How to weigh a bike?
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1857 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
Reset the scale if it needs it, then grab the bike. Holding it, step on the scale again.get off and write down that number.
Subtract the two numbers. The bike weight is the difference between the two. Most modern scales are good to 1/10 lb or to show lb and ounces, so for me that's enough resolution. I don't expect to get grams accurately when I'm putting nearly 100 kg on the scale.
Write down the bike weight and throw away the scraps of paper, to destroy the evidence.
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1857 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
#53
Non omnino gravis
Here's a thought project for you: what do you learn by knowing how much the bike weighs? In what magical ways does your life change?
I can honestly say I have no accurate idea what any of my bikes weigh. Some are over 20lbs. One is probably under 20lbs. I don't think any of them crack 30lbs.
If I had the precise numbers written down, nothing would change. Bike weights and miles ridden do seem to come out as inversely proportionate on BF, though.
I can honestly say I have no accurate idea what any of my bikes weigh. Some are over 20lbs. One is probably under 20lbs. I don't think any of them crack 30lbs.
If I had the precise numbers written down, nothing would change. Bike weights and miles ridden do seem to come out as inversely proportionate on BF, though.
Likes For DrIsotope:
#54
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times
in
1,187 Posts
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,094
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 1,290 Times
in
743 Posts
Uhm, no, that was my original point with my first post saying to use the bathroom scale. I was just answering a post regarding using Google to figure out how how many ounces in a pound. Which is totally unnecessary considering 1. No need, and 2. It's not rocket science so I could do that calculation in my head or at the most use a calculator.
So I agree, there is no difference in my opinion between 30 and 31 pounds.
So I agree, there is no difference in my opinion between 30 and 31 pounds.
#56
Non omnino gravis
I like a bike for how it rides. Unless the weight is so high that it's noticeable (which for me seems to be in the low-30s-- I had a sluggo C-Dale hybrid that was like 34lbs dry) I don't care. Whatever one of my bikes weighs, add at least 5lbs for water (sometimes more in the summer,) then 215lbs of meat to make it move. The weight of the bike? Two categories: too much, and just fine. Luckily, everything in the stable is just fine.
#58
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
#60
Junior Member
You could buy a luggage scale which even has a hook to hang from and a big hook to hang a wheel on. They’re cheap.
#61
Senior Member
How about the scale at your local truck stop ?
#63
Banned
subtract the without from the with.. simple Math,
#64
Junior Member
Thread Starter
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: midwest
Posts: 2,528
Bikes: 2018 Roubaix Expert Di2, 2016 Diverge Expert X1
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 482 Post(s)
Liked 151 Times
in
105 Posts
It actually has an advantage. If you use a hanging scale that is not calibrated absolutely, say it weighs a couple pounds too heavy, then your result will be off by that much. if your bathroom scale is similarly off, when you weigh yourself+bike and subtract yourself, the inaccuracy cancels out. Bathroom scales do not have precise resolution though (maybe 1/2 lb at best?). But to that precision, it is an accurate measurement,
#66
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Use your bathroom scale. Weigh yourself then weigh yourself holding your bike. The difference is the weight of your bike.
#67
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I use a digital bathroom scale. First I get on it and weigh myself, writing down the result (on disposable paper so I don't have to look at the number when done!!!.
Reset the scale if it needs it, then grab the bike. Holding it, step on the scale again.get off and write down that number.
Subtract the two numbers. The bike weight is the difference between the two. Most modern scales are good to 1/10 lb or to show lb and ounces, so for me that's enough resolution. I don't expect to get grams accurately when I'm putting nearly 100 kg on the scale.
Write down the bike weight and throw away the scraps of paper, to destroy the evidence.
Reset the scale if it needs it, then grab the bike. Holding it, step on the scale again.get off and write down that number.
Subtract the two numbers. The bike weight is the difference between the two. Most modern scales are good to 1/10 lb or to show lb and ounces, so for me that's enough resolution. I don't expect to get grams accurately when I'm putting nearly 100 kg on the scale.
Write down the bike weight and throw away the scraps of paper, to destroy the evidence.
My bike is so light, I weigh less holding it.
#68
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
#69
ChristopherL
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 38
Bikes: '62 Peugeot PA 10, '73 Peugeot UO8, '74 Peugeot UE8 (converted to UO8 look alike), '75 Peugeot UO8, Peugeot Ventoux PH501, '7? Sekine SHS 271, '89 Centurion Ironman Master, '86 Centurion Elite RS, '87 Centurion Ironman Master
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times
in
5 Posts
Me thinks, THE WINNER ! ! !
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 490
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 252 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times
in
48 Posts
Did someone suggest Archimedes method? You measure how much water is displaced when you submerge the bike. Then you need to estimate material densities of the various components on the bike, subtract empty volume inside the frame and wheel tubes. I think it would be an interesting project for an engineering class.
Last edited by vane171; 06-01-20 at 09:04 PM.
#71
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
My bathroom scale has a display that reads out to one tenth of a pound. This would imply a level of precision that it really doesn't have. I can get on and off repeatedly and the numbers are all over the place, varying by almost a pound. I have no idea as to the accuracy. Regarding the fish scale, I've never caught a fish that weighs as much as my bike, so needless to say, my fish scale doesn't go high enough. Maybe if you live on saltwater....