Do you worry about bone density?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 186
Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu Gravel Bike, 2015 Motobecane Turino Team
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Do you worry about bone density?
I've been reading some of these articles about cyclists having low bone density. My dad and his mother have both dealt with osteoporosis so I worry about it for myself. I realize most of those articles looked at cyclist who put in gobs of miles, but I'm wondering if any of you take any steps to try and avert loosing bone mass. I like that by commuting I can get exercise without going to the gym, but some people say to lift weights to build bone mass.
Do you do anything in this regard?
Do you do anything in this regard?
#2
Fork and spoon operator
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hopkins, Minnesota
Posts: 577
Bikes: 2013 Surly Crosscheck, 1990 Schwinn Impact, 1973 Schwinn Continental
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
7 Posts
I've heard this mentioned before, but I guess I don't know what causes it. If it's just that it's non-weight-bearing than replacing driving with riding should have no effect. Is there more to it than that?
#3
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
I do strength and conditioning workouts 3 times per week. I have my own 300 pound barbell, kettlebells and gymnastic rings. I train at home or outside. There is no need for gym membership. It's a lot cheaper to buy your own stuff and excercise at home. I've heard about cycling and bone density but I don't know if it's true or not. The main reason why I strength train is because I want to maintain my fitnness.
#4
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,788
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
There is some evidence to support the claim, but it becomes a problem with the long-distance cyclists more than anyone else; cycling doesn't promote bone strength because so little weight is actually carried by the bones -- if you STOOD on the pedals the whole time, it'd be a different story.
I began to 'worry' about this in early 2010, while recovering from a cracked ankle (2nd broken bone in just over two years), and started to supplement with calcium/vit. D. No definitive way to tell if it's done any good, but I haven't broken a bone since. Being on your feet a lot will negate any problems cycling may cause, and my job is 'on the feet for 8'.
I began to 'worry' about this in early 2010, while recovering from a cracked ankle (2nd broken bone in just over two years), and started to supplement with calcium/vit. D. No definitive way to tell if it's done any good, but I haven't broken a bone since. Being on your feet a lot will negate any problems cycling may cause, and my job is 'on the feet for 8'.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: 6367 km away from the center of the Earth
Posts: 1,666
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I bet it affects more people riding lightweight bicycles than people riding heavy bikes since the later must push harder on the pedal to move the bike
#6
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
Your "theory" doesn't make any sense. I am sure all those pro racers with their light bikes pedal much harder then an average commuter on their heavy bike...A 30 pound commuter bike will not increase your bone density anymore then a 19 pound race bike, it doesn't matter how hard you pedal... The only way to increase bone density is through weight training, plyometrics and sprint running.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: 6367 km away from the center of the Earth
Posts: 1,666
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Your "theory" doesn't make any sense. I am sure all those pro racers with their light bikes pedal much harder then an average commuter on their heavy bike...A 30 pound commuter bike will not increase your bone density anymore then a 19 pound race bike, it doesn't matter how hard you pedal... The only way to increase bone density is through weight training, plyometrics and sprint running.
I noticed though that bicycle weight has a huge impact on how hard you push on the pedal when some lightweight people i know told me they couldn't handle my heavy bike for long due to the bicycle weight. 120 pounds on a 70 pounds bike is not the same as 220 pounds on the same 70 pounds bike.
The weight ratio of the bike in the first case is 36%
in the other case it is 24%
you don't necessarely need weight training.
Last edited by erig007; 08-24-13 at 03:05 PM.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 186
Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu Gravel Bike, 2015 Motobecane Turino Team
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
erig, the point is not how much effort you put out. The problem, people theorize, is that your body is not supporting its own weight. Unless you have that 200 lbs of groceries on your back and you are out of the saddle the entire time, it is not helping you.
Astronauts lose bone mass in space because there is never any pressure on their bones, so basically, the bones atrophy.
I don't quite understand the way weight bearing on a bike differs from standing. Cyclists absolutely put huge forces on their legs, but the force on a cyclists hips is much less than say a runner..... I don't understand the mechanism, but bone loss in professional cyclists is very real.
People also theorize that it has to do with exercising with a calorie deficit. Professionals clearly can't feed their bodies enough calories to make up for what they expend during a long race. The body could be pulling nutrients from other parts of the body to make up for that. Hence bone loss.
I was hoping to find some people who have really looked into this issue and dealt with it. Speculation really doesn't help anything. But, my question was 'do people worry about bone loss' and it seems the answer so far is "No."
Astronauts lose bone mass in space because there is never any pressure on their bones, so basically, the bones atrophy.
I don't quite understand the way weight bearing on a bike differs from standing. Cyclists absolutely put huge forces on their legs, but the force on a cyclists hips is much less than say a runner..... I don't understand the mechanism, but bone loss in professional cyclists is very real.
People also theorize that it has to do with exercising with a calorie deficit. Professionals clearly can't feed their bodies enough calories to make up for what they expend during a long race. The body could be pulling nutrients from other parts of the body to make up for that. Hence bone loss.
I was hoping to find some people who have really looked into this issue and dealt with it. Speculation really doesn't help anything. But, my question was 'do people worry about bone loss' and it seems the answer so far is "No."
#10
Fork and spoon operator
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hopkins, Minnesota
Posts: 577
Bikes: 2013 Surly Crosscheck, 1990 Schwinn Impact, 1973 Schwinn Continental
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
7 Posts
You pedal to accelerate, but you also pedal to stay at constant speed. Different kinds of friction apply a force backward and you need to apply an equal force forward to stay at constant speed. And friction increases nonlinearly with speed, which is why it's so hard to maintain say 25 mph even on flat ground. You can look up power output for pro racers, and it's very high. As long as you're pedaling at the same cadence, higher power means higher torque (and higher force).
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: 6367 km away from the center of the Earth
Posts: 1,666
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
erig, the point is not how much effort you put out. The problem, people theorize, is that your body is not supporting its own weight. Unless you have that 200 lbs of groceries on your back and you are out of the saddle the entire time, it is not helping you.
Astronauts lose bone mass in space because there is never any pressure on their bones, so basically, the bones atrophy.
I don't quite understand the way weight bearing on a bike differs from standing. Cyclists absolutely put huge forces on their legs, but the force on a cyclists hips is much less than say a runner..... I don't understand the mechanism, but bone loss in professional cyclists is very real.
People also theorize that it has to do with exercising with a calorie deficit. Professionals clearly can't feed their bodies enough calories to make up for what they expend during a long race. The body could be pulling nutrients from other parts of the body to make up for that. Hence bone loss.
I was hoping to find some people who have really looked into this issue and dealt with it. Speculation really doesn't help anything. But, my question was 'do people worry about bone loss' and it seems the answer so far is "No."
Astronauts lose bone mass in space because there is never any pressure on their bones, so basically, the bones atrophy.
I don't quite understand the way weight bearing on a bike differs from standing. Cyclists absolutely put huge forces on their legs, but the force on a cyclists hips is much less than say a runner..... I don't understand the mechanism, but bone loss in professional cyclists is very real.
People also theorize that it has to do with exercising with a calorie deficit. Professionals clearly can't feed their bodies enough calories to make up for what they expend during a long race. The body could be pulling nutrients from other parts of the body to make up for that. Hence bone loss.
I was hoping to find some people who have really looked into this issue and dealt with it. Speculation really doesn't help anything. But, my question was 'do people worry about bone loss' and it seems the answer so far is "No."
force travels from feet to hips via legs' bones but on a bicycle because the angle hips-femur is not the same as when someone run or walk hips tend to handle flexion rather than pressure.
The other thing is that when someone walk or run, their is an impact on the hips from the feet on the ground which tends to reinforce bone structure. On a bicycle, on the other hand there isn't much impact
What i can see as well is that on a bicycle the pressure of the pedal is on the fore foot and because the foot acts as a spring some energy is dissipated
when you walk or run the pressure/impact is on the back of the foot or the side depending on if you tend to pronate, suppinate or have a more neutral footstep.
Another thing i see is that on a bike with spd type pedal at some time the pressure become negative when the cyclist move up his/her foot
Last edited by erig007; 08-24-13 at 03:53 PM.
#12
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
How many people ride 300 pound bikes up 10% grade ?? . It's a recipe for disaster which will kill and destroy your knees...I much rather prefer deadlifts, squats , power cleans and plyometric jumps. I also commute on a fixed gear which provides more resistence then a freewheel bike.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: 6367 km away from the center of the Earth
Posts: 1,666
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
How many people ride 300 pound bikes up 10% grade ?? . It's a recipe for disaster which will kill and destroy your knees...I much rather prefer deadlifts, squats , power cleans and plyometric jumps. I also commute on a fixed gear which provides more resistence then a freewheel bike.
You pedal to accelerate, but you also pedal to stay at constant speed. Different kinds of friction apply a force backward and you need to apply an equal force forward to stay at constant speed. And friction increases nonlinearly with speed, which is why it's so hard to maintain say 25 mph even on flat ground. You can look up power output for pro racers, and it's very high. As long as you're pedaling at the same cadence, higher power means higher torque (and higher force).
Last edited by erig007; 08-24-13 at 04:12 PM.
#14
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
i have been doing this for years and i haven't had any problem yet and i had an achille tendon rupture when i was younger. I believe that as long as i keep riding i won't have any trouble as my bones are used to.
i agree but you agree that the average joe will have a bike less clean (which means more friction), not as efficient (cheaper gears), probably some larger tires and an heavier bike than a pro racer. Because of all that i couldn't say which one has to handle more friction. I know for sure that the average joe will weight more and will be heavier than some pro racer.
i agree but you agree that the average joe will have a bike less clean (which means more friction), not as efficient (cheaper gears), probably some larger tires and an heavier bike than a pro racer. Because of all that i couldn't say which one has to handle more friction. I know for sure that the average joe will weight more and will be heavier than some pro racer.
Last edited by wolfchild; 08-24-13 at 06:21 PM. Reason: spelling
#15
Fork and spoon operator
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hopkins, Minnesota
Posts: 577
Bikes: 2013 Surly Crosscheck, 1990 Schwinn Impact, 1973 Schwinn Continental
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
7 Posts
You can eliminate all those unknowns by just comparing power output. For roughly similar cadence and crank length, power is a measure of force. Amateur cyclists can't achieve the power elites can, based on power meter results.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: 6367 km away from the center of the Earth
Posts: 1,666
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Amateur cyclists and average joe is not exactly the same but it's quite close. I will be sure when the 400 pounds average albert will fail short though. Until then i must believe you,
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
I'm a high mileage cyclist (500,000 miles). I drove my heel bone through the tibia/fibula a decade ago. When the X-ray came up, the orthopedic surgeon, one of the team physicians for the Sacramento Kings, called the entire staff in to marvel at the densest bones he had ever seen. If I worry at all about bone density, it is to be concerned that I am dragging excess weight up every hill.
My take on it is this: bones will grow denser in response to damage. Damage is inflicted by stress. Most folks focus on muscle output or weight bearing as primary stress, but I think that may be mistaken. The stress that is relevant for weight-bearing activities for bone density is the micro-fracture causing slamming of the feet into the ground, such as is experienced in basketball. I think I get a similar level of stress by riding full out on crappy roads. The bike bounces, as do my lower legs.
It would be interesting to compare track cyclists' bone density to that of off-road racers, particularly if one can find off-roaders who have good form (less upper body use and more shock absorption from the legs). Maybe that can't be done anymore since the off-road folks are all on suspension bikes.
My take on it is this: bones will grow denser in response to damage. Damage is inflicted by stress. Most folks focus on muscle output or weight bearing as primary stress, but I think that may be mistaken. The stress that is relevant for weight-bearing activities for bone density is the micro-fracture causing slamming of the feet into the ground, such as is experienced in basketball. I think I get a similar level of stress by riding full out on crappy roads. The bike bounces, as do my lower legs.
It would be interesting to compare track cyclists' bone density to that of off-road racers, particularly if one can find off-roaders who have good form (less upper body use and more shock absorption from the legs). Maybe that can't be done anymore since the off-road folks are all on suspension bikes.
#18
Senior Member
I wonder if part of the culprit has to do with the fact that people who frequently ride bicycles tend to walk less. I used to walk a lot until taking up bike riding. Now to go anywhere more than 10 blocks away (half mile?), I go by bike.
Regarding the low weight-bearing nature of cycling, what about the wrists? I ride hybrid with flat bar and I feel my wrists are supporting considerable weight during a long ride (very sore). However when I had a bone density scan of my wrists, the result was below normal bone density.
#19
Full Member
There was a study that had people jump up and down 30 times daily. Doing so increased bone density and appeared to be protective for osteoporosis. If you're worried jump up and down 30 times or go running a fe days a week.
#20
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,788
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
You have three points of contact with the bike -- bar, pedals, saddle. Between the three, 100% of your weight is divided (unevenly). I've read that 50-60% of your weight is routinely carried on the saddle, about 30% on the pedals, and the rest on the bar. I can't link to that, since I don't remember where I read it, so all I have to go on is my admittedly imperfect memory.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On the bridge with Picard
Posts: 5,932
Bikes: Specialized Allez, Specialized Sirrus
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I had a bone scan a few years ago and was shocked to hear that I had decreased bone density in my spine. In addition to cycling I've done marathons and half marathons for the last 18 years. The bone scan pushed me into upping my weight training in the gym, along with taking calcium supplements.
Different bodies will have different results, but you do need some sort of weight-bearing exercise to stress your bones in order to prevent bone loss as you get older.
Different bodies will have different results, but you do need some sort of weight-bearing exercise to stress your bones in order to prevent bone loss as you get older.
#22
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,286 Posts
Jumping excercises are called Plyometric training. They are very effective if done correctly.
#23
Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: No. Va.
Posts: 490
Bikes: '96 C40, '04 C50, '04 Merlin Magia, '97 Stumpjumper, '04 Specilaized Roubaix
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 562 Times
in
178 Posts
Weight bearing exercise. You do not have weight bearing on you on a bike. Your weight is bearing on the bike. Get off the bike and run, do yoga, play basketball...these will make you bear your weight. Remember high impact/low impact aerobics? The impact is on YOUR body. Stop trying to say that biking is weight bearing. It is NOT. Pro cyclists have know for years that this is an issue in their sport. Why is it being debated on here?
Cycling is NOT weight-bearing exercise. If you want to have healthy bones for years and years, do WEIGHT BEARING EXERCISE in addition to your cycling!
Cycling is NOT weight-bearing exercise. If you want to have healthy bones for years and years, do WEIGHT BEARING EXERCISE in addition to your cycling!
__________________
There are no tailwinds. There are headwinds and days when I'm awesome!
There are no tailwinds. There are headwinds and days when I'm awesome!
#24
Senior Member
Suggestion for study: test the bone density of those who live on the top floor of a walk-up building and carry their bikes with heavy chain- and U-locks down- and upstairs daily.
#25
bragi
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: seattle, WA
Posts: 2,911
Bikes: LHT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I've been reading some of these articles about cyclists having low bone density. My dad and his mother have both dealt with osteoporosis so I worry about it for myself. I realize most of those articles looked at cyclist who put in gobs of miles, but I'm wondering if any of you take any steps to try and avert loosing bone mass. I like that by commuting I can get exercise without going to the gym, but some people say to lift weights to build bone mass.
Do you do anything in this regard?
Do you do anything in this regard?