Why'd I bonk?
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,288
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8279 Post(s)
Liked 9,034 Times
in
4,472 Posts
Yes, 10 hours per week.
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,288
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8279 Post(s)
Liked 9,034 Times
in
4,472 Posts
Does muscle soreness diminish significantly as you up your endurance? Do you just meditate it away until you achieve muscle nirvana? Am I that much worse about stretching/rolling than the average bear? Or maybe I need to deliberately back off the climbs for a while, so that I can focus on time and distance.
.
.
If you can, go for an easy spin when you are tired or sore, even on a trainer.
The soreness will get better as you ride more and figure things out, especially at your age.
Oh, not time and distance, time and intensity.
#53
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,533
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
So, my initial reaction to this is: "ouch, my poor thighs." I'm probably on my bike for six, six and a half hrs/week, and I think muscle soreness is a big part of my limitation there. That's not to say that I'm miserably sore all the time, but my current level of activity allows me to space out my rides enough so that I'm not generally riding on sore legs. Or sitting at my desk thinking about how sore my legs are all day. Or saying "oof" every time I get off the couch.
Does muscle soreness diminish significantly as you up your endurance? Do you just meditate it away until you achieve muscle nirvana? Am I that much worse about stretching/rolling than the average bear? Or maybe I need to deliberately back off the climbs for a while, so that I can focus on time and distance.
In general, thanks so much for the feedback, and I'll definitely check out the book and HIIT. This thread has been really cool and I feel motivated to push through this to a better place with my riding. Tonight I changed it up and did a weeknight ride with the same total elevation gain as normal but 50% more distance over a longer period of time, which seems like the the right direction to be moving. Plus it was just good to confirm I can still go out for a ride without ushering in a metabolic apocalypse upon my poor, poor body.
Does muscle soreness diminish significantly as you up your endurance? Do you just meditate it away until you achieve muscle nirvana? Am I that much worse about stretching/rolling than the average bear? Or maybe I need to deliberately back off the climbs for a while, so that I can focus on time and distance.
In general, thanks so much for the feedback, and I'll definitely check out the book and HIIT. This thread has been really cool and I feel motivated to push through this to a better place with my riding. Tonight I changed it up and did a weeknight ride with the same total elevation gain as normal but 50% more distance over a longer period of time, which seems like the the right direction to be moving. Plus it was just good to confirm I can still go out for a ride without ushering in a metabolic apocalypse upon my poor, poor body.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#54
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,108
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3430 Post(s)
Liked 3,566 Times
in
1,792 Posts
I started road riding again 14 weeks ago. My legs stopped being sore around week 9.
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
Massive fatigue, "wooden legs", stiffness, however; that's still always there after overextending myself.
Contrast that to say, sprinting across a playground or playing basketball for a few minutes, which can leave me sore for 2-3 days!
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
This, however, is very unlikely to be what the OP experienced after adequate fueling in the days prior, breakfast, and on the bike nutrition. He had plenty of calories and was unlikely to be expending huge kJs.
#57
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
974 Posts
You're just not getting the hours in. I try for 10 hours/week. 8 is OK, less not so much. Mileage-wise, 200 miles/week is strong, 150 you do OK, 100 you're just getting by until summer. That's conventional wisdom and experience. However, you seem to qualify for the time-crunched cyclist program, conveniently laid out for you in a book and training program of that name: https://www.amazon.com/Time-Crunched...dp/1937715507/
That book is a good intro for folks without a lot of time. After repeating a plan from in there a few times, up to maybe a year or so, you "get the idea". Then you can apply the principles without doing the same exact prescribed workouts and plans.
My work calendar tells me this is week 39 in the year. If I take my gross hours and divide, I get 4.6 per week. Removing off weeks for my vacation and work travel earlier in the year, it goes up to maybe close to 6.
If I had to, pretty sure I'm close to 320w for 20min now. I can do right at 350w for 5min and am weekly adding power over 2min right now being in the 420ish range. All at 70kg.
I get a lot of the weekend enduro paceline clubbies wondering if I could make it on a long ride. Last one was formally 70ish but I rode alone to and from the ride to hit around 90mi. I pulled probably a lot and another racer guy and I broke for home with 4 miles to go and traded turns at whatever we could manage for a minute at a pull. We averaged about 30mph the last few miles into town. Once a month I'll do a solo metric non-stop at a hard tempo on just three bottles and a banana, only stop for turns/lights.
I can do distance/time just fine. The issue is people put out too much power on longer rides early on when they're not trained for that power zone for that duration. I could do the AOMM tomorrow solo, I'd just dial the power way way way down. My butt would hurt from saddle time and not making enough power to lighten the load, but so be it.
I tend to do a lot more intervals. It's all in how you manage the time. You can do some fantastic workouts in the sub-hour range. You can accumulate a LOT of training stress in upper SS zone on minimal time, including outdoors.
You just have to be more focused because you can't afford not to be if you have less time.
I don't think you have to have 8 hours a week and more unless you're doing back to back fondo stages OR you're an upper level racer. You have to have laser focus though.
Last week I had 505 TSS on only 6.5 hours. No farting around.
Likes For burnthesheep:
#58
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Right. To clarify, my breakdown on Saturday had nothing to do with muscle soreness. I brought up soreness as a separate issue because I think DOMS is basically what's holding me back from increasing my overall weekly time and mileage. But that's definitely a mental limitation-- I'm not avoiding a fourth/fifth ride per week because I'm in too much pain, I'm just avoiding it because I tend to think of DOMS as something I need to minimize.
What you guys are saying about DOMS diminishing over time with increased fitness is actually a totally novel concept for me. A concept to which I respond "hell yeah, sign me up for THAT." Time to start learning about intervals...
What you guys are saying about DOMS diminishing over time with increased fitness is actually a totally novel concept for me. A concept to which I respond "hell yeah, sign me up for THAT." Time to start learning about intervals...
#59
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,108
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3430 Post(s)
Liked 3,566 Times
in
1,792 Posts
A pro cyclist doing a hard ride reportedly burns 10-15 calories per minute.
#60
Full Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 209
Bikes: Giant TCR Advanced Pro 0 Disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times
in
35 Posts
I've bonked in as little as thirty minutes after a huge ride the day before and inadequate nutrition. So sure, it can and does happen early on in rides, but that's due to the day/days of eating prior to the ride.
This, however, is very unlikely to be what the OP experienced after adequate fueling in the days prior, breakfast, and on the bike nutrition. He had plenty of calories and was unlikely to be expending huge kJs.
This, however, is very unlikely to be what the OP experienced after adequate fueling in the days prior, breakfast, and on the bike nutrition. He had plenty of calories and was unlikely to be expending huge kJs.
My original post was more about sharing what works (not what's adequate) if he wants to perform day after day. Some comments here on nutrition is just infuriating. Do not tell me three bags of oatmeal and a banana is good breakfast. It's not. Yes, go ahead crush a century on a bag of gummy bears and two water bottles. Is it doable? Hell yes if you really try. But trust me you won't be doing much until next Saturday. We all have done that. It's really up to him to find the right balance on and off the bike. Having a clean and healthy diet is a good start.
Having said that I found this podcast very helpful:
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,823
Bikes: 1996 Trek 970 ZX Single Track 2x11
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 614 Post(s)
Liked 565 Times
in
429 Posts
Of course, if old enough or with conditions such that your ability to recover just isn't sufficient given the level of work you're demanding, you're likely to fail to repair the damage you're inflicting upon the muscles (as evidenced by soreness, fatigue, etc).
Sufficient time to recover is also needed, for improvements. Again, how much depends on your age, fitness and other factors.
Myself, I simply no longer have the ability to recover from, say, two intensely hard "leg day" exercise stints weekly. Back in my early 20s, I could do this with a fair chance I'd have it all back by the start of the next week, but it was pushing things. These days, nearly 40yrs later, I need another two or three days' of recovery for such effort, and the effort is lower (along with the gains). IOW, recovery time is slower now than 30-40yrs ago. As one should expect.
Can't say that I've ever pushed that hard in cycling. But, given that it still involves cardio and hard use of the leg muscles, I can't imagine the parallels are all that off.
In general, thanks so much for the feedback, and I'll definitely check out the book and HIIT. This thread has been really cool and I feel motivated to push through this to a better place with my riding. Tonight I changed it up and did a weeknight ride with the same total elevation gain as normal but 50% more distance over a longer period of time, which seems like the the right direction to be moving. Plus it was just good to confirm I can still go out for a ride without ushering in a metabolic apocalypse upon my poor, poor body.
You certainly should consider strength and stretching exercises if you're facing hard/hill sections in your rides or runs. There's simply no substitute for sufficient strength, on sections or for times when strength is needed (above and beyond whatever stamina you might have overall).
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,114
Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 989 Post(s)
Liked 586 Times
in
440 Posts
1) Bad day (it happens)
2) Lack of fitness / preparation - which doesn't seem to be the case given that you've indicated having done this particular ride in the past...
2) Lack of fitness / preparation - which doesn't seem to be the case given that you've indicated having done this particular ride in the past...
#63
Senior Member
Sunday I did a 5x10min sweet spot session on the trainer over 90mins, 98TSS and 1093 calories
Today, I did a 3x20 sweet spot session over 2hrs, 120TSS and 1396 calories.
The calories are derived from my power meters, my threshold is 285w (4w/kg) so I've been doing intervals at 250-265.
#64
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,108
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3430 Post(s)
Liked 3,566 Times
in
1,792 Posts
My big event breakfast was alway oatmeal, plus sometimes scrambled eggs.
Likes For terrymorse:
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
That's exactly my point. His #1 issue is lack of fitness which it will take years to improve. No shortcuts there. My main observation was his nutrition wasn't completely dialed in. It's the low hanging fruit. We are all speculating about how much calories he had in his body and what he ate that morning was enough to compensate. We don't know how fatigued he was that week. We don't know if he pulled an all-nighter Wednesday night. We don't know if he had a sick toddler to take care of or he has a stressful day job. All of these contribute to the eventual result.
My original post was more about sharing what works (not what's adequate) if he wants to perform day after day. Some comments here on nutrition is just infuriating. Do not tell me three bags of oatmeal and a banana is good breakfast. It's not. Yes, go ahead crush a century on a bag of gummy bears and two water bottles. Is it doable? Hell yes if you really try. But trust me you won't be doing much until next Saturday. We all have done that. It's really up to him to find the right balance on and off the bike. Having a clean and healthy diet is a good start.
My original post was more about sharing what works (not what's adequate) if he wants to perform day after day. Some comments here on nutrition is just infuriating. Do not tell me three bags of oatmeal and a banana is good breakfast. It's not. Yes, go ahead crush a century on a bag of gummy bears and two water bottles. Is it doable? Hell yes if you really try. But trust me you won't be doing much until next Saturday. We all have done that. It's really up to him to find the right balance on and off the bike. Having a clean and healthy diet is a good start.
You just went off on a tangent espousing your rather extreme (and strange) nutritional ideas that are irrelevant to just about everything .
Likes For rubiksoval:
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
I'd like to address the hours per week thing.
I don't think you have to have 8 hours a week and more unless you're doing back to back fondo stages OR you're an upper level racer. You have to have laser focus though.
Last week I had 505 TSS on only 6.5 hours. No farting around.
I don't think you have to have 8 hours a week and more unless you're doing back to back fondo stages OR you're an upper level racer. You have to have laser focus though.
Last week I had 505 TSS on only 6.5 hours. No farting around.
That you've had relatively good results simply speaks to a better endurance disposition than most (ie, talent) It doesn't mean that your plan is actually any good. It gets you to where you want to be, but it's unlikely to get you much further. It's kind of disingenuous to say something like "you just need to be focused and you can get by with 4.5 hours a week."
Well, no. A very few select people can. A very few select people can also run 4:10 miles off of 20 mpw. The vast majority cannot, however.
Enter actual training.
That's the funny thing about stimulus and response. When that stimulus stays the same, so does the response...
Likes For rubiksoval:
#68
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
1000 kJ an hour is only 276 watts. I did a workout that was 300 watts for three hours and finished up with 3520 kJ in three hours, 18 minutes.
Not really that big of a thing compared to actual pro riders who can do that for 6 plus hours.
#69
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,108
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3430 Post(s)
Liked 3,566 Times
in
1,792 Posts
Not sure what the reportedly is.
1000 kJ an hour is only 276 watts. I did a workout that was 300 watts for three hours and finished up with 3520 kJ in three hours, 18 minutes.
Not really that big of a thing compared to actual pro riders who can do that for 6 plus hours.
1000 kJ an hour is only 276 watts. I did a workout that was 300 watts for three hours and finished up with 3520 kJ in three hours, 18 minutes.
Not really that big of a thing compared to actual pro riders who can do that for 6 plus hours.
238 Calories/hr is about 4 Calories per minute. Pros can burn over 3 times that rate on a hard ride.
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
The body’s efficiency of turning fuel combustion into useable work at the muscles being engaged is called an individual’s Gross Metabolic Efficiency (GME). The typical GME ranges from roughly 20% to 25%. What that means is, of the 1 Calorie your body plans to burn to produce 4.184 kJ of work, the average human body is only going to be effectively using 20-25% of that Calorie to do so. The remaining 75-80% of the stored chemical energy (Calories) is lost to the external environment in the form of heat.
1 Calorie × 25% = .25 → .25 × 4.184 kJ = 1.045 kJ
For practical reasons, most cyclists approximate this to: 1 kJ to 1 Calorie.
https://blog.trainerroad.com/calories-and-power/
Likes For rubiksoval:
#71
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
974 Posts
Just to add on some relevant information...Haven't you only been riding for like...2 years? Without ever having done significant training volume? And you really have no idea what your performance would actually be with said training volume?
That you've had relatively good results simply speaks to a better endurance disposition than most (ie, talent) It doesn't mean that your plan is actually any good. It gets you to where you want to be, but it's unlikely to get you much further. It's kind of disingenuous to say something like "you just need to be focused and you can get by with 4.5 hours a week."
Well, no. A very few select people can. A very few select people can also run 4:10 miles off of 20 mpw. The vast majority cannot, however.
Enter actual training.
That's the funny thing about stimulus and response. When that stimulus stays the same, so does the response...
That you've had relatively good results simply speaks to a better endurance disposition than most (ie, talent) It doesn't mean that your plan is actually any good. It gets you to where you want to be, but it's unlikely to get you much further. It's kind of disingenuous to say something like "you just need to be focused and you can get by with 4.5 hours a week."
Well, no. A very few select people can. A very few select people can also run 4:10 miles off of 20 mpw. The vast majority cannot, however.
Enter actual training.
That's the funny thing about stimulus and response. When that stimulus stays the same, so does the response...
I've just pilfered through the data, plans, and info and tried to make the best sense of it that I can and optimize what I've got (time and myself).
#72
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 4,444
Bikes: bikes
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2622 Post(s)
Liked 1,429 Times
in
711 Posts
I wish I could get similar results like that! It'd make cycling a lot more time efficient.
#73
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
974 Posts
I'm glad you did address this though for the original poster's topic because highlighting that it isn't common makes sure people don't end up with expectations that don't work out. It is very relevant.
I think the "Time Crunched" book does mention the genetic lottery portion, but in their own self interest (of selling a book) they seem to gloss over that pretty quick.
You can't sell a book about big gains on short time if you toss in a bunch of caveats.
If I had to give tips about the time crunched thing specific to the workouts: your results may vary........disclaimer, etc........
-Do your "not so fun" work indoors on a trainer. The 3x3's, under overs, etc. You accumulate more stress per minute than outdoors where eventually you go downhill. It sucks, but that's the situation of being short on time. And by indoor, I mean do it in ERG. Zwift with a smart trainer would be just like outdoors. It's better to put out some power to circulate your blood/oxygen after hard efforts to recover than just coast back down a hill.
-On the back end of their "hiit" workouts (or any hiit workout) where you're well above 100 % (like 120% and stuff) tack on whatever intensity and duration SS interval on the tail end you can manage physically and time wise. You've mobilized some energy stores that are now circulating your body, but aren't super great for hiit. The hiit helped bring them out. Use them on the tail end of the workout. It's mentally taxing, but I've had good luck doing this. Like..........2 sets of 3x3 then one SS interval of 8min. That's short for SS, but you'll already be feeling crap. (I credit this with a FastTalk podcast segment and the gurus on Slowtwitch)
-Double up days once in a while. Somehow I've had success with doing a fairly tough lunch hour workout, having a good nutritious lunch, then a good snack right before the weeknight worlds ride. Just seems to workout really well for training stimulus. If you look at how training stress accumulates, if you're short on time and can accumulate 100 TSS today instead of 50 today and 50 tomorrow......that's a bigger training stress.
#74
Senior Member
What a fun thread, I've always held the notion that you can do on any given day about 90% of what you could do in an entire week (given of course that that is your sole activity that week and you are well rested). So, if your weekly maximum is normally around 10-12 hours then your longest ability to ride should be around there too.
I've seen plenty of anecdotal evidence that this is true, given your situation I would assume you just had a bad day. If you've been reasonably training for 2 years, something like 70mi with 5k of climbing really shouldn't be that hard at all. The symptoms you describe sound to me like a combo of heat getting to ya and possibly dehydration.
I've seen plenty of anecdotal evidence that this is true, given your situation I would assume you just had a bad day. If you've been reasonably training for 2 years, something like 70mi with 5k of climbing really shouldn't be that hard at all. The symptoms you describe sound to me like a combo of heat getting to ya and possibly dehydration.
#75
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Progress works in funny ways. I think I easily could have come out of this fairly discouraged, taken it easy the next week with the excuse of sore legs, and backed off in general as the days get shorter and cooler. Instead, I listened to you crazy bastards and decided to take a stab at increasing my training volume and intensity. So, after one day of rest and feeling down on myself, I got back on the saddle last Monday and committed myself to finding out what a proper ten hour week feels like. I started the week with some longer, flatter rides where I focused on intensity over flats and gentler climbs. Things got dicey for my ten hour plan when a cold front came in Thursday and brought some hardcore winds with it, but I stuck it out and got some good wind conditioning in. I finished the hours off strong with a great ride yesterday, knocked off a good PR on Kings Mountain (another good climb in the area,) and just generally enjoying myself cruising through the redwoods on a beautiful day. I feel like I've had a total paradigm shift about the training volume I'm capable of and interested in pursuing, and my legs feel fine and ready for the next ten hours I'll start this afternoon. I also picked up and worked my way into the Time Crunched Cyclist book and finally bought a scale so I can start thinking a little more seriously about my weight. As we move toward the dreaded dark months, I imagine I'll be back around with a new thread asking some questions about intervals and indoor trainers soon.
So thanks, ya crazies, & happy trails.
Likes For sanmateoclimber: