turns me off titanium and most modern steel roadbikes, too.
#6
Occam's Rotor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
I have a modern steel (custom) road bike with carbon fork, seat post, bars, stem. It actually works well (and looks good) synergistically.
But you are right about this one.
But you are right about this one.
#7
Occam's Rotor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
[double post]
Last edited by Cyclist0108; 11-16-20 at 12:26 PM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,892
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4792 Post(s)
Liked 3,918 Times
in
2,548 Posts
Funny,I read the 1984 interview with Tom Kellog, Gary Klein and Jim Redcay last night. Klein said then that bicycles were in the third "era". First era - push bikes. Second era- pedals and the high wheelers. Third era- safety bikes - diamond frames and chain/shaft driven drive trains. That he had developed a new tubing for the closing chapter of the third era. That further evolution in metals, composites and ceramics were just more of the end of that era.
Magnesium -more tweaks to push this era a little longer. (The first two eras lasted about 15 years each, This one has gone on 140 years. Will any of us live to see the next?)
I took a spin on professor David Wilson's recumbent 44 years ago. Short wheelbase, under the knees steering, semi-reclined position, Easy to ride, completely natural first time and obviously fast. I rode with the professor a few times as he commuted home and I headed out on training rides. Yes, I always caught him from behind, chatted and left him but he was a middle aged professor and I was a mid 20s bike racer. He was one of the few non-racers fast enough for me to condescend to slow to. And that bike had commuter clincher wheels and nothing special parts. But sew-ups and racing equipment and that recumbent would have been a rocket. I knew that with my spin around the parking lot.
Now with this magnesium for the frame of that recumbent, plus race worthy gear; that 1976 bike would be an all-world fast road bike today, just not allowed to race. (I say this and I will not be a convert until I lose my balance because I love "the dance"; the out of the saddle climb. I live for it. Maybe the fourth era will be a design that dances. I can hope.)
Ben
Magnesium -more tweaks to push this era a little longer. (The first two eras lasted about 15 years each, This one has gone on 140 years. Will any of us live to see the next?)
I took a spin on professor David Wilson's recumbent 44 years ago. Short wheelbase, under the knees steering, semi-reclined position, Easy to ride, completely natural first time and obviously fast. I rode with the professor a few times as he commuted home and I headed out on training rides. Yes, I always caught him from behind, chatted and left him but he was a middle aged professor and I was a mid 20s bike racer. He was one of the few non-racers fast enough for me to condescend to slow to. And that bike had commuter clincher wheels and nothing special parts. But sew-ups and racing equipment and that recumbent would have been a rocket. I knew that with my spin around the parking lot.
Now with this magnesium for the frame of that recumbent, plus race worthy gear; that 1976 bike would be an all-world fast road bike today, just not allowed to race. (I say this and I will not be a convert until I lose my balance because I love "the dance"; the out of the saddle climb. I live for it. Maybe the fourth era will be a design that dances. I can hope.)
Ben
Likes For 79pmooney:
#9
Senior Member
Good engineering dictates the best material for each part not the same material for each part.
Likes For Mulberry20:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times
in
446 Posts
Possibly because the bike burst into flames and incinerated them.....
Likes For Litespud:
#12
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,102 Times
in
1,366 Posts
I thought magnesium was usually for castings. It’s used for the lowers of suspension forks, for example.
The bike will not burst into flames but the people who make it are perhaps in more danger than usual.
The bike will not burst into flames but the people who make it are perhaps in more danger than usual.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
Likes For Darth Lefty:
#13
jj
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 331
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 110 Times
in
78 Posts
Another red frame with black wheels and squeak brakes. I have one. It’s pretty. It squeaks when there’s rain. They can be made out of anything, including maple or mahogany.
I’m curious what the alloy actually is, but Allite (understandably so) is tight lipped about it. It might just be 88% Al, 4% Zn, 3% Cu, and 4.9% Mg... just a high Mg content version of 7075. It might be >60% Mg.
Allite’s site paints a portrait (to my eyes) of wishful thinking of it being applicable for anything more than the teensiest marginal gains outside of military/aerospace. [edit] It possibly would be great for cellphone and tablet chassis & back covers.
I’m only academically curious, though. With regard to bikes, I’m pretty happy with my old steel frames. Reynolds got it right decades ago AFAIC. Going any further is like trying to invent a better Oreo.
I’m curious what the alloy actually is, but Allite (understandably so) is tight lipped about it. It might just be 88% Al, 4% Zn, 3% Cu, and 4.9% Mg... just a high Mg content version of 7075. It might be >60% Mg.
Allite’s site paints a portrait (to my eyes) of wishful thinking of it being applicable for anything more than the teensiest marginal gains outside of military/aerospace. [edit] It possibly would be great for cellphone and tablet chassis & back covers.
I’m only academically curious, though. With regard to bikes, I’m pretty happy with my old steel frames. Reynolds got it right decades ago AFAIC. Going any further is like trying to invent a better Oreo.
Last edited by hsuBM; 11-17-20 at 05:13 AM.
#14
Senior Member
I think I need one. Not because it is the greatest thing ever, but because in my quest to have a bike from every material. Hit the cycle, so to speak.
Likes For bblair:
#15
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,474 Times
in
4,181 Posts
Likes For mstateglfr:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,893
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1062 Post(s)
Liked 665 Times
in
421 Posts
Funny,I read the 1984 interview with Tom Kellog, Gary Klein and Jim Redcay last night. Klein said then that bicycles were in the third "era". First era - push bikes. Second era- pedals and the high wheelers. Third era- safety bikes - diamond frames and chain/shaft driven drive trains. That he had developed a new tubing for the closing chapter of the third era. That further evolution in metals, composites and ceramics were just more of the end of that era.
Magnesium -more tweaks to push this era a little longer. (The first two eras lasted about 15 years each, This one has gone on 140 years. Will any of us live to see the next?)
I took a spin on professor David Wilson's recumbent 44 years ago. Short wheelbase, under the knees steering, semi-reclined position, Easy to ride, completely natural first time and obviously fast. I rode with the professor a few times as he commuted home and I headed out on training rides. Yes, I always caught him from behind, chatted and left him but he was a middle aged professor and I was a mid 20s bike racer. He was one of the few non-racers fast enough for me to condescend to slow to. And that bike had commuter clincher wheels and nothing special parts. But sew-ups and racing equipment and that recumbent would have been a rocket. I knew that with my spin around the parking lot.
Now with this magnesium for the frame of that recumbent, plus race worthy gear; that 1976 bike would be an all-world fast road bike today, just not allowed to race. (I say this and I will not be a convert until I lose my balance because I love "the dance"; the out of the saddle climb. I live for it. Maybe the fourth era will be a design that dances. I can hope.)
Ben
Magnesium -more tweaks to push this era a little longer. (The first two eras lasted about 15 years each, This one has gone on 140 years. Will any of us live to see the next?)
I took a spin on professor David Wilson's recumbent 44 years ago. Short wheelbase, under the knees steering, semi-reclined position, Easy to ride, completely natural first time and obviously fast. I rode with the professor a few times as he commuted home and I headed out on training rides. Yes, I always caught him from behind, chatted and left him but he was a middle aged professor and I was a mid 20s bike racer. He was one of the few non-racers fast enough for me to condescend to slow to. And that bike had commuter clincher wheels and nothing special parts. But sew-ups and racing equipment and that recumbent would have been a rocket. I knew that with my spin around the parking lot.
Now with this magnesium for the frame of that recumbent, plus race worthy gear; that 1976 bike would be an all-world fast road bike today, just not allowed to race. (I say this and I will not be a convert until I lose my balance because I love "the dance"; the out of the saddle climb. I live for it. Maybe the fourth era will be a design that dances. I can hope.)
Ben
#17
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
There are one piece cast Mg frames. They look very logical. Just one big squirt, and there you are a bike frame, and almost no manual labor what so ever.
#18
bill nyecycles
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 3,328
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 789 Post(s)
Liked 350 Times
in
190 Posts
Hey everyone - someone in the Cyclocross/Gravel forum pointed me over here because they saw this thread.
So, I'm one of those brand ambassadors jadocs mentioned above. I've been riding my A/1 for about 4 months. It's my first gravel bike and so far I am loving it.
I also read the review yesterday that mstateglfr posted and thought it was real good critical review - I agreed with a lot of it.
My thoughts on the bike so far:
1) the frame itself is real nice. It's lightweight and ride quality so far has been excellent IMO. My size small with pedals and everything weighed in around 19 lbs.
2) me, nor the bike have spontaneously combusted yet
3) I have no experienced the paint/chainslap issue on the dropped stay as of yet (that was pointed out in that article)
4) agree with the article about the internal cable routing system - the rubber stoppers are not the best. hopefully this is rectified in future iterations.
5) I don't have the issue with the cables rubbing on the front of the headtube because of how I arranged the cables when I moved/swapped the hoods/bars, etc. I'll try to get a pic of that specifically later
6) the dropped chainstay initially caught me off guard as well but honestly i don't even see it anymore. I also think it looks better than say, the way Allied Bikes did it with their version: https://alliedcycleworks.com/collections/able
7) this particular model is geared toward being an everything bike. the A/1 comes in 700c and 650b versions and it's designed to be a gravel bike or a trail bike or a touring bike or urban assault machine. Are there other bikes like that out there? sure.
8) vaast is concentrating on limiting their product line to a few specific types of bikes that can encompass as many types of riding as possible.
9) the article talked a lot about fit, and as a small person i had to do some extra work to get a better fit out of the box. I swapped the stock bars and stem for a 20mm shorter stem and bars with much less reach and flare. I will say the GRX hoods are a mile long to begin with so i definitely needed to shorten the reach.
10) On my size small i have minimal tow overlap issues. on my single track expedition this past weekend i only rubbed my shoes twice and it didn't cause me to falter
11) the company is heavily into sustainability. the frames are recyclable. the bike box is 100% recyclable with no plastic. the processes to remove and process the materials from the earth are safer and less harmful to the environment.
12) the super mag frame is lighter and stronger than steel, titanium, and aluminum, and a much much higher shock absorption rate than aluminum.
Anyway, i'm happy to talk about the bike with anyone that has questions!
In the meantime, here's some pics from my rides
Here's a clearer look at the bars/stem changes I made. I put on an 70mm Ritchey WCS C220 73d stem, and Whiskey No.7 6F bars. The bottle cages are Tacx Devas.
So, I'm one of those brand ambassadors jadocs mentioned above. I've been riding my A/1 for about 4 months. It's my first gravel bike and so far I am loving it.
I also read the review yesterday that mstateglfr posted and thought it was real good critical review - I agreed with a lot of it.
My thoughts on the bike so far:
1) the frame itself is real nice. It's lightweight and ride quality so far has been excellent IMO. My size small with pedals and everything weighed in around 19 lbs.
2) me, nor the bike have spontaneously combusted yet
3) I have no experienced the paint/chainslap issue on the dropped stay as of yet (that was pointed out in that article)
4) agree with the article about the internal cable routing system - the rubber stoppers are not the best. hopefully this is rectified in future iterations.
5) I don't have the issue with the cables rubbing on the front of the headtube because of how I arranged the cables when I moved/swapped the hoods/bars, etc. I'll try to get a pic of that specifically later
6) the dropped chainstay initially caught me off guard as well but honestly i don't even see it anymore. I also think it looks better than say, the way Allied Bikes did it with their version: https://alliedcycleworks.com/collections/able
7) this particular model is geared toward being an everything bike. the A/1 comes in 700c and 650b versions and it's designed to be a gravel bike or a trail bike or a touring bike or urban assault machine. Are there other bikes like that out there? sure.
8) vaast is concentrating on limiting their product line to a few specific types of bikes that can encompass as many types of riding as possible.
9) the article talked a lot about fit, and as a small person i had to do some extra work to get a better fit out of the box. I swapped the stock bars and stem for a 20mm shorter stem and bars with much less reach and flare. I will say the GRX hoods are a mile long to begin with so i definitely needed to shorten the reach.
10) On my size small i have minimal tow overlap issues. on my single track expedition this past weekend i only rubbed my shoes twice and it didn't cause me to falter
11) the company is heavily into sustainability. the frames are recyclable. the bike box is 100% recyclable with no plastic. the processes to remove and process the materials from the earth are safer and less harmful to the environment.
12) the super mag frame is lighter and stronger than steel, titanium, and aluminum, and a much much higher shock absorption rate than aluminum.
Anyway, i'm happy to talk about the bike with anyone that has questions!
In the meantime, here's some pics from my rides
Here's a clearer look at the bars/stem changes I made. I put on an 70mm Ritchey WCS C220 73d stem, and Whiskey No.7 6F bars. The bottle cages are Tacx Devas.
Likes For the sci guy:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,892
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4792 Post(s)
Liked 3,918 Times
in
2,548 Posts
OK, the recumbent is faster,but not radically so. (Well, the really laid back ones are much faster downhill.) They have improved safety but suffer from poorer perception of safety. I think also the recumbent has suffered from poor presentation, David Wilson's was excellent but few got to ride it. Suppose it had a driven Gary Klein buildiing and marketing it. Presenting it as a finished, polished product. Putting bike racers on it. (Gary Klein took his early bikes to NEBC club races and encouraged us all to take a spin on them. Had professor Wilson equipped his recumbent with sewups and had one of us race it, well maybe the cycling world would be different now.)
Also we don't adopt big changes simply because they are better. Witness the metric system. Yes, we (the US) use metric a little because we have to to compete in the world. But our choice for everyday use is more archaic than the safety bicycle.
Likes For 79pmooney:
#20
Senior Member
Funny,I read the 1984 interview with Tom Kellog, Gary Klein and Jim Redcay last night. Klein said then that bicycles were in the third "era". First era - push bikes. Second era- pedals and the high wheelers. Third era- safety bikes - diamond frames and chain/shaft driven drive trains. That he had developed a new tubing for the closing chapter of the third era. That further evolution in metals, composites and ceramics were just more of the end of that era.
Magnesium -more tweaks to push this era a little longer. (The first two eras lasted about 15 years each, This one has gone on 140 years. Will any of us live to see the next?)
Ben
Magnesium -more tweaks to push this era a little longer. (The first two eras lasted about 15 years each, This one has gone on 140 years. Will any of us live to see the next?)
Ben
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,938
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3943 Post(s)
Liked 7,286 Times
in
2,942 Posts
#23
Senior Member
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,938
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3943 Post(s)
Liked 7,286 Times
in
2,942 Posts
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,892
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4792 Post(s)
Liked 3,918 Times
in
2,548 Posts
There are excellent wood and bamboo bikes out there. The owner of Portland's River City Bicycles has a a bamboo one he commuted on for years, parking it on the showroom floor. Portland also has the framebuilder, Renova that builds laminated wood bikes that are light, stiff and gorgeous.
Both of those bikes are real bicycles that can be ridden as hard as any other and perform not far off the best out there. (And for show, no CF frame comes remotely close to the Renova.)
That said, my bikes are boring. 3 painted steel bikes and two ti, one bare, one 3/4s painted, both with painted steel forks. (Someone mentioned above titanium with CF forks. Not me.)
Both of those bikes are real bicycles that can be ridden as hard as any other and perform not far off the best out there. (And for show, no CF frame comes remotely close to the Renova.)
That said, my bikes are boring. 3 painted steel bikes and two ti, one bare, one 3/4s painted, both with painted steel forks. (Someone mentioned above titanium with CF forks. Not me.)
Likes For 79pmooney: