What is/was the best Raleigh road bike of the 1970s?
#26
Newbie
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,158
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3810 Post(s)
Liked 6,699 Times
in
2,611 Posts
I’ve owned and ridden the following 1970s Raleigh road bikes (for some models, multiple examples):
Professional
Professional track
RRA
International
Gran(d) Sport(s)
Competition
Competition GS
Super Course
I was majorly disappointed in the ride qualities of the Professional and RRA. The one that remains in the stable is a ‘71 Int’l converted to 650b x 42mm tires. A Super Course is probably the best bet as a city bike with upright bars, but having done that setup, some had geometry better suited for that weight distribution than others.
Professional
Professional track
RRA
International
Gran(d) Sport(s)
Competition
Competition GS
Super Course
I was majorly disappointed in the ride qualities of the Professional and RRA. The one that remains in the stable is a ‘71 Int’l converted to 650b x 42mm tires. A Super Course is probably the best bet as a city bike with upright bars, but having done that setup, some had geometry better suited for that weight distribution than others.
Likes For nlerner:
#28
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
There's no such thing as Super Record hubs.
That said, in order:
I'm still at a loss as to the need to get the best Raleigh as your first though, especially coming from Schwinn electroforged boat anchors.
That said, in order:
- Does it fit?
- Does it ride well?
- Does the frame have any questionable areas around the lugwork (including crash damage)?
- Is the frame straight? (eyeball it from the back)
- Is it repainted?
- If so, is the repaint hiding anything?
- Is it everything you thought it would be when you rode it?
- Did you have even the slightest reservation about any one thing upon seeing it?
I'm still at a loss as to the need to get the best Raleigh as your first though, especially coming from Schwinn electroforged boat anchors.
- A nice Pro makes for a terrible commuter. Any nice hard-to-replace bike falls into this category.
- If you're just after The Best, Raleigh isn't where to find it. There are '70s custom frames from small builders out there which could be had at a similar price with outstanding lugwork. Raleigh and build quality are mutually exclusive terms, unless you're talking about custom-built SBDU Professionals.
- Part of the desire of owning a Raleigh Pro is because they look cool. But to feel this way, you'd have to have seen one before to buy into the cool factor. Seems like you've paged through catalogs but it never caught your attention until we mentioned it. I'm worried that we're putting ideas in your head.
- The Mk.II-Mk.IV and Mk.V are very different bikes with very different rides, so "I want a Raleigh Professional" means jack. That statement has many different meanings.
- If you're putting together a museum...I get it.
- nlerner here has pretty much proven that you can live life to the fullest with a restomodded Raleigh Super Course.
- I have three Raleigh Pros. I've ridden two of them, one is still being built, and I'm still more likely to grab my 1951 Raleigh Sports for fun, or my '61 Schwinn Paramount to go fast (and don't get me started on how overrated Paramounts are too, even though I'm guilty of promoting them too).
Likes For jda775838:
#30
Senior Member
Raleigh Team Professional. Best Raleigh of the '70s and '80s.
#31
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
There's not necessarily a NEED for the best Raleigh model out there, as much as a desire not to get something known to be inferior to one of the better ones only to have more problems with it. Am looking for my first vintage Raleigh & want it to be a really good one, to last a very long time. With that said, I'm preferring one of the better models. I've read around online & the Professional, along with others mentioned, are known to be better. And no, no one's putting anything in my head, it's what I've surmised from the reading I've done, questions I've asked, etc. Just want the best for the money I spend.
- Professional: Nuovo RD will always shift sloppily with the Regina freewheel. Modern narrow chains may skate on the inner chainring during downshifts.
- International: Particularly easy to find them with really sloppy lugwork. Same Nuovo RD issue.
- Grand Sport: Crappy, plastic Simplex drivetrain parts. Stronglight crank will need a special puller if you want to service the bottom bracket.
- Competition: Huret Jubilee front and rear derailers look beautiful and shift like crap on narrow spaced freewheels. Prone to sloppy lugwork similar to the International prior to the later G.S. edition (Japanese-built GSes are vastly better).
- Super Course: The bike of a million lugs, tubesets, geometries, and just generally whatever was in the parts bin. Again, crappy Simplex drivetrain parts and a cottered steel crank.
And sometimes, what works for one may not work for another. Take Neal's negative experiences with the Professional and Raleigh Record Ace. I don't know if he he had a Mk.IV Pro or a Mk.V Pro, but I think my Mk.V happens to be one of the best machines I've ever ridden - and there's always the possibility that two bikes of the same series might ride differently due to some oddity during a particular frame's construction.
The mere fact that you're looking for "quality" out of a 1970's Raleigh is already barking up the wrong tree. These are mass-produced, mixed-bag bikes, and their longevity is due to a combination of price when new, popularity, availability on the used market, and the fact that basic upgrades (e.g., derailers, crankset) could turn a mid-range Super Course into a competent and reliable machine for many years of riding.
-Kurt
#32
Senior Member
Think too about where you ride, and how you ride. Are the roads rough? Think wider tires. Will you ride only on pavement, or on rail trails etc? Need fenders?
The Pro was a race bike and wouldn’t be the best choice for mixed use riding. A SC, GS or Int’l would be a great choice and give you lots of flexibility.
The Pro was a race bike and wouldn’t be the best choice for mixed use riding. A SC, GS or Int’l would be a great choice and give you lots of flexibility.
#33
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
And you see, this is where the whole subjectivity of what's "best" comes into play. I know the SBDU's were "the best" in terms of construction and the tier of the parts used on them, but that only applies if one's concept of "the best" aligns with the idea of racing.
Case in point, I'm the type of guy who has thrown North Roads on a Professional Mk.IV. I value city bicycles, fenders, internally geared hubs, and my love of drop bars has waned every year I get older (I hear anyone over 40 on this forum laughing their butt off right now). But I still value light 531 framesets. As far as Raleighs go, this more or less puts the Super Tourer into my "best" status, unless someone pops up with some freak of an SBDU bike with fender clearance and eyelets (SIGN ME UP!)
Likewise, I wouldn't use a fairly rare Super Tourer for commuting, and the Bluemels fender stays would piss me off in regular use, as far as toe overlap goes. Since I also don't like it when a derailer hanger is sitting unused on a bike, the "best" Raleigh for me for commuting would be a Super Course with stamped rear drops fitted with an IGH, light wheels, fenders with stays on the inside edge, and North Roads.
To add one more layer of complication: If I had to choose a wall-hanger for the "best" Raleigh, it would be an all-original SBDU Professional.
"Best" is all about what you're going to do with it.
-Kurt
Case in point, I'm the type of guy who has thrown North Roads on a Professional Mk.IV. I value city bicycles, fenders, internally geared hubs, and my love of drop bars has waned every year I get older (I hear anyone over 40 on this forum laughing their butt off right now). But I still value light 531 framesets. As far as Raleighs go, this more or less puts the Super Tourer into my "best" status, unless someone pops up with some freak of an SBDU bike with fender clearance and eyelets (SIGN ME UP!)
Likewise, I wouldn't use a fairly rare Super Tourer for commuting, and the Bluemels fender stays would piss me off in regular use, as far as toe overlap goes. Since I also don't like it when a derailer hanger is sitting unused on a bike, the "best" Raleigh for me for commuting would be a Super Course with stamped rear drops fitted with an IGH, light wheels, fenders with stays on the inside edge, and North Roads.
To add one more layer of complication: If I had to choose a wall-hanger for the "best" Raleigh, it would be an all-original SBDU Professional.
"Best" is all about what you're going to do with it.
-Kurt
Last edited by cudak888; 06-30-20 at 08:26 PM.
Likes For cudak888:
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,749
Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 702 Post(s)
Liked 672 Times
in
420 Posts
The mere fact that you're looking for "quality" out of a 1970's Raleigh is already barking up the wrong tree. These are mass-produced, mixed-bag bikes, and their longevity is due to a combination of price when new, popularity, availability on the used market, and the fact that basic upgrades (e.g., derailers, crankset) could turn a mid-range Super Course into a competent and reliable machine for many years of riding.
-Kurt
I've restored a dozen or so Raleigh bikes from the 1970's and the weak link in every one of them has been the frame. All were out of alignment, sloppy brazing, left and right stays of differing lengths, head-tube faces not parallel. There may have been other flaws that an experienced frame-builder would notice. I restore them because they look cool, are easy to find and I enjoy a challenge.
Likes For branko_76:
#35
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
-Kurt
Likes For cudak888:
#36
Senior Member
I’ve owned and ridden the following 1970s Raleigh road bikes (for some models, multiple examples):
Professional
Professional track
RRA
International
Gran(d) Sport(s)
Competition
Competition GS
Super Course
I was majorly disappointed in the ride qualities of the Professional and RRA. The one that remains in the stable is a ‘71 Int’l converted to 650b x 42mm tires. A Super Course is probably the best bet as a city bike with upright bars, but having done that setup, some had geometry better suited for that weight distribution than others.
Professional
Professional track
RRA
International
Gran(d) Sport(s)
Competition
Competition GS
Super Course
I was majorly disappointed in the ride qualities of the Professional and RRA. The one that remains in the stable is a ‘71 Int’l converted to 650b x 42mm tires. A Super Course is probably the best bet as a city bike with upright bars, but having done that setup, some had geometry better suited for that weight distribution than others.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,158
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3810 Post(s)
Liked 6,699 Times
in
2,611 Posts
Oh, yeah, Super Tourer. I’ve owned a couple of those, too, but they’re essentially Competitions with upright bars, which means really lousy geometry for that weight distribution. They call for drop bars and more weight on the front end, but then you might as well find a Competition, which are far more readily available.
Likes For nlerner:
#38
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
The above statement is right on.
I've restored a dozen or so Raleigh bikes from the 1970's and the weak link in every one of them has been the frame. All were out of alignment, sloppy brazing, left and right stays of differing lengths, head-tube faces not parallel. There may have been other flaws that an experienced frame-builder would notice. I restore them because they look cool, are easy to find and I enjoy a challenge.
I've restored a dozen or so Raleigh bikes from the 1970's and the weak link in every one of them has been the frame. All were out of alignment, sloppy brazing, left and right stays of differing lengths, head-tube faces not parallel. There may have been other flaws that an experienced frame-builder would notice. I restore them because they look cool, are easy to find and I enjoy a challenge.
This said, I can't say that I've been disappointed with the ride of any of them. If you're looking to drop $200 - $300 on a versatile, ready-to-ride 531 framed vintage bicycle that's in pretty good condition - it's worth it to consider what Raleigh made.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
Likes For USAZorro:
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,749
Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 702 Post(s)
Liked 672 Times
in
420 Posts
I think the best that any of us can do is provide our own anecdotes. Given what I've seen, it's more accurate to say that build quality is "uneven". The Team Professional and Professional MK I that I have (and have taken down to bare metal) are very well constructed. The lugs are nicely thinned, brazing and mitering are top notch (of course you'd expect that with these models). I also own two Competitions, two Internationals, a Grand Sports, an RRA and have had 3 Super Courses over the years. I may have been fortunate, but none of them had egregious issues with construction, but it is clear that they were not (with the possible exceptions of the RRA and one of the Internationals) built in the same painstaking manner. Yes, it does pay to take time inspecting the details when acquiring one (as one ideally would when purchasing any vintage bicycle).
This said, I can't say that I've been disappointed with the ride of any of them. If you're looking to drop $200 - $300 on a versatile, ready-to-ride 531 framed vintage bicycle that's in pretty good condition - it's worth it to consider what Raleigh made.
This said, I can't say that I've been disappointed with the ride of any of them. If you're looking to drop $200 - $300 on a versatile, ready-to-ride 531 framed vintage bicycle that's in pretty good condition - it's worth it to consider what Raleigh made.
Likes For branko_76:
#40
1/2 as far in 2x the time
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Northern Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 1,746
Bikes: Yes, Please.
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 499 Post(s)
Liked 285 Times
in
222 Posts
A red yellow and black one. That's what made them so lust-worthy at the time. So I was/am shallow. Then I was pretty fast, other things didn't matter much . Now, I am really slow, and those things matter even less.
Nothing wrong with knowledge, however.
I like the gen 1 RD.
Nothing wrong with knowledge, however.
I like the gen 1 RD.
__________________
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
I seem to have lost what little mind I had left before this all started.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,374
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2482 Post(s)
Liked 2,955 Times
in
1,678 Posts
I briefly owned a first-year Professional (the white Tokyo Olympics model, reportedly designed by Cino Cinelli for Raleigh) and an International in the early '70s. The Pro was beautifully built; the International had sloppy lugwork and pulled to the left badly.
#42
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
Likes For USAZorro:
#43
Junior Member
The 78 SGP's when stripped down and compared to the '77 SC frame of the same size would be indistinguishable other than color and decals if the SGP's didn't have fancier lug work.
All have 68mm bottom bracket shells, each has stamped dropouts, and the same geometry. If I were to remove the paint you couldn't tell them apart.
The SGP came had Q/R large flange Normandy hubs, the SC had low flange Q/R Atom hubs, Both have Raleigh Scripted cranks with steel chain rings, both have 14/28 Atom freewheels.
The SGP has Suntour V derailleurs, the SC has Cyclone derailleurs. The SGP's have a Raleigh scripted SR stems, the SC models have GB stems. Both have center pull brakes, the 78 SGP models have Raleigh scripted calipers, the '77 SC's have Weinmann labeled calipers. When compared weight wise, both 23.5" frames weight the same, and both 25.5" frames weigh the same.
I bought both 25.5" bikes brand new myself, I bought the 23.5" SGP as a new old stock bike off eBay about 18 years ago, the 23.5" SC belonged to a family friend who passed away in the 80's. Its been mine since then.
I've owned a few Internationals, ride wise I prefer the SGP and SC. I was never a fan of sew up tires or the geometry of the upper range bikes. My favorite model of all the 70's Raleighs is the 1974 Super Tourer.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,749
Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 702 Post(s)
Liked 672 Times
in
420 Posts
I've got two '78 SGP's here, and two '77 SC's here, a 23.5 and 25.5" version of each model.
The 78 SGP's when stripped down and compared to the '77 SC frame of the same size would be indistinguishable other than color and decals if the SGP's didn't have fancier lug work.
All have 68mm bottom bracket shells, each has stamped dropouts, and the same geometry. If I were to remove the paint you couldn't tell them apart.....
.....When compared weight wise, both 23.5" frames weight the same
The 78 SGP's when stripped down and compared to the '77 SC frame of the same size would be indistinguishable other than color and decals if the SGP's didn't have fancier lug work.
All have 68mm bottom bracket shells, each has stamped dropouts, and the same geometry. If I were to remove the paint you couldn't tell them apart.....
.....When compared weight wise, both 23.5" frames weight the same
I also have two 23-1/2" 1972 Super Course frames.Both have 68mm BB shells tapped for 24TPI and built with Reynolds 531 Plain Gauge tubing.
SGP frames weigh more than SC frames.
Last edited by branko_76; 07-01-20 at 10:20 AM.
Likes For branko_76:
#45
2 wheeled enthusiast
I've been very happy with my 74 Super Tourer 10 speed. I just acquired it last year, but it seems to be a steady and ready steed whenever I'm ready to climb aboard. In fact, just did 40 miles in the rain last weekend. Unfortunately with no fenders/mudguards, but hopefully that will soon be rectified as I have a pair of VO hammered fenders just waiting for me to put the ST on the stand.
#46
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
Oh, yeah, Super Tourer. I’ve owned a couple of those, too, but they’re essentially Competitions with upright bars, which means really lousy geometry for that weight distribution. They call for drop bars and more weight on the front end, but then you might as well find a Competition, which are far more readily available.
I'm super curious, given that I just put North Roads on a Pro Mk.IV.
-Kurt
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times
in
1,439 Posts
There's not necessarily a NEED for the best Raleigh model out there, as much as a desire not to get something known to be inferior to one of the better ones only to have more problems with it. Am looking for my first vintage Raleigh & want it to be a really good one, to last a very long time. With that said, I'm preferring one of the better models. I've read around online & the Professional, along with others mentioned, are known to be better. And no, no one's putting anything in my head, it's what I've surmised from the reading I've done, questions I've asked, etc. Just want the best for the money I spend.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#48
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
I've got two '78 SGP's here, and two '77 SC's here, a 23.5 and 25.5" version of each model.
The 78 SGP's when stripped down and compared to the '77 SC frame of the same size would be indistinguishable other than color and decals if the SGP's didn't have fancier lug work.
All have 68mm bottom bracket shells, each has stamped dropouts, and the same geometry. If I were to remove the paint you couldn't tell them apart.
The SGP came had Q/R large flange Normandy hubs, the SC had low flange Q/R Atom hubs, Both have Raleigh Scripted cranks with steel chain rings, both have 14/28 Atom freewheels.
The SGP has Suntour V derailleurs, the SC has Cyclone derailleurs. The SGP's have a Raleigh scripted SR stems, the SC models have GB stems. Both have center pull brakes, the 78 SGP models have Raleigh scripted calipers, the '77 SC's have Weinmann labeled calipers. When compared weight wise, both 23.5" frames weight the same, and both 25.5" frames weigh the same.
I bought both 25.5" bikes brand new myself, I bought the 23.5" SGP as a new old stock bike off eBay about 18 years ago, the 23.5" SC belonged to a family friend who passed away in the 80's. Its been mine since then.
I've owned a few Internationals, ride wise I prefer the SGP and SC. I was never a fan of sew up tires or the geometry of the upper range bikes. My favorite model of all the 70's Raleighs is the 1974 Super Tourer.
The 78 SGP's when stripped down and compared to the '77 SC frame of the same size would be indistinguishable other than color and decals if the SGP's didn't have fancier lug work.
All have 68mm bottom bracket shells, each has stamped dropouts, and the same geometry. If I were to remove the paint you couldn't tell them apart.
The SGP came had Q/R large flange Normandy hubs, the SC had low flange Q/R Atom hubs, Both have Raleigh Scripted cranks with steel chain rings, both have 14/28 Atom freewheels.
The SGP has Suntour V derailleurs, the SC has Cyclone derailleurs. The SGP's have a Raleigh scripted SR stems, the SC models have GB stems. Both have center pull brakes, the 78 SGP models have Raleigh scripted calipers, the '77 SC's have Weinmann labeled calipers. When compared weight wise, both 23.5" frames weight the same, and both 25.5" frames weigh the same.
I bought both 25.5" bikes brand new myself, I bought the 23.5" SGP as a new old stock bike off eBay about 18 years ago, the 23.5" SC belonged to a family friend who passed away in the 80's. Its been mine since then.
I've owned a few Internationals, ride wise I prefer the SGP and SC. I was never a fan of sew up tires or the geometry of the upper range bikes. My favorite model of all the 70's Raleighs is the 1974 Super Tourer.
Actually, there isn't a great deal of difference in frame geometry between SC/GS/Comp/RRA and International - at least not in the 21-1/2" size. 22" top tube, 17" chain stays (17.5" on the GS). Replace the tubulars with cushier tires, and the rides aren't appreciably different either. This is one reason why I have nearly all of mine built up with some small quirk or another. There are so many ways to build them up and enjoy them.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
Likes For USAZorro:
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Manhattan & Woodstock NY
Posts: 2,748
Bikes: 1987 Mercian Pro, 1985 Shogun 500, early '70s Falcon San Remo, 1972 Peugeot PX-10, 1972 Schwinn Paramount P13-9, 1971 Raleigh International, 1971 Peugeot PX-10, 1970 Raleigh Professional Mk1
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 938 Post(s)
Liked 2,942 Times
in
981 Posts
I've got a chromed version of this that I built this winter, and a well-made 1971 International. I prefer the Mk. I for subtle reasons that are hard to qualify beyond that from the very first ride it felt like I'd always had it.
__________________
1987 Mercian Pro, 1985 Shogun 500, 197? Falcon San Remo, 1972 Peugeot PX-10, 1972 Schwinn Paramount P13-9, 1971 Peugeot PX-10, 1971 Raleigh International, 1970 Raleigh Professional Mark I
Curator/Team Mechanic: 2016 Dawes Streetfighter, 1984 Lotus Eclair, 1975 Motobecane Jubile Mixte, 1974 Raleigh Sports, 1973 Free Spirit Ted Williams, 1972 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Philips Sport
1987 Mercian Pro, 1985 Shogun 500, 197? Falcon San Remo, 1972 Peugeot PX-10, 1972 Schwinn Paramount P13-9, 1971 Peugeot PX-10, 1971 Raleigh International, 1970 Raleigh Professional Mark I
Curator/Team Mechanic: 2016 Dawes Streetfighter, 1984 Lotus Eclair, 1975 Motobecane Jubile Mixte, 1974 Raleigh Sports, 1973 Free Spirit Ted Williams, 1972 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Philips Sport
Likes For ascherer:
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,158
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3810 Post(s)
Liked 6,699 Times
in
2,611 Posts
I think it's a matter of front-end geometry specifically fairly steep head-tube angle, which doesn't play well with upright bars and weight more distributed over the saddle/crankset than over the bars. The ST (and the last Competition I had set up with upright bars) just did not handle well on fast descents or climbing out of the saddle. I was really fighting the front end. I've had that experience with some Super Courses that I've converted to upright bars, but not all!
Likes For nlerner: