"Dear Carleton"
#3077
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 3,215
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yup. That head tube is like 8 or 9cm. Waaaay to low.
I guess it makes for a smaller "compact" frame that is stiffer. But, look at what lengths you have to go to make aero bars work. Also, the "low is always better" trend in aero bars is over. Now that aero bar base pads are rising, so should the stack of the frames.
#3078
Full Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 277
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
I tried and failed to get closeups of the Italian team pursuit bikes as they were things of beauty, Pinarello Maat frames, Campag wheels, here is a stock image of the team
#3079
Full Member
Ha. I hadn't thought of the fact that molds are so expensive that it actually limits the available sizes.
You are dead on about the stack. Most track bikes have a short head tube. Until "short-n-shallow" bars like the Scatto came along, riders would use +17deg stems to get the stack back so they could run drop bars.
Shallow bars like the Scatto (and those that came after) have certainly helped with that.
My personal example, a 58 or 60cm frame would often come with a 11cm head tube. With shallow B125 bars (similar in depth to the Scatto), I still had to use lots of rise:
11cm Headtube on my first Tiemeyer (made as a Kilo bike). This head tube is admittedly too short. This is an early season "comfort" setup that's really high. But, still, I had to use spacers and rise stem.
Look what happened when I had a custom frame made with what I feel is an appropriate 15cm head tube:
I can run a nearly flat steam (-6 degrees I think) and the bars are reasonably deep. Notice the grip distance from the top of the tire.
I can run a -17deg stem and go deeper if needed.
You are dead on about the stack. Most track bikes have a short head tube. Until "short-n-shallow" bars like the Scatto came along, riders would use +17deg stems to get the stack back so they could run drop bars.
Shallow bars like the Scatto (and those that came after) have certainly helped with that.
My personal example, a 58 or 60cm frame would often come with a 11cm head tube. With shallow B125 bars (similar in depth to the Scatto), I still had to use lots of rise:
11cm Headtube on my first Tiemeyer (made as a Kilo bike). This head tube is admittedly too short. This is an early season "comfort" setup that's really high. But, still, I had to use spacers and rise stem.
Look what happened when I had a custom frame made with what I feel is an appropriate 15cm head tube:
I can run a nearly flat steam (-6 degrees I think) and the bars are reasonably deep. Notice the grip distance from the top of the tire.
I can run a -17deg stem and go deeper if needed.
#3080
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 607
Bikes: Serotta steel track bike, Specialized MTB
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
https://instagram.com/p/BCdosxckV9s/
I'm not sure about yhe model name
#3081
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 125
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My personal example, a 58 or 60cm frame would often come with a 11cm head tube. With shallow B125 bars (similar in depth to the Scatto), I still had to use lots of rise:
11cm Headtube on my first Tiemeyer (made as a Kilo bike). This head tube is admittedly too short. This is an early season "comfort" setup that's really high. But, still, I had to use spacers and rise stem.
Still, I wonder how much the stack of spacers below the stem on the Tiemeyer impacted front end stiffness and placed the steerer at greater risk of failure.... Spacers and rise are useful for fine tuning, but not an ideal substitute for an appropriately sized HT.
#3082
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 141
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yup. That head tube is like 8 or 9cm. Waaaay too low.
I guess it makes for a smaller "compact" frame that is stiffer. But, look at what lengths you have to go to make aero bars work. Also, the "low is always better" trend in aero bars is over. Now that aero bar base pads are rising, so should the stack of the frames.
I guess it makes for a smaller "compact" frame that is stiffer. But, look at what lengths you have to go to make aero bars work. Also, the "low is always better" trend in aero bars is over. Now that aero bar base pads are rising, so should the stack of the frames.
I understand that track being such a limited market, there can't really be as much geometry variation as there is in road, but I'm at a loss for finding a frame that fits me well for pursuiting. A lot of [track] bikes these days have very long top tubes - I presume - to stretch people out to get them more aero. Additionally, for road bikes, HTs are getting taller to make that stretched position more comfortable. Pacelining on the road I watch my buddies pass me and their arms are stretched out in front of them; this is pretty en vogue for the way a road bike fits these days and it just makes me think that if we shortened the cockpit up, people might stop complaining about back pain. /rant
Anyway, for me, these long TTs and tall HTs make it especially difficult to find a pursuit bike. On my current 2009 Fuji Track Pro, I need to run a 40mm stem, and extensions under the base bar and I still feel uncomfortable. I've come to the conclusion that I have proportionally long legs. At present, I'm looking at 52cm and even some 49cm frames to get the right reach and stack measurements.
To be honest for a pursuit bike, I'd rather have a super low HT and subsequently a low base bar and then adjust my fit through risers. Not only would it offer some cleaner airflow, but it adds another fitting variable to tweak things.
#3083
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
Yes.
But, I'm looking at it from a mass-start POV.
Just like there is no one bike for crits and TTs on the road, there probably shouldn't be for track.
How many people ride the same road bike in bunch races and TTs on the road? Why should we do the same on the track?
But, I'm looking at it from a mass-start POV.
I understand that track being such a limited market, there can't really be as much geometry variation as there is in road, but I'm at a loss for finding a frame that fits me well for pursuiting. A lot of [track] bikes these days have very long top tubes - I presume - to stretch people out to get them more aero. Additionally, for road bikes, HTs are getting taller to make that stretched position more comfortable. Pacelining on the road I watch my buddies pass me and their arms are stretched out in front of them; this is pretty en vogue for the way a road bike fits these days and it just makes me think that if we shortened the cockpit up, people might stop complaining about back pain. /rant
Anyway, for me, these long TTs and tall HTs make it especially difficult to find a pursuit bike. On my current 2009 Fuji Track Pro, I need to run a 40mm stem, and extensions under the base bar and I still feel uncomfortable. I've come to the conclusion that I have proportionally long legs. At present, I'm looking at 52cm and even some 49cm frames to get the right reach and stack measurements.
I am sort of an aero nerd and I can see how running pads right on the bars isn't as 'clean' as running with some risers. One can imagine airflow getting bunched up across the surface of the base bar, yet with risers there's more open space for the air to travel.
To be honest for a pursuit bike, I'd rather have a super low HT and subsequently a low base bar and then adjust my fit through risers. Not only would it offer some cleaner airflow, but it adds another fitting variable to tweak things.
Anyway, for me, these long TTs and tall HTs make it especially difficult to find a pursuit bike. On my current 2009 Fuji Track Pro, I need to run a 40mm stem, and extensions under the base bar and I still feel uncomfortable. I've come to the conclusion that I have proportionally long legs. At present, I'm looking at 52cm and even some 49cm frames to get the right reach and stack measurements.
I am sort of an aero nerd and I can see how running pads right on the bars isn't as 'clean' as running with some risers. One can imagine airflow getting bunched up across the surface of the base bar, yet with risers there's more open space for the air to travel.
To be honest for a pursuit bike, I'd rather have a super low HT and subsequently a low base bar and then adjust my fit through risers. Not only would it offer some cleaner airflow, but it adds another fitting variable to tweak things.
How many people ride the same road bike in bunch races and TTs on the road? Why should we do the same on the track?
#3086
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 141
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My Track Pro with a longish TT fits me like a glove with drops and feels great in the thick of a bunch race, not so much in a pursuit!
+1
I do wish that at least the companies who are known to offer good, accessible track frames did this. I say accessible because while the likes of BT, Koga and FES do this, good luck getting one. Planet X offers (offered?) both the Track Pro and the TOR, the latter intended to be more TT-specific. However, because of its even longer TT, I would have had to have gotten a 47cm in order to get acceptable reach.
I do wish that at least the companies who are known to offer good, accessible track frames did this. I say accessible because while the likes of BT, Koga and FES do this, good luck getting one. Planet X offers (offered?) both the Track Pro and the TOR, the latter intended to be more TT-specific. However, because of its even longer TT, I would have had to have gotten a 47cm in order to get acceptable reach.
#3087
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,445
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4233 Post(s)
Liked 2,948 Times
in
1,807 Posts
That is a cool picture. I thought the rifling was supposed to make it flex less.
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),
#3088
Lapped 3x
SLX flexes "a lot" because of it's diameter. Steel tubes featured in lugged construction all had to conform to certain external tube diameters to fit into the lugs available. Those diameters are relatively small compared to what is available today in steel, aluminum, or carbon. That's why it seems puny. SLX is a beefed up version of Columbis SL. It's essentially SL "Xtra". It was meant to be a stiffer version of the steel tubes available at the time it was introduced. Back then, it was as stiff as you could get in a lugged frame. What you see in the photo are reinforcing ribs. The reason the tube has that rifling, (the twisted ribs), is because when a bike flexes, it does so because the individual frame tubes twist. If you can align these ribs with the twisting forces, (to put the ribs in either compression or tension), you will best be able to make use of these minimal reinforcements. This is the exact same principle used in orienting carbon fibers within a frame lay-up. Back then, they knew the frame tubes twisted, but they didn't know exactly to what degree, or the force lines, so the twist rate of the rifling in SLX is just a guess as to what would work best.
Last edited by taras0000; 03-09-16 at 09:17 PM.
#3089
aka mattio
Contradicting yourself @carleton. On one hand you are saying Wiggins bike is wrong as it isn't suitable for mass start yet say there should not be just the one frame for all track races?
he races a cervelo (it's a street fixie )
#3090
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
Contradicting yourself @carleton. On one hand you are saying Wiggins bike is wrong as it isn't suitable for mass start yet say there should not be just the one frame for all track races?
#3091
Full Member
SLX flexes "a lot" because of it's diameter. Steel tubes featured in lugged construction all had to conform to certain external tube diameters to fit into the lugs available. Those diameters are relatively small compared to what is available today in steel, aluminum, or carbon. That's why it seems puny. SLX is a beefed up version of Columbis SL. It's essentially SL "Xtra". It was meant to be a stiffer version of the steel tubes available at the time it was introduced. Back then, it was as stiff as you could get in a lugged frame. What you see in the photo are reinforcing ribs. The reason the tube has that rifling, (the twisted ribs), is because when a bike flexes, it does so because the individual frame tubes twist. If you can align these ribs with the twisting forces, (to put the ribs in either compression or tension), you will best be able to make use of these minimal reinforcements. This is the exact same principle used in orienting carbon fibers within a frame lay-up. Back then, they knew the frame tubes twisted, but they didn't know exactly to what degree, or the force lines, so the twist rate of the rifling in SLX is just a guess as to what would work best.
Don't forget about Columbus SP. I think that was their stiffest offering. I replaced my 531SL frame with a SP frame and there was a world of difference. Then again, I replaced the SP frame with an early Cannondale which was absurdly stiff.
#3092
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 607
Bikes: Serotta steel track bike, Specialized MTB
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
SLX flexes "a lot" because of it's diameter. Steel tubes featured in lugged construction all had to conform to certain external tube diameters to fit into the lugs available. Those diameters are relatively small compared to what is available today in steel, aluminum, or carbon. That's why it seems puny. SLX is a beefed up version of Columbis SL. It's essentially SL "Xtra". It was meant to be a stiffer version of the steel tubes available at the time it was introduced. Back then, it was as stiff as you could get in a lugged frame. What you see in the photo are reinforcing ribs. The reason the tube has that rifling, (the twisted ribs), is because when a bike flexes, it does so because the individual frame tubes twist. If you can align these ribs with the twisting forces, (to put the ribs in either compression or tension), you will best be able to make use of these minimal reinforcements. This is the exact same principle used in orienting carbon fibers within a frame lay-up. Back then, they knew the frame tubes twisted, but they didn't know exactly to what degree, or the force lines, so the twist rate of the rifling in SLX is just a guess as to what would work best.
I have columbus SL track frame(80's track frame). So I want to know more about my tubing
Last edited by gycho77; 03-10-16 at 08:02 AM.
#3093
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,445
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4233 Post(s)
Liked 2,948 Times
in
1,807 Posts
I think there's a new SL that's different from the stuff we had in the 80's. Don't know how it compares or what your track bike is made out of. I just think lugs are pretty.
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),
#3094
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 59
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Some custom makers such as Serotta mixed SP down tubes with SL elsewhere to create a stiffer frame without unnecessary weight penalty where not needed, such as the top tube.
#3095
Lapped 3x
For anyone curious as to how wall thickness and diameter effect tube stiffness. Wall thickness will increase tube stiffness in a linear fashion. Increase wall thickness 20%, then stiffness increases 20%. Stiffness increases by the cube of diameter. So increasing wall thickness might slightly increase the tube stiffness, doubling the diameter will increase it's stiffness 8X. This is for bending along the tubes linear axis. Torsional resistance of a tube increases by the 4th power of a diameter, so this doubling of diameter on a tube will make it 16X more resistant to twisting forces. It is a the torsional loads that allow the linear flex of a tube on a bicycle.
Last edited by taras0000; 03-10-16 at 09:58 PM.
#3096
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
Thanks for explaining the wall thickness.
When I had my first Tiemeyer made, I thought it was interesting that he asked me my weight and estimated max power output. He told me that he would use different tube thicknesses based on that to increase the stiffness when it was appropriate.
So 2 Tiemeyers may look the same on the outside, but the characteristics and weight would be different based on the owners' characteristics. That dude is a modern master.
When I had my first Tiemeyer made, I thought it was interesting that he asked me my weight and estimated max power output. He told me that he would use different tube thicknesses based on that to increase the stiffness when it was appropriate.
So 2 Tiemeyers may look the same on the outside, but the characteristics and weight would be different based on the owners' characteristics. That dude is a modern master.
#3097
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 3,215
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hmm, I need to draw the fbd. Intuition is telling me that, since you have triangles, if you flex a frame something needs to be in bending. Going to need to put pencil to paper and figure out if I'm missing something.
#3098
Senior Member
In addition to bending some frame sections are in torsion and shear, and often in combination.
#3099
Full Member
#3100
Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Melbourne, Aust
Posts: 47
Bikes: BMC RM01, Focus Izarco, Inexa track, KHS SS MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Took me a few seconds to work out that the seat tube was split... really messed with my mind for a sec.. interesting way of shortening the chain stays