New Firecrest 303s
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,644 Times
in
6,053 Posts
New Firecrest 303s
Zipp put out a new generation of one of their most popular wheelsets. They're fat and hookless. New hubs.
While external width is only 1mm wider at 30mm, the rims use a hookless sidewall design that gives a 25mm bed and a much fuller tyre profile. This reduces the ‘waist’ between tyre and rim that could often trip up airflow and while the new wheel is 5mm shallower than the old 303 at 40mm deep, it’s actually tested faster in the wind tunnel and on the road.
The take-home is that using Zipp’s own 28mm tubeless road tyres showed that on rough/gravel/cobbled roads, a 70kg rider will roll fastest with 55psi in the front and 60psi in the rear. Using a 30mm you should drop to 50-55psi and even lower the fatter you go. Even on smoother roads, Zipp’s data suggests you only need a handful more psi to return a 10W gain over narrower rims and tyres at higher pressures. They’ve even deliberately rated the rims with a max of 72psi, not because more isn’t safer but because they’re determined to get people to try lower pressures.
https://www.cyclingnews.com/amp/news...st-303-wheels/
While external width is only 1mm wider at 30mm, the rims use a hookless sidewall design that gives a 25mm bed and a much fuller tyre profile. This reduces the ‘waist’ between tyre and rim that could often trip up airflow and while the new wheel is 5mm shallower than the old 303 at 40mm deep, it’s actually tested faster in the wind tunnel and on the road.
The take-home is that using Zipp’s own 28mm tubeless road tyres showed that on rough/gravel/cobbled roads, a 70kg rider will roll fastest with 55psi in the front and 60psi in the rear. Using a 30mm you should drop to 50-55psi and even lower the fatter you go. Even on smoother roads, Zipp’s data suggests you only need a handful more psi to return a 10W gain over narrower rims and tyres at higher pressures. They’ve even deliberately rated the rims with a max of 72psi, not because more isn’t safer but because they’re determined to get people to try lower pressures.
https://www.cyclingnews.com/amp/news...st-303-wheels/
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
Good thing I don't ride on rough/gravel/cobbled roads and can use my skinnier and faster wheels and tires.
30mm. Yikes.
30mm. Yikes.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410
Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 850 Post(s)
Liked 344 Times
in
247 Posts
I’ve been pushing for wider tires and lower pressures for a while, so I’m glad to see it finally gaining traction.
But at the same time, I’m not convinced that 28s measuring to 30 are going to be faster for absolutely everyone - especially climbers who weigh less than 150lbs. The cynic in me expects the pendulum to swing the other way when they realize that, for a similar depth, narrower tires (on wide rims) are more aero, lighter and probably roll similarly if you go to a low enough pressure.
With TL and hookless, perhaps there is LESS reason now to go with wider tires than ever - just run your 23mm tires at 60-80psi. You’re not going to pinch flat anymore 🤷♂️
Wider tires, for now, seem to be a band-aid over the fact that hookless isn’t reliable at higher pressures and carbon rims are too delicate to take hard impacts frequently.
But at the same time, I’m not convinced that 28s measuring to 30 are going to be faster for absolutely everyone - especially climbers who weigh less than 150lbs. The cynic in me expects the pendulum to swing the other way when they realize that, for a similar depth, narrower tires (on wide rims) are more aero, lighter and probably roll similarly if you go to a low enough pressure.
With TL and hookless, perhaps there is LESS reason now to go with wider tires than ever - just run your 23mm tires at 60-80psi. You’re not going to pinch flat anymore 🤷♂️
Wider tires, for now, seem to be a band-aid over the fact that hookless isn’t reliable at higher pressures and carbon rims are too delicate to take hard impacts frequently.
Last edited by smashndash; 05-28-20 at 03:47 PM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,505
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20791 Post(s)
Liked 9,435 Times
in
4,663 Posts
I was reading about these earlier today. IIRC, they're coming in at ~1350g for the pair for a wide, mid-depth rim - nice. That said, I'd be more tempted by the 303S, which seems to provide much of the benefit at a lower price, though they're not as light.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,644 Times
in
6,053 Posts
These sound more than a little reminiscent of Enve's 4.5 ARs. In the profile including 25 mm internal, in being extra fat, and in being hookless. These are about 150g lighter which at that kind of $$$ is nothing to sneeze at. I'd rather have the Enves any day of the week and twice on Sunday, but it's an interesting development and if I was going to buy Zipps it would be some flavor of 303s.
The Enve wheels were made for the cobble races, and are marketed for mixed surface rides where you want control on the gravel and speed on the pavement. I don't know the story behind the Zipps but they'd excel at the same kind of riding.
I've beaten the crap out of mine, and I'm built like a football player. Really amazed at the abuse they stand up to.
The Enve wheels were made for the cobble races, and are marketed for mixed surface rides where you want control on the gravel and speed on the pavement. I don't know the story behind the Zipps but they'd excel at the same kind of riding.
I've beaten the crap out of mine, and I'm built like a football player. Really amazed at the abuse they stand up to.
#7
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 216
Bikes: 2020 Pinarello Dogma F12 Disc (Enve SES 3.4), 2020 S-Works Roubaix (Zipp 303 NSW), 2020 Canyon Ultimate Evo 10.0 (DT Swiss DICUT 1100), 2006 Cervelo Soloist (10 speed Ultegra), 2018 S-Works Camber, 2019 S-Works Epic
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 58 Post(s)
Liked 72 Times
in
32 Posts
Look like great wheels. I always loved my first generation Firecrest 303s and like the 303 NSW as well. There’s a limit to how wide and low pressure I want to/need to go. I don’t feel at this point running my DR Swiss PRC 1100 wheels at 75/80 (with 26 mm tires) or my Zipp 303 NSW at a similar pressure (28 mm tires) needs much additional comfort - though I must admit I love the feel of open tubulars on both wheels. I’ve become a bit less aero-focused on wheels because I can get great flat road speed on my PRC1100 set without a bunch of weight, so they climb well. It sounds like these wheels are incredibly light! I’d love to give them a try for fun at some point.
We’re pretty lucky with all this amazing cycling tech that’s coming out. Lots of great choices out there.
We’re pretty lucky with all this amazing cycling tech that’s coming out. Lots of great choices out there.
Likes For justonwo:
#8
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
Hmm... certain Continental tires are rated safe for hookless Enve rims.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
What's the advantage of hookless over a hooked rim? It simplifies manufacturing, but why not a hooked rim that can run clinchers and tubeless? Except for a very small weight difference, this helps the manufacturers but not the consumers/riders.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,505
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20791 Post(s)
Liked 9,435 Times
in
4,663 Posts
IIRC, hookless are better in terms of impacts, it gives you a bit better sidewall/rim profile/transition, and it effectively gives you more volume. Also, simplification in manufacturing benefits consumers if the savings are passed on.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,644 Times
in
6,053 Posts
Less rotational weight which people make a big deal of, and a stronger more important resistant rim.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,595
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 608 Post(s)
Liked 352 Times
in
225 Posts
Just before reading this thread, I watched the GCN "review/paid content" video on these wheels. What intrigued me is the weight that WiFi has mentioned at 1352 grams. For a clincher disk rim that is excellent. They certainly made my short list for my next carbon wheels.
#13
Senior Member
The real reason they push for lower pressure is to get away with otherwise dangerous, tyre blow off, but cheap to manufacture, hookless rims. Ppl drink the kool aid as if they reinvented the wheel ... They didnt.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,644 Times
in
6,053 Posts
Dangerous? Really? I've been on hookless rims for years. Haven't even died once yet.
#15
Senior Member
Here is the ENVE, really short, hookless rim/tyre compatibility list. Look for all your favorites that isnt there.
https://www.enve.com/en/lp/tire-compatibility/
The lack of compatibility is what the GCN infomercial didnt disclose even ift its really important from a practical AND safety point of view.
#16
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,338
Bikes: R5, Allez Sprint, Shiv
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times
in
295 Posts
Except that you lose pretty much all this benefit by being forced to use 28mm tubular tires, which are likely atleast 100gm heavier apiece than the lighter 25c. And you get a shallower rim.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,505
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20791 Post(s)
Liked 9,435 Times
in
4,663 Posts
Also, 100g heavier apiece? Nooooo - the new 28mm Pro One TLE Addix are ~270g each, the 25mm are ~245g.
Likes For WhyFi:
#18
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,585
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4696 Post(s)
Liked 1,512 Times
in
987 Posts
Yes really. Most tyres are designed to work with hooked rims. - Im sure you can get away with hookless with a tyre that is specifically designed for hookless, or if you run a TL tyre at really low pressure. But then you are into experimenting and on your own.
Here is the ENVE, really short, hookless rim/tyre compatibility list. Look for all your favorites that isnt there.
https://www.enve.com/en/lp/tire-compatibility/
The lack of compatibility is what the GCN infomercial didnt disclose even ift its really important from a practical AND safety point of view.
Here is the ENVE, really short, hookless rim/tyre compatibility list. Look for all your favorites that isnt there.
https://www.enve.com/en/lp/tire-compatibility/
The lack of compatibility is what the GCN infomercial didnt disclose even ift its really important from a practical AND safety point of view.
"So herein lies the number one problem in road/gravel tubeless innovation today. Rim manufacturers have outpaced the rate at which some tire manufacturers have innovated, creating a complicated environment for consumers when it comes to pairing tires with their new state-of-the-art hookless road or gravel rims."
#19
Senior Member
Enve's take on why evidently there are tires that aren't compatible:
"So herein lies the number one problem in road/gravel tubeless innovation today. Rim manufacturers have outpaced the rate at which some tire manufacturers have innovated, creating a complicated environment for consumers when it comes to pairing tires with their new state-of-the-art hookless road or gravel rims."
"So herein lies the number one problem in road/gravel tubeless innovation today. Rim manufacturers have outpaced the rate at which some tire manufacturers have innovated, creating a complicated environment for consumers when it comes to pairing tires with their new state-of-the-art hookless road or gravel rims."
Removing the hook is no more innovative than making rims with a non standard diameter and then blame the tyres for not fitting, lol. Enve and zipp are the one causing complications and confusion, not to mention possible danger to unsuspecting customers that may not notice or be aware of the the danger mounting at standard tyre to a hookless rim, that at a glance looks and feels compatible, but isnt. - At the very least such a rim should be plastered with warnings or be larger to a degree that no standard clincher could be mounted.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,505
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 353 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20791 Post(s)
Liked 9,435 Times
in
4,663 Posts
Gallons and gallons of kool aid :-)
Removing the hook is no more innovative than making rims with a non standard diameter and then blame the tyres for not fitting, lol. Enve and zipp are the one causing complications and confusion, not to mention possible danger to unsuspecting customers that may not notice or be aware of the the danger mounting at standard tyre to a hookless rim, that at a glance looks and feels compatible, but isnt. - At the very least such a rim should be plastered with warnings or be larger to a degree that no standard clincher could be mounted.
Removing the hook is no more innovative than making rims with a non standard diameter and then blame the tyres for not fitting, lol. Enve and zipp are the one causing complications and confusion, not to mention possible danger to unsuspecting customers that may not notice or be aware of the the danger mounting at standard tyre to a hookless rim, that at a glance looks and feels compatible, but isnt. - At the very least such a rim should be plastered with warnings or be larger to a degree that no standard clincher could be mounted.
#21
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,338
Bikes: R5, Allez Sprint, Shiv
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times
in
295 Posts
These are aimed squarely and unapologetically at those that have bought in to wider, tubeless tires - folks that would be running 28mm+, regardless, so I see it as just... benefit, not trade-off.
Also, 100g heavier apiece? Nooooo - the new 28mm Pro One TLE Addix are ~270g each, the 25mm are ~245g.
Also, 100g heavier apiece? Nooooo - the new 28mm Pro One TLE Addix are ~270g each, the 25mm are ~245g.
Likes For guadzilla:
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,644 Times
in
6,053 Posts
Yes really. Most tyres are designed to work with hooked rims. - Im sure you can get away with hookless with a tyre that is specifically designed for hookless, or if you run a TL tyre at really low pressure. But then you are into experimenting and on your own.
Here is the ENVE, really short, hookless rim/tyre compatibility list. Look for all your favorites that isnt there.
https://www.enve.com/en/lp/tire-compatibility/
The lack of compatibility is what the GCN infomercial didnt disclose even ift its really important from a practical AND safety point of view.
Here is the ENVE, really short, hookless rim/tyre compatibility list. Look for all your favorites that isnt there.
https://www.enve.com/en/lp/tire-compatibility/
The lack of compatibility is what the GCN infomercial didnt disclose even ift its really important from a practical AND safety point of view.
My favs are the IRCs, followed by Pro Ones. Funny that they're both on the list.
You only mount tires that work with your rims. Kind of like in your car. Are you telling me the danger is that you're going to crash while texting? That people who don't know that they're taking about won't like your setup?
Likes For Seattle Forrest:
#23
Senior Member
Thanks! Is water wet?
My favs are the IRCs, followed by Pro Ones. Funny that they're both on the list.
You only mount tires that work with your rims. Kind of like in your car. Are you telling me the danger is that you're going to crash while texting? That people who don't know that they're taking about won't like your setup?
My favs are the IRCs, followed by Pro Ones. Funny that they're both on the list.
You only mount tires that work with your rims. Kind of like in your car. Are you telling me the danger is that you're going to crash while texting? That people who don't know that they're taking about won't like your setup?
https://www.schwalbe.com/en/tubeless...danforderungen
But Sure, You Enve and Zipp knows better. Right?
Last edited by Racing Dan; 05-30-20 at 08:26 AM.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,644 Times
in
6,053 Posts
Does it matter if the rim is shallower if it's faster? That just means less weight, and less vulnerability to cross winds, right?
But that design choice [hookless] has allowed this wheel to become more efficient overall. It has a more bulbous rim profile that allows the tire to sit wider, meaning less tire deflection, a shorter contact patch and reduced rolling resistance. Energy lost to vibrations in the road has also decreased thanks to higher volume tires running at lower pressures.
https://pelotonmagazine.com/gear/the...ious-overhaul/
#25
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,387
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 897 Post(s)
Liked 1,110 Times
in
478 Posts
But at the same time, I’m not convinced that 28s measuring to 30 are going to be faster for absolutely everyone - especially climbers who weigh less than 150lbs. The cynic in me expects the pendulum to swing the other way when they realize that, for a similar depth, narrower tires (on wide rims) are more aero, lighter and probably roll similarly if you go to a low enough pressure.