2 Treadmill Myths
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
2 Treadmill Myths
A couple of things you can learn pretty quickly from casual searching on the internet are
1. Set the incline to 1% or 2% to make the treadmill run equal to outside, because of air resistance, and
2. The bio-mechanical differences of stride on the treadmill are factors making a significant difference
I have come to conclude that these are both likely urban myths. You can disagree which is one reason I'm posting - to hear the counter arguments.
In the first, I've looked at various calculators and calculations, some from pretty old literature, and there is so much variance that I'm more comfortable with the simple calculation from base principles and best available estimates. The familiar old drag equation and taking the more or less consensus estimate of Cd as 1, frontal area of the runner as .45 meters squared. I did find one reference to wind tunnel testing of a standing body, Cd of 1.1-1.2 and area .5, and reasonably the runner is slightly lower or leaning so area is smaller. I'm not sure why the drag coefficient would be less, but "around 1" appears to be generally accepted so I go with that.
So with those estimations, for various paces I come up with these watts spent for drag
6 min/mile 24 watts ranging to 10 min/mile, 5 watts (see chart)
So it's a pretty small amount at paces 8-10, and offset at those speeds by cooling air flow if you compare outside. That comports with some studies of oxygen intake comparisons, which found them pretty much equal on the treadmill and outside, at the slower paces. But it's WAY more than some claims I've seen, such as 3% of someone's effort "at a marathon pace" of 5.5 minutes per mile!
Bio-mechanically I know that it's less impact on the joints particularly, but beyond that I think that most (all?) of the claims are vapor. Other than psychological pressures to change the stride, and uneven ground outside, I just don't see any valid reason why the stride mechanics necessarily changes. Particularly the claim that the moving belt throws your foot up at the back of the stride - I'm calling urban myth on that one. And true to confirmation bias inclination I've found a study that agrees with me ... and some that don't ...
But I'm going to submit that there isn't any difference in effort or technique in an 8 minute pace on the treadmill or running outside! Feel free to dispute ...
1. Set the incline to 1% or 2% to make the treadmill run equal to outside, because of air resistance, and
2. The bio-mechanical differences of stride on the treadmill are factors making a significant difference
I have come to conclude that these are both likely urban myths. You can disagree which is one reason I'm posting - to hear the counter arguments.
In the first, I've looked at various calculators and calculations, some from pretty old literature, and there is so much variance that I'm more comfortable with the simple calculation from base principles and best available estimates. The familiar old drag equation and taking the more or less consensus estimate of Cd as 1, frontal area of the runner as .45 meters squared. I did find one reference to wind tunnel testing of a standing body, Cd of 1.1-1.2 and area .5, and reasonably the runner is slightly lower or leaning so area is smaller. I'm not sure why the drag coefficient would be less, but "around 1" appears to be generally accepted so I go with that.
So with those estimations, for various paces I come up with these watts spent for drag
6 min/mile 24 watts ranging to 10 min/mile, 5 watts (see chart)
So it's a pretty small amount at paces 8-10, and offset at those speeds by cooling air flow if you compare outside. That comports with some studies of oxygen intake comparisons, which found them pretty much equal on the treadmill and outside, at the slower paces. But it's WAY more than some claims I've seen, such as 3% of someone's effort "at a marathon pace" of 5.5 minutes per mile!
Bio-mechanically I know that it's less impact on the joints particularly, but beyond that I think that most (all?) of the claims are vapor. Other than psychological pressures to change the stride, and uneven ground outside, I just don't see any valid reason why the stride mechanics necessarily changes. Particularly the claim that the moving belt throws your foot up at the back of the stride - I'm calling urban myth on that one. And true to confirmation bias inclination I've found a study that agrees with me ... and some that don't ...
But I'm going to submit that there isn't any difference in effort or technique in an 8 minute pace on the treadmill or running outside! Feel free to dispute ...
#2
The Left Coast, USA
A couple of things you can learn pretty quickly from casual searching on the internet are
1. Set the incline to 1% or 2% to make the treadmill run equal to outside, because of air resistance, and
2. The bio-mechanical differences of stride on the treadmill are factors making a significant difference
..
1. Set the incline to 1% or 2% to make the treadmill run equal to outside, because of air resistance, and
2. The bio-mechanical differences of stride on the treadmill are factors making a significant difference
..
However, from personal experience, I'll add the absolute level and sameness of the treadmill track creates artificial impact/hot spots...the nice thing about outside running is the terrain changes, even slightly, which I think builds strong stabilizing muscles and spreads the impact around. Just my h.o.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
I read these myths were recently debunked by an actual study by some fitness PhDs.Sorry, I don't have a link to the article. In sum, not much difference between road running and treadmill until you get up to the elite athlete level.
However, from personal experience, I'll add the absolute level and sameness of the treadmill track creates artificial impact/hot spots...the nice thing about outside running is the terrain changes, even slightly, which I think builds strong stabilizing muscles and spreads the impact around. Just my h.o.
However, from personal experience, I'll add the absolute level and sameness of the treadmill track creates artificial impact/hot spots...the nice thing about outside running is the terrain changes, even slightly, which I think builds strong stabilizing muscles and spreads the impact around. Just my h.o.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Colorado
Posts: 200
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 107 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times
in
14 Posts
Christine Clark, the 2000 U.S. women's marathon champion, who was from Alaska, did most of her training on a treadmill. They mention the indoor heat, 70 F in her house, as one advantage of the treadmill. In some ways I think I get a harder workout on the treadmill because I set a target slope and pace and will work harder to maintain that setting, whereas outdoors I might slow down more when tired. It's also easier to maintain good form and avoid injuries on the treadmill. I think the major problem is that if I train mostly on the treadmill and then run outdoors, I'm more likely to get injured on the outdoor run (perhaps because of weaker stabilizing muscles as FrenchFit mentioned), so it's good to include some outdoor runs in the training.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
It looks like no one is going to make a stand on my two "myths" but what about my wind drag numbers? In terms of "watts" out of habit and because that's how we're used to thinking, but around 10 watts at 8 minute pace is honestly more than I had expected. Getting more in the range of 6 or 7 minutes, the drag is a significant portion of the total (total power numbers more or less what we're accustomed to, according to internet "wisdom" and "smart" treadmills).
So I'm thinking, next time I race I'm going to wear a tighter shirt and shorts, maybe cycling jersey, and probably run behind some big guy for the draft! 20 or 30 watts drag (depending on which area and drag estimates), taking a third off that for drafting, that starts to add up.
So I'm thinking, next time I race I'm going to wear a tighter shirt and shorts, maybe cycling jersey, and probably run behind some big guy for the draft! 20 or 30 watts drag (depending on which area and drag estimates), taking a third off that for drafting, that starts to add up.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,190
Bikes: Ti, Mn Cr Ni Mo Nb, Al, C
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 942 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times
in
349 Posts
I do have a question (not related to wind resistance), I know nothing about treadmills, but I do ride rollers. If I could set my roller drums to spin to replicate a desired speed, would I not be putting less watts (less effort) when I pedaled to maintain that speed? Wouldn't that almost simulate going down a hill? Does this translate to treadmills as well when you run? Is that where the myth came from?
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
I do have a question (not related to wind resistance), I know nothing about treadmills, but I do ride rollers. If I could set my roller drums to spin to replicate a desired speed, would I not be putting less watts (less effort) when I pedaled to maintain that speed? Wouldn't that almost simulate going down a hill? Does this translate to treadmills as well when you run? Is that where the myth came from?
The treadmill surface moving at a constant speed, it wouldn't be different whether the treadmill is moving under our feet, or we're moving over the surface. Because physics, non-accelerating frame of reference. But where's the work go is your question I think, since our body isn't really moving forward? I haven't really studied it other than noticing "non-accelerating reference frame" but it looks to me:
1. We're leaping in the air, our center of mass going up and down (same on treadmill and road)
2. Air resistance (not on the treadmill)
3. From running form, the foot strike may slow us down a tiny bit especially if we over-stride, and we have to make that up on the push-off. (same on treadmill and road)
4. Running up/downhill, not getting into that here since we can keep the incline at zero.
The treadmill is usually softer and springier which makes the landing softer, and might spring back more than just the "spring loading" of our tendons. But that would be a very minor difference in the work, and mainly helps to make treadmilling easier on the joints. From the 3 above, only the air resistance is much different from running outside. Most of the work comes from #1 , and there is a little extra work outside getting up to speed to begin with.
On the bike we don't have anything analogous to #1 since the bike supports our weight.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,190
Bikes: Ti, Mn Cr Ni Mo Nb, Al, C
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 942 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times
in
349 Posts
Thanks for the explanation. With respect to #1 , would there not also be an element of pushing forward (when running on a real road) that is not replicated on a treadmill? or is the difference so minute that it doesn't make a difference?
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Thanks for the explanation. With respect to #1 , would there not also be an element of pushing forward (when running on a real road) that is not replicated on a treadmill? or is the difference so minute that it doesn't make a difference?
Initially getting up to the 6 mph does take more and isn't replicated on the treadmill, because the momentum changes from zero to whatever at 6 mph. But steady pace running at 6 is the same in that respect, treadmill or road. On the treadmill you have zero momentum all the time. Running across ground you have 6 mph times mass momentum, that's not changing if the speed is steady. It's the momentum change that we push against.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,593
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5234 Post(s)
Liked 3,608 Times
in
2,357 Posts
fwiw, in real life, we have to propel ourselves forward. but on a treadmill, we only have to stay above the moving belt
#12
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,587
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3915 Post(s)
Liked 1,967 Times
in
1,403 Posts
It's just Einstein. Frame of reference. We do propel ourselves forward in the "stationary" machine frame of reference, otherwise we accelerate backwards into another frame of reference with accompanying pain. We really are doing 6 mph though from another frame of reference we appear stationary. HR is about the same as it would be at the same speed off-machine, therefore we are doing the work of propelling ourselves forward.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DannoXYZ
Indoor & Stationary Cycling Forum
138
11-23-21 07:48 AM
divide_by_0
Triathlon
30
06-12-12 08:43 AM