Are Mountain Bike Shoes That Are Good For Road Bikes That Good!
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,825
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 401 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Are Mountain Bike Shoes That Are Good For Road Bikes That Good!
Okay. Let me explain the title.
I've heard people say that mountain bike shoes are great due to the recessed cleat which means you can walk around in them.
I've heard other people saying that you really need a really stiff sole on a mountain bike shoe for road biking.
So if you get that super stiff sole mountain shoe can you still walk around in them okay? Are they much better than a road bike shoe in that you can run around in them in the grass etc?
I've heard people say that mountain bike shoes are great due to the recessed cleat which means you can walk around in them.
I've heard other people saying that you really need a really stiff sole on a mountain bike shoe for road biking.
So if you get that super stiff sole mountain shoe can you still walk around in them okay? Are they much better than a road bike shoe in that you can run around in them in the grass etc?
#3
Farmer tan
No. And why would you even want to get off your bike to walk at all? Does. Not. Compute.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,737
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Its marketing.
People prefer to walk and mountain bike shoes allow it.
If you want to ride in road bike shoes, that's ok.
Its up to you to decide on whether walkability is on your list.
People prefer to walk and mountain bike shoes allow it.
If you want to ride in road bike shoes, that's ok.
Its up to you to decide on whether walkability is on your list.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 526
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#6
Farmer tan
#7
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,542
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3894 Post(s)
Liked 1,943 Times
in
1,388 Posts
Yes, an MTB shoe should have a very stiff sole for road biking. Some do. More roadies around here wear Sidi Dominators than any other model shoe. They are very stiff, comfortable, and yet walkable. They also never seem to wear out. Not that anyone ever walks their bike, but it's totally nice not to walk like a duck in stores, parking lots, etc.
#8
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Glendale, California
Posts: 17
Bikes: Trek/KHS Fliteteam
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I got used to a SPD which has dual platform pedal that I've been using with my 94 roadbike and since I bought another roadbike of which has a Look clipless pedal, I am still contemplating whether the latter is actually better. Still trying to get use to clipping my left shoe to the Look pedal which gets frustrating sometimes. Maybe if I can find a dual platform Look clipless pedal, then I can easily say that it's better.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 765
Bikes: Fitz randonneuse, Trek Superfly/AL, Tsunami SS, Bacchetta, HPV Speed Machine, Rans Screamer
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 100 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I think this can be clearer.
Stiff soles help with power transfer, mainly at high intensity, but makes less difference at recreational endurance pace. They can in some cases reduce hot spots by spreading the load out more, again, more so at higher intensities. Stiff soles are not something you will want to walk around in all day, play other sports, run. The soles don't bend at all. The soles on stiff MTB shoes tend to be narrow, and unstable on hard surfaces. But they are relatively walkable compared to dedicated road shoes.
There are many more walkable shoes out there, where you might forget you are wearing cleats. Even cleated hiking boots. Some are well suited for fast touring, utility riding, and randonneuring. With these you probably want a pedal with more platform to support the shoe.
Stiff soles help with power transfer, mainly at high intensity, but makes less difference at recreational endurance pace. They can in some cases reduce hot spots by spreading the load out more, again, more so at higher intensities. Stiff soles are not something you will want to walk around in all day, play other sports, run. The soles don't bend at all. The soles on stiff MTB shoes tend to be narrow, and unstable on hard surfaces. But they are relatively walkable compared to dedicated road shoes.
There are many more walkable shoes out there, where you might forget you are wearing cleats. Even cleated hiking boots. Some are well suited for fast touring, utility riding, and randonneuring. With these you probably want a pedal with more platform to support the shoe.
#11
Senior Member
Because you made the climb up Baldy to catch a glimpse of Peter Sagan & the gang and while it's a bit steep, they're still doing about 14mph but you know you can run that fast for a bit while still taking video and you catch a wink and a smile from Peter as he realizes you're hauling @$$ just to keep up but he hears you yelling for him to go and digs it. Thus these....
#12
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,305
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1451 Post(s)
Liked 731 Times
in
374 Posts
Because you made the climb up Baldy to catch a glimpse of Peter Sagan & the gang and while it's a bit steep, they're still doing about 14mph but you know you can run that fast for a bit while still taking video and you catch a wink and a smile from Peter as he realizes you're hauling @$$ just to keep up but he hears you yelling for him to go and digs it. Thus these....
But for a long hard ride, those shoes are pretty flexy.
All comes down to priorities. If you want a good cycling shoe, that you can walk in at rest stops, something like the Sidi referenced above.
If you want a shoe to walk in, that works ok to ride in, then what you've posted works.
And who the heck runs along racers?
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
Last edited by merlinextraligh; 08-21-15 at 07:43 AM.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Portage, MI
Posts: 227
Bikes: 2016 Emonda ALR 5, 2014 Trek 7.2 FX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The ones I have are "road touring" shoes. They combine the stiffness of a road shoe with a very small amount of rubber around the edges of the bottom of the shoe. It's a compromise between road and MTB shoes. I love them because I can still walk around if I want/need to. It's still not pleasant, but it's better than road shoes.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Brazil (cold South)
Posts: 269
Bikes: 1995 Specialized Stumpjumper M2 / 2013 Caloi Carbon Elite 29er / 2015 Cannondale CAADX 105 / 2017 Specialized Roubaix Elite
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This is what I use:
Rigid enough for when you need to hammer down the pedals and comfortable when off the bike. Not tennis shoe comfortable but good enough for short walks.
Rigid enough for when you need to hammer down the pedals and comfortable when off the bike. Not tennis shoe comfortable but good enough for short walks.
#15
Senior Member
I have a pair of Bontrager RL MTB shoes, they're great for road riding. I've done 75-80 mile rides with no hot spots and none of those horrible things you'll hear some people talk about. Yeah maybe if you go with the sub $100 pairs it might not be as comfortable. I'm not racing so I don't need a stiff carbon sole. I can easily walk around at rest stops on group rides, or easily walk around in a 7-11 to get water refills. I considered going with Ultegra pedals and road shoes but honestly couldn't identify a single benefit that would actually benefit me.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,114
Bikes: 2006 Raleigh Cadent 2.0, 2016 Trek Emonda ALR 6, 2015 Propel Advanced SL 2, 2000 K2 Zed SE
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My MTB shoes have seriously stiff soles and I can still tell the difference under certain circumstances. Better/worse is a bad way to describe it, but I definitely prefer the road shoes for tougher road rides.
Lots of really good riders I know use mountain shoes/pedals full time. I did, until I had to look into pedals that are easier on my goofy knees. I wouldn't worry either way unless you're at a point where tiny details are the only way to eek out a little more improvement. Unless your mountain shoes are really flexy it's not a problem until you are forced to look at things that provide even less improvement than even shaving your legs does.
Lots of really good riders I know use mountain shoes/pedals full time. I did, until I had to look into pedals that are easier on my goofy knees. I wouldn't worry either way unless you're at a point where tiny details are the only way to eek out a little more improvement. Unless your mountain shoes are really flexy it's not a problem until you are forced to look at things that provide even less improvement than even shaving your legs does.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 1,643
Bikes: 1997 Rivendell Road Standard 650b conversion (tourer), 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10 (gravel/tour), 2013 Foundry Auger disc (CX/gravel), 2016 Cannondale Fat CAAD 2 (MTB/winter), 2011 Cannondale Flash 29er Lefty (trail MTB)
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 167 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
I don't agree with the need for stiff soles for cycling use (non-racing). That's based on my personal experience, others may have different experience.
My favorite shoes are Pearl Izumi X-Alp Seek V, which have a very flexible sole. Not much stiffer than a normal hiking shoe.
Wearing these flexible shoes, I:
* ride centuries, climb hills, and ride fast
* ride MTB and fat bike
* commute to work and wear them all day
* walk or run normally
* have comfortable feet
Wearing these flexible shoes, I do not:
* walk like a duck, or have to use cleat covers
* have to bring a second pair of shoes for work
* race
* have foot or knee pain
* have too-hot feet
Pearl Izumi seems to be the only major company that makes flexible shoes of decent quality (in their X-Alp and X-Road lines).
You can get flexible shoes from Bontrager or Specialized, but only in their lowest-end model that has otherwise poor materials.
Well, Shimano's shoes may be decent and flexible, but they are usually butt-ugly (my opinion) so I don't pay attention to them.
One drawback to the Pearl X-Alp shoes: they are wider than most bike shoes, so it's tough to fit a shoe cover over them. Pearl instructs you to use a size bigger than normal. Ok, but they don't make an XXXL cover to fit over my size 48's. So, I picked up a pair of Sidi GTX boots for cold/wet weather.
My favorite shoes are Pearl Izumi X-Alp Seek V, which have a very flexible sole. Not much stiffer than a normal hiking shoe.
Wearing these flexible shoes, I:
* ride centuries, climb hills, and ride fast
* ride MTB and fat bike
* commute to work and wear them all day
* walk or run normally
* have comfortable feet
Wearing these flexible shoes, I do not:
* walk like a duck, or have to use cleat covers
* have to bring a second pair of shoes for work
* race
* have foot or knee pain
* have too-hot feet
Pearl Izumi seems to be the only major company that makes flexible shoes of decent quality (in their X-Alp and X-Road lines).
You can get flexible shoes from Bontrager or Specialized, but only in their lowest-end model that has otherwise poor materials.
Well, Shimano's shoes may be decent and flexible, but they are usually butt-ugly (my opinion) so I don't pay attention to them.
One drawback to the Pearl X-Alp shoes: they are wider than most bike shoes, so it's tough to fit a shoe cover over them. Pearl instructs you to use a size bigger than normal. Ok, but they don't make an XXXL cover to fit over my size 48's. So, I picked up a pair of Sidi GTX boots for cold/wet weather.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lewisburg, TN
Posts: 1,356
Bikes: Mikkelsen custom steel, Santa Cruz Chameleon SS, old trek trainer bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
I use a set of S works MTB shoes for MTB and road, love em. Won't be switching to road shoes anytime soon.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 246
Bikes: 2015 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 105, 2012 Fuji Roubaix, 1988 Basso Gap
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I use Shimano RT82 shoes. They are a road shoe with a recessed SPD cleat. I use them with Shimano A600 road pedals (Shimano touts them as an Ultegra level pedal). The shoes are comfortable, stiff, and walkable. The pedals provide a nice platform and solid engagement for good power transfer. Has worked well for me so far.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,432
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times
in
38 Posts
You can buy mtn shoes with just as stiff a sole as a road shoe very easily. Most of them are literally the same sole of shoe just punched differently with different holes between the mtn and road version (with the mtn also having grip around the cleat).
Walkability:
Road Shoes: Stiff sole, often hard to walk around in due to the bottom being slippery metal and no grip on the sides. The only possible exception I've seen is Speedplay has some sort of grippy surface you can put on their cleat and apparently it's about the same as a mountain shoe. Sometimes you can have shoe covers that cover the cleat and have some grip making them comparable to mtn shoes.
Mountain Shoes: Stiff Soles, bottom is designed to have some grip for walking around on.
These have worked fine for me for walking short distances - need to use the bathroom, walk into work, bought groceries wearing them. They're not something I would want to wear all day, and they're not something I'd want to go for a hike in. Literally running in them would be a very bad idea in my opinion.
Casual Mountain Shoes: These have a softer sole that's designed to be nicer to walk around in. Personally I had issues with the softer sole giving me knee pain when clipped in but that might be just me. I personally didn't find these much better than mountain shoes myself, sole is a little grippier and a little more comfortable but not as good as a regular shoe. The fact that is has a cleat is something it can't overcome. Might be ok for wearing at work if you had a desk job, I dunno, I haven't found much use for these myself.
Flat Bottomed Bike Shoes: Like from companies like Chrome:
Kursk Bike Sneaker All Black | Urban Bike Sneaker | Chrome Industries
They don't have a cleat, and are meant to be worn with flat pedals with pins. The bottom of the shoe is designed to grip the pedals on those kind of pedals, the sole is designed to be fairly stiff for biking but not overly so for walking, and they accomplish this a lot better because they don't have the drawback of having the cleat.
Flat Bottomed Bike Shoes are the only kind of shoes I'd recommend for "running around in grass" or any serious walking at your destination. If I wanted to bike somewhere and then hike, or was wearing them all day at work, this is the only kind of shoe I'd recommend.
Mountain bike shoes are fine if you just want to be able to walk into a restroom, buy groceries on your way home, walk into a restaurant comfortable in the middle of a ride, walk into a gas station with a tile floor and refill water, that sort of thing.
I found road shoes without additional covers to be annoying for doing some of those basic tasks off the bike. Though like I said I've heard Speedplay has some sort of solution now so you don't have a metal cleat sliding around on the ground, while walking around scuffs it all up and wears it down early.
Walkability:
Road Shoes: Stiff sole, often hard to walk around in due to the bottom being slippery metal and no grip on the sides. The only possible exception I've seen is Speedplay has some sort of grippy surface you can put on their cleat and apparently it's about the same as a mountain shoe. Sometimes you can have shoe covers that cover the cleat and have some grip making them comparable to mtn shoes.
Mountain Shoes: Stiff Soles, bottom is designed to have some grip for walking around on.
These have worked fine for me for walking short distances - need to use the bathroom, walk into work, bought groceries wearing them. They're not something I would want to wear all day, and they're not something I'd want to go for a hike in. Literally running in them would be a very bad idea in my opinion.
Casual Mountain Shoes: These have a softer sole that's designed to be nicer to walk around in. Personally I had issues with the softer sole giving me knee pain when clipped in but that might be just me. I personally didn't find these much better than mountain shoes myself, sole is a little grippier and a little more comfortable but not as good as a regular shoe. The fact that is has a cleat is something it can't overcome. Might be ok for wearing at work if you had a desk job, I dunno, I haven't found much use for these myself.
Flat Bottomed Bike Shoes: Like from companies like Chrome:
Kursk Bike Sneaker All Black | Urban Bike Sneaker | Chrome Industries
They don't have a cleat, and are meant to be worn with flat pedals with pins. The bottom of the shoe is designed to grip the pedals on those kind of pedals, the sole is designed to be fairly stiff for biking but not overly so for walking, and they accomplish this a lot better because they don't have the drawback of having the cleat.
Flat Bottomed Bike Shoes are the only kind of shoes I'd recommend for "running around in grass" or any serious walking at your destination. If I wanted to bike somewhere and then hike, or was wearing them all day at work, this is the only kind of shoe I'd recommend.
Mountain bike shoes are fine if you just want to be able to walk into a restroom, buy groceries on your way home, walk into a restaurant comfortable in the middle of a ride, walk into a gas station with a tile floor and refill water, that sort of thing.
I found road shoes without additional covers to be annoying for doing some of those basic tasks off the bike. Though like I said I've heard Speedplay has some sort of solution now so you don't have a metal cleat sliding around on the ground, while walking around scuffs it all up and wears it down early.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Illinois
Posts: 261
Bikes: 2015 Ridley Fenix Ultegra, 2016 Ridley X-Trail
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Messigician10
General Cycling Discussion
46
12-01-16 03:36 PM
dimabear
Road Cycling
44
04-19-10 10:44 PM
sunstealth
General Cycling Discussion
12
02-26-10 02:43 PM