Carbon or alloy
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,948
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3949 Post(s)
Liked 7,295 Times
in
2,946 Posts
It seems like lots of them used to be really noisy -- I always thought they sounded like a "Big Wheel" approaching -- but most current carbon wheels seem to be no louder than alloy.
#27
Senior Member
Deep profile carbon rims have a very poor cost to benefit ratio. They are pretty much a waste of money for recreational riders. I don't consider them due to occasional strong cross winds and most weigh more than the moderately priced Campy zondas that I use on two bikes. They weigh 1550 grams and with 16/21 spokes, the should have decent aerodynamics. They have Campy's best hubs, without wasting money on ceramic bearings.
I once thought of moving up to the Shamal or fulcrum zero. They're 100 grams lighter, but the have the same number of fat aluminum spokes, that don't seem like they would be as aerodynamic. They cost twice as much as zondas.
I've read reports of Chinese carbon wheels needing frequent truing. You won't have that problem with campy or fulcrum wheels.
check out pro bike kit for good prices.
I once thought of moving up to the Shamal or fulcrum zero. They're 100 grams lighter, but the have the same number of fat aluminum spokes, that don't seem like they would be as aerodynamic. They cost twice as much as zondas.
I've read reports of Chinese carbon wheels needing frequent truing. You won't have that problem with campy or fulcrum wheels.
check out pro bike kit for good prices.
I am currently waiting delivery on a set of HED Belgium Plus rims on White Industries T11 hubs laced 24/28 with Saphim CX Ray spokes. They are supposed to weigh 1,587 grams and I will use Vittoria Corsa Control 25 mm tubeless tires. They will be used on my new Cicli Barco XCr bike now being finished in Italy. I expect the entire bike to be barely under 19 lbs for a 59 cm seat tube size.
Likes For Johnk3:
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,948
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3949 Post(s)
Liked 7,295 Times
in
2,946 Posts
#29
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
Novatec hubs are the Asian budget alternative, but they are not mysterious and they are not undocumented. They are sold with a wide variety of bikes. Look here for example:
Novatec Hubs | N guide
Novatec Hubs | N guide
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
#30
Senior Member
Owned? Well, I bought a set of tubular Eastons for my wife's Wilier time trial bike. I have not ridden on those, but my serious racer LBS guru loaned me a set he was proud of while I was having a set of wheels rebuilt. I took it out on a back country road with a rough chipped stone surface. The damn things made so much noise, I couldn't concentrate on anything else. I realize that carbon wheels are the ideal for racing types. But, I am 72 y/o and hardly a racer. I frequently ride on rough roads.
A few months ago I was lollygagging along a back country road admiring the trees and creek that the road followed when I hit a big-ass pothole that threw me back onto the road so hard my helmet cracked open like an over-ripe melon. My H Plus son Archtype rim was not fazed and not a mm out of true. I wonder if a carbon rim with fewer spokes would have survived as well. I certainly would have been wary of its structural integrity thereafter.
A few months ago I was lollygagging along a back country road admiring the trees and creek that the road followed when I hit a big-ass pothole that threw me back onto the road so hard my helmet cracked open like an over-ripe melon. My H Plus son Archtype rim was not fazed and not a mm out of true. I wonder if a carbon rim with fewer spokes would have survived as well. I certainly would have been wary of its structural integrity thereafter.
Likes For Johnk3:
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,948
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3949 Post(s)
Liked 7,295 Times
in
2,946 Posts
Owned? Well, I bought a set of tubular Eastons for my wife's Wilier time trial bike. I have not ridden on those, but my serious racer LBS guru loaned me a set he was proud of while I was having a set of wheels rebuilt. I took it out on a back country road with a rough chipped stone surface. The damn things made so much noise, I couldn't concentrate on anything else. I realize that carbon wheels are the ideal for racing types. But, I am 72 y/o and hardly a racer. I frequently ride on rough roads.
-- are lighter (also lighter than Shamals)
-- are more aero
-- are less flexible
-- have more spokes
-- are just as quiet (except for the free hubs, which are louder)
All my wheels are used regularly on gravel, and two sets of the carbon wheels are used in gravel races. Carbon and aluminum have held up equally well. I'm not saying that carbon wheels are for everyone, but they definitely offer performance advantages.
#32
Newbie
Thread Starter
Deep profile carbon rims have a very poor cost to benefit ratio. They are pretty much a waste of money for recreational riders. I don't consider them due to occasional strong cross winds and most weigh more than the moderately priced Campy zondas that I use on two bikes. They weigh 1550 grams and with 16/21 spokes, the should have decent aerodynamics. They have Campy's best hubs, without wasting money on ceramic bearings.
I once thought of moving up to the Shamal or fulcrum zero. They're 100 grams lighter, but the have the same number of fat aluminum spokes, that don't seem like they would be as aerodynamic. They cost twice as much as zondas.
I've read reports of Chinese carbon wheels needing frequent truing. You won't have that problem with campy or fulcrum wheels.
check out pro bike kit for good prices .
I've read reports of Chinese carbon wheels needing frequent truing. You won't have that problem with campy or fulcrum wheels.
check out pro bike kit for good prices .
Why I go for carbon rims? Same reason as I went for carbon frames from alloy, Curious about the ride quality etc. But I don't have any problem going back to alloy in the future.
Last edited by cheesesandwich; 02-16-20 at 09:29 AM.
#33
Senior Member
I wouldn't judge carbon wheels based on one ride on a borrowed set. I own 5 sets of carbon wheels, as well as 3 sets of the aforementioned Campy Zonda / Fulcrum Racing 3 wheels. Compared to Zondas, the carbon wheels:
-- are lighter (also lighter than Shamals)
-- are more aero
-- are less flexible
-- have more spokes
-- are just as quiet (except for the free hubs, which are louder)
All my wheels are used regularly on gravel, and two sets of the carbon wheels are used in gravel races. Carbon and aluminum have held up equally well. I'm not saying that carbon wheels are for everyone, but they definitely offer performance advantages.
-- are lighter (also lighter than Shamals)
-- are more aero
-- are less flexible
-- have more spokes
-- are just as quiet (except for the free hubs, which are louder)
All my wheels are used regularly on gravel, and two sets of the carbon wheels are used in gravel races. Carbon and aluminum have held up equally well. I'm not saying that carbon wheels are for everyone, but they definitely offer performance advantages.
Of course, the carbon wheels, especially high quality ones, are a lot more expensive than alloy. I have seen side by side lists of carbon and alloy rims and was struck by how close they are in weight. I assume that may have to do with the larger size of the deep aero carbon rims. In any event, to me saving 100 grams on a wheelset does not justify spending an extra thousand or so. And there is the the long term durability factor.
#34
Senior Member
Fulcrum 7 wheels are very low level wheels. I wouldn't own anything lower than Fulcrum 3/Zonda. That's the sweet spot where the weight is decent, the hub quality excellent and the rim is also excellent. The next wheel up the line costs about twice as much. Bontrager Aeolus carbon rimmed wheels cost 3 times as much and weigh a little more. The only carbon rimmed wheelsets that are moderately priced come from China and if they don't stay true, they are not any bargain.
I haven't owned any carbon rims for good reason. I prefer rim brakes. Rim brakes and carbon rims isn't a smart combination since I ride a lot of mountain descents.
I haven't owned any carbon rims for good reason. I prefer rim brakes. Rim brakes and carbon rims isn't a smart combination since I ride a lot of mountain descents.
#35
Senior Member
Fulcrum 7 wheels are very low level wheels. I wouldn't own anything lower than Fulcrum 3/Zonda. That's the sweet spot where the weight is decent, the hub quality excellent and the rim is also excellent. The next wheel up the line costs about twice as much. Bontrager Aeolus carbon rimmed wheels cost 3 times as much and weigh a little more. The only carbon rimmed wheelsets that are moderately priced come from China and if they don't stay true, they are not any bargain.
I haven't owned any carbon rims for good reason. I prefer rim brakes. Rim brakes and carbon rims isn't a smart combination since I ride a lot of mountain descents.
I haven't owned any carbon rims for good reason. I prefer rim brakes. Rim brakes and carbon rims isn't a smart combination since I ride a lot of mountain descents.
I for one am going with direct mount rim breaks. There is also the aestethics, disc breaks look ugly.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,948
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3949 Post(s)
Liked 7,295 Times
in
2,946 Posts
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,948
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3949 Post(s)
Liked 7,295 Times
in
2,946 Posts
#38
Senior Member
I made the mistake of buying the cheaper Scirocco wheelset once. They were OK, but not as nice as the Zondas. I got them real cheap and resold them after about 6 months, with little loss. I've owned the higher level Fulcrum Zero wheels, too. No complaints about them, but not worth twice the price to save 100 grams, but in this case, they sure were pretty. In this case, 11 speed was just introduced, late in 2008, for the 2009 model year so this special edition LOOK 585 of mine got a new compact crank and 11 speed cassette, for the mountains.
To be more specific, the cheaper wheels are a lot heavier, require rim tape and have lower priced hubs with cartridge bearings.
To be more specific, the cheaper wheels are a lot heavier, require rim tape and have lower priced hubs with cartridge bearings.
Last edited by DaveSSS; 02-17-20 at 08:40 AM.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,948
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3949 Post(s)
Liked 7,295 Times
in
2,946 Posts
I made the mistake of buying the cheaper Scirocco wheelset once. They were OK, but not as nice as the Zondas. I got them real cheap and resold them after about 6 months, with little loss. I've owned the higher level Fulcrum Zero wheels, too. No complaints about them, but not worth twice the price to save 100 grams.
#40
Senior Member
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,948
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3949 Post(s)
Liked 7,295 Times
in
2,946 Posts
My apologies. I didn't realize that your wheel preference is the best choice for everyone. I'm curious though, why do they make all those other wheels if Zondas are clearly the right wheel for everybody?
#42
Senior Member
My alloy H Plus Son rims are totally silent. My White Industries hubs are just a quite faint ticking sound. The Vittoria Corsa Control tires make the most noise which is almost none. But I can hear most carbons coming like Big Wheels, especially the full disc wheels on some time trial bikes. I'll bet they are fun in the wind.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410
Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 850 Post(s)
Liked 344 Times
in
247 Posts
This is probably the hottest take here. How is DT240 so much better than the 350? It’s just a bearing swap away from being practically identical, isn’t it? Besides having swappable front endcaps and thread-in spokes (which are questionable in value)?
I know OP made their choice but I’ll share anyway. I have experience with an alloy rim + bitex (china) hub and a deep carbon rim + DT350 hubs.
I had no huge problems with the bitex hub. Bearings are not as smooth as DT but that’s an easy fix. The pawls frequently skipped if I got on the power after coasting, but a) getting rid of half the pawls and b) keeping the endcaps tight helped with that. I get this issue on the 350 as well, despite it having one of the most highly praised mechanisms. I would also say the 6 pawl freehub drag was unbearable but I’m sure that’s the case with most high engagement systems. None of these are dealbreakers. Not sure how much better/worse novatec is.
The deep carbon rims made it really sketchy to ride no-handed above ~20mph and crosswinds/high speed descending required more active control. The ride quality was also significantly worse. Bumps felt a lot more “square”. I would run lower tire pressures, but the worst problem with carbon rims is how delicate they are. There’s a lot of gravel strewn across roads here and I was getting a lot of chips in the brake track. I was also afraid of damaging the rim (invisibly) by hitting a pothole at lower pressures. The braking is also worse on long, steep descents despite my using expensive and fast wearing Black Prince pads. Once heat soaks in, the rims feel like polished hardwood. There’s no bite. The brakes are also harder to modulate because of how weirdly grabby the soft pads combined with the textured brake track are. Alloy braking is pretty predictable and linear. Carbon jumps to significant braking at a light touch, and then (especially with heat soak) doesn’t do much until you REALLY grab them and then it kicks in hard. Late braking is scary because you aren’t quite sure about how much the brakes are gonna bite.
Overall, I wouldn’t worry about the cheaper hub too much but I would seriously think about whether deep rims are worth it. They look cool and are undeniably faster on flats and descents but they reduce your ride quality, make handling/braking harder and require babying. I won’t list expense because China carbon rims are cheap.
I know OP made their choice but I’ll share anyway. I have experience with an alloy rim + bitex (china) hub and a deep carbon rim + DT350 hubs.
I had no huge problems with the bitex hub. Bearings are not as smooth as DT but that’s an easy fix. The pawls frequently skipped if I got on the power after coasting, but a) getting rid of half the pawls and b) keeping the endcaps tight helped with that. I get this issue on the 350 as well, despite it having one of the most highly praised mechanisms. I would also say the 6 pawl freehub drag was unbearable but I’m sure that’s the case with most high engagement systems. None of these are dealbreakers. Not sure how much better/worse novatec is.
The deep carbon rims made it really sketchy to ride no-handed above ~20mph and crosswinds/high speed descending required more active control. The ride quality was also significantly worse. Bumps felt a lot more “square”. I would run lower tire pressures, but the worst problem with carbon rims is how delicate they are. There’s a lot of gravel strewn across roads here and I was getting a lot of chips in the brake track. I was also afraid of damaging the rim (invisibly) by hitting a pothole at lower pressures. The braking is also worse on long, steep descents despite my using expensive and fast wearing Black Prince pads. Once heat soaks in, the rims feel like polished hardwood. There’s no bite. The brakes are also harder to modulate because of how weirdly grabby the soft pads combined with the textured brake track are. Alloy braking is pretty predictable and linear. Carbon jumps to significant braking at a light touch, and then (especially with heat soak) doesn’t do much until you REALLY grab them and then it kicks in hard. Late braking is scary because you aren’t quite sure about how much the brakes are gonna bite.
Overall, I wouldn’t worry about the cheaper hub too much but I would seriously think about whether deep rims are worth it. They look cool and are undeniably faster on flats and descents but they reduce your ride quality, make handling/braking harder and require babying. I won’t list expense because China carbon rims are cheap.
Last edited by smashndash; 02-25-20 at 02:13 PM.
#44
Senior Member
I have looked at the Hplus rims too. But the aero ones are narrow. Wide rims still appeals to me. The carbon rims I chose the 25mm instead of 28mm because I don't have to adjust the brakes when changing wheels. Although they are only 18mm internally, something I have to compromise.
Lots of people tout how light carbon wheels are but the reality is that they are not significantly lighter than aluminum. Campagnolo's top Alloy rim wheelset weighs in at 1449 gm. Their top Carbon disc wheelset at 33 mm deep weighs in at 1485 gm but costs $$$$.
Major alloy rim makers for road bikes have rims that weigh between 435 gms and 485 gms. (HED, Easton, Boyd, H Plus Son, Velocity)
Major carbon rim makers rims weigh between 375 and 545 gm. (Reynolds, ENVE, Boyd, Knight)
How important is the aero factor? I'll bet that you will not be able to tell the difference. The rider, bike, helmet, saddlebag, water bottle, shirt, etc are more significant. But if you are a time trial racer, deep carbon wheels are very important because like the helmet, skinsuit, shoe covers, etc, it all adds up to seconds per mile.
Carbon fiber isn't a consideration unless you have disc brakes. Carbon fiber rim brakes are mediocre at best and dangerous at worst. Carbon fiber does not disperse heat well and require special brake pads at the very least.
Last edited by Johnk3; 02-25-20 at 05:49 PM.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,948
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3949 Post(s)
Liked 7,295 Times
in
2,946 Posts
Actually, Campy's lightest carbon wheels are 1360g, and many companies make carbon wheels that weigh less than that.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410
Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 850 Post(s)
Liked 344 Times
in
247 Posts
Yeah I thought that seemed off lol. The lightest rims are low profile hookless carbon rims. These can get into the 290g range. There aren’t many on the market right now because hookless rims don’t work with tube-requiring tires but once tubeless is the norm (the disc brake war is a false flag operation to distract the public from TL) we’re going to see a lot of sub 1200g road wheelsets. Cadex, Light Bicycle, ENVE and probably some others have already taken advantage of this. Some guys are also developing carbon spokes, which would basically mean an 1100g wheelset would be similar or better than a 1500g steel spoke, alloy wheelset in terms of stiffness. Disc brakes mean we might even see the comeback of single wall rims like the Zipp 3Zero Moto. Probably talking 1000g race-worthy wheelsets at that point. The tech exists. It would be ignorant to say that carbon wheels aren’t lighter.
#47
Senior Member
But those super light weight wheels are far out of the pocket book of this thread.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,948
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3949 Post(s)
Liked 7,295 Times
in
2,946 Posts
My point is that for most consumers, the carbon wheels they can afford or that come on prebuilt bikes are not much lighter than alloy rims.
#49
Senior Member
Yes, because the aluminum wheels you're comparing them to are rim brake. If you want to compare disc brake wheels, then Campy's lightest aluminum is 1592g. You have to compare apples to apples.
Good, lightweight carbon wheels are available at reasonable prices. I gave my wife a new set of carbon wheels in December. They are the same weight as Campy's lightest carbon wheels, but they cost less than Campy's best aluminum wheels. (No, they're not generic Asian imports.)
Good, lightweight carbon wheels are available at reasonable prices. I gave my wife a new set of carbon wheels in December. They are the same weight as Campy's lightest carbon wheels, but they cost less than Campy's best aluminum wheels. (No, they're not generic Asian imports.)
#50
Senior Member
Yes, because the aluminum wheels you're comparing them to are rim brake. If you want to compare disc brake wheels, then Campy's lightest aluminum is 1592g. You have to compare apples to apples.
Good, lightweight carbon wheels are available at reasonable prices. I gave my wife a new set of carbon wheels in December. They are the same weight as Campy's lightest carbon wheels, but they cost less than Campy's best aluminum wheels. (No, they're not generic Asian imports.)
Good, lightweight carbon wheels are available at reasonable prices. I gave my wife a new set of carbon wheels in December. They are the same weight as Campy's lightest carbon wheels, but they cost less than Campy's best aluminum wheels. (No, they're not generic Asian imports.)