Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Article : Touring Bike Buyers Guide: Geometry

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Article : Touring Bike Buyers Guide: Geometry

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-20, 02:17 AM
  #1  
pakeboi
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 531
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 216 Post(s)
Liked 32 Times in 29 Posts
Article : Touring Bike Buyers Guide: Geometry

https://www.adventurecycling.org/blo...uide-geometry/
pakeboi is offline  
Old 01-02-20, 09:05 AM
  #2  
hokiefyd 
Senior Member
 
hokiefyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,139

Bikes: More bikes than riders

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1443 Post(s)
Liked 759 Times in 568 Posts
The article cites traditional touring bikes has having "high trail" to aid in the carrying of front loads. My understanding is the opposite -- low(er) trail supports the carrying of a front load better than high(er) trail does. Of course, the terms "high" and "low" are subjective, but the numbers they cite for the Trek 520 and Surly LHT (61mm and 67mm, respectively) are not what I would call "high".

Am I off base here?
hokiefyd is offline  
Old 01-02-20, 09:38 AM
  #3  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times in 1,577 Posts
Originally Posted by hokiefyd
The article cites traditional touring bikes has having "high trail" to aid in the carrying of front loads. My understanding is the opposite -- low(er) trail supports the carrying of a front load better than high(er) trail does. Of course, the terms "high" and "low" are subjective, but the numbers they cite for the Trek 520 and Surly LHT (61mm and 67mm, respectively) are not what I would call "high".

Am I off base here?
I think they meant to say what they did. Plenty of people, likely the majority, still prefer higher than neutral trail. Even if they couldn't put it into those words.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 01-02-20, 10:43 AM
  #4  
pdlamb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,895

Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2599 Post(s)
Liked 1,924 Times in 1,208 Posts
I think the 520 and LHT trail quoted would indeed qualify as "high trail." "Low trail" would likely be 50 mm or lower. It's like politics today, there is no middle ground. :/
pdlamb is offline  
Old 01-02-20, 12:26 PM
  #5  
hokiefyd 
Senior Member
 
hokiefyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,139

Bikes: More bikes than riders

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1443 Post(s)
Liked 759 Times in 568 Posts
Originally Posted by pdlamb
It's like politics today, there is no middle ground. :/
Seriously!
hokiefyd is offline  
Old 01-02-20, 05:42 PM
  #6  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times in 4,181 Posts
Another thread by pakeboi with no real info from pakeboi.
https://www.bikeforums.net/cyclocros...-magazine.html
mstateglfr is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.