Titanium's cachet
#76
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,686
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1125 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
#77
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,483
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7649 Post(s)
Liked 3,469 Times
in
1,832 Posts
So ... are my Al and CF bikes fake, or imaginary?
#78
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,686
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1125 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
#79
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: IL-USA
Posts: 1,859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
And that's not the only issue; the other part is the engineering for making a distinctive product from every other big-name company.
Not true at all.
Who told you that ti frames are REALLY flexy? Some are most aren't.
Who told you that ti frames are REALLY flexy? Some are most aren't.
Typical titanium alloy metal costs roughly ten times what steel and aluminum do, plus the machining and welding costs are higher as well.
It's main notable characteristics that it can flex a LOT without cracking and breaking,
and that it is highly resistant to corrosion that eats up a lot of other metals.
In other industries it isn't used unless at least one of those two conditions requires it.
There is no corrosive chemicals involved in bicycling, but there is some instances where a thinner, lighter -yet-more-dependable spring would be advantageous.
#80
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Erie, CO
Posts: 4
Bikes: Eddy Merckx Century/C-Record, Gios Compact Evo KK/Chorus, F. Moser Leader AX/Chorus, Bottecchia Professional/C-Record, Masi 3V/Record, Litespeed Vortex/Record, Giant TCR SL/Chorus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
@Maelochs nailed it - use the right tool for the job. I love my 14-lb CF bike when it's a wicked fast ride with lots of climbing and I'm trying to keep up with the kids. Sunny summer Sunday afternoon? I take out one of the steel bikes glittering with chrome and polished bits all over. Winter conditions (salt, grit, ice, rain, etc.)? Time for Ti. And since I live in CO, I spend 4 months every year on my Litespeed and love every mile.
#81
Jet Jockey
Thread Starter
This has become, predictably enough, a frame material debate. There's probably not a way around that.
Really, I was after something more nebulous, maybe phrased as how fashionable or not Ti is now, since it seems to be populating the BD and Nashbar markets pretty heavily now. The cycling press (yes, I know...) reserve their most ecstatic writing for CF and steel, depending on the publication and readership.
Really, I was after something more nebulous, maybe phrased as how fashionable or not Ti is now, since it seems to be populating the BD and Nashbar markets pretty heavily now. The cycling press (yes, I know...) reserve their most ecstatic writing for CF and steel, depending on the publication and readership.
#82
Generally bewildered
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 3,037
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 6.9, 1999 LeMond Zurich, 1978 Schwinn Superior
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1152 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
251 Posts
This forum doesn't allow "likes", so I'll just concur with Roadrash3's comment on Maeloch's post: well put.
#83
Heck on Wheels
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: USA Midwest
Posts: 1,055
Bikes: In Signature
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 206 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
No, they're complex. And if you multiply them, they're negative.
__________________
"I had a great ride this morning, except for that part about winding up at work."
Bikes so far: 2011 Felt Z85, 80's Raleigh Sovereign (USA), 91 Bianchi Peregrine, 91 Austro-Daimler Pathfinder, 90's Trek 730 Multitrack, STOLEN: 80 Schwinn Voyageur (Japan)
"I had a great ride this morning, except for that part about winding up at work."
Bikes so far: 2011 Felt Z85, 80's Raleigh Sovereign (USA), 91 Bianchi Peregrine, 91 Austro-Daimler Pathfinder, 90's Trek 730 Multitrack, STOLEN: 80 Schwinn Voyageur (Japan)
#84
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
58 Posts
Yea, that's true--but then,,,,, why use it at all?
Typical titanium alloy metal costs roughly ten times what steel and aluminum do, plus the machining and welding costs are higher as well.
It's main notable characteristics that it can flex a LOT without cracking and breaking,
and that it is highly resistant to corrosion that eats up a lot of other metals.
In other industries it isn't used unless at least one of those two conditions requires it.
There is no corrosive chemicals involved in bicycling, but there is some instances where a thinner, lighter -yet-more-dependable spring would be advantageous.
Typical titanium alloy metal costs roughly ten times what steel and aluminum do, plus the machining and welding costs are higher as well.
It's main notable characteristics that it can flex a LOT without cracking and breaking,
and that it is highly resistant to corrosion that eats up a lot of other metals.
In other industries it isn't used unless at least one of those two conditions requires it.
There is no corrosive chemicals involved in bicycling, but there is some instances where a thinner, lighter -yet-more-dependable spring would be advantageous.
#85
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,686
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1125 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
Open Mold Frames
"An “open mold frame” is a mold which the factory owns. They can sell that frame to anyone they choose. The brands who buy these open mold frames don’t own or control the design, engineering, or material selection for the products they’re marketing. Generally, they specify the paint and logos. You’ll see some of the smaller brands with identical frames from one to the next. This is often what you’ll be getting when you select an inexpensive carbon frame or component. These might be perfectly good, and they might not be. You just don’t know.
Many name-brands will purchase the molds they use and own them. That is the brand’s IP and the factory cannot sell that frame to anyone else."
And this video at 3:35 into it shows a mold:
Keep in mind to that regardless of how much hand work is involved most CF frames are made in China who employs workers with an average wage of $27.50 a day, so really any hand labor being done is being done dirt cheap.
#86
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,483
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7649 Post(s)
Liked 3,469 Times
in
1,832 Posts
Ummm ... as far as I know, ALL CF is built in molds ... usually vacuumed to suck the epoxy thoroughly through the weave, and then baked.
Really high-end bikes have better pre-production engineering---more care goes into exactly how many layers of what weave in what orientation will give the widely varied frame characteristics each separate section can potentially offer---and the initial design is more complicated---or at least more heavily researched and engineered.
The open-mold frames are basically reverse-engineered copies, and not necessarily laid up with the same precision or the same weaves in the same directions, because the reverse-engineer wouldn't necessarily know what the original engineer intended.
Really high-end bikes have better pre-production engineering---more care goes into exactly how many layers of what weave in what orientation will give the widely varied frame characteristics each separate section can potentially offer---and the initial design is more complicated---or at least more heavily researched and engineered.
The open-mold frames are basically reverse-engineered copies, and not necessarily laid up with the same precision or the same weaves in the same directions, because the reverse-engineer wouldn't necessarily know what the original engineer intended.
#87
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
58 Posts
Open Mould frames are just that.
Designed by a factory and then licenced for other companies to use and brand as their own.
A number of companies can use that same mould so long as they pay the licence fee.
#88
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,667
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2323 Post(s)
Liked 4,983 Times
in
1,775 Posts
This has become, predictably enough, a frame material debate. There's probably not a way around that.
Really, I was after something more nebulous, maybe phrased as how fashionable or not Ti is now, since it seems to be populating the BD and Nashbar markets pretty heavily now. The cycling press (yes, I know...) reserve their most ecstatic writing for CF and steel, depending on the publication and readership.
Really, I was after something more nebulous, maybe phrased as how fashionable or not Ti is now, since it seems to be populating the BD and Nashbar markets pretty heavily now. The cycling press (yes, I know...) reserve their most ecstatic writing for CF and steel, depending on the publication and readership.
LOL, and this thread has digressed into a fight over what open mold means in the carbon fiber world.
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
#89
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,483
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7649 Post(s)
Liked 3,469 Times
in
1,832 Posts
I guess that's what killed Titanium---it was so simple and basic, there was nothing for BF posters to fight over. We all lost interest, and moved on to more controversial frame materials.
#90
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,667
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2323 Post(s)
Liked 4,983 Times
in
1,775 Posts
LOL, and we finally have the winning answer.
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
#91
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 740
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
58 Posts
Part of the reason why there is a proliferation of CF frames and a small number of Ti frames is that you can punch out considerably more CF frames in the time taken to build one ti frame.
#93
Full Member
For me it was a pragmatic choice, not a matter of style. I have purchased and built-up two used Moots frames, a Psychlo X and a Vamoots CR. Both are great bikes and fill the need they were intended for, a gravel grinder and a speedy exercise bike. Style is perception not reality, for the OP titanium seems to be a dated material, it's not, it still has all the benefits and drawbacks as a bike building material that it had a decade ago.
#94
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
If you were to set a CF frame and a Ti out side for 10 years, there would be almost no visible change in the Ti frame but the CF frame would show a great deal of weathering.
#95
Full Member
A majority of people are just going to buy what's at the bike shop, and what's at the bike shop is carbon fiber. I imagine the big bike retailers have a lot to do with what's trendy. At the highest level carbon bikes are faster, but how many of us are at the highest level? Carbon at the highest level reminds of this...
"1. A racing car has only ONE objective: to WIN motor races. If it does not do this it is nothing but a waste of time, money, and effort.
This may sound obvious but remember it does not matter how clever it is, or how inexpensive, or how easy to maintain, or even how safe, if it does not consistantly win it is NOTHING!"
-Colin Chapman
"1. A racing car has only ONE objective: to WIN motor races. If it does not do this it is nothing but a waste of time, money, and effort.
This may sound obvious but remember it does not matter how clever it is, or how inexpensive, or how easy to maintain, or even how safe, if it does not consistantly win it is NOTHING!"
-Colin Chapman
#96
well hello there
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Point Loma, CA
Posts: 15,430
Bikes: Bill Holland (Road-Ti), Fuji Roubaix Pro (back-up), Bike Friday (folder), Co-Motion (tandem) & Trek 750 (hybrid)
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times
in
206 Posts
Can't we all just get along?
__________________
.
.
Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
.
.
Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
#97
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,633
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4731 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
I had one of those once.. every time I hit a bump though, the little diamond CF bits would pop out. Had to keep gluing them back in.
#98
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 8,896
Bikes: Waterford RST-22, Bob Jackson World Tour, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Soma Saga, De Bernardi SL, Specialized Sequoia
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 196 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
I owned a ti Eddy Merckx AX for a number of years, and it was favorite bike for a long time. It was my go-to bike for long rides. I eventually sold it because I bought a Waterford that fit me better and rode even nicer, which became my preferred bike for long rides. I originally bought the Merckx used and sold it for a little more than I paid for it after riding it for about 5 years, 15,000+ miles. Not a bad investment.
To me the main advantages of ti frames are that they doesn't rust and you don't have to paint them. That is also one of its main disadvantages because most ti bike look the same and frankly are quite boring (unless you like dull gray). The ride quality for steel and ti frames, assuming similar geometries, is nearly identical. During the period that I owned my Merckx AX, I also owned a Merckx Corsa 01 (steel) in the same size with nearly identical geometry. Both bikes were equipped with the same wheels, saddle and other relevant parts. They rode and handled virtually the same.
IMHO, the main reason why custom steel frames outsell custom ti frames is the way they look. Most people buying a custom frame want to put their personal stamp on the bike with regard to frame color, design and decals. Although you can paint a ti frame, it defeats one of the main advantages of owning one -- that is, not having to worry about chipping or scratching the paint. So, most people with ti bikes end up with a rather boring, generic looking gray frame. There is nothing wrong with that if you happen to like that particular look, and some people who buy custom steel frames have them painted gray or silver.
To me the main advantages of ti frames are that they doesn't rust and you don't have to paint them. That is also one of its main disadvantages because most ti bike look the same and frankly are quite boring (unless you like dull gray). The ride quality for steel and ti frames, assuming similar geometries, is nearly identical. During the period that I owned my Merckx AX, I also owned a Merckx Corsa 01 (steel) in the same size with nearly identical geometry. Both bikes were equipped with the same wheels, saddle and other relevant parts. They rode and handled virtually the same.
IMHO, the main reason why custom steel frames outsell custom ti frames is the way they look. Most people buying a custom frame want to put their personal stamp on the bike with regard to frame color, design and decals. Although you can paint a ti frame, it defeats one of the main advantages of owning one -- that is, not having to worry about chipping or scratching the paint. So, most people with ti bikes end up with a rather boring, generic looking gray frame. There is nothing wrong with that if you happen to like that particular look, and some people who buy custom steel frames have them painted gray or silver.
Last edited by tarwheel; 01-06-17 at 03:24 PM.
#99
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Brisbane Aust
Posts: 1,643
Bikes: Giant ToughRoad Giant talon
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 705 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
1 Post
And not necessarily made by a bicycle technician with extensive training and years of experience under their belt either. The assembler could just as easily have been working in a rice paddy the week before. That's the great Chinese economic miracle.
#100
Senior Member
I have a BD Ti bike, a CF bike, a steel bike and several aluminum bikes. I don't race now, but I used to. I ride a fair amount and I like to go reasonably fast.
My opinions:
- this business about Ti "soaking up buzz" and Ti's "magical ride feel" is misleading. This is entirely driven by the stiffness of the frame (and tires being used), not the material of the frame. Generally Ti frames are a bit less stiff than CF frames but that's more driven by frame design than intrinsic properties of the material. That makes an average Ti frame feel different (less stiff) than an average CF frame. I happen to feel the obsession with stiffness in frames is silly and counterproductive, maybe other people also like less stiff frames but don't want to say it that way and so talk about "soaking up buzz" or similar. Regardless tires and tire pressure make a much bigger difference than frame material in "soaking up buzz".
- I like Ti because it always looks new, it's really tough to ding in a crash, I like the unpainted aesthetics and it's easier to work on a Ti frame without having to fret about clamping forces excessively. I really like CF but I put impact resistance, toughness and durability above everything else and in my experience CF simply can't touch steel and Ti in this regard. Note that none of these factors are related to "ride quality". Note that steel has a lot of these same qualities.
- From a practical perspective, for me there's little reason to prefer Ti to steel. Steel is equally tough if not tougher, steel is a lot cheaper, steel is a lot easier to source. I bought Ti because the BD Ti bike is an incredible deal in my opinion (and a frame I've enjoyed very, very much). Every other frame I was looking at was steel. I understand why people buy steel much more frequently than Ti.
- One of my dream bike is a custom anodized Firefly Ti. This has little to do with performance and a lot to do with the aesthetic of their bikes, them being from my home city and that they seem like good guys in interviews. My other dream bike is a Richard Sachs steel because he was really nice to me once when I was a kid and he's rightly very famous. These bikes are both extremely expensive and the RS is basically impossible to get. As the sole wage earner in my family with two kids getting close to college... maybe next year. I'll readily admit that the appeal of these bikes is much more of an emotional decision than a logical decision.
My opinions:
- this business about Ti "soaking up buzz" and Ti's "magical ride feel" is misleading. This is entirely driven by the stiffness of the frame (and tires being used), not the material of the frame. Generally Ti frames are a bit less stiff than CF frames but that's more driven by frame design than intrinsic properties of the material. That makes an average Ti frame feel different (less stiff) than an average CF frame. I happen to feel the obsession with stiffness in frames is silly and counterproductive, maybe other people also like less stiff frames but don't want to say it that way and so talk about "soaking up buzz" or similar. Regardless tires and tire pressure make a much bigger difference than frame material in "soaking up buzz".
- I like Ti because it always looks new, it's really tough to ding in a crash, I like the unpainted aesthetics and it's easier to work on a Ti frame without having to fret about clamping forces excessively. I really like CF but I put impact resistance, toughness and durability above everything else and in my experience CF simply can't touch steel and Ti in this regard. Note that none of these factors are related to "ride quality". Note that steel has a lot of these same qualities.
- From a practical perspective, for me there's little reason to prefer Ti to steel. Steel is equally tough if not tougher, steel is a lot cheaper, steel is a lot easier to source. I bought Ti because the BD Ti bike is an incredible deal in my opinion (and a frame I've enjoyed very, very much). Every other frame I was looking at was steel. I understand why people buy steel much more frequently than Ti.
- One of my dream bike is a custom anodized Firefly Ti. This has little to do with performance and a lot to do with the aesthetic of their bikes, them being from my home city and that they seem like good guys in interviews. My other dream bike is a Richard Sachs steel because he was really nice to me once when I was a kid and he's rightly very famous. These bikes are both extremely expensive and the RS is basically impossible to get. As the sole wage earner in my family with two kids getting close to college... maybe next year. I'll readily admit that the appeal of these bikes is much more of an emotional decision than a logical decision.