Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

Wheel and tire selection help needed

Search
Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Wheel and tire selection help needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-19, 12:30 PM
  #1  
BigPoser
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
BigPoser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 599

Bikes: BAHL Giro, BAHL Uno, BAHL GVL, Cuevas

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 250 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Wheel and tire selection help needed

Hi All,

I'm building up my gravel machine and have everything except my wheels and tires and that is where I need some advice. I've narrowed it down to a couple wheels and a couple tires. I'm able to get the wheels with discounts so there would be about a $200 difference between them. The Light Bike wheels would be built with Novatec hubs if that helps.

Here are the wheels that I'm looking at:
https://www.lightbicycle.com/700C-tu...vel-bikes.html

https://industrynine.com/wheels/road/ul-235-tra/

My tire options would be either the Donnelly MSO X'Plor 700x40c or Panaracer Gravelking SK 700x38c. I've used the MSO's in a 36c and I really liked them. Hearing very good things about the Gravelking's as well.

Anyone have any experience with either of these?

Thanks in advance.

Brandon
BigPoser is offline  
Old 10-11-19, 12:47 PM
  #2  
redlude97
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times in 173 Posts
Would rather have i9 hubs over novatec so I'd lean that way even though the rims are al vs carbon
redlude97 is offline  
Old 10-11-19, 01:32 PM
  #3  
BigPoser
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
BigPoser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 599

Bikes: BAHL Giro, BAHL Uno, BAHL GVL, Cuevas

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 250 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by redlude97
Would rather have i9 hubs over novatec so I'd lean that way even though the rims are al vs carbon
Thanks. I was kind of leaning that way as well. Funny thing is the i9 wheels are lighter than the LB.
BigPoser is offline  
Old 10-11-19, 02:03 PM
  #4  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times in 4,189 Posts
Between the 2 tires you mention, I would go with the MSO in 120tpi if you are using tubes. Fast, light, and good protection. If tubeless, then still the MSO, I guess.
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 10-11-19, 02:42 PM
  #5  
Marcus_Ti
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
 
Marcus_Ti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331

Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times in 254 Posts
Originally Posted by BigPoser
Thanks. I was kind of leaning that way as well. Funny thing is the i9 wheels are lighter than the LB.
NOTE the i9 wheelset weight limits. 100KG max. For a wheelset that is going to see some groading use I'd wanted a stronger build.

You can get Light Bicycle rims in lots of hub configurations...I wouldn't get Novatec hubs--they're cartridge bearing, but that is about all that there is that is nice to say about them. Many people report underwhelming bearing life. Mine or laced to Onyx Racing Products hubs, you can get them with DT or i9 hubs in stock sets
Marcus_Ti is offline  
Old 10-11-19, 02:46 PM
  #6  
redlude97
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times in 173 Posts
Originally Posted by BigPoser
Thanks. I was kind of leaning that way as well. Funny thing is the i9 wheels are lighter than the LB.
Light aluminum rims aren't necessarily a good thing, they dent easily IME. Love my stan's crest but they aren't the most durable rim out there. Carbon rims can actually be made quite a bit more durable at the same weight as aluminum rims in these shallow depths
redlude97 is offline  
Old 10-11-19, 03:09 PM
  #7  
chas58
Senior Member
 
chas58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863

Bikes: too many of all kinds

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 335 Posts
Light aluminum rims aren't necessarily a good thing, they dent easily IME. Love my stan's crest but they aren't the most durable rim out there. Carbon rims can actually be made quite a bit more durable at the same weight as aluminum rims in these shallow depths
True. It sounds like carbon works best hookless. I hear some horror stories about hooked carbon rims gone wrong...
chas58 is offline  
Old 10-11-19, 03:11 PM
  #8  
chas58
Senior Member
 
chas58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863

Bikes: too many of all kinds

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 335 Posts
I wouldn't get Novatec hubs--they're cartridge bearing, but that is about all that there is that is nice to say about them. Many people report underwhelming bearing life. Mine or laced to Onyx Racing Products hubs, you can get them with DT or i9 hubs in stock sets
Well, popping in some new bearings is pretty easy and cheap if it comes to that.
chas58 is offline  
Old 10-11-19, 03:17 PM
  #9  
BigPoser
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
BigPoser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 599

Bikes: BAHL Giro, BAHL Uno, BAHL GVL, Cuevas

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 250 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by chas58
True. It sounds like carbon works best hookless. I hear some horror stories about hooked carbon rims gone wrong...
What are the pros and cons of hooked vs hookless?
BigPoser is offline  
Old 10-11-19, 03:18 PM
  #10  
BigPoser
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
BigPoser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 599

Bikes: BAHL Giro, BAHL Uno, BAHL GVL, Cuevas

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 250 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
Between the 2 tires you mention, I would go with the MSO in 120tpi if you are using tubes. Fast, light, and good protection. If tubeless, then still the MSO, I guess.
Thanks. I'll be tubeless for sure.
BigPoser is offline  
Old 10-11-19, 03:28 PM
  #11  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times in 4,189 Posts
Originally Posted by BigPoser
Thanks. I'll be tubeless for sure.
Because this is BF and almost none of us can resist suggesting he equipment, consider the WTB Resolute tire also.
I am using these tubeless, and they fly compared to the 120 TPI MSO, and I actually really liked the MSO.
The Resolute measures 43 mm wide on a pretty typical witdh rim, so that may be an issue, but if it isn't then definitely consider them. Bikeinn.com sells them for $35/which is probably 20 less than the MSO.
The tread blocks are more pronounced on the WTB, but review after review backs what I sense which is that tread does not make that tire slow.

Really though, there is no wrong choice with what you are considering. They are all quality tires over all.
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 10-11-19, 11:06 PM
  #12  
wsteve464
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 161 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times in 62 Posts
I wouldn't go with the Gravelking. I had a set of the SK, it has been the only tire so far to get a sidewall puncture, three of them. Just didn't have good luck with them.
wsteve464 is offline  
Old 10-14-19, 07:32 AM
  #13  
chas58
Senior Member
 
chas58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863

Bikes: too many of all kinds

Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 335 Posts
Originally Posted by BigPoser
What are the pros and cons of hooked vs hookless?
That can be a long answer…

Short answer:

With aluminum wheels, they are all hooked, because it is easier to make that way, and along with an inner tube, allows for a good grip on the tire and the use of high pressure.

With carbon – hookless is easier, cheaper, stronger, and can be safer at lower pressures. Putting a hook on a carbon wheel allows the use of higher pressure, but if not made properly, the hook can cut the tire causing a blowout.

Longer answer:

Hookless, like just about everything innovative, comes from mountain biking. You might notice that car and motorcycle tires are hookless. Like them, hookless mountain bike tires rely on the rim bed (not the wheel flange) to hold the tire in place against the wheel flange. Works well with tire pressure that cars and mountain bikes use.

With a carbon rim, It also makes a stronger rim that is (marginally) wider and easier (less expensive) to make. The down side is that most agree it can’t take much more than 60-70psi. This matter is worsened by the lack of standards and difficulty mounting tubeless that cause blow offs (although most of these are in a garage, not the road).

Beaded carbon rims have the advantage of being able to take more pressure when used with tubes. It’s a little more difficult with tubeless in that there is no tube pressing the tire into the bead (this is not necessary with hookless). The big problem comes in that carbon wheels are molded (not extruded like aluminum). Its easiest to have the mold release at the hooks, leading to some sharp flashing which will cut into a tire if not removed properly (and it not always is). Alternatively, the carbon wheel can be machined to give it the hook. This machining process sometimes exposes the ends of the fiber, and that can also cut through a tire. Of course when a tire fails, people usually blame the tire and not the wheel.
chas58 is offline  
Old 10-16-19, 01:24 PM
  #14  
genrlz
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 22
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I've been looking at both the MSO and the Michelin Power Gravel. I'm leaning more towards the Michelin. Have you looked at that yet?
genrlz is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.