Shifting and Chain Flex, What is "Normal Effects"
#1
Quidam Bike Super Hero
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Stone Mountain, GA (Metro Atlanta, East)
Posts: 1,135
Bikes: 1995 Trek 800 Sport, aka, "CamelTrek"
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 331 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times
in
282 Posts
Shifting and Chain Flex, What is "Normal Effects"
Spending a LOT of time musing on the effects of shifting a chain and running it off the most straight chain line. Obviously, one has to shift at least one cog just to shift. Mechanically, what are the stresses the chain is undergoing and, more importantly to my musings, what stresses are magnified by shifting and running the chain one, two, or more cogs off the straight line?
Example: I run a 9 speed Shimano and standard KMC chain. I almost exclusively stay within two cogs of straight (2/5/8) but do a lot of all round pedaling in the middle chainring and 7th cog (two cogs off of straight). In reality (and or theory), what am I doing to the normal wear and tear on the chain? Is two, three, four, or more cogs off the straight line increasing problems for the chain or other parts. When does "off the straight line" become cross chaining?
Thanks for all constructive instruction!
Example: I run a 9 speed Shimano and standard KMC chain. I almost exclusively stay within two cogs of straight (2/5/8) but do a lot of all round pedaling in the middle chainring and 7th cog (two cogs off of straight). In reality (and or theory), what am I doing to the normal wear and tear on the chain? Is two, three, four, or more cogs off the straight line increasing problems for the chain or other parts. When does "off the straight line" become cross chaining?
Thanks for all constructive instruction!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times
in
446 Posts
Spending a LOT of time musing on the effects of shifting a chain and running it off the most straight chain line. Obviously, one has to shift at least one cog just to shift. Mechanically, what are the stresses the chain is undergoing and, more importantly to my musings, what stresses are magnified by shifting and running the chain one, two, or more cogs off the straight line?
Example: I run a 9 speed Shimano and standard KMC chain. I almost exclusively stay within two cogs of straight (2/5/8) but do a lot of all round pedaling in the middle chainring and 7th cog (two cogs off of straight). In reality (and or theory), what am I doing to the normal wear and tear on the chain? Is two, three, four, or more cogs off the straight line increasing problems for the chain or other parts. When does "off the straight line" become cross chaining?
Thanks for all constructive instruction!
Example: I run a 9 speed Shimano and standard KMC chain. I almost exclusively stay within two cogs of straight (2/5/8) but do a lot of all round pedaling in the middle chainring and 7th cog (two cogs off of straight). In reality (and or theory), what am I doing to the normal wear and tear on the chain? Is two, three, four, or more cogs off the straight line increasing problems for the chain or other parts. When does "off the straight line" become cross chaining?
Thanks for all constructive instruction!
Last edited by Litespud; 08-01-20 at 04:46 PM.
Likes For Litespud:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,319
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1438 Post(s)
Liked 1,092 Times
in
723 Posts
Musing less and riding more will relieve a lot of the stress; on you at least.
Likes For dsbrantjr:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,706
Bikes: Trek 730 (quad), 720 & 830, Bike Friday NWT, Brompton M36R & M6R, Dahon HAT060 & HT060, ...
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 840 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times
in
251 Posts
The inefficiencies from tension being at an angle to the cogs or rings tend to behave like (1-cosine(angle)). For small angles relative to straight on they are completely irrelevant.
Likes For 2_i:
#5
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,538
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3672 Post(s)
Liked 5,427 Times
in
2,757 Posts
You might ask about chain life in the single speed section and compare it to your own.
#6
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
Next time you have your chain off the bike take hold of a section with two hands wide apart and twist into an 'S' shape. It's amazing how much flex is build into it for the exact purpose of crossing chain lines.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
I was thinking about how I'd measure that. A power meter of some kind and a speedometer maybe? You could measure how much power was necessary to maintain the same speed in various gearing combinations. I kind of suspect background noise, like wind differences and measuring errors are going to drown out whatever data you'd get.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,706
Bikes: Trek 730 (quad), 720 & 830, Bike Friday NWT, Brompton M36R & M6R, Dahon HAT060 & HT060, ...
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 840 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times
in
251 Posts
There is this paper: "Effects of Frictional Loss on Bicycle Chain Drive Efficiency", Spicer et al, J. Mech. Des. 123 (2001) 598, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1412848, that claims that losses due to imperfect chainline are lower than other factors that matter, with the dominant being ring-sprocket size combination.
Likes For 2_i:
#9
Quidam Bike Super Hero
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Stone Mountain, GA (Metro Atlanta, East)
Posts: 1,135
Bikes: 1995 Trek 800 Sport, aka, "CamelTrek"
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 331 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times
in
282 Posts
There is this paper: "Effects of Frictional Loss on Bicycle Chain Drive Efficiency", Spicer et al, J. Mech. Des. 123 (2001) 598, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1412848, that claims that losses due to imperfect chainline are lower than other factors that matter, with the dominant being ring-sprocket size combination.
A few paragraphs in, concerns about flex are addressed, but admits no studies exist. Unfortunately beyond my mental and physical pay grades....
#10
Banned
Now all derailleur chains are of a 'bushingless' design.
In making the inner link plate, the steel from punching the hole, is formed into part of the bushing for the roller edges.
No longer a sleeve piece under the full width of the roller ... that used to be separate (& different steel)
a smaller contact surface on the ends , means it wears a bit sooner..
that is where your lateral flex comes from . the way rollers, pins and the partial bushing-flange interact.
Sedisport chains were the earliest adopters of this design, I think.. now it's universal.
3/32" full bushing chains are what's rare.
In making the inner link plate, the steel from punching the hole, is formed into part of the bushing for the roller edges.
No longer a sleeve piece under the full width of the roller ... that used to be separate (& different steel)
a smaller contact surface on the ends , means it wears a bit sooner..
that is where your lateral flex comes from . the way rollers, pins and the partial bushing-flange interact.
Sedisport chains were the earliest adopters of this design, I think.. now it's universal.
3/32" full bushing chains are what's rare.
Last edited by fietsbob; 08-02-20 at 02:18 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
This area of concern could be called "chain-weenieism".
I wonder if those with earbuds are less prone because of something to listen to during long hours riding.
I've gone through a number of 'weenieisms" for example contemplating airfoil shapes to stick on the backside of cable housings.
AFAS cross chaining, IMO adequate lubrication is a much bigger factor for both friction and wear. I spend plenty of time in big/big (10 speed).
If you have a triple, and use the whole cassette with the middle ring, it will make no difference in chain life., but it's fun to theorize.
I wonder if those with earbuds are less prone because of something to listen to during long hours riding.
I've gone through a number of 'weenieisms" for example contemplating airfoil shapes to stick on the backside of cable housings.
AFAS cross chaining, IMO adequate lubrication is a much bigger factor for both friction and wear. I spend plenty of time in big/big (10 speed).
If you have a triple, and use the whole cassette with the middle ring, it will make no difference in chain life., but it's fun to theorize.
#12
Quidam Bike Super Hero
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Stone Mountain, GA (Metro Atlanta, East)
Posts: 1,135
Bikes: 1995 Trek 800 Sport, aka, "CamelTrek"
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 331 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times
in
282 Posts
Could be, could be... and I'm hoping it inadvertently is... nothing to worry about and nothing worth doing about it if it is... i.e., as mentioned earlier, just a normal wear situation.