Bike computer question
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Bike computer question
I really enjoy reading posts and looking at bike pictures here on BF. I’ve often wondered, I don’t see very many pictures with bike computer speed sensors lashed to the front fork....a few, but not many. So, do most of you nice folks use a smartphone app like RWGPS or do many of you own a bike GPS? Just curious. Thanks!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Los Alamitos, Calif.
Posts: 2,478
Bikes: Trek 7.4 FX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1026 Post(s)
Liked 913 Times
in
535 Posts
Some sensors are attached to the front hub, Trek has an sensor mounting point in their NDS chainstay. Many of them just use the GPS capability of the head unit to do those calculation.
#3
I think I know nothing.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NE PA
Posts: 711
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 233 Post(s)
Liked 290 Times
in
204 Posts
On some of my bikes I have older wired speed sensors on the front fork. On my main use bikes I have wireless sensors attached to the crank arm (cadence) and the rear wheel hub (speed). This is a typical set up these days.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,259
Bikes: Bianchi Ti Megatube; Colnago Competition; Planet-X EC-130E; Klein Pulse; Amp Research B4; Litespeed Catalyst; Trek Y11
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 596 Post(s)
Liked 476 Times
in
258 Posts
After having taken all cycling computers off all my bikes several years ago, then finally using Strava on my smartphone a few times, I recently picked up a Garmin Edge 25 (it was on sale). It's nice to be able to switch the small unit to any bike, not worry about any wires, not worry about front wheel run-out, not worry about sensor alignment. Technology has certainly come a long way and can make your life easier, and lets you track all the things you want to on a spin.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,529
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5220 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times
in
2,331 Posts
3 bikes, 3 cheap wired computers
Likes For rumrunn6:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 157
Bikes: BMC Teammachine SLR02 Disc, Cannondale CAAD 4
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
10 Posts
GPS bike computer for me...these are probably the most common now. My cadence sensor attaches to my shoe so it can be used on whatever bike I'm riding.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,826
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3185 Post(s)
Liked 2,020 Times
in
1,158 Posts
I really enjoy reading posts and looking at bike pictures here on BF. I’ve often wondered, I don’t see very many pictures with bike computer speed sensors lashed to the front fork....a few, but not many. So, do most of you nice folks use a smartphone app like RWGPS or do many of you own a bike GPS? Just curious. Thanks!
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Thank you all! I just ordered a top tube bag with a window for a smartphone, I’ll give it a try. I have a wireless computer installed right now, think I will move the speed sensor to the rear too. Thanks again!
#9
Mother Nature's Son
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sussex County, Delaware
Posts: 3,111
Bikes: 2014 Orbea Avant MD30, 2004 Airborne Zeppelin TI, 2003 Lemond Poprad, 2001 Lemond Tourmalet, 2014? Soma Smoothie
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 838 Post(s)
Liked 1,414 Times
in
801 Posts
With a wireless unit, I believe that moving the speed sensor and magnet to the rear wheel is not an option.The unit and sensor need to be in line and closer together. Even most wired units have a wire that is too short to mount on the rear wheel, unless it also has a cadence sensor that mounts on the crank. That kind of wiring is very susceptible to damage due to the length and locations of the wiring. For me, at this point, I have no need for a GPS unit. I do not want to track my routes, and I do not want to be tracked. I still have a flip phone that I carry with me, but usually have turned off when riding. A basic wireless computer is all I wish to have, and gives me the basic data that I use. Cateye Velo 9 wireless can be purchased for a bit more than $20, and it is very durable and gives accurate readings.
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Ha, I too carry a flip phone and my wireless unit is a Velo 9. 😁
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times
in
446 Posts
Do you mind telling me what cadence sensor you use? I wouldn't mind a cadence readout, but I'm not wild about sticking little plastic doohickies on my bike. A shoe-mounted sensor seems like a decent alternative. I've thought about trying to adapt the Garmin sensor, which is designed to attach to the crank arm without a corresponding frame sensor - not sure if it works by proximity to the frame or to the head unit - but if there's a Garmin-compatible shoe0mounted sensor out there, that would make more sense. Thanks.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 157
Bikes: BMC Teammachine SLR02 Disc, Cannondale CAAD 4
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
10 Posts
Do you mind telling me what cadence sensor you use? I wouldn't mind a cadence readout, but I'm not wild about sticking little plastic doohickies on my bike. A shoe-mounted sensor seems like a decent alternative. I've thought about trying to adapt the Garmin sensor, which is designed to attach to the crank arm without a corresponding frame sensor - not sure if it works by proximity to the frame or to the head unit - but if there's a Garmin-compatible shoe0mounted sensor out there, that would make more sense. Thanks.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,063
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18322 Post(s)
Liked 15,303 Times
in
7,232 Posts
Clearly visible. Ol’ skool. I also use PGS—paper guidance system—when I tour. Also known as cue sheets.
Likes For indyfabz:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,241
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4222 Post(s)
Liked 1,322 Times
in
916 Posts
One reason the rear wheel is used is to detect pedal rotations (cadence) and wheel rotations (speed) in one sensor.
It's possible that, given the rear is already busy, having the sensor on the rear looks better.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,241
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4222 Post(s)
Liked 1,322 Times
in
916 Posts
There are wireless sensors that don't use ANT+/BT that work from the rear wheel (they sometimes support cadence too).
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: reno, nv
Posts: 2,275
Bikes: yes, i have one
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1124 Post(s)
Liked 1,171 Times
in
682 Posts
i have the wahoo sensor. Came with my kicker. When I mounted it to my shoe I always got erratic readings at low cadence (<50). Once I mounted it to the crank it was fine.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 157
Bikes: BMC Teammachine SLR02 Disc, Cannondale CAAD 4
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
10 Posts
I had mine on the crank for 6 months or so before I got a new bike and moved it to my shoe so I could use 1 sensor on two bikes. Performance is the same on the crank or the shoe. I never pedal less than 50 rpm (is that even possible?) so I can’t speak to that.
#20
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,613
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,526 Times
in
997 Posts
The latest (last 2-3+ yrs) of wireless speed sensors mount to a hub with rubber bands. I have mine on my rear. Any picture from the side of a bike usually looks from the cassette side, so it would be completely hidden in a photo.
#21
Senior Member
All types have some sort of drawback. I use a GPS unit to show me speed. i use it on 2 bikes and it is nice to not need to set the correct bike for the correct wheel diameter. the only drawback is it needs to be re-charged frequently (GPS uses more power than wired magnetic sensors). But I have to plug the lights in anyway.
i used to have simple wired sensors for speed and cadence. the problem is the wire cna get damaged (and will) and the magnets are not strong and you need to get he sensor very close. i ended up buying larger magnets and managing to make my own sensor mount. Not the cleanest solution and also subject to damage.
Something in the middle are the wireless sensors for speed (they likely use an accelerometer to detect turning of the wheel). But in times of GPS speed seems best doen with GPS.
I like cadence, but you need to find a spot on the crank to reliably attach the sensor and it needs to be removable to replace the battery. I've successfully used $10 no-name bluetooth (or ANT?) sensors off ebay. Batteries seem to last half a year. Only drawback is between my two bikes i need to change the bike on the computer for it to use the cadence sensor. The cadence sensor is nice if you think about drivetrain upgrades and where you would benefit from more range.
Fro tracking I use my phone. The biek computer can do that too, but then uploading data to the phone takes time and doesn't always work. The bike computer basically is just used for instant data.
At some point I had a chest HRM. but got fed up with strapping it on, and not paying attention anyway. When I'm cold, HR is low, when I'm exhausted, it will be high. What am i supposed to do with that information?
i used to have simple wired sensors for speed and cadence. the problem is the wire cna get damaged (and will) and the magnets are not strong and you need to get he sensor very close. i ended up buying larger magnets and managing to make my own sensor mount. Not the cleanest solution and also subject to damage.
Something in the middle are the wireless sensors for speed (they likely use an accelerometer to detect turning of the wheel). But in times of GPS speed seems best doen with GPS.
I like cadence, but you need to find a spot on the crank to reliably attach the sensor and it needs to be removable to replace the battery. I've successfully used $10 no-name bluetooth (or ANT?) sensors off ebay. Batteries seem to last half a year. Only drawback is between my two bikes i need to change the bike on the computer for it to use the cadence sensor. The cadence sensor is nice if you think about drivetrain upgrades and where you would benefit from more range.
Fro tracking I use my phone. The biek computer can do that too, but then uploading data to the phone takes time and doesn't always work. The bike computer basically is just used for instant data.
At some point I had a chest HRM. but got fed up with strapping it on, and not paying attention anyway. When I'm cold, HR is low, when I'm exhausted, it will be high. What am i supposed to do with that information?
Likes For spelger:
#24
Senior Member
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: reno, nv
Posts: 2,275
Bikes: yes, i have one
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1124 Post(s)
Liked 1,171 Times
in
682 Posts
i think there are some on BF that would challenge your assertion about speed vs power. me...? i'll stay out of that one.