Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Best smart trainer to get started with Zwift

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Best smart trainer to get started with Zwift

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-17, 10:57 PM
  #1  
rmd5533
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Best smart trainer to get started with Zwift

Hi everyone,

I am planning on getting a smart trainer to use with Zwift and improve my fitness over the winter. I would like to keep the price to around $400, but am willing to spend $500 if it is worth it. What is the most highly recommended smart trainer in this price range?

So far, I am currently looking at two different options: the Kinetic Rock and Roll Smart and the Tacx Vortex. I am drawn to the Kinetic due to the side to side motion it allows, but the Tacx also seems highly rated.

I currently ride a Cannondale Supersix Evo Hi Mod and weigh 165lbs. Also, are there any other equipment/accessories I will need in order to use Zwift? I have a smart phone and basic laptop. I plan on getting a floor mat and front tire riser. Would I need a USB Bluetooth adapter to run Zwift off of my laptop?

Thanks for the help!
rmd5533 is offline  
Old 11-28-17, 11:29 PM
  #2  
atwl77
Kamen Rider
 
atwl77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: KL, MY
Posts: 1,071

Bikes: Fuji Transonic Elite, Marechal Soul Ultimate, Dahon Dash Altena

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 351 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times in 164 Posts
Not familiar with the two trainers you mention, but I think the side-to-side motion is a pretty good feature to have.

And generally yes, you would need a USB ANT+ antenna to connect to your trainer's sensors, unless your trainer (and any additional sensors you want to use, e.g. cadence and heart rate) also supports Bluetooth -- though general advise would still be get a USB dongle (either with a built-in cable, or get an extension cable) so that you can place the antenna close to the trainer.
atwl77 is offline  
Old 11-29-17, 05:02 AM
  #3  
PaddleFoot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 222
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hello,

Any money you spend on a smart-trainer/Zwift setup is well worth it, so only cry once if you can (buy good stuff). It will easily have you in the best shape of your life when others are just getting re-started for the Spring.

Display it on a HDTV if you can. As atwl77 said, you need a dongle. I wasted 36 hours trying every single thing in the world to get BT running. I bought an ANt+ dongle and I was riding in seconds.

You'll need a mat and water-resistant area, fans, 2-3x the towels you think you'll need, 2-3x as much laundry will need to be done for towels and riding clothes. Buy sweat bands to help control the sweat too.

I have learned so much about perfecting bike fit and my form while riding is now automatic. Two weeks of Zwift gave me 2+ mph averages outdoors and I was not even trying. I looked down and my speeds were that much faster.

It is a very good thing.

oops, Sorry I can't help with trainer choice. I went with a kickR myself.

Last edited by PaddleFoot; 11-29-17 at 05:07 AM.
PaddleFoot is offline  
Old 11-29-17, 05:53 AM
  #4  
jwalther
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Lexington KY
Posts: 385

Bikes: Litespeed T3, Felt Breed 30, Co-Motion Supremo Tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Liked 62 Times in 29 Posts
https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2017/10/...endations.html
jwalther is offline  
Old 11-29-17, 06:04 AM
  #5  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,049

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22596 Post(s)
Liked 8,925 Times in 4,158 Posts
Agree with DCRainmaker. I was in same position and got Wahoo KICKR Snap. Connects via Bluetooth to my laptop so no additional connections needed. It even comes with a front riser.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Old 11-29-17, 07:33 AM
  #6  
Larry77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Western PDX
Posts: 210

Bikes: Cannondale Synapse, Focus Izalco, Focus Mares CX, BMC GF02, Giant VT3 MTB (upgraded), Felt Brougham SS

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Make sure you get a "smart" trainer, Zwift is not nearly as fun without one. The Wahoo Kickr Snap is a really popular cheaper trainer. It should be in the DC reviews...
Larry77 is offline  
Old 11-29-17, 09:00 AM
  #7  
motosonic
Senior Member
 
motosonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 630
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 275 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
I recently picked up a CycleOps Magnus. I was previously just using a standard fluid trainer (no Zwift) what a huge difference and the trainer worked flawlessly with Zwift, which was nice.
motosonic is offline  
Old 11-29-17, 10:05 AM
  #8  
redfooj
pluralis majestatis
 
redfooj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: you rope
Posts: 4,206

Bikes: a DuhRosa

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 537 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
no problems with my tacx vortex but if i was buying again, since the prices are quite low now, i would go with a direct drive machine
redfooj is offline  
Old 11-29-17, 10:22 AM
  #9  
mvnsnd
Senior Member
 
mvnsnd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: WNY
Posts: 3,100

Bikes: Factor O2, Caad10, Caad2

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 365 Post(s)
Liked 122 Times in 78 Posts
Originally Posted by datlas
Agree with DCRainmaker. I was in same position and got Wahoo KICKR Snap. Connects via Bluetooth to my laptop so no additional connections needed. It even comes with a front riser.
Which laptop and which program? Zwift normally doesn't work with laptop bluetooth connections, so you need the phone to make the bluetooth connection to the trainer work.

To the original poster, you may need/want the USB ANT+ dongle, of which an inexpensive version is here: ANT+ USB
mvnsnd is offline  
Old 11-29-17, 11:34 AM
  #10  
99Klein 
Senior Member
 
99Klein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Lincoln Nebraska
Posts: 1,088

Bikes: 99 Klein Quantum, 2012 Cannondale CAAD10 5, Specialized Tarmac Comp, Foundry Thresher, Fuji Sportif

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by PaddleFoot
Hello,

Any money you spend on a smart-trainer/Zwift setup is well worth it, so only cry once if you can (buy good stuff). It will easily have you in the best shape of your life when others are just getting re-started for the Spring.
Truer words have never been typed. I too went with the Kickr and I'm a cheap ass. Got me back on the trainer after more than 15 winters off. I HATE trainers.....well I use to ;-)
99Klein is offline  
Old 11-29-17, 11:44 AM
  #11  
British
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm curious about this as well. I already own a Kinetic Rock and Roll which I bought before I even heard of Zwift...

But now I want to set this up, and my primary concern is that this particular trainer won't automatically adjust difficulty in Zwift based on hills, i.e. you would need to upshift to simulate the incline (the exact opposite of what you'd do when you encounter a hill in real life). I'm worried this will really ruin the immersion. Is this correct? Did I buy the wrong trainer?
British is offline  
Old 11-29-17, 12:32 PM
  #12  
tomazo
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by British
I'm curious about this as well. I already own a Kinetic Rock and Roll which I bought before I even heard of Zwift...

But now I want to set this up, and my primary concern is that this particular trainer won't automatically adjust difficulty in Zwift based on hills, i.e. you would need to upshift to simulate the incline (the exact opposite of what you'd do when you encounter a hill in real life). I'm worried this will really ruin the immersion. Is this correct? Did I buy the wrong trainer?
Yep, resistance controlled by zwift is more than half of the whole experience with zwift. From what i know there are two version of kinetic rock and roll, check if yours can be controlled by zwift
https://support.zwift.com/hc/en-us/a...Smart_Trainers
tomazo is offline  
Old 11-29-17, 01:29 PM
  #13  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,049

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22596 Post(s)
Liked 8,925 Times in 4,158 Posts
Originally Posted by mvnsnd
Which laptop and which program? Zwift normally doesn't work with laptop bluetooth connections, so you need the phone to make the bluetooth connection to the trainer work.

To the original poster, you may need/want the USB ANT+ dongle, of which an inexpensive version is here: ANT+ USB
I am using a 2 year old MacBook Pro and running Zwift, the trainer pairs with the computer no problem using bluetooth. Phone is NOT necessary, although the "mobile link app" is useful as a remote control.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Old 11-29-17, 01:48 PM
  #14  
formula bike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 56
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by British
I'm curious about this as well. I already own a Kinetic Rock and Roll which I bought before I even heard of Zwift...

But now I want to set this up, and my primary concern is that this particular trainer won't automatically adjust difficulty in Zwift based on hills, i.e. you would need to upshift to simulate the incline (the exact opposite of what you'd do when you encounter a hill in real life). I'm worried this will really ruin the immersion. Is this correct? Did I buy the wrong trainer?
It isn't necessarily cheap, but if you have a non-smart version of a kinetic trainer, you can buy the item below to upgrade your old trainer. Though I haven't seen this done personally.

https://www.kurtkinetic.com/trainers...rol-power-unit

Perhaps off topic, why is there so much focus on zwift? I have been looking into a getting a trainer, but trainerroad seems much more appealing to me...
formula bike is offline  
Old 11-29-17, 02:02 PM
  #15  
ksryder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2,537

Bikes: yes

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1281 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 329 Posts
Originally Posted by formula bike
It isn't necessarily cheap, but if you have a non-smart version of a kinetic trainer, you can buy the item below to upgrade your old trainer. Though I haven't seen this done personally.

https://www.kurtkinetic.com/trainers...rol-power-unit

Perhaps off topic, why is there so much focus on zwift? I have been looking into a getting a trainer, but trainerroad seems much more appealing to me...
Horses for courses. Zwift is fun because it's interactive and, with a smart trainer, a person could almost feel like it was a real ride with terrain and elevation and everything.

Personally I prefer Trainerroad, because I have a dumb trainer and I got a lot more benefit last winter from using the structured workouts on Trainerroad than I did with Zwift. But -- a smart trainer would be useful with Trainerroad, too.
ksryder is offline  
Old 11-29-17, 05:02 PM
  #16  
firebird854
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 581

Bikes: 2016 Specialized Tarmac Expert

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 258 Post(s)
Liked 114 Times in 62 Posts
I personally bought a Magnus 2 months ago and have been using the heck out of it. One piece of advice that no one ever told me, and I only found out after melting a tire, CALIBRATE BEFORE EVERY RIDE. None of the documentation says this, Zwift doesn't say this, but it is imperative in order to have accurate readings and a fun time. Also, I prefer trainerroad over zwift, but that's just me, especially since zwift just raised their price from $10 a month to $15 dollars a month.
firebird854 is offline  
Old 11-30-17, 06:06 AM
  #17  
mvnsnd
Senior Member
 
mvnsnd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: WNY
Posts: 3,100

Bikes: Factor O2, Caad10, Caad2

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 365 Post(s)
Liked 122 Times in 78 Posts
Originally Posted by datlas
I am using a 2 year old MacBook Pro and running Zwift, the trainer pairs with the computer no problem using bluetooth. Phone is NOT necessary, although the "mobile link app" is useful as a remote control.
It must be an IOS thing then, because it is stated that one must use a phone with Bluetooth when using Zwift with Windows.
mvnsnd is offline  
Old 11-30-17, 07:48 AM
  #18  
Larry77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Western PDX
Posts: 210

Bikes: Cannondale Synapse, Focus Izalco, Focus Mares CX, BMC GF02, Giant VT3 MTB (upgraded), Felt Brougham SS

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by firebird854
CALIBRATE BEFORE EVERY RIDE. None of the documentation says this, Zwift doesn't say this, but it is imperative in order to have accurate readings and a fun time.
I'm curious about this, I use The Hammer and used to calibrate almost every ride but I didn't notice any difference so I stopped. What do you notice as an improvement by calibrating so often?
Larry77 is offline  
Old 11-30-17, 02:05 PM
  #19  
pesty
Master Sarcaster
 
pesty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 527

Bikes: 2018 Allez Sprint, 2016 Trek Crockett Canti

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 190 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Cheap rollers (or trainer if you go that way) and a Power Meter.
Yes... Zwift won't control the resistance this way, but you can use the power meter when you get back on the road in the summer. This is what I do.
pesty is offline  
Old 11-30-17, 02:15 PM
  #20  
datlas 
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,049

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22596 Post(s)
Liked 8,925 Times in 4,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Larry77
I'm curious about this, I use The Hammer and used to calibrate almost every ride but I didn't notice any difference so I stopped. What do you notice as an improvement by calibrating so often?
If you have a direct drive (like your Hammer) it's probably not necessary.

If you have a wheel-on trainer (like my KICKR Snap and most budget trainers), it's a good idea.
__________________
Originally Posted by rjones28
Addiction is all about class.
datlas is offline  
Old 12-01-17, 07:30 AM
  #21  
City Guy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: SF Bay Area, California USA
Posts: 97
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 13 Posts
Greetings,

About 4 months ago I purchased direct from Wahoo, a factory reconditioned Wahoo Kickr SNAP, wheel on trainer. You may want to check the Wahoo website for a reconditioned model, the one I purchased was significantly less than a new trainer, and I recall there was also a sale going on when I purchased mine. So far it has worked flawlessly.

On the recommendation of a friend, I did purchase another rear wheel, cassette and trainer tire to use on the bike when on the trainer.
City Guy is offline  
Old 12-01-17, 05:14 PM
  #22  
firebird854
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 581

Bikes: 2016 Specialized Tarmac Expert

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 258 Post(s)
Liked 114 Times in 62 Posts
Originally Posted by Larry77
I'm curious about this, I use The Hammer and used to calibrate almost every ride but I didn't notice any difference so I stopped. What do you notice as an improvement by calibrating so often?
I use the Cyclops Magnus which is an on-wheel trainer, it makes quite a difference, I hear it is much less so with direct drive trainers like the hammer.
firebird854 is offline  
Old 12-02-17, 11:05 PM
  #23  
turkey9186
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA SF Bay Area
Posts: 476

Bikes: 2014 CDale EVO, 2007 System Six, 2004 Litespeed Solano, 2002 Burley Duet

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 92 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
After reading all the reviews, I will hopefully have a Kickr on Wednesday. Wahoo had a 10% off cyber Monday sale.
I came close to buyingn a Kinetic trainer until I did some research. Cycleops and Wahoo both use ANT+ or BLE. Kinetic uses a proprietary BLE signal that is not supported by all the programs out there.
Every review said the Kickr had a better "road" feel than the Magnus due to the larger and heavier flywheel.
I am using an older rim and tire on my current fluid trainer. If you use your current wheel, you will definitely want to get a steel rear skewer to use on the trainer.
turkey9186 is offline  
Old 12-04-17, 05:08 PM
  #24  
99Klein 
Senior Member
 
99Klein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Lincoln Nebraska
Posts: 1,088

Bikes: 99 Klein Quantum, 2012 Cannondale CAAD10 5, Specialized Tarmac Comp, Foundry Thresher, Fuji Sportif

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by turkey9186
After reading all the reviews, I will hopefully have a Kickr on Wednesday. Wahoo had a 10% off cyber Monday sale.
I came close to buyingn a Kinetic trainer until I did some research. Cycleops and Wahoo both use ANT+ or BLE. Kinetic uses a proprietary BLE signal that is not supported by all the programs out there.
Every review said the Kickr had a better "road" feel than the Magnus due to the larger and heavier flywheel.
I am using an older rim and tire on my current fluid trainer. If you use your current wheel, you will definitely want to get a steel rear skewer to use on the trainer.

Congratulations. You'll love it.

Now be sure and study all the tips and tricks. The biggest being to use the big gear and a smaller sprocket in ERG mode....helps avoid the death spiral :-)

Enjoy!
99Klein is offline  
Old 12-04-17, 06:39 PM
  #25  
Abe_Froman
Senior Member
 
Abe_Froman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,524

Bikes: Marin Four Corners, 1960's Schwinn Racer in middle of restoration, mid 70s Motobecane Grand Touring, various other heaps.

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9347 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by pesty
Cheap rollers (or trainer if you go that way) and a Power Meter.
Yes... Zwift won't control the resistance this way, but you can use the power meter when you get back on the road in the summer. This is what I do.
Hrmm interesting...you can use zwift with just a power meter? I have a cheap/dumb wheel on trainer, and have been thinking about getting a powet meter.

Would I need anything else?
Abe_Froman is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.