"Arkansas Stop" law - changing the rules at red lights and stop signs
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
2 Posts
"Arkansas Stop" law - changing the rules at red lights and stop signs
https://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlo...ike-stop-signs
While I appreciate giving the freedom to bicyclists to read the situation, I have a bad feeling that the outcome might be more collisions from drivers who aren't educated about the changes. It references a similar law that's been on the books in Idaho for a while-- does anyone know how the reception has been up there?
(It occurs to me that with such a law, there will be less pressure to install bike-friendly infrastructure like bike lane pressure pads or walk signal buttons. In fact, a lot of intersections even in cities here lack even pedestrian-targeted walk signals)
The law says that cyclists approaching a stop sign must slow down — stopping if necessary to avoid a hazard — and yield to right-of-way pedestrians or other traffic. They can then proceed through the intersection without stopping. At red lights, cyclists must come to a complete stop and yield to traffic. Then they may proceed through the light.
. . .
“When you come up to the light, and there’s no cross traffic, you can go ahead and move through. Cars that may be behind you are no longer behind you. You’re able to move through the intersection, get on down the road and maybe even make the next light, and you’re not slowing down the traffic behind you that is only going to be able to go at your speed.”
Idaho passed a similar law in 1982, and the practice is commonly known as the Idaho Stop.
. . .
“When you come up to the light, and there’s no cross traffic, you can go ahead and move through. Cars that may be behind you are no longer behind you. You’re able to move through the intersection, get on down the road and maybe even make the next light, and you’re not slowing down the traffic behind you that is only going to be able to go at your speed.”
Idaho passed a similar law in 1982, and the practice is commonly known as the Idaho Stop.
(It occurs to me that with such a law, there will be less pressure to install bike-friendly infrastructure like bike lane pressure pads or walk signal buttons. In fact, a lot of intersections even in cities here lack even pedestrian-targeted walk signals)
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,483
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7649 Post(s)
Liked 3,469 Times
in
1,832 Posts
Talk to people in Idaho. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_stop) Instituted in 1982. Still working.
#3
Cycle Year Round
Idaho stop law indicates that it makes cyclist safer. All states need to implement the law. Many cyclist apply the law even in the other states for their own safety.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
How many stop light in all of Idaho’s?
Anyhow, good for Arkansas. Looking forward to some meaningful data.
Massachusetts bike bill adds Paris Stop. It passed both houses last session then died in House Ways and Means. The chair of the House Ways and Means [name intentionionally un-named] was then swiftly defeated by Nika Elugardo.
-mr. bill
Anyhow, good for Arkansas. Looking forward to some meaningful data.
Massachusetts bike bill adds Paris Stop. It passed both houses last session then died in House Ways and Means. The chair of the House Ways and Means [name intentionionally un-named] was then swiftly defeated by Nika Elugardo.
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 04-03-19 at 02:02 PM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
Right on red and straight on T = yield.
Massachusetts added yield on leading pedestrian signal.
Again, it died last session, and it has about 18 months to make it through the new session.
-mr. bill
Massachusetts added yield on leading pedestrian signal.
Again, it died last session, and it has about 18 months to make it through the new session.
-mr. bill
#8
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
974 Posts
Been a law many places many years with success for motorcyclists. Motorcycles don't trip the lights at those lights from a side road that crosses a 55mph divided road. Meaning at non-busy hours a motorcycle crossing would either have to run it red or wait possibly 10 minutes for a car to come up from behind.
In town, I usually hit pause....roll over to the cross walk button, hit it, then get back to the light.
In town, I usually hit pause....roll over to the cross walk button, hit it, then get back to the light.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,229
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18409 Post(s)
Liked 15,520 Times
in
7,324 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,811
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1591 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,018 Times
in
571 Posts
I do most of my recreational riding in the adjacent county as I live on the county line. That county still has no traffic lights. I believe it's the only one left in state.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,229
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18409 Post(s)
Liked 15,520 Times
in
7,324 Posts
By my count, 8,347 in the entire state. Seems like that number is increasing:
https://www.idahopress.com/news/loca...c83b291d8.html
I didn't count stop signs, which are also covered by the Idaho Stop Law.
https://www.idahopress.com/news/loca...c83b291d8.html
I didn't count stop signs, which are also covered by the Idaho Stop Law.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
75 lights?
24 lights?
? lights?
XKCD
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 04-04-19 at 07:48 AM.
#14
Junior Member
Been a law many places many years with success for motorcyclists. Motorcycles don't trip the lights at those lights from a side road that crosses a 55mph divided road. Meaning at non-busy hours a motorcycle crossing would either have to run it red or wait possibly 10 minutes for a car to come up from behind.
In town, I usually hit pause....roll over to the cross walk button, hit it, then get back to the light.
In town, I usually hit pause....roll over to the cross walk button, hit it, then get back to the light.
#16
Junior Member
Ahh, that is indeed news to me. Hard to tell from the summary but I'd be curious where all it applies to motorcycles and if in those places it applies to all the situations (treating a stop sign as a yield etc.) or just the "won't trigger the signal sensor". I had no idea any of these applied to motorcycles though. Thanks.
#17
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,115
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1788 Post(s)
Liked 1,628 Times
in
933 Posts
As a resident of Washington State, it is my understanding that you have to sit for 1 whole complete cycle, & only then is it permissable to proceed. The logic is the infrastructure provided was not sensetive enough to detect your presence to operate in the manner intended.
However, the "I didn't stop because that light is broken" excuse is not valid in court. That's what the ccomplete cycle" thing is about.
There is a law on the books requiring all new intersections being built & all intersections being repaired or upgraded be equipped to be able to detect bicycles & light vehicles such as motorcycles. Motion detection cameras & AI seems to be the method of choice. I hit several suitably equipped intersections on my morning commute. I think it's called "dynamic traffic management," but I may be wrong. I've gotta say, though, by whatever name they call it the system works well.
Edit: Yep. Gotta stop & wait 1 complete cycle.
However, the "I didn't stop because that light is broken" excuse is not valid in court. That's what the ccomplete cycle" thing is about.
There is a law on the books requiring all new intersections being built & all intersections being repaired or upgraded be equipped to be able to detect bicycles & light vehicles such as motorcycles. Motion detection cameras & AI seems to be the method of choice. I hit several suitably equipped intersections on my morning commute. I think it's called "dynamic traffic management," but I may be wrong. I've gotta say, though, by whatever name they call it the system works well.
Edit: Yep. Gotta stop & wait 1 complete cycle.
Last edited by base2; 04-04-19 at 08:36 AM.
#18
Non omnino gravis
I live where actual crimes occur fairly regularly, so the police in my experience do not care about cyclists at all. I've rolled stop signs and jumped the light right in front of police cruisers, and they don't even look twice. We barely register to people in cars, I'm not sure we register to cops at all. Now if you have a bag of aluminum cans hanging from your handlebars, that sure seems to be a different story.
I apply the Idaho Stop here 100%-- stop sign is a yield, red light is a stop sign. The California Vehicle Code was written 100% for motor vehicles. Bicycles are a footnote at best, and little of the content is concerned with the safety of cyclists. I see someone try to race a railway crossing at least once a week. So they're clearly not even really that concerned about their own welfare. I'll keep looking out for myself, the laws can catch up later.
I apply the Idaho Stop here 100%-- stop sign is a yield, red light is a stop sign. The California Vehicle Code was written 100% for motor vehicles. Bicycles are a footnote at best, and little of the content is concerned with the safety of cyclists. I see someone try to race a railway crossing at least once a week. So they're clearly not even really that concerned about their own welfare. I'll keep looking out for myself, the laws can catch up later.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,483
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7649 Post(s)
Liked 3,469 Times
in
1,832 Posts
As a resident of Washington State, it is my understanding that you have to sit for 1 whole complete cycle, & only then is it permissable to proceed. The logic is the infrastructure provided was not sensetive enough to detect your presence to operate in the manner intended. .
Most of those cases are common-sense situations anyway. if i can look a quarter-mile down the road in each direction and see no cars, only a top-fuel dragster could hit me before i crossed ... and anything going nearly that fast, i would hear before I could see it.
#20
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,115
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1788 Post(s)
Liked 1,628 Times
in
933 Posts
The logic breaks down when some lights don't trigger outside of commuter hours unless cross-traffic is present. You would have to sit until dawn waiting for a "complete" cycle.
Most of those cases are common-sense situations anyway. if i can look a quarter-mile down the road in each direction and see no cars, only a top-fuel dragster could hit me before i crossed ... and anything going nearly that fast, i would hear before I could see it.
Most of those cases are common-sense situations anyway. if i can look a quarter-mile down the road in each direction and see no cars, only a top-fuel dragster could hit me before i crossed ... and anything going nearly that fast, i would hear before I could see it.
Last edited by base2; 04-04-19 at 08:48 AM.
#21
Junior Member
I live where actual crimes occur fairly regularly, so the police in my experience do not care about cyclists at all. I've rolled stop signs and jumped the light right in front of police cruisers, and they don't even look twice. We barely register to people in cars, I'm not sure we register to cops at all. Now if you have a bag of aluminum cans hanging from your handlebars, that sure seems to be a different story.
I apply the Idaho Stop here 100%-- stop sign is a yield, red light is a stop sign. The California Vehicle Code was written 100% for motor vehicles. Bicycles are a footnote at best, and little of the content is concerned with the safety of cyclists. I see someone try to race a railway crossing at least once a week. So they're clearly not even really that concerned about their own welfare. I'll keep looking out for myself, the laws can catch up later.
I apply the Idaho Stop here 100%-- stop sign is a yield, red light is a stop sign. The California Vehicle Code was written 100% for motor vehicles. Bicycles are a footnote at best, and little of the content is concerned with the safety of cyclists. I see someone try to race a railway crossing at least once a week. So they're clearly not even really that concerned about their own welfare. I'll keep looking out for myself, the laws can catch up later.
Funny story, I was once pulled over (while driving a car) by a police officer on a bicycle. This was not a congested metro area where that would make sense btw. This was in the early 90's in a sprawling suburb where I'd never even seen a local officer on a bicycle. I was approaching an intersection out of a neighborhood onto a slightly larger/faster road and rolled significantly past the stop sign just as he rode by on the street I was turning onto. As I turned he waved me over to stop. If I recall correctly he only gave me a warning though.
#22
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,515
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times
in
219 Posts
My #1 safety tip for cyclists is to "reduce your exposure to motorized traffic" whatever it takes. 100 fewer cars per commute is quite a reduction of risk IMO. I seem to be able to look both ways and cross a street safely however. As witnessed here on BF, not everyone has that capability. No law against WAITING for the light to go green if you cant figure it out.
#23
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Good news on Arkansas, hope this is a trend.
Tangent--I was riding in Leominster, MA last Saturday, and a couple entered the crosswalk on the left side of the street. A car in behind me passed me and zoomed through the crosswalk like they weren't even there. The couple was so surprised I stopped to wait for them to cross that it actually took them a second or two to catch on and start walking again. We all laughed when one of the crossers pointed out how ironic it was that it was the vehicle that could fall over at a stop was the one that actually obeyed the law.
Tangent--I was riding in Leominster, MA last Saturday, and a couple entered the crosswalk on the left side of the street. A car in behind me passed me and zoomed through the crosswalk like they weren't even there. The couple was so surprised I stopped to wait for them to cross that it actually took them a second or two to catch on and start walking again. We all laughed when one of the crossers pointed out how ironic it was that it was the vehicle that could fall over at a stop was the one that actually obeyed the law.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
Tangent--I was riding in Leominster, MA last Saturday, and a couple entered the crosswalk on the left side of the street. A car in behind me passed me and zoomed through the crosswalk like they weren't even there. The couple was so surprised I stopped to wait for them to cross that it actually took them a second or two to catch on and start walking again. We all laughed when one of the crossers pointed out how ironic it was that it was the vehicle that could fall over at a stop was the one that actually obeyed the law.
-mr. bill
#25
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Yup. People smile when you don't treat them like meat pylons.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlZjJeiggn4
-mr. bill
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlZjJeiggn4
-mr. bill
Exhibit A the next time somebody says drivers are more law-obedient than bicyclists.