Asian Serial Number Guide
#151
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
Need your help in identifying this Free Spirit FS10 age, or any info that can be found.
I am trying to determined age or year of this Taiwan made "FS10" Free Spirit bicycle.
I have two numbers stamped on bottom of bottom bracket shell.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
The numbers are:
489-471370
31C1C416
I have pics but, because I am new to the site, I am not allowed to post them at this time.
However, the bike appears to be a "twin brother" of the bike pics posted by Frank Horrigan on his FS10 thread.
Thanks in advance for and answers, help, or direction that might be offered.
Thanks!Dan Oaks
I am trying to determined age or year of this Taiwan made "FS10" Free Spirit bicycle.
I have two numbers stamped on bottom of bottom bracket shell.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
The numbers are:
489-471370
31C1C416
I have pics but, because I am new to the site, I am not allowed to post them at this time.
However, the bike appears to be a "twin brother" of the bike pics posted by Frank Horrigan on his FS10 thread.
Thanks in advance for and answers, help, or direction that might be offered.
Thanks!Dan Oaks
#152
Junior Member
I have this "Bridgestone" frame that I got off CL as a beater. I really wasn't concerned with the brand at the time, because of the goal. A few times I wondered if it was a Bridgestone but since there was no tubing stickers or even a model or name I figured someone just slapped some Bridgestone stickers on it for the heck of it.
The serial says J41718(or 6)2. Though it looks like some of the numbers that have been related to other Bridgestone's in this thread, when I throw in the Gregorian, Fortnight or Imperial Japanese thing then it doesn't make sense
Can anyone help me ID this frame?
The serial says J41718(or 6)2. Though it looks like some of the numbers that have been related to other Bridgestone's in this thread, when I throw in the Gregorian, Fortnight or Imperial Japanese thing then it doesn't make sense
Can anyone help me ID this frame?
Last edited by jskita; 05-24-19 at 02:15 AM.
#153
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
I have this "Bridgestone" frame that I got off CL as a beater. I really wasn't concerned with the brand at the time, because of the goal. A few times I wondered if it was a Bridgestone but since there was no tubing stickers or even a model or name I figured someone just slapped some Bridgestone stickers on it for the heck of it.
The serial says J41718(or 6)2. Though it looks like some of the numbers that have been related to other Bridgestone's in this thread, when I throw in the Gregorian, Fortnight or Imperial Japanese thing then it doesn't make sense
Can anyone help me ID this frame?
The serial says J41718(or 6)2. Though it looks like some of the numbers that have been related to other Bridgestone's in this thread, when I throw in the Gregorian, Fortnight or Imperial Japanese thing then it doesn't make sense
Can anyone help me ID this frame?
Last edited by T-Mar; 05-29-19 at 07:51 AM.
#154
Junior Member
The serial number format is consistent with Bridgestone, though it could be Bridgestone contract manufacture, as opposed to Bridgestone brand. The serial number format could also be interpreted as Miyata. Assuming it is Bridgestone, the serial number, in conjunction with the short dropouts and top tube cable tunnels, should make this mid-1984 manufacture. The lack of down tube shifter bosses suggests entry level and further evidence of this status is offered by the flat cut seat lug, steel headset and lack of finishing at the stay to dropout transition. However, I am surprised to see a forged dropout without a hanger, given the apparent era. Still, I see that it's single speed, so we shouldn't rule out the possibility that the hanger was removed and the frame repainted as part of a conversion. Given the apparent era and level, I'd assume it was designed for 27" wheels? What brand are the dropouts? What size seat post does it use? It may not help but I'd appreciate an overall picture.
#155
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
A 27.2mm post suggests an Ishiwata tubeset, as both Tange and Miyata (who drew their own butted tubes) would use a post no larger than 26.8mm useless it was Tange Prestige, in which case I would definitely expect brazed-on shift lever bosses and better overall workmanship standards. The major Ishiwata users during this era were Bianchi, Bridgestone, Fuji, Kabuki, Maruishi, Ross and Schwinn. The serial number format does not fit Bianchi, Fuji, Maruishi or Ross. Both Kabuki and Schwinn were contract manufactured by Bridgestone, so it does appear to be at least Bridgestone manufacture, if not a real Bridgestone.
A 27.2mm seat post is quite large. Ishiwata 022 used this size of post but the lack of brazed-on shift levers bosses would be atypical for an 022 frame of this era. More likely, it is seamed Ishiwata EX-F, possibly with lower grade Magny (carbon manganese) or hi-tensile forks and stays.
My leading candidate would be Bridgestone 400. The frame was an unspecified triple butted CrMo main triangle and this would be consistent with Ishiwata EX. The stays and forks were hi-tensile steel. The frame features are also consistent for a Bridgestone 400, with the exception of a derailleur hanger and dropout eyelets, which as discussed earlier, were probably removed. Even the steel headset, which is the component most likely to be OEM, is correct.
Last edited by T-Mar; 06-03-19 at 10:16 AM.
#156
Senior Member
Nishiki Optima XRS
So I just would like to confirm that what I’m thinking is correct. I have a Nishiki Optima XRS, a 700c wheeled hybrid. I believe it to be a 1993 or 1994 based on component spec and various websites (know your bike and bikepedia, bicycle blue book). The frame has two serial numbers stamped on the bottom of the BB shell: F2K03288 on the drive side, and R935020176 on the non drive side. Is this a Fairley built frame, November 1992? All the Shimano date codes appear to either be 0 (or Q) and a letter, i.e., 0G (or QG) etc. If the 0 is actually a Q, then that would make better sense as the components are all Shimano 400CX or 700CX, which were only produced for a few years in the early 90’s. But the two numbers stamped into the BB shell are tripping me up. Any thoughts?
EDIT: After stumbling on T-Mar’s excellent Nishiki Serial Number Database post here on BF, I believe the R935020176 sn to be the correct serial number. That would therefore place it as a Derby manufactured frame, Kent Washington, on the 350th day of 1992, sequential production number of 0176. The component date codes would further support this as they were all manufactured sometime in 1992. But what is the other F2K number? Both numbers have factory paint down in them so were applied at the factory before painting. And I find it hard to believe the frame was made in the USA given the relatively low MSRP of $569 (according to bikepedia or bicycle blue book). But stranger things have happened, right?
EDIT: After stumbling on T-Mar’s excellent Nishiki Serial Number Database post here on BF, I believe the R935020176 sn to be the correct serial number. That would therefore place it as a Derby manufactured frame, Kent Washington, on the 350th day of 1992, sequential production number of 0176. The component date codes would further support this as they were all manufactured sometime in 1992. But what is the other F2K number? Both numbers have factory paint down in them so were applied at the factory before painting. And I find it hard to believe the frame was made in the USA given the relatively low MSRP of $569 (according to bikepedia or bicycle blue book). But stranger things have happened, right?
Last edited by Smokinapankake; 06-06-19 at 11:54 AM.
#157
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
So I just would like to confirm that what I’m thinking is correct. I have a Nishiki Optima XRS, a 700c wheeled hybrid. I believe it to be a 1993 or 1994 based on component spec and various websites (know your bike and bikepedia, bicycle blue book). The frame has two serial numbers stamped on the bottom of the BB shell: F2K03288 on the drive side, and R935020176 on the non drive side. Is this a Fairley built frame, November 1992? All the Shimano date codes appear to either be 0 (or Q) and a letter, i.e., 0G (or QG) etc. If the 0 is actually a Q, then that would make better sense as the components are all Shimano 400CX or 700CX, which were only produced for a few years in the early 90’s. But the two numbers stamped into the BB shell are tripping me up. Any thoughts?
EDIT: After stumbling on T-Mar’s excellent Nishiki Serial Number Database post here on BF, I believe the R935020176 sn to be the correct serial number. That would therefore place it as a Derby manufactured frame, Kent Washington, on the 350th day of 1992, sequential production number of 0176. The component date codes would further support this as they were all manufactured sometime in 1992. But what is the other F2K number? Both numbers have factory paint down in them so were applied at the factory before painting. And I find it hard to believe the frame was made in the USA given the relatively low MSRP of $569 (according to bikepedia or bicycle blue book). But stranger things have happened, right?
EDIT: After stumbling on T-Mar’s excellent Nishiki Serial Number Database post here on BF, I believe the R935020176 sn to be the correct serial number. That would therefore place it as a Derby manufactured frame, Kent Washington, on the 350th day of 1992, sequential production number of 0176. The component date codes would further support this as they were all manufactured sometime in 1992. But what is the other F2K number? Both numbers have factory paint down in them so were applied at the factory before painting. And I find it hard to believe the frame was made in the USA given the relatively low MSRP of $569 (according to bikepedia or bicycle blue book). But stranger things have happened, right?
Given the very late 1992 serial numbers, the bicycle would be a 1993 model. Shimano 400CX and 700CX components were only produced for the 1993-1995 model years, though manufacturing on the 1993 model year components would have started at least as early as mid-1992. As such they should have "Q" though "T" year codes. Typically, Shimano distinguishes between the "O" and "Q" codes by overscoring a backslash (\) though the "Q".
Last edited by T-Mar; 06-07-19 at 07:26 AM.
#158
Senior Member
Thank you so much T-Mar for your vast knowledge. I suspected they were Q, not 0, and your post confirms what I was thinking, but by golly it sure looks like 0, where typically you see a slash through to identify as 0... thanks again for your help!
#159
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 150
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
Regarding Australian brand "Ricardo", the serial numbers consistently seem to follow the format "LyFxxxx". Is it known if 'L' stands for a manufacturer and which one it is?
#160
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
The only company that I'm aware of who used this format was Overlord, a Taiwanese based company with factories in Taiwan and China. In Canada, Overlord products were department store level bicycles sold by Canadian Tire. If you're posting about it here, I'm assuming Ricardo were a higher level bicycle but I'm not sure if Overlord ventured beyond entry low end. It may or may not be the same company. Sorry, I can't be of more assistance.
#161
Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 40
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I also see my friend's frame with 2 serial numbers under the bottom brachet. top ly90 *** below 000 ****. This number is the Kawamura serial number?
#162
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
Sanz, I've never seen a Kawamura frame with that serial number format.
#163
Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The two serial numbers suggest the bicycle was manufactured in two different facilities. This is not unknown the bicycle industry. The F-number is definitely not Fairly but the format suggests it represents November 1992. This is 2-6 weeks prior to the date of the Kent serial number. This suggests that the F-number represents the frame's contract manufacturer. Given that both numbers are under the paint, it may have shipped in a phosphated or primed finish, being painted and assembled by Derby's Kent facility.
Given the very late 1992 serial numbers, the bicycle would be a 1993 model. Shimano 400CX and 700CX components were only produced for the 1993-1995 model years, though manufacturing on the 1993 model year components would have started at least as early as mid-1992. As such they should have "Q" though "T" year codes. Typically, Shimano distinguishes between the "O" and "Q" codes by overscoring a backslash (\) though the "Q".
Given the very late 1992 serial numbers, the bicycle would be a 1993 model. Shimano 400CX and 700CX components were only produced for the 1993-1995 model years, though manufacturing on the 1993 model year components would have started at least as early as mid-1992. As such they should have "Q" though "T" year codes. Typically, Shimano distinguishes between the "O" and "Q" codes by overscoring a backslash (\) though the "Q".
#164
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
xmoksax, welcome to the forums. I'm not familiar with the Amust brand but Shimano Exage 300LX was a short lived group that would place it 1991-1992. The serial number may represent December 1990, which would be consistent with a 1991 model. Your paint scheme, with a fade from blue to yellow, was also popular during this period.
Nishiki was not a bicycle manufacturer but a bicycle brand. The rights to the brand were held by various companies and could vary from country to country. "Produced by Nishiki" is ambiguous and could be interpreted several ways. It could mean that the brand was owned by the same company that owned Nishiki. It could also mean that the owner of the Amust brand contracted the owners of the Nishiki brand to have the bicycle manufactured via one of their suppliers. Marketing people tend to push the boundary on labels like these, in an attempt to sell more bicycles. Putting a recognizable brand name like Nishiki on a minor or new brand would help to stimulate sales.
Certainly, the serial number format is consistent with that of one of the known contract manufacturers of the Nishiki brand during this era, so there is a connection, though I can't define the exact nature of the connection. In late 1988, Derby bought West Coast Cycle, the company that owned the rights to the Nishiki brand in the USA. I don't know how many non-USA rights Derby had acquired by the 1991 model year. Can I ask the country of your location? It might provide a clue to the nature of the "Nishiki" connection.
Nishiki was not a bicycle manufacturer but a bicycle brand. The rights to the brand were held by various companies and could vary from country to country. "Produced by Nishiki" is ambiguous and could be interpreted several ways. It could mean that the brand was owned by the same company that owned Nishiki. It could also mean that the owner of the Amust brand contracted the owners of the Nishiki brand to have the bicycle manufactured via one of their suppliers. Marketing people tend to push the boundary on labels like these, in an attempt to sell more bicycles. Putting a recognizable brand name like Nishiki on a minor or new brand would help to stimulate sales.
Certainly, the serial number format is consistent with that of one of the known contract manufacturers of the Nishiki brand during this era, so there is a connection, though I can't define the exact nature of the connection. In late 1988, Derby bought West Coast Cycle, the company that owned the rights to the Nishiki brand in the USA. I don't know how many non-USA rights Derby had acquired by the 1991 model year. Can I ask the country of your location? It might provide a clue to the nature of the "Nishiki" connection.
#165
Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 40
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just guessed it. can you help me this serial tmar?
with 2 serial numbers under the bottom brachet. Left ly90 *** right 000 ****.
writing the direction of circular bottom brachet
with 2 serial numbers under the bottom brachet. Left ly90 *** right 000 ****.
writing the direction of circular bottom brachet
Last edited by Sanz; 06-21-19 at 10:50 PM.
#166
Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
xmoksax, welcome to the forums. I'm not familiar with the Amust brand but Shimano Exage 300LX was a short lived group that would place it 1991-1992. The serial number may represent December 1990, which would be consistent with a 1991 model. Your paint scheme, with a fade from blue to yellow, was also popular during this period.
Nishiki was not a bicycle manufacturer but a bicycle brand. The rights to the brand were held by various companies and could vary from country to country. "Produced by Nishiki" is ambiguous and could be interpreted several ways. It could mean that the brand was owned by the same company that owned Nishiki. It could also mean that the owner of the Amust brand contracted the owners of the Nishiki brand to have the bicycle manufactured via one of their suppliers. Marketing people tend to push the boundary on labels like these, in an attempt to sell more bicycles. Putting a recognizable brand name like Nishiki on a minor or new brand would help to stimulate sales.
Certainly, the serial number format is consistent with that of one of the known contract manufacturers of the Nishiki brand during this era, so there is a connection, though I can't define the exact nature of the connection. In late 1988, Derby bought West Coast Cycle, the company that owned the rights to the Nishiki brand in the USA. I don't know how many non-USA rights Derby had acquired by the 1991 model year. Can I ask the country of your location? It might provide a clue to the nature of the "Nishiki" connection.
Nishiki was not a bicycle manufacturer but a bicycle brand. The rights to the brand were held by various companies and could vary from country to country. "Produced by Nishiki" is ambiguous and could be interpreted several ways. It could mean that the brand was owned by the same company that owned Nishiki. It could also mean that the owner of the Amust brand contracted the owners of the Nishiki brand to have the bicycle manufactured via one of their suppliers. Marketing people tend to push the boundary on labels like these, in an attempt to sell more bicycles. Putting a recognizable brand name like Nishiki on a minor or new brand would help to stimulate sales.
Certainly, the serial number format is consistent with that of one of the known contract manufacturers of the Nishiki brand during this era, so there is a connection, though I can't define the exact nature of the connection. In late 1988, Derby bought West Coast Cycle, the company that owned the rights to the Nishiki brand in the USA. I don't know how many non-USA rights Derby had acquired by the 1991 model year. Can I ask the country of your location? It might provide a clue to the nature of the "Nishiki" connection.
#167
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
I'm in Indonesia, I got this bike on a thrift store. There is a sticker from Japanese authorities. The Amust 600 spec's are vertical DO with a handpump placement. And it's true the colour fade purple yellow. Sorry I can't attach images of my bike, I'm new in bike forums 😁
Last edited by T-Mar; 06-25-19 at 08:50 AM.
#168
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
#169
Junior Member
My leading candidate would be Bridgestone 400. The frame was an unspecified triple butted CrMo main triangle and this would be consistent with Ishiwata EX. The stays and forks were hi-tensile steel. The frame features are also consistent for a Bridgestone 400, with the exception of a derailleur hanger and dropout eyelets, which as discussed earlier, were probably removed. Even the steel headset, which is the component most likely to be OEM, is correct.
Thanks Again!
#171
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
Picked up a Bridgestone Radac Thursday, I believe it's a '90 Radac 2100 based on the component dates (Shimano N) and the component group match to the '90 catalog.
But, what's up with the frame number? 9X60116 doesn't match anything I've found.
It seems like the start could be a "yF" for end of '89 build. But after that, it's a 57cm not a 60, so any meaning is off.
Even stranger, why would Bridgestone use a non-standard numbering system? Could they have been contracting them?
But, what's up with the frame number? 9X60116 doesn't match anything I've found.
It seems like the start could be a "yF" for end of '89 build. But after that, it's a 57cm not a 60, so any meaning is off.
Even stranger, why would Bridgestone use a non-standard numbering system? Could they have been contracting them?
#172
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: WNY
Posts: 444
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 177 Post(s)
Liked 313 Times
in
162 Posts
Kabuki Diamond Formula D
Looks to be a 1982 model
B221779 although the B is poorly struck.
Headbadge is stamped 0502
Not sure if that's a partial B, D or P
Unfortunate black paint
B221779 although the B is poorly struck.
Headbadge is stamped 0502
Not sure if that's a partial B, D or P
Unfortunate black paint
#173
Junior Member
Agreed, the 1st two characters are reverse format of what I would expect on a Bridgestone manufactured product. Unfortunately, I don't have any S/N data for other aluminum frames, so I can't offer an explanation for this. However, to the best of my knowledge, Bridgestone never incorporated size codes into the serial number. Certainly none of the Bridgestone S/N I've collected indicate this, though there is the odd case where coincidence could make the 3rd and 4th characters appear to be a size code.
Last edited by so-ichiro; 07-22-19 at 10:55 PM.
#174
Junior Member
Zunow Hummingbird - designed by Zunow
Thank you @T-Mar for the great guide. I also have two Zunow Hammingbirds. This model is "designed by Zunow", and its serial numbers, M9P5009 and M9P5020, appear to match Miki format. Both frames are size 50 cm, so I wondered the serial number format included the frame size.
#175
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Steve Bauer serial nos.
T-Mar,Just discovered this thread (after reading the one on the Steve Bauer Mystery Bike), and I'm intrigued. I have several SB's, so I tried to confirm their dates of manufacture using their serial numbers. Not sure the guide works for them, though. Like the gentleman up-thread with the SB Whistler, mine have SN's that start with two capital letters, followed by 5 numbers. That doesn't seem to fit the Yamaguchi system suggested for them, as it starts out with letter-number-letter. The ones that do appear to correspond (during the mid-80's) to the SB sequence look to be those of Fuji, Kawamura, Maruishi, Miyata and Tsunoda - but of them, only Maruishi's produced dates that make sense.
Specifically, mine have SN's that start with either F (like both the Whistler's and the SB Mystery Bike's) or G; followed by either H, N or S. Assuming the second letter refers to a fortnight, Mariushi's system would give them dates ranging from April '86 to April '87 - certainly a period compatible with their colour schemes. Do you think Maruishi could have been the (or a) builder of early SB frames? Or have I muffed something? Thanks so much, BTW, for putting together and sharing all this info!
Specifically, mine have SN's that start with either F (like both the Whistler's and the SB Mystery Bike's) or G; followed by either H, N or S. Assuming the second letter refers to a fortnight, Mariushi's system would give them dates ranging from April '86 to April '87 - certainly a period compatible with their colour schemes. Do you think Maruishi could have been the (or a) builder of early SB frames? Or have I muffed something? Thanks so much, BTW, for putting together and sharing all this info!