Sage advice, or lunacy? Hmmm...
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 728
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 365 Post(s)
Liked 419 Times
in
248 Posts
It depends on what you call a "good reason", I suppose.
The last bike I bought I intended to use for (a) riding for fun (which may, at times, include fantasizing that I'm "fast", in some sense of the word) and fitness; and (b) commuting to work. I don't race. There was a carbon frame version of the bike I ended up buying (the bike I bought has an aluminum frame). For my use, I could find no "good reason" to go with the carbon version. Any marginal benefit of the carbon frame in terms of weight and aerodynamic drag was not worth the extra cost. Also, I don't think the carbon frame had the "braze-ons" (they're no longer braze-ons, I suppose I should call them "attachment points"???) for fenders and rack. So, for this purchase, there was "good reason" to eschew the carbon frame bike and to go with the aluminum frame.
For someone racing Cat 5, would the weight/aero benefit of the carbon over the aluminum be measurable in the only terms that are meaningful in a race (i.e. placings)?
What about Cat 4? 3? Etc.
If riding the carbon would allow a citizen racer to place one place higher in a race, would that be a "good reason" to get the carbon frame? How about a youngster who is shooting for a pro career and, therefore, to whom placings mean more than just bragging rights and upgrade points?
Is buying a carbon frame because you prefer the feel (assuming there's a perceptible difference) a "good reason"?
Is buying a carbon frame because you like the "bling" value a "good reason"?
In BikeSnob's article, he assumes that the only "good reason" for buying a carbon frame is that you can benefit in a real way (e.g. winning a professional bicycle race) from riding the carbon frame as opposed to riding a different material. And, he asserts that carbon is less durable under "normal use", and therefore there is a financial disincentive for getting a carbon frame over and above the extra cost of a carbon fiber bike vs. an Al or steel bike. If you reject his premises, then of course his argument falls apart.
I've only ridden a carbon bike once (it was actually a Serotta Ottrot, so carbon tubes with Ti head tube/BB/seat cluster - as far as I remember), so I have no opinion of the "feel" of a carbon frame over other materials, all else being equal. I do enjoy riding a lighter bike more than a heavier bike, however, even if the feeling does not translate to a measurable difference in performance. (My new bike is about 2 lb lighter than my old one, and I can measure a difference in time over a distance, but it is a slight difference, and I have no way to control for other factors, for example pushing harder because I "feel" faster.)
For me, I can pretend to be Eddy Merckx just as well on a bike with an aluminum frame as on one with a carbon frame, so there's no "good reason" for me to get a carbon bike.
The last bike I bought I intended to use for (a) riding for fun (which may, at times, include fantasizing that I'm "fast", in some sense of the word) and fitness; and (b) commuting to work. I don't race. There was a carbon frame version of the bike I ended up buying (the bike I bought has an aluminum frame). For my use, I could find no "good reason" to go with the carbon version. Any marginal benefit of the carbon frame in terms of weight and aerodynamic drag was not worth the extra cost. Also, I don't think the carbon frame had the "braze-ons" (they're no longer braze-ons, I suppose I should call them "attachment points"???) for fenders and rack. So, for this purchase, there was "good reason" to eschew the carbon frame bike and to go with the aluminum frame.
For someone racing Cat 5, would the weight/aero benefit of the carbon over the aluminum be measurable in the only terms that are meaningful in a race (i.e. placings)?
What about Cat 4? 3? Etc.
If riding the carbon would allow a citizen racer to place one place higher in a race, would that be a "good reason" to get the carbon frame? How about a youngster who is shooting for a pro career and, therefore, to whom placings mean more than just bragging rights and upgrade points?
Is buying a carbon frame because you prefer the feel (assuming there's a perceptible difference) a "good reason"?
Is buying a carbon frame because you like the "bling" value a "good reason"?
In BikeSnob's article, he assumes that the only "good reason" for buying a carbon frame is that you can benefit in a real way (e.g. winning a professional bicycle race) from riding the carbon frame as opposed to riding a different material. And, he asserts that carbon is less durable under "normal use", and therefore there is a financial disincentive for getting a carbon frame over and above the extra cost of a carbon fiber bike vs. an Al or steel bike. If you reject his premises, then of course his argument falls apart.
I've only ridden a carbon bike once (it was actually a Serotta Ottrot, so carbon tubes with Ti head tube/BB/seat cluster - as far as I remember), so I have no opinion of the "feel" of a carbon frame over other materials, all else being equal. I do enjoy riding a lighter bike more than a heavier bike, however, even if the feeling does not translate to a measurable difference in performance. (My new bike is about 2 lb lighter than my old one, and I can measure a difference in time over a distance, but it is a slight difference, and I have no way to control for other factors, for example pushing harder because I "feel" faster.)
For me, I can pretend to be Eddy Merckx just as well on a bike with an aluminum frame as on one with a carbon frame, so there's no "good reason" for me to get a carbon bike.
#27
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,984
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10440 Post(s)
Liked 11,914 Times
in
6,101 Posts
Arguably, none of us "needs" anything more than a 25 lb steel bike with Tiagra. As far as I'm concerned, "It's better than something cheaper, and I want it and can afford it" is "good reason" enough.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Missoula MT
Posts: 1,767
Bikes: Handsome xoxo, Serotta atx, Canyon Endurace CF8
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 1,899 Times
in
849 Posts
I bought a Canyon Endurace CF8 this past July and have put about 4000 miles on it so far and I still think steel bikes look better and If I had to do it over I probably would have spent a little more and got a steel bike.
Likes For jadmt:
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Missoula MT
Posts: 1,767
Bikes: Handsome xoxo, Serotta atx, Canyon Endurace CF8
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 1,899 Times
in
849 Posts
amen....for some reason there is no like button on your post....otherwise I would have just hit like cause I am lazy
Likes For jadmt:
#30
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,057
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22600 Post(s)
Liked 8,928 Times
in
4,160 Posts
Likes For datlas:
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,491
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,479 Times
in
1,836 Posts
The last bike I bought I intended to use for (a) riding for fun (which may, at times, include fantasizing that I'm "fast", in some sense of the word) and fitness; and (b) commuting to work. I don't race. There was a carbon frame version of the bike I ended up buying (the bike I bought has an aluminum frame). For my use, I could find no "good reason" to go with the carbon version. Any marginal benefit of the carbon frame in terms of weight and aerodynamic drag was not worth the extra cost. Also, I don't think the carbon frame had the "braze-ons" (they're no longer braze-ons, I suppose I should call them "attachment points"???) for fenders and rack. So, for this purchase, there was "good reason" to eschew the carbon frame bike and to go with the aluminum frame.
Some people here seem to think some other people here fetishize certain frame materials (and some do admit they do ... ) but I am not one of them. Bikes are tools and toys, so buy the tool which does the job and the toy which is fun to play with.
Likes For Maelochs:
#32
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 209
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 154 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
22 Posts
Sage advice. I just built my son a new ride up from a Fuji Roubaix frame. It's a hydro-formed alum frame with carbon stays and really nice carbon forks. I just couldn't believe how light an stiff it is. I got it for $100. It's in like-new condition. It's so light and nimble. My main bike is a really light steel-framed bike with steel forks and it just flies, and it soaks up the road. I'm sure that the high-end carbon bikes are great, but for everyday roadies, anything will do.
Likes For ArgoMan:
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,871 Times
in
3,015 Posts
(I'm not telling anyone what to think, say or brag about)
Performance based on value as it relates to me and what I do, which is very similar to what other recreational riders do...
The 3k ALR (price including wheel upgrade) is pretty much going to get me to the same place in the same amount of time as the 5k carbon model.
Aero on a long ride or century? I guess if I'm doing a 100 mile TT it would matter - but just like most everyone else, I'm not doing 100 mile TT's on a standard road bike. I'm drafting other riders with very limited time up front. And I'm riding the speed of the paceline - the CF bike isn't getting me into a faster paceline, so my time will be based off the paceline time.
Climbing? The bikes are within a few ounces of each other, in some cases the ALR + wheels weighs less than the CF of the same total cost.
Sure, if I double the cost I can get a more aero or lighter bike - but I'm talking dollar for dollar, and in some cases more dollars for the CF bike - the extra performance just isn't there.
Performance based on value as it relates to me and what I do, which is very similar to what other recreational riders do...
The 3k ALR (price including wheel upgrade) is pretty much going to get me to the same place in the same amount of time as the 5k carbon model.
Aero on a long ride or century? I guess if I'm doing a 100 mile TT it would matter - but just like most everyone else, I'm not doing 100 mile TT's on a standard road bike. I'm drafting other riders with very limited time up front. And I'm riding the speed of the paceline - the CF bike isn't getting me into a faster paceline, so my time will be based off the paceline time.
Climbing? The bikes are within a few ounces of each other, in some cases the ALR + wheels weighs less than the CF of the same total cost.
Sure, if I double the cost I can get a more aero or lighter bike - but I'm talking dollar for dollar, and in some cases more dollars for the CF bike - the extra performance just isn't there.
However, I do prefer the way carbon bars and seatposts soak up all the road buzz. I think those would be worthwhile genuine upgrades on any frame, especially for endurance riding.
#34
Senior Member
What I have found with carbon frames and forks is that they are limiting. Not much I can do to modify a carbon frame or fork to fit a different size hub OLD. I can remove the rear triangle on a lugged steel frame and change it to add tire clearance. Not something that can easily be done with carbon. I can change the rear drop out to horizontal on a steel frame, not so much with a carbon frame.
Yes, I have done all of the above with steel frames. To do the same with a carbon frame is major surgery and sometimes not possible. As I said, carbon frames are limiting.
Full disclosure, I have owned 3 carbon frames in the past and enjoyed them, but switched back to steel.
Yes, I have done all of the above with steel frames. To do the same with a carbon frame is major surgery and sometimes not possible. As I said, carbon frames are limiting.
Full disclosure, I have owned 3 carbon frames in the past and enjoyed them, but switched back to steel.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,660
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1248 Post(s)
Liked 1,323 Times
in
674 Posts
What I have found with carbon frames and forks is that they are limiting. Not much I can do to modify a carbon frame or fork to fit a different size hub OLD. I can remove the rear triangle on a lugged steel frame and change it to add tire clearance. Not something that can easily be done with carbon. I can change the rear drop out to horizontal on a steel frame, not so much with a carbon frame.
Yes, I have done all of the above with steel frames. To do the same with a carbon frame is major surgery and sometimes not possible. As I said, carbon frames are limiting.
Full disclosure, I have owned 3 carbon frames in the past and enjoyed them, but switched back to steel.
Yes, I have done all of the above with steel frames. To do the same with a carbon frame is major surgery and sometimes not possible. As I said, carbon frames are limiting.
Full disclosure, I have owned 3 carbon frames in the past and enjoyed them, but switched back to steel.
Likes For Jughed:
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,954
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3956 Post(s)
Liked 7,307 Times
in
2,949 Posts
It was 61° here today. The linked article snapped me back to reality -- it's still winter.
#38
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,226
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2585 Post(s)
Liked 5,648 Times
in
2,924 Posts
My overly simplistic take on the conversation above comes down to this: A Pinto is a budget car that will get you from here to there at a low initial cost and that can be modified and is just fine. Then there are people with means that can afford Porsches, who buy the cars because they like the styling, the assumed performance, weight savings and prestige.
The Pinto drivers will never convince the Porsche drivers to switch and vice versa. If we were all rational people, we would all drive econo cars. Fortunately for some, there are other less rational but more appealing choices.
The Pinto drivers will never convince the Porsche drivers to switch and vice versa. If we were all rational people, we would all drive econo cars. Fortunately for some, there are other less rational but more appealing choices.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Likes For rsbob:
#42
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,664
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1948 Post(s)
Liked 1,472 Times
in
1,020 Posts
Waiting for whoever to diss me about platinum cards (that I do not have).
#43
Senior Member
Atlas Shrugged, I do the work myself. Learned to braze back in high school and after many decades decided to build a frame made to fit me and with tubing and features to my liking. Ended up designing an building 5 of them! Rattle can paint is good enough as they are all working bikes. Costs are minimal, well below the cost of a replacement frame from any material.
As for replacing a rear triangle or drop outs, it is not difficult, at least it isn't for me. Working with carbon sheets is much more difficult from what minimum knowledge I have about the process.
As for replacing a rear triangle or drop outs, it is not difficult, at least it isn't for me. Working with carbon sheets is much more difficult from what minimum knowledge I have about the process.
Likes For Steel Charlie:
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4416 Post(s)
Liked 4,871 Times
in
3,015 Posts
Atlas Shrugged, I do the work myself. Learned to braze back in high school and after many decades decided to build a frame made to fit me and with tubing and features to my liking. Ended up designing an building 5 of them! Rattle can paint is good enough as they are all working bikes. Costs are minimal, well below the cost of a replacement frame from any material.
As for replacing a rear triangle or drop outs, it is not difficult, at least it isn't for me. Working with carbon sheets is much more difficult from what minimum knowledge I have about the process.
As for replacing a rear triangle or drop outs, it is not difficult, at least it isn't for me. Working with carbon sheets is much more difficult from what minimum knowledge I have about the process.
Likes For PeteHski:
#47
...
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Whitestone and Rensselaerville, New York
Posts: 1,518
Bikes: Bicycles? Yup.
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 482 Post(s)
Liked 1,593 Times
in
739 Posts
Just old-style clickbait. A bud used to write for Sports Afield and Stereo Review. At least once a year he'd get assigned to write a controversial story trashing an old favorite ______, to inflame reader's passions and gin up angry letters to the editor.
I'm glad Eben has a paying gig, he's a talented writer.
I'm glad Eben has a paying gig, he's a talented writer.
#48
Senior Member
I've ridden a lot of bikes of all the different materials. I feel I am rather subjective about it and have no preference.
Steel bike people say it is so smooth... idk. It's fine, I guess.
Ti bike people say it rides like steel with the weight of carbon... idk. It's still pretty heavy
Carbon bike people say it is super light and compliant... idk. Most of them are still pretty heavy.
Aluminum bike people say it is only a few grams heavier and they save thousands... idk. I don't find that much savings.
I've never sought out a specific material when purchasing a bike. I loved high end classics, so I rode steel, I liked the look of a bare frame, so I rode Ti, I bought an entry level bike when I first got into it, so I rode aluminum, and I found killer deals on frames and rode carbon.
I haven't ever noticed the nuances of difference in ride characteristics, mostly I have noticed geometry changes from race, endurance, classic, and new bikes. I have found that I like light wheels (high engagement hubs a must on MTB but not so critical on road) and I like Ultegra/Force level or above drivetrains - the shifting is noticeably smoother and quieter (to me). Unless you're building from frame up, you can't usually buy a comparable bike in aluminum or carbon. Aluminum bikes usually get low end heavy components and wheels and carbon bikes get the nicer stuff. Usually it's cheaper to buy a carbon bike complete vs an aluminum frame and build it yourself with the good stuff.
I don't care about frame material, but I do care about good components. Usually that puts me on carbon bikes.
Steel bike people say it is so smooth... idk. It's fine, I guess.
Ti bike people say it rides like steel with the weight of carbon... idk. It's still pretty heavy
Carbon bike people say it is super light and compliant... idk. Most of them are still pretty heavy.
Aluminum bike people say it is only a few grams heavier and they save thousands... idk. I don't find that much savings.
I've never sought out a specific material when purchasing a bike. I loved high end classics, so I rode steel, I liked the look of a bare frame, so I rode Ti, I bought an entry level bike when I first got into it, so I rode aluminum, and I found killer deals on frames and rode carbon.
I haven't ever noticed the nuances of difference in ride characteristics, mostly I have noticed geometry changes from race, endurance, classic, and new bikes. I have found that I like light wheels (high engagement hubs a must on MTB but not so critical on road) and I like Ultegra/Force level or above drivetrains - the shifting is noticeably smoother and quieter (to me). Unless you're building from frame up, you can't usually buy a comparable bike in aluminum or carbon. Aluminum bikes usually get low end heavy components and wheels and carbon bikes get the nicer stuff. Usually it's cheaper to buy a carbon bike complete vs an aluminum frame and build it yourself with the good stuff.
I don't care about frame material, but I do care about good components. Usually that puts me on carbon bikes.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,254
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18424 Post(s)
Liked 15,579 Times
in
7,337 Posts
Blast from the past.
#50
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,516
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
I thought posting that was a bannable offense. See you in a week or two, maybe.