Breezer Inversion
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Breezer Inversion
Anyone own one of these or have any experience with them? Even though I have both aluminum bikes and a nice BMC carbon bike, I’m always partial to steel bikes, especially for their pliant ride and versatility. The Inversion seems like it would be a good gravel bike and all around ride, but just wanted to see what others thought. I wish it had clearance for wider tires, but 38mm is probably adequate for most of the gravel roads around here.
#2
Behold my avatar:
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SW Colorado
Posts: 1,034
Bikes: 2019 Gorilla Monsoon, 2013 Surly Krampus, Brompton folder
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6941 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times
in
289 Posts
Anyone own one of these or have any experience with them? Even though I have both aluminum bikes and a nice BMC carbon bike, I’m always partial to steel bikes, especially for their pliant ride and versatility. The Inversion seems like it would be a good gravel bike and all around ride, but just wanted to see what others thought. I wish it had clearance for wider tires, but 38mm is probably adequate for most of the gravel roads around here.
Aside from that, the bike looks nice.
Last edited by dgodave; 03-27-18 at 08:38 AM.
#4
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Can’t disagree, tire clearance is one thing you can’t upgrade. Another better option might be the All City Cosmic Stallion, but they aren’t available and are pricier.
#5
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Anyone own one of these or have any experience with them? Even though I have both aluminum bikes and a nice BMC carbon bike, I’m always partial to steel bikes, especially for their pliant ride and versatility. The Inversion seems like it would be a good gravel bike and all around ride, but just wanted to see what others thought. I wish it had clearance for wider tires, but 38mm is probably adequate for most of the gravel roads around here.
#6
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I’m tempted to order a 2017 as they seem to be a good deal right now. I like the 2018 colors better though. Look forward to hear what you think when you get yours!
#7
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
1. The component mix performs extremely well. Most of the readers here probably already ride components of this quality, but this level is a bit new for me. I really appreciate the brakes and the shifting.
2. The fit is a bit tough with this bike. For folks around my height (6 ft, 1/2 inch), there is a decision to be made between a 54 (L) and a 57 (XL). At first I was leaning toward the 54, and I was ok with the reach dimension, but the stack was very short for my needs. So I ended up opting for the 57. So far I think I made the right choice. I'm very comfortable riding on the horizontal bars. The brake hood position is pretty aggressive (for an old guy like me). Strangely, the drops, with the flared handlebars feel very good, particularly with a headwind. But then the saddle starts to wear on the wrong parts in that position. So position-wise, I'm still evaluating. And of course that will vary from rider to rider.
3. I love how the tires and frame combine to deliver a comfortable ride.
That's all I have so far, I'll come back later with more details and some photos.
#8
Senior Member
I looked at these. They have a fairly plain Jane steel frame and the BB86 was a deal killer for me. The similar Raleigh Tamland 2 has a nicer 631 frame with a threaded BB and comes with Rival 1, which I really like. I also costs a lot less, especially with the corporate discount.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 7,828
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1873 Post(s)
Liked 692 Times
in
468 Posts
I looked at these. They have a fairly plain Jane steel frame and the BB86 was a deal killer for me. The similar Raleigh Tamland 2 has a nicer 631 frame with a threaded BB and comes with Rival 1, which I really like. I also costs a lot less, especially with the corporate discount.
__________________
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
#10
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I looked at these. They have a fairly plain Jane steel frame and the BB86 was a deal killer for me. The similar Raleigh Tamland 2 has a nicer 631 frame with a threaded BB and comes with Rival 1, which I really like. I also costs a lot less, especially with the corporate discount.
Last edited by desert; 04-03-18 at 08:30 PM.
#11
Senior Member
#12
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What size bike do you have?
#14
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There have been some reports of creaking, with press-fit bottom brackets. Threaded bottom brackets can be disassembled, greased, etc. in an effort to stop any creaking. I haven't seen any statistics (failure rate) on this, I've just seen anecdotes. Also, the best frame material to support a robust press fit is steel, so I'm more comfortable with the BB86 in a steel frame than in any other material. Press fit BB's give the frame designer more flexibility to build in the optimum combination of light weight and stiffness. As with all designs, it's a compromise; higher performance versus a perceived risk. I'll side with Shimano on this one, particularly with a steel frame.
#15
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 34
Bikes: 2012 Trek Madone 3.1 Shimano
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't know what the current codes are, but the Tamland 2 is $1499 and the Tamland 1 is $1349. I don't know if it's trending up or down. However, the Roker Sport is $1299 which is $70 more than I paid last year at this time.
#17
Behold my avatar:
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SW Colorado
Posts: 1,034
Bikes: 2019 Gorilla Monsoon, 2013 Surly Krampus, Brompton folder
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6941 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times
in
289 Posts
There have been some reports of creaking, with press-fit bottom brackets. Threaded bottom brackets can be disassembled, greased, etc. in an effort to stop any creaking. I haven't seen any statistics (failure rate) on this, I've just seen anecdotes. Also, the best frame material to support a robust press fit is steel, so I'm more comfortable with the BB86 in a steel frame than in any other material. Press fit BB's give the frame designer more flexibility to build in the optimum combination of light weight and stiffness. As with all designs, it's a compromise; higher performance versus a perceived risk. I'll side with Shimano on this one, particularly with a steel frame.
#18
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I understand the dislike for the BB86, but the frame construction is the highlight of the Inversion. Heat treating after welding is a step forward, providing more strength/pound than many other steel frames. Welding heat treated tubes, weakening them with the weld-affected zone, is effectively a waste of good steel tube properties. Also, I'll never ride another Raleigh frame, after my mtb experience with a cracked frame. Raleigh quality isn't great, in my opinion. But they are cheap. Also, the Tamland weighs a full 2 lbs more than the Breezer.
#19
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Hey, sorry I was negative about your bike. I had one bad experience with a Raleigh bike, so your post hit a sore spot. My comments regarding Raleigh frames were aimed at their AL frames, so I shouldn't have brought that up in this discussion. You're correct, the air hardening should improve the strength of the weld area. I looked at this bike a bit more today, and it looks just fine. Interestingly, the geometry is very similar to the Breezer. It costs $500 less. The higher price on the Breezer gets one hydraulic disks, Ultegra componentry, and 2 lbs less weight. I think that's worth it for me, but they both look like fine bikes.
What size bike do you have?
What size bike do you have?
#20
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I can probably agree that some Raleighs might not be on a par in construction with some other higher end brands, but I have a couple of modern Raleighs that have been solid performers for years, including a belt drive Misceo 4.0 that has been my daily commuter across multiple cities, it's awesome in any weather. Since the Breezer is a similar price point, I'd like to get your opinion on the quality of construction on your Inversion. How clean are the welds? Any noticeable squeaks? How is the ride over rough roads and gravel? How's the quality of the paint? Just being inquisitive, since I don't have a chance to see one in person.
The ride quality is great, but I give as much credit to the tires as I do the frame. The 34c tires just soak up the bumps, even at the max 80 psi. The frame probably contributes some as well, but I'm a big fan of wide tires and their resulting ride quality. Speaking of tires, I really like this choice in tire. At 80 psi on the road, they ride on the smooth center like a road tire. But there is some tread on the side for off road.
I think the high level components bring a lot of value at this price point. I could have had a carbon Damone at this price point, but I'd be trading component level for the carbon frame and isospeed. I prefer the shock absorbing qualities of this particular combination of tires and frame, along with the robustness of steel, along with all the rack and water bottle mounts.
There is no creaking or noise of any kind so far. But it's early yet. I'll report back with any problems, but for now it rides great.
#21
Senior Member
Hey, sorry I was negative about your bike. I had one bad experience with a Raleigh bike, so your post hit a sore spot. My comments regarding Raleigh frames were aimed at their AL frames, so I shouldn't have brought that up in this discussion. You're correct, the air hardening should improve the strength of the weld area. I looked at this bike a bit more today, and it looks just fine. Interestingly, the geometry is very similar to the Breezer. It costs $500 less. The higher price on the Breezer gets one hydraulic disks, Ultegra componentry, and 2 lbs less weight. I think that's worth it for me, but they both look like fine bikes.
What size bike do you have?
What size bike do you have?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sweetspot
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
12
08-17-19 04:18 PM
b0rderline
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
30
04-26-17 04:15 PM