Best, simplest safety camera for capturing license plate numbers
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,432
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times
in
38 Posts
The downside is for individuals who feel unsafe without a video recording device but believe that buying, mounting and recording with any video camera while bicycling will somehow make their cycling safer in any way, i.e reduces their bicycling risk in ANY credible manner.
I think personally that a highly visible camera might gain you some additional protection causing them to think twice before acting like a jerk. Plenty of situations it wouldn't help in but it's been my experience in non-biking situations that some of these people suddenly calm down and start acting more rationally the moment you pull out a camera and start recording.
#28
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,971
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,533 Times
in
1,044 Posts
Personally I think whipping out a smartphone when faced with hostile people might have the same efect on people who might be deterred. Then there may be some of "those people" who be enraged at the use of a bicyclist's camera and feel provoked enough to ignore it and be stimulated to escalate hostile action.
#29
Sophomore Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,531
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1628 Post(s)
Liked 1,057 Times
in
631 Posts
... and then change their minds when they remember they're being recorded and might face actual consequences if they do anything stupid. Scumbags will be scumbags, I have no control over that. I don't see how leaving my camera home changes that fact or makes me safer in any way.
#30
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,971
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,533 Times
in
1,044 Posts
Or not change their minds and get even more provoked and hostile and slap the camera out of your hands or off your head when you (to the scumbags' irrational mind) stick it in his face.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,606
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 626 Post(s)
Liked 701 Times
in
418 Posts
1) Forward and rear facing,
2) Designed for motorcycles, so it's weather proof
3) Battery powered, doesn't need extra power like most automotive versions
4) only about $130
https://americanlegendrider.com/prod...RoCPZgQAvD_BwE
I think you can get this model a little cheaper on Amazon. When I get my velomobile, this is what is going on it. (I'm also going to install a motorcycle anti-theft device).
2) Designed for motorcycles, so it's weather proof
3) Battery powered, doesn't need extra power like most automotive versions
4) only about $130
https://americanlegendrider.com/prod...RoCPZgQAvD_BwE
I think you can get this model a little cheaper on Amazon. When I get my velomobile, this is what is going on it. (I'm also going to install a motorcycle anti-theft device).
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,606
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 626 Post(s)
Liked 701 Times
in
418 Posts
I find that there is a certain class of people for whom once they realize they're being recorded, suddenly start behaving a lot better.
I think personally that a highly visible camera might gain you some additional protection causing them to think twice before acting like a jerk. Plenty of situations it wouldn't help in but it's been my experience in non-biking situations that some of these people suddenly calm down and start acting more rationally the moment you pull out a camera and start recording.
I think personally that a highly visible camera might gain you some additional protection causing them to think twice before acting like a jerk. Plenty of situations it wouldn't help in but it's been my experience in non-biking situations that some of these people suddenly calm down and start acting more rationally the moment you pull out a camera and start recording.
I went to the local police a few years ago with the license plate number and a photo of a van that intentionally forced me off the road, and the police said there was nothing they could do. Maybe they would have done something with video? I kinda doubt it. Has anyone ever had any success using video evidence to get the police to go after bad drivers?
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Mid Atlantic / USA
Posts: 2,115
Bikes: 2017 Specialized Crosstrail / 2013 Trek Crossrip Elite
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1002 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times
in
155 Posts
Back to being serious....
If you are capable of a little rigging you might look into the cheaper off brand car dash cams. Some are really small and have surprisingly good resolution.
The down side is that they are usually meant to be plugged into a USB port. So you'd have to rig a USB battery to power it. That does work, but it's an extra thing strapped to the bike. You'd also have to figure out how to mount it as the windshield suction cup won't work. And they likely aren't rated for being waterproof since they are meant to be used inside the car.
But you can get them for $20-$30.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,511 Times
in
2,855 Posts
1) Forward and rear facing,
2) Designed for motorcycles, so it's weather proof
3) Battery powered, doesn't need extra power like most automotive versions
4) only about $130
https://americanlegendrider.com/prod...RoCPZgQAvD_BwE
I think you can get this model a little cheaper on Amazon. When I get my velomobile, this is what is going on it. (I'm also going to install a motorcycle anti-theft device).
2) Designed for motorcycles, so it's weather proof
3) Battery powered, doesn't need extra power like most automotive versions
4) only about $130
https://americanlegendrider.com/prod...RoCPZgQAvD_BwE
I think you can get this model a little cheaper on Amazon. When I get my velomobile, this is what is going on it. (I'm also going to install a motorcycle anti-theft device).
#36
Junior Member
I don't believe any camera will be able to capture an oncoming vehicle plate with the headlights on, or at least I am not aware of any practical solution for that high of a lighting intensity contrast.
I think that this camera may be one of the best or the one to beat for night and/or low light capture, but it's also US $800.00. It's pretty amazing tech.
https://www.sionyx.com/get-to-know-the-aurora.html
I went to the local police a few years ago with the license plate number and a photo of a van that intentionally forced me off the road, and the police said there was nothing they could do. Maybe they would have done something with video? I kinda doubt it. Has anyone ever had any success using video evidence to get the police to go after bad drivers?
I also had a camera recording when I was struck in a hit-and-run by a truck, and the responding officer noted in the police report that the motor vehicle operator was fully at fault for the collision(He drove through a stop sign, and struck me from behind, while my camera demonstrated that I was obeying all traffic laws.). This crash video was also invaluable in the insurance claims for my own auto insurance policies.
*Low light plate capture with the Sony may be seen here.
Last edited by dragoonO1; 03-05-19 at 01:37 PM. Reason: additional response, and video link
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,436
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 623 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 396 Times
in
274 Posts
There was an interesting video of two men riding there bicycles and being sideswiped by someone at or around Berkley CA. The police were able to read the license plate from the video and when they went to the residence the parolee had a large amount of weapons and ammunition at the location. There are several videos were the person being videoed becomes in ragged and starts to pound on the bicyclist and attempts to steel the camera. I believe most of these occurred in England or there a bouts. In fact if you like to watch You Tube videos of people loosing there cookies on a bicyclist. Search on You Tube for road rage on bicyclists in England.
#39
Senior Member
any GoPro
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,511 Times
in
2,855 Posts
A huge plus to me is the big, instant-on switch that can be operated easily, even with heavy gloves on.
In the past I used Contour cameras which had a comparable switch, and I loved that feature!
#41
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,115
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1788 Post(s)
Liked 1,628 Times
in
933 Posts
I own 2 Garmin Virb cameras. I just took the last mount off of the last bike.
There is 2 competing forces at work. 1 being frame rate, & the other being resolution.
I found that unless the speed difference was less than 10-15 mph, the resolution just wasn't high enough to reliably determine a license plate number of a passing car in any situation. The further or faster the car, the harder it was to read. Nearing impossible for cars that were actually at a safe distance or traveling at the speed limit.
The only situation I think it would help with would be a slow speed run-down within the first 90 minutes of a ride. Pretty unlikely in my opinion.
I tried all the aspect ratios, resolutions, etc...A high framerate really only gave more lower resolution samples to choose from. A low frame rate only offered 2 or 3 "maybe" identifiable images...maybe,, depending on speed, distance, & vector.
At 90 minutes per battery, it just didn't work as well as I hoped.
Maybe when 4k cameras get acceptable battery life (read: 3 hours or more), I'll try again.
There is 2 competing forces at work. 1 being frame rate, & the other being resolution.
I found that unless the speed difference was less than 10-15 mph, the resolution just wasn't high enough to reliably determine a license plate number of a passing car in any situation. The further or faster the car, the harder it was to read. Nearing impossible for cars that were actually at a safe distance or traveling at the speed limit.
The only situation I think it would help with would be a slow speed run-down within the first 90 minutes of a ride. Pretty unlikely in my opinion.
I tried all the aspect ratios, resolutions, etc...A high framerate really only gave more lower resolution samples to choose from. A low frame rate only offered 2 or 3 "maybe" identifiable images...maybe,, depending on speed, distance, & vector.
At 90 minutes per battery, it just didn't work as well as I hoped.
Maybe when 4k cameras get acceptable battery life (read: 3 hours or more), I'll try again.
Last edited by base2; 04-01-19 at 11:17 AM.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,992
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2494 Post(s)
Liked 738 Times
in
522 Posts
The good times never last forever, but if cyclists think that they will always be able to submit their ride videos showing them being cut-off and collecting damage awards then think again. There are few things that happen in our public spaces that aren't being observed by recording devices. As they proliferate you can expect defense counsels everywhere to demand more objective (3rd party) evidence of their clients culpability in an accident. Personally, I think that is as it should be. Drivers use dash cams to protect themselves legally against another persons claim and NOT to bolster a claim made against someone else. Cyclists might be the only class of road user attempting to use video documentation offensively. I suspect it works as well as it does because the stakes aren't high enough for the defense to go all out in ruling the evidence inadmissible. So consider me Agnostic on the worth of camera equipment. I can tell you that drivers don't notice your camera and that is NOT what is making them behave. Get over yourself if you think that. My carbon fork road racer didn't cost $800.00 and I am NOT paying that for a camera to possibly win enough in an insurance claim to replace it. Half of the accidents cyclists get into they caused. Work on that?
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,992
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2494 Post(s)
Liked 738 Times
in
522 Posts
You may be onto something. I mean, I get it. Yeah, having a camera keeps the cyclist honest. I'd never be able to keep riding as recklessly as I do now if I had a $%#^& camera recording it all!
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Queens, NY for now...
Posts: 1,515
Bikes: 82 Lotus Unique, 86 Lotus Legend, 88 Basso Loto, 88 Basso PR, 89 Basso PR, 96 Bianchi CDI, 2013 Deda Aegis, 2019 Basso Diamante SV
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 172 Times
in
113 Posts
The good times never last forever, but if cyclists think that they will always be able to submit their ride videos showing them being cut-off and collecting damage awards then think again. There are few things that happen in our public spaces that aren't being observed by recording devices. As they proliferate you can expect defense counsels everywhere to demand more objective (3rd party) evidence of their clients culpability in an accident. Personally, I think that is as it should be. Drivers use dash cams to protect themselves legally against another persons claim and NOT to bolster a claim made against someone else. Cyclists might be the only class of road user attempting to use video documentation offensively.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,511 Times
in
2,855 Posts
This is sometimes referred to in specs as "Field of View", although that is technically a little different.
Anything over 63 degrees is a wide-angle lens, which:
- Makes objects look more distant than they really are, (e.g. the car that buzzed you).
- Causes straight lines near the edges to look bent, (e.g. utility poles at the edge of the road).
- Causes objects to be rendered in fewer pixels, causing loss of resolution, (e.g. license plates).
But mfgrs like to brag about how wide their lens is, e.g. this page even refers to 90 degrees as "narrow": What is GoPro Field of View (FOV)? » Project GoPro
Here is an image from a photography site that gives photographic definitions:
#46
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,115
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1788 Post(s)
Liked 1,628 Times
in
933 Posts
You are missing the biggest variable that makes plates hard to read: Angle of View.
This is sometimes referred to in specs as "Field of View", although that is technically a little different.
-snip
- Causes objects to be rendered in fewer pixels, causing loss of resolution, (e.g. license plates).
Here is an image from a photography site that gives photographic definitions:
This is sometimes referred to in specs as "Field of View", although that is technically a little different.
-snip
- Causes objects to be rendered in fewer pixels, causing loss of resolution, (e.g. license plates).
Here is an image from a photography site that gives photographic definitions:
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,606
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 626 Post(s)
Liked 701 Times
in
418 Posts
Um, what? Using them offensively? If someone puts you in danger because they are driving like a moron, there is absolutely nothing "offensive" on the rider's part. Are you seriously complaining about people using cameras to capture the nonsense that some drivers pull?
I always win!
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,992
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2494 Post(s)
Liked 738 Times
in
522 Posts
Um, what? Using them offensively? If someone puts you in danger because they are driving like a moron, there is absolutely nothing "offensive" on the rider's part. Are you seriously complaining about people using cameras to capture the nonsense that some drivers pull?
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Queens, NY for now...
Posts: 1,515
Bikes: 82 Lotus Unique, 86 Lotus Legend, 88 Basso Loto, 88 Basso PR, 89 Basso PR, 96 Bianchi CDI, 2013 Deda Aegis, 2019 Basso Diamante SV
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Liked 172 Times
in
113 Posts
I am not complaining about anything I am observing the irony that is the American cyclist, certain that their camera will capture motorist malfeasance and land them a nice payday in court when the inevitable ground strike occurs. Ironic because on the other side we have the post mortem information that in 50% of accidents the cyclist is at fault. Isn't that also the definition of 'hubris'? I don't know, I could be wrong but I have enough faith in first responders, law enforcement, insurance adjuster types ... if it matters, I believe they can sort it out from the forensic evidence at hand! I doubt a Go Pro on my head could add much of significance. If they didn't weigh half a pound and cost $200 ea. and you need at least two ... like I said, I don't know ... I've found it better (all around) to simply not get hit. It really isn't that hard to do.
And I have absolutely no faith in law enforcement and insurance adjusters to figure out what happened (either through incompetence or simple laziness). I had a (luckily very minor) motor vehicle accident a couple of years ago where the other driver pulled a move that was outlandishly dangerous and stupid. When the cops showed up he completely lied about what happened, and despite his lie being illogical, without solid evidence (video) they wanted nothing to do with figuring out the truth.
To add insult to injury, how many times do we see motorists that are 100% at fault for "accidents" getting nothing but a simple ticket (if that). It's ridiculous...
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,992
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2494 Post(s)
Liked 738 Times
in
522 Posts
Exactly. Everyone from the arresting officer to the Judge knew the driver was texting. Knew it. Knew exactly what they sent and who to because of course their phone transcripts were subpoenaed from their provider. And? Having video would change the outcome? When and if cameras are given to cyclists the way helmets are I won't have any excuse not to have one but I'm hanged if I am going to pay money to get one ... or two. No, hell no. It's way easier simply not to need one. The driver who you had the 'very minor' accident with. Do you think the officers response would be the same if it was a very major accident? Are you sure, considering his move was so outrageous, are you sure your camera would capture anything meaningful? I mean I've seen my share of YouTube accidents that left me scratching my head as to what happened. Worse than useless. And I have to keep the battery charged, upload the files, archive the files ... some of us have lives. Not all of us are paranoid want to be drivers.