56 cm Sloped tt vs 58 cm straight tt
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
56 cm Sloped tt vs 58 cm straight tt
I currently ride a 56 CM Specialized Langster ('08 London because I used to think I was cool). I'm planning on selling that bike for a few reasons (mainly I want a steel frame with a non-sloping top tube that will accept fatter tires since the roads near me are horrific) and building up a new bike with Fyxation's Eastside Track Frameset. I'm a little stuck with what to do about sizing, however. My Langster seems really small; I'm about 6'1 with pretty short legs (31'' inseam) and a long torso and so it feels like I'm always way out in front over the bike when I am riding. I mainly ride around town and to and from work (about two miles on flat ground, so nothing major) so the ability to throw the bike around isn't a big deal to me. I'm much more interested in having a comfortable bike that I can ride at a relatively relaxed pace for long periods of time without feeling like I'm really cramped (I'm throwing a coaster brake and porteur bars on the new bike, so definitely not built for speed).
I've purchased both the 55cm and 58cm versions of the Eastside Track Frameset and don't really know which one I should build up. I haven't had too many bikes, and so I'm not sure how the sloped top tube of the Langster translates when measured against the more traditional geometry of the Eastside Track. I've copied the geometry of all three bikes below; if anyone has any ideas about which might be best for me I'd really appreciate any insight.
Specialized Langster 56 CM Geometry
Top Tube Length (Horizontal) 565 mm
Seat Tube (C-Top of top tube) 520 mm
Head Tube Length 180 mm
Heat Tube Angle 73.0 °
Seat Tube Angle 73.25 º
Bottom Bracket Drop 69 mm
Chain Stay Length 405 mm
Wheel Base 991 mm
Standover Height 786 mm
Fork Rake 43 mm
Fyxation 58 CM Geometry
Top Tube (effective) 580 mm
Top Tube (actual) 580 mm
Seat Tube (C-Top of top tube) 580 mm
Head Tube Length 159 mm
Heat Tube Angle 73.0 °
Seat Tube Angle 73.5 º
Bottom Bracket Drop 60 mm
Chain Stay Length 400 mm
Wheel Base 993 mm
Standover Height 836 mm
Fork Rake 38 mm
Fork Length 380 mm
Seat Post Ø 27.2 mm
Headset Style 1 1/8 Threadless
Bottom Bracket 68mm English
Rear Hub Spacing 120 mm
Material 4130 Cr-mo Frame / 4130 Cr-mo Fork
Fyxation 55 CM Geometry
Top Tube (effective) 560 mm
Top Tube (actual) 560 mm
Seat Tube (C-Top of top tube) 540 mm
Head Tube Length 130 mm
Heat Tube Angle 73.0 °
Seat Tube Angle 73.5 º
Bottom Bracket Drop 60 mm
Chain Stay Length 400 mm
Wheel Base 979 mm
Standover Height 809 mm
Fork Rake 38 mm
Fork Length 380 mm
Seat Post Ø 27.2 mm
Headset Style 1 1/8 Threadless
Bottom Bracket 68mm English
Rear Hub Spacing 120 mm
Material 4130 Cr-mo Frame / 4130 Cr-mo Fork
I've purchased both the 55cm and 58cm versions of the Eastside Track Frameset and don't really know which one I should build up. I haven't had too many bikes, and so I'm not sure how the sloped top tube of the Langster translates when measured against the more traditional geometry of the Eastside Track. I've copied the geometry of all three bikes below; if anyone has any ideas about which might be best for me I'd really appreciate any insight.
Specialized Langster 56 CM Geometry
Top Tube Length (Horizontal) 565 mm
Seat Tube (C-Top of top tube) 520 mm
Head Tube Length 180 mm
Heat Tube Angle 73.0 °
Seat Tube Angle 73.25 º
Bottom Bracket Drop 69 mm
Chain Stay Length 405 mm
Wheel Base 991 mm
Standover Height 786 mm
Fork Rake 43 mm
Fyxation 58 CM Geometry
Top Tube (effective) 580 mm
Top Tube (actual) 580 mm
Seat Tube (C-Top of top tube) 580 mm
Head Tube Length 159 mm
Heat Tube Angle 73.0 °
Seat Tube Angle 73.5 º
Bottom Bracket Drop 60 mm
Chain Stay Length 400 mm
Wheel Base 993 mm
Standover Height 836 mm
Fork Rake 38 mm
Fork Length 380 mm
Seat Post Ø 27.2 mm
Headset Style 1 1/8 Threadless
Bottom Bracket 68mm English
Rear Hub Spacing 120 mm
Material 4130 Cr-mo Frame / 4130 Cr-mo Fork
Fyxation 55 CM Geometry
Top Tube (effective) 560 mm
Top Tube (actual) 560 mm
Seat Tube (C-Top of top tube) 540 mm
Head Tube Length 130 mm
Heat Tube Angle 73.0 °
Seat Tube Angle 73.5 º
Bottom Bracket Drop 60 mm
Chain Stay Length 400 mm
Wheel Base 979 mm
Standover Height 809 mm
Fork Rake 38 mm
Fork Length 380 mm
Seat Post Ø 27.2 mm
Headset Style 1 1/8 Threadless
Bottom Bracket 68mm English
Rear Hub Spacing 120 mm
Material 4130 Cr-mo Frame / 4130 Cr-mo Fork
#2
Senior Member
Horizontal top tube and effective top tube are basically the same thing. Actual top tube in sloping frames is of no importance at all.
So the langster horizontal or effective top tube (htt or ett) is 565mm which seems really short for your height (especially if you have short legs)
The fyxation 55cm has a htt of 560 which is even shorter so definitely no that.
The 58cm has a htt of 580mm which to me seems pretty good.
There other things that affect the actual reach to the handlebar like seat tube angle and head tube angle but all the frames are so similiar in those regards that i'm not gonna go there.
Build up the 58. You get the reach you need (15mm more than the langster). Also put a decent length stem on it (none of these 30-50mm fixie ridiculous mess up yor handling stems. 90-130mm is good)
So the langster horizontal or effective top tube (htt or ett) is 565mm which seems really short for your height (especially if you have short legs)
The fyxation 55cm has a htt of 560 which is even shorter so definitely no that.
The 58cm has a htt of 580mm which to me seems pretty good.
There other things that affect the actual reach to the handlebar like seat tube angle and head tube angle but all the frames are so similiar in those regards that i'm not gonna go there.
Build up the 58. You get the reach you need (15mm more than the langster). Also put a decent length stem on it (none of these 30-50mm fixie ridiculous mess up yor handling stems. 90-130mm is good)
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,475
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 961 Post(s)
Liked 1,627 Times
in
1,044 Posts
Nice to know - See guys purchase a slanting top tube for the looks then slamming their bars down - Not really considering the slant just makes one more factor not to deal with....
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
#4
Senior Member
If the seat tube "mouth" is lower then more seat post is showing. This then means that you are sitting on a longer steel/carbon pole which then (I know you are guessing it) flexes and absorbs a bit more bumps and vibration.
Also it would seem that the compact geometry (sloping frames) allows for a frame to fit a larger segment of the population and more different body proportions.
#5
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,788
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Make sure, when you build the bike up (58cm, yes), that you get a seatpost that has a little setback to the clamp; not all have it, and that will give you a touch more adjustment for that longer torso.
#6
Banned
with same size wheel/tires ..
The top of the front of the top tube to the ground similar?
obviously the rear is lower, seat tube shorter on one..
The top of the front of the top tube to the ground similar?
obviously the rear is lower, seat tube shorter on one..
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I actually purchased the Velo Orange Grand Cru long setback seatpost so I'm really glad to hear your advice. I ended up getting a 70mm stem so sort of in the middle of what you suggest but if it's too small I will go bigger.