Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Training & Nutrition
Reload this Page >

sustained watage...what are respectable numbers?

Search
Notices
Training & Nutrition Learn how to develop a training schedule that's good for you. What should you eat and drink on your ride? Learn everything you need to know about training and nutrition here.

sustained watage...what are respectable numbers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-08, 09:36 AM
  #1  
Smallguy
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Smallguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,331
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
sustained watage...what are respectable numbers?

with all the threads about watts and how it is probably the best measure of improved fitness/ability.

what are respectable numbers to be able to sustain

I see some guys are able to push 1k+ for a sprint (umd I believe)

but

what would the average person be able to do?

what would be respectable beginning cyclist average

an avid cyclist ?

Cat 1 or 2 racer?

someone racing in the tour sustain?

I'm trying to get a rough idea of what to set for short term intermediate and longer goals
Smallguy is offline  
Old 11-05-08, 09:41 AM
  #2  
Smallguy
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Smallguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,331
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I actually just found this at

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_performance


The average "in-shape" person can produce about 3 watts/kg for more than an hour (e.g., around 200 watts for a 70 kg rider), with top amateurs producing 5 watts/kg and elite athletes achieving 6 watts/kg for similar lengths of time. Elite track sprinters are able to attain an instantaneous maximum output of around 2,000 watts, or in excess of 25 watts/kg; elite road cyclists may produce 1,600 to 1,700 watts as an instantaneous maximum in their burst to the finish line at the end of a five-hour long road race. Even at moderate speeds, most cycling energy is spent in overcoming aerodynamic drag, which increases with the square of speed; therefore, power needs increase approximately with the cube of speed.
Smallguy is offline  
Old 11-05-08, 10:24 AM
  #3  
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,520
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 451 Times in 265 Posts
Originally Posted by Smallguy
I'm trying to get a rough idea of what to set for short term intermediate and longer goals
https://www.cyclingpeakssoftware.com/...11/profile.asp
asgelle is offline  
Old 11-05-08, 12:13 PM
  #4  
Smallguy
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Smallguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,331
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
is FT on that chart what one can maintain for an extended period of time?

https://www.cyclingpeakssoftware.com/...profile_v4.gif

I looked around but didn't really find the answer
Smallguy is offline  
Old 11-05-08, 12:31 PM
  #5  
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,520
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 451 Times in 265 Posts
Originally Posted by Smallguy
is FT on that chart what one can maintain for an extended period of time?

https://www.cyclingpeakssoftware.com/...profile_v4.gif
"Index efforts of 5 s, 1 min, 5 min, and at functional threshold power (see "What is threshold power?" on this website) were chosen ..."
https://www.cyclingpeakssoftware.com/.../threshold.asp
asgelle is offline  
Old 11-05-08, 01:31 PM
  #6  
Smallguy
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Smallguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,331
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
so in short yes to "is FT on that chart what one can maintain for an extended period of time?"
Smallguy is offline  
Old 11-05-08, 02:04 PM
  #7  
mp123
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
FT=functional threshhold=max power for one hour
mp123 is offline  
Old 11-05-08, 02:09 PM
  #8  
mp123
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Also, as far as the Wikipedia article goes I'd have to say that the "average in shape person" is probably not producing 3 w/kg for more than an hour. I'd guess that less than 10% of the people you see riding bikes around are doing that. Depends on what you mean by "average" I guess...
mp123 is offline  
Old 11-05-08, 02:22 PM
  #9  
Smallguy
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Smallguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,331
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
my definition of average would be someone who rides a day or 2 a week or commutes a short distance a few times a week

3w/kg for me would mean I'd be pumping out 292.5. I can do 200 watts currently but not for an hour more like 20 mins but you gotta start somewhere.

so it's time to loose some weight and get more power too.
Smallguy is offline  
Old 11-05-08, 04:29 PM
  #10  
ottsville
sidelined
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 342

Bikes: 2005 Scattante R660, Kona Race Light SS conversion, 2007 Schwinn Fastback CX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Smallguy
so it's time to loose some weight and get more power too.
Amen.
ottsville is offline  
Old 11-05-08, 04:47 PM
  #11  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Smallguy
with all the threads about watts and how it is probably the best measure of improved fitness/ability.

what are respectable numbers to be able to sustain

I see some guys are able to push 1k+ for a sprint (umd I believe)

but

what would the average person be able to do?

what would be respectable beginning cyclist average

an avid cyclist ?

Cat 1 or 2 racer?

someone racing in the tour sustain?

I'm trying to get a rough idea of what to set for short term intermediate and longer goals
Haha, that's funny using my pitiful sprint as an example.
umd is offline  
Old 11-05-08, 04:52 PM
  #12  
JohnKScott
Senior Member
 
JohnKScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 3,385

Bikes: It has two wheels

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Smallguy
I actually just found this at

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_performance


The average "in-shape" person can produce about 3 watts/kg for more than an hour (e.g., around 200 watts for a 70 kg rider), with top amateurs producing 5 watts/kg and elite athletes achieving 6 watts/kg for similar lengths of time. Elite track sprinters are able to attain an instantaneous maximum output of around 2,000 watts, or in excess of 25 watts/kg; elite road cyclists may produce 1,600 to 1,700 watts as an instantaneous maximum in their burst to the finish line at the end of a five-hour long road race. Even at moderate speeds, most cycling energy is spent in overcoming aerodynamic drag, which increases with the square of speed; therefore, power needs increase approximately with the cube of speed.
Wow...I knew I sucked but...

I hoped I didn't suck that much.
JohnKScott is offline  
Old 11-05-08, 05:02 PM
  #13  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Note that power scales somewhat with weight, so we look at power/weight as watts/kg. So, for what it's worth, since I was used as example... I've had a few single samples over 1000W but my best 5s power is about 950W. I weigh for practical purposes 63kg, so that puts my 5s at the bottom of the "good" range. I can hold a relatively high level for 20-30 seconds but it falls off quickly after than and my 1m power is somewhere in the middle of the "fair" range. My 5min is actually my "strongest" duration, and I don't have my data in front of me right now but I believe it was well into the "very good" range. My FT at my peak was somewhere in middle of the "very good" range but I did not yet have a power meter and with my injury and now kind of "off season" I haven't put in a good test and have only done in the high "good" range.
umd is offline  
Old 11-05-08, 06:47 PM
  #14  
Smallguy
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Smallguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,331
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by umd
Haha, that's funny using my pitiful sprint as an example.
so if your sprint is "pitiful" what would you consider to be a good number?
Smallguy is offline  
Old 11-05-08, 07:33 PM
  #15  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Smallguy
so if your sprint is "pitiful" what would you consider to be a good number?
Ok, so my sprint is probably better than many BF'rs that don't race, but I always get my ass kicked whenever I am up against anyone who can really sprint, i.e. most people I ride with. First though, you really have to look at more than just the peak number; that gets you a jump, but you have to be able to sustain it. 5s gives you a better idea but really a sprint is going to last a while and it's more important how fast you are going than how much power you are putting out. Anyway, as to what isn't pathetic? Waterrockets can do, what, 1600, something like that? I was talking with a teammate, and although he may have been messing with me, said he could do 1500. A local pro I was talking to said he could do 1800 but that was as a junior and he hadn't used a power meter for a while...
umd is offline  
Old 11-05-08, 08:03 PM
  #16  
8Lives
Senior Member
 
8Lives's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 461

Bikes: Lemond Zurich

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I had a performance assessment done earlier this year as a 48th birthday present. I thought "some present" but it was actually a lot less painful than I anticipated. I came in at 4.3 w/kg at FT which is in the "very good" range.
8Lives is offline  
Old 11-11-08, 09:39 AM
  #17  
cslone
Quarq shill
 
cslone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,962

Bikes: 08 Felt F4, 05 Fuji Team SL, 08 Planet X Stealth, 10 Kona Jake the Snake, 03 Giant OCR flat bar.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Smallguy
so if your sprint is "pitiful" what would you consider to be a good number?

That's also dependent on weight. It's about the w/kg. I have done 1600w 5 second sprints before, but I weight almost 90kg. While that puts me solidly in the "Cat 2" sprint range, someone who weighs 165lbs and has a 1325w 5 second sprint has a similar w/kg. I'm hoping to drop down to around 84kg AND keep that sprint power. My threshold is what sucks though at 315w(3.5 w/kg). I'm doing lots of Sweet Spot Training, hoping to be up around 340+ by crit season.

This chart, known as the "e-wang" chart shows the general ranges put out buy tested riders.

https://www.cyclingpeakssoftware.com/...profile_v4.gif
cslone is offline  
Old 11-11-08, 10:16 AM
  #18  
127.0.0.1
50000 Guatts of power
 
127.0.0.1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,001
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
that's the e-wang ?

cripes I am much stronger than I thought

it is the weight I need to trim. power I have. holy crap I am waaaaaaay remotivated
127.0.0.1 is offline  
Old 11-11-08, 11:17 AM
  #19  
cslone
Quarq shill
 
cslone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,962

Bikes: 08 Felt F4, 05 Fuji Team SL, 08 Planet X Stealth, 10 Kona Jake the Snake, 03 Giant OCR flat bar.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
You can have all the power you want. It's results that count.
cslone is offline  
Old 11-11-08, 11:18 AM
  #20  
asgelle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,520
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 451 Times in 265 Posts
Originally Posted by cslone
This chart, known as the "e-wang" chart shows the general ranges put out buy tested riders.
Not exactly. Only the high and low values come from riders and these were not necessarily taken during tests.
https://www.cyclingpeakssoftware.com/...11/profile.asp
asgelle is offline  
Old 11-11-08, 11:54 AM
  #21  
cslone
Quarq shill
 
cslone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,962

Bikes: 08 Felt F4, 05 Fuji Team SL, 08 Planet X Stealth, 10 Kona Jake the Snake, 03 Giant OCR flat bar.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
The resultant values for intermediate performances were then cross-checked against available data to assure that this approach resulted in valid guidelines.
Ah, I took this "available data" as testing.
cslone is offline  
Old 11-12-08, 09:44 PM
  #22  
fatallightning
Cat 666
 
fatallightning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: nyack, ny (yes, that one)
Posts: 1,462
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cslone
That's also dependent on weight. It's about the w/kg. I have done 1600w 5 second sprints before, but I weight almost 90kg. While that puts me solidly in the "Cat 2" sprint range, someone who weighs 165lbs and has a 1325w 5 second sprint has a similar w/kg. I'm hoping to drop down to around 84kg AND keep that sprint power. My threshold is what sucks though at 315w(3.5 w/kg). I'm doing lots of Sweet Spot Training, hoping to be up around 340+ by crit season.

This chart, known as the "e-wang" chart shows the general ranges put out buy tested riders.

https://www.cyclingpeakssoftware.com/...profile_v4.gif
i would think, on a flat sprint, as most finishes are, w/cdA would be more important. i would think the weight difference going from 25 in the peloton to 35 in a field sprint would be trumped by pure power.
fatallightning is offline  
Old 11-12-08, 09:50 PM
  #23  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by fatallightning
i would think, on a flat sprint, as most finishes are, w/cdA would be more important. i would think the weight difference going from 25 in the peloton to 35 in a field sprint would be trumped by pure power.
It's acceleration, weight is still important, but probably less important than on a climb.
umd is offline  
Old 11-17-08, 02:51 PM
  #24  
TechKnowGN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,266

Bikes: 2009 Fuji Newest 1.0, 2011 Trek 3900 Disc MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So if I understand right 1007W isnt very good max power if you weigh 143 kg? That puts me at about 6.97 w/Kg, right?
TechKnowGN is offline  
Old 11-17-08, 03:17 PM
  #25  
127.0.0.1
50000 Guatts of power
 
127.0.0.1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,001
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
if you can hold 400 watts for 30 minutes

then......then.....you got some balzak
127.0.0.1 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.