Opinions/Recommendations for a 1984 Ross Mt. Whitney bike
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 32
Bikes: too many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Opinions/Recommendations for a 1984 Ross Mt. Whitney bike
Would like opinions/recommendations/help on my latest purchase, a 1984 Ross Mt. Whitney bike that is in very good condition and mostly original. It was updated to a 7-speed freewheel, double 42/52 crank set and has some junk tires from sitting in a heated garage for years. Did this bike have a 42/52 crank set originally and what size/type/brand of tire would you put on it? I’m not trying to go back 100% original but would like opinions especially on the tires. Thinking of some Kenda Kwest 26x1.5 or some Marathons. It will be ridden on paths/street only. Thanks to everyone for the help!
Irv
Irv
#2
Senior Member
Here's mine in what I think is original equipment (except tires and ?). Mainly Shimano parts including Deerhead derailleurs....Crank is 48/36/24. Fun bike with that funky, laid back early Mtn. bike geometry. Tires are currently 1.95 Hemisphere Armidillos. If I were riding on streets regularly I'd get some lighter slicks.
Would like opinions/recommendations/help on my latest purchase, a 1984 Ross Mt. Whitney bike that is in very good condition and mostly original. It was updated to a 7-speed freewheel, double 42/52 crank set and has some junk tires from sitting in a heated garage for years. Did this bike have a 42/52 crank set originally and what size/type/brand of tire would you put on it? I’m not trying to go back 100% original but would like opinions especially on the tires. Thinking of some Kenda Kwest 26x1.5 or some Marathons. It will be ridden on paths/street only. Thanks to everyone for the help!
Irv
Irv
#3
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 15,944
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times
in
174 Posts
I really like the 1.5 Panaracer Ribmos - great protection, but they feel a little more lively than some other similar priced tires. GREAT with rain.
I love those Ross MTBs...very sharp. Take a look at this thread if you want some inspiration...
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...ar-Conversions
I love those Ross MTBs...very sharp. Take a look at this thread if you want some inspiration...
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...ar-Conversions
Last edited by KonAaron Snake; 11-06-13 at 05:35 AM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STP
Posts: 14,491
Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 821 Post(s)
Liked 256 Times
in
142 Posts
I really like the 1.5 Panaracer Ribmos - great protection, but they feel a little more lively than some other similar priced tires. GREAT with rain.
I love those Ross MTBs...very sharp. Take a look at this thread if you want some inspiration...
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...ar-Conversions
I love those Ross MTBs...very sharp. Take a look at this thread if you want some inspiration...
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...ar-Conversions
....and that Ross is a solid value for sure.
My wife has been enjoying the family "pass around" Stumpjumper with Fat Franks as well. They roll great, never flat and seem to handle inclement weather well.
Plus, she gets loads of comments about them, mostly positive.
Also, for city use, try the el cheapo Resist Nomads I have here on the La Cruz. They are great tires for the $$$, are also available in 26" and seem to wear well. They don't feel as "dead" as some of the other budget choices available.
Last edited by gomango; 11-06-13 at 05:50 AM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: RTP Area, NC
Posts: 338
Bikes: Somebody stole them all... I walk now.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The 84 catalog shows an XT crank with 46/36/26 on the Mt Whitney. Fun bike, but extremely heavy. I had the same year Mt Hood for a bit and ran 1.5 Bontragers on it while using it for bike touring.
#6
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,526
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times
in
628 Posts
For road and path riding, I would go with any of the myriad of slicks, either in 1.25 width or 1.5 inch width. Plenty of choices out there.
#7
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,649
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,703 Times
in
937 Posts
I always love your dedicated pages- your enthusiasm really shows!
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#8
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,194
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,296 Times
in
866 Posts
The very layed-back angles on these fine Mt Whitneys will work well on the street if the frame is sized large enough for the rider, i.e. on the very large side if possible.
Off road, the long chainstays won't permit the rider to lean so far foreward if traction is poor on the steeper climbs, so a relatively smaller frame might be ideal (if still somewhat larger than what a contemporary frame fit would suggest).
Off road, the long chainstays won't permit the rider to lean so far foreward if traction is poor on the steeper climbs, so a relatively smaller frame might be ideal (if still somewhat larger than what a contemporary frame fit would suggest).