Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Only Front Panniers?

Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Only Front Panniers?

Old 08-10-18, 07:46 PM
  #1  
TiHabanero
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,457
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1740 Post(s)
Liked 1,369 Times in 718 Posts
Only Front Panniers?

What is the thinking behind running only front panniers and a standard saddle bag? Why not mount the panniers on the rear and out of the wind?
TiHabanero is offline  
Old 08-10-18, 08:53 PM
  #2  
skookum
cyclotourist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: calgary, canada
Posts: 1,470
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Liked 205 Times in 130 Posts
Originally Posted by TiHabanero
What is the thinking behind running only front panniers and a standard saddle bag? Why not mount the panniers on the rear and out of the wind?
Back in the olde days..there was a theory that low rider front panniers were more aerodynamic because they created an area of less turbulence behind them for the pedals to rotate. Some people are still promoting the concept.
My mind rolled back 20 years to the forgotten, but still significant ZZipper Tailwind Panniers from 1982. These panniers, wind tunnel designed and proven, made your bike up to 7% faster through the wind than a bike without panniers. ANGLETECH, with the blessing of Glen Brown and Karl Abbe reintroduce these very modern and ultimate panniers as the ANGLETECH TECHWIND™ system.The basic philosophy of the system is:An aerodynamic shape that reduces the drag of your bike by 7%. ANGLETECH TECHWIND’S™ maintain their shape whether full or empty, always delivering the speed and good looks. The rear of the ANGLETECH TECHWIND’S™ are square profile to catch those tailwinds and blow you down the road.
I don't know if this is proven to work, I suspect not, and I have no association with this product and make no recommendations.

If you don't have tons of gear, low riders up front and a saddlebag allow you to balance the load between front and rear and the keep the front load low which is more stable.
I have toured that way and liked it, but I usually have more stuff so prefer front and rear panniers.
skookum is offline  
Old 08-10-18, 09:39 PM
  #3  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,604

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times in 4,181 Posts
When possible, i use rear panniers up front and a compression dry bag atop the rear rack. It's become my favorite setup for when I don't need 4 bags.

I like the stabilization the bags create up front. I can stand out of the saddle and the setup is more stable too.

Based on my completely unscientific analysis, I find there is no difference in wind resistance. The bags stick out the same amount whether placed in the front or rear.

oh, and there is already a rear weight bias due to me riding, so pushing some weight up front has to be nice for those rear spokes.
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 08-10-18, 11:26 PM
  #4  
El.Gato
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Have a look here. He tried this on an almost scientific way

Ups, Not allowed to post urls yet but if you search for „cyclingabout front panniers“ (exactly like this) you will find the link I mean

havent tried only front by myself yet...
El.Gato is offline  
Old 08-11-18, 12:38 AM
  #5  
3speed
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 3,473
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 363 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
There’s no question I’d rather run fronts and something small on the rear rack versus rears. The bike handes So much better that way. I’ve noticed no difference between front or rear as far as wind resistance is concerned. I’ve read several things that said as much also.
3speed is offline  
Old 08-11-18, 07:31 AM
  #6  
Tourist in MSN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,175

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3451 Post(s)
Liked 1,452 Times in 1,131 Posts
Originally Posted by TiHabanero
What is the thinking behind running only front panniers and a standard saddle bag? Why not mount the panniers on the rear and out of the wind?
I think aerodynamics have nothing to do with it. With a frame that is too flexy, this gets rid of the heavy weight on a rear rack that can make your bike feel like a wet noodle when the tail decides to wag the dog.

I do not use this method, I put most of the weight on my rear but my bikes are stiff enough that they handle well with four panniers and handlebar bag.
Tourist in MSN is offline  
Old 08-11-18, 08:42 AM
  #7  
raybo
Bike touring webrarian
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,071

Bikes: I tour on a Waterford Adventurecycle. It is a fabulous touring bike.

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 53 Posts

I neither carry camping or cooking gear when I tour. As a result, I don’t need to carry 4 bags. I can just use 2. Front panniers are smaller and lighter than rear ones. Also, metal racks are heavy, as well. Why carry extra weight if I don’t have to?

I use a frame bag, as well.
raybo is offline  
Old 08-11-18, 08:57 AM
  #8  
boomhauer
Senior Member
 
boomhauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 782
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 226 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times in 32 Posts
Front panniers in combination with a 20 mph headwind is brutal.
I would rather have turbulent air hit my rear panniers than laminar air hit my front panniers.
It's the curse of being an engineer. On long, flat boring plains your mind drifts into issues that probably don't make much difference.
boomhauer is offline  
Old 08-11-18, 09:02 AM
  #9  
cyccommute 
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,341

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6200 Post(s)
Liked 4,198 Times in 2,355 Posts
Originally Posted by skookum
Back in the olde days..there was a theory that low rider front panniers were more aerodynamic because they created an area of less turbulence behind them for the pedals to rotate. Some people are still promoting the concept.
Nope. It wasn't due to aerodynamics. Frank Berto and Jim Blackburn did tests in the mid80s on the use of low riders and found that the front lowrider greatly stabilized the ride as you have correctly pointed out. Aerodynamic panniers came along after the introduction of the lowrider but, I suspect, that they offer only minimal improvement.

They also found that the worst configuration in terms of handling was low-riders front and rear.

Originally Posted by TiHabanero
What is the thinking behind running only front panniers and a standard saddle bag? Why not mount the panniers on the rear and out of the wind?
It's about stability. Putting heavily loaded bags on the rear of the bike cantilevers a load over a vehicle that is already biased towards an overloaded rear wheel. The front wheel on a bicycle is lightly loaded with just the rider on the bike. Putting more load rearward can introduce sway into the system which "wags the dog" at most every speed. If you have lightweight, flexible racks like most aluminum racks, the problem is even worse. Putting the load on the front wheel reduces the wagging and makes the ride more stable. Additionally, the front wheel is much stronger than the rear wheel so the load doesn't stress the spokes as much.

I ride with 4 panniers for on-road tours but most of the load is in the front...about 60%. The rear bags are for light but bulky stuff. Food, stove, cooking gear, i.e, any thing that is small but dense, goes in the front bags.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 08-11-18, 10:36 AM
  #10  
skidder
Pennylane Splitter
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 1,878

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1781 Post(s)
Liked 1,434 Times in 984 Posts
I'm doing 'credit card' trips (hotels & hostels at night) and only use front panniers, a saddlebag for tools, and a small bag for daily stuff that's either on top of my front rack (Surly front rack) or rear rack. The steering can be a little sloppier with everything up front, but its usually just a matter of packing properly to correct it. Seems to work for me, YMMV. .
skidder is online now  
Old 08-11-18, 10:44 AM
  #11  
jefnvk
Senior Member
 
jefnvk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207

Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama

Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 51 Posts
My front felt very unloaded both credit card tours with bags on back. Next time I will run bags up front.

As someone mentioned, dense heavy stuff went up front on my camping trip with four bags. Different bike, so not apples to apples, but felt much better with more weight forward.
jefnvk is offline  
Old 08-11-18, 10:54 AM
  #12  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
With my small wheel low trail bikes; Bike Friday, panniers ,
and Brompton, head tube mounted fitting, QR,

the handling is more solid....


Front loads and low trail are a good pairing..

VBQ readers , rave about their low trail rando bikes ,
with bigger wheels, more rake/offset lowers the trail measurement,
on the ground plane..




...

Last edited by fietsbob; 08-11-18 at 11:00 AM.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 08-11-18, 11:07 AM
  #13  
Brian25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 720

Bikes: Road, mountain and track bikes and tandems.

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 282 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 18 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by TiHabanero
What is the thinking behind running only front panniers and a standard saddle bag? Why not mount the panniers on the rear and out of the wind?
I found your post to be a little bit vague. A determination as to how may bags and their location really depends on A) what type of touring you intend upon embarking on and B) how much gear you intend on taking. I mean in square inches not necessarily weight. For instance, I do full loaded touring. I would simply run out of space with the amount of gear I take on tours with less than four panniers. I have read that steering becomes greatly affected when you put more than 20 lbs on the front racks. On a side note: Personally I am against the frame bags, because of the importance to have easy access to several water bottles. Do tourists know that they need to drink close to a bottle an hour while riding?
Brian25 is offline  
Old 08-11-18, 12:13 PM
  #14  
LeeG
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,199
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 81 Times in 64 Posts
Originally Posted by TiHabanero
What is the thinking behind running only front panniers and a standard saddle bag? Why not mount the panniers on the rear and out of the wind?
Some bikes handle better with a front load than only a rear load. Your average sport tour/cross bike wasn’t intended to carry only a rear load but a load that is primarily the rider and between the wheels. Everything being equal, rim, spoke count the front wheel is less likely to bend or taco in a crash.

Once you put on panniers you’ve pretty much thrown out the window any aerodynamic difference between front or rear compared to no panniers. And increased weight provides a greater time penalty going up hills compared to increased speed on descents. Basically if aerodynamics is a concern you’re already a fast rider and riding in an aerodynamic posture with minimal gear.

While a front load slows down side to side movement of the front wheel a heavy rear load can exacerbate front wheel shimmy at high speeds. Given that high speed steering comes from leaning there’s less of a penalty in handling compared to high speed shimmy where oscillations start steering your bike instead of you steering your bike.

Putting a set of small panniers on a front low rider rack puts the weight under the control of your arms as opposed to over the rear wheel where it acts a long weighted lever sending side to side torquing onto your arms and front wheel.




Last edited by LeeG; 08-11-18 at 01:01 PM.
LeeG is offline  
Old 08-11-18, 09:16 PM
  #15  
stardognine
Partially Sane.
 
stardognine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Sunny Sacramento.
Posts: 3,559

Bikes: Soma Saga, pre-disc

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 972 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 643 Times in 468 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian25
. Do tourists know that they need to drink close to a bottle an hour while riding?
I do. 🙂 Meaning, I never figured out an exact amount, but I sure know I drink a lot. Especially in the summer, obviously.
stardognine is offline  
Old 08-12-18, 03:53 AM
  #16  
saddlesores
Senior Member
 
saddlesores's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Thailand..........Nakhon Nowhere
Posts: 3,654

Bikes: inferior steel....and....noodly aluminium

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1053 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 229 Posts
Originally Posted by TiHabanero
What....? Why.....?
.....................................................................
................choice is personal.............
........like it some do, others not....
......try you should, then choose......
...................................................................
saddlesores is offline  
Old 08-12-18, 09:19 AM
  #17  
cyccommute 
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,341

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6200 Post(s)
Liked 4,198 Times in 2,355 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian25
I I have read that steering becomes greatly affected when you put more than 20 lbs on the front racks.
Not true. As LeeG pointed out, bicycles are steered by leaning. Even at slow speeds, front panniers with 60% of the load have little effect on the steering. I carry around 40 to 50lb now...depending on the amount of food I'm carrying...and have carried as much as 60lbs in the past. I don't weigh the bags but I generally aim for a 60/40 ratio. That means that even at 40 lbs, I'm carrying around 24 lbs on the front but I've carried almost 40 lb on the front. I've never noticed any steering problem.

Originally Posted by Brian25
On a side note: Personally I am against the frame bags, because of the importance to have easy access to several water bottles. Do tourists know that they need to drink close to a bottle an hour while riding?
I'm not a fan of frame bags either. I do use a less then full frame bag for off-road touring but that's a different beast. That said, I also don't use my water bottles for water that I drink regularly when touring. Two of the cages are dedicated to carrying sports drink and the third is dedicated to reserve water. But the water I drink comes from a Camelbak. It holds more and can be packed with ice which makes for far more refreshing liquid intake than drinking tepid water. As an added bonus, the ice cools me as I ride.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 08-12-18, 11:18 AM
  #18  
Brian25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 720

Bikes: Road, mountain and track bikes and tandems.

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 282 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 18 Times in 15 Posts
Front pannier load

Originally Posted by cyccommute
Not true. As LeeG pointed out, bicycles are steered by leaning. Even at slow speeds, front panniers with 60% of the load have little effect on the steering. I carry around 40 to 50lb now...depending on the amount of food I'm carrying...and have carried as much as 60lbs in the past. I don't weigh the bags but I generally aim for a 60/40 ratio. That means that even at 40 lbs, I'm carrying around 24 lbs on the front but I've carried almost 40 lb on the front. I've never noticed any steering problem.



I'm not a fan of frame bags either. I do use a less then full frame bag for off-road touring but that's a different beast. That said, I also don't use my water bottles for water that I drink regularly when touring. Two of the cages are dedicated to carrying sports drink and the third is dedicated to reserve water. But the water I drink comes from a Camelbak. It holds more and can be packed with ice which makes for far more refreshing liquid intake than drinking tepid water. As an added bonus, the ice cools me as I ride.
As I wrote; I read about how over 20 lbs on the front of a bike is going to affect steering. (I do not even remember if the 20 lbs was total weight or 20 lbs per side) I admit that I have no personel experience with touring with more than eight pounds per side, just that there is some website that writes with authority about the tipping point as when there is too much weight on the front. The page that I was reading was comparing plain front racks to the low rider type that puts the load closest to the axle level. Wish I could find it. Not sure if it is true, but might be interesting for those thinking about loading up the front of their bike.
I'll never use a frame bag. I am short, my frame triangle barely fits water bottles. I could see it on the big guys bikes with the 60- 64 cm frame where they have tons of room for both bottles and a frame bag, but not me.
Brian25 is offline  
Old 08-12-18, 07:10 PM
  #19  
zacharyhoyt
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orwell, NY
Posts: 22

Bikes: 1998 Trek 520

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I have a milk crate up front, between the handlebars. It's not very aerodynamic but it's handy to put things in. Now when I am on a trip I pull a canoe on a trailer with most of the load in it, and just a few things up front with nothing on the rear rack. I find that having some load on the front wheel makes the bike feel more solidly on the road, and when I don't have anything up front it feels kind of light and bouncy. It's probably all just in my head, but that's what I've thought I noticed.
Zach
zacharyhoyt is offline  
Old 08-12-18, 08:00 PM
  #20  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,604

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times in 4,181 Posts
Originally Posted by zacharyhoyt
I have a milk crate up front, between the handlebars. It's not very aerodynamic but it's handy to put things in. Now when I am on a trip I pull a canoe on a trailer with most of the load in it, and just a few things up front with nothing on the rear rack. I find that having some load on the front wheel makes the bike feel more solidly on the road, and when I don't have anything up front it feels kind of light and bouncy. It's probably all just in my head, but that's what I've thought I noticed.
Zach
you pull a canoe?
pics shouldnt be asked for when someone mentions this- theu should just be posted in advance.

bring em here, please!
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 08-13-18, 02:48 PM
  #21  
stardognine
Partially Sane.
 
stardognine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Sunny Sacramento.
Posts: 3,559

Bikes: Soma Saga, pre-disc

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 972 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 643 Times in 468 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
you pull a canoe?
!
With your bike? Yes, pics, please. 😉
stardognine is offline  
Old 08-13-18, 03:29 PM
  #22  
linus
Crawler
 
linus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: OH~ CANADA
Posts: 1,410
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 211 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by raybo

I neither carry camping or cooking gear when I tour. As a result, I don’t need to carry 4 bags. I can just use 2. Front panniers are smaller and lighter than rear ones. Also, metal racks are heavy, as well. Why carry extra weight if I don’t have to?

I use a frame bag, as well.
Different bike, but same idea.

Forgot to mention I also carry a tent, cooking gear, and drone in my pack.

Last edited by linus; 08-13-18 at 03:59 PM.
linus is offline  
Old 08-14-18, 11:58 AM
  #23  
zacharyhoyt
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orwell, NY
Posts: 22

Bikes: 1998 Trek 520

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I am trying to get enough posts to be able to put up pictures, I'm almost there but I keep getting error messages. I'll keep trying, and thanks for your patience.
Zach
zacharyhoyt is offline  
Old 08-14-18, 12:01 PM
  #24  
zacharyhoyt
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orwell, NY
Posts: 22

Bikes: 1998 Trek 520

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post

Here is a picture of my loaded rig on the way to the Adirondacks, crossing the Black River outside Boonville, NY. It's a 1998 Trek 520 with a milk crate on the front and homemade rear carrier which I normally use to run errands, and a homemade trailer and canoe. I only can get away for a trip once a year. My first day last summer was 117 miles, but after that I spent more time canoeing than riding till the end of my week's vacation when it was time to go home. I'll be leaving in a week or two for this year's trip, depending on the weather. With the big tires the trailer pulls easily and it's easier to put my camping stuff in the canoe than having everything on the bike. This will be my 5th annual Adirondack trip with the canoe in tow, and I had 5 years of non-amphibious travel before that.
Zach
zacharyhoyt is offline  
Likes For zacharyhoyt:
Old 08-14-18, 12:23 PM
  #25  
zacharyhoyt
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Orwell, NY
Posts: 22

Bikes: 1998 Trek 520

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I think my problem was that I couldn't use a quote either, till I had 10 posts. I also found out that I wasn't allowed to post more than 5 times in 24 hours, which is why I waited till today to try again. Here are a few more pictures, now that I think it works:


Bridge at Santanoni Preserve


Route 28n heading toward Long Lake from Newcomb


At the top of the climb out of Lowville


Getting started on the 2016 trip
zacharyhoyt is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.