Randomness: Why pricing is the way it is?
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: South Carolina Upstate
Posts: 2,104
Bikes: 2010 Fuji Absolute 3.0 1994 Trek 850
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 555 Times
in
322 Posts
supply and demand will determine the price as long as other factors are not in play
#28
Senior Member
There are always other factors at play when buying retail.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,879
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3906 Post(s)
Liked 7,182 Times
in
2,905 Posts
Can anyone explain what the OP's complaint is?
#30
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,775
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,102 Times
in
1,366 Posts
MAP absolutely is price fixing. If it weren't, different retailers would have different prices depending what margin they wanted to run, or to blow out overstock or old stock. But they can't for fear of the distributor cutting them off. What other merit or metric am I supposed to use to choose between these retailers? They are not permitted to compete. They are paralyzed.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,879
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3906 Post(s)
Liked 7,182 Times
in
2,905 Posts
MAP absolutely is price fixing. If it weren't, different retailers would have different prices depending what margin they wanted to run, or to blow out overstock or old stock. But they can't for fear of the distributor cutting them off. What other merit or metric am I supposed to use to choose between these retailers? They are not permitted to compete. They are paralyzed.
Likes For tomato coupe:
#32
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,775
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,102 Times
in
1,366 Posts
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,879
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3906 Post(s)
Liked 7,182 Times
in
2,905 Posts
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,768
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6882 Post(s)
Liked 10,875 Times
in
4,639 Posts
Originally Posted by Darth Lefty;21800203[b
]MAP absolutely is price fixing. If it weren't, different retailers would have different prices depending what margin they wanted to run, or to blow out overstock or old stock. But they can't for fear of the distributor cutting them off. What other merit or metric am I supposed to use to choose between these retailers? They are not permitted to compete. They are paralyzed.
I pointed out the key factor in an earlier post: price-fixing occurs horizontally –- meaning it is an agreement among firms at the same stage of the production and distribution process, such as between manufacturers or between retailers. MAP pricing, on the other hand, is entirely vertical: it is a manufacturer imposing a minimum advertised price on the entity in the next step of the chain - the retailer. Such vertical agreements are not considered “price-fixing.“ (Note that this would still allow different manufacturers to set different MAP prices and hence still compete with each other. So, your assertion that MAP pricing eliminates competition is just incorrect.)
Let me work with your own example: A Cane Creek headset. If CC colluded with Chris King to coordinate prices - probably to jack them up, but at minimum perhaps just an agreement to not undercut each other - that would be price fixing. They are horizontally-related in the market, which means they are competitors. When CC enforces MAP pricing with its retailers, that is entirely vertical, and not price fixing. After all, Chris King could still sell headsets at lower prices, even if they, too, use MAP.
Following is a snippet from a Federal Trade Commission site on the subject… Note that this is one of the federal agencies charged with enforcing anti-trust law, along with the anti-trust division of the Justice Department – which views it the same way:
If a manufacturer, on its own, adopts a policy regarding a desired level of prices, the law allows the manufacturer to deal only with retailers who agree to that policy. A manufacturer also may stop dealing with a retailer that does not follow its resale price policy. That is, a manufacturer can implement a dealer policy on a "take it or leave it" basis.
Last edited by Koyote; 11-21-20 at 08:21 PM.
Likes For Koyote: