48/16 sucks
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
48/16 sucks
Okay it might be great for someone who doesn't want to ever go near 30mph but it doesn't work for me. I had to replace my rear cog(15t) a few days ago to a 16t(already had it). It's a dura ace cog and lock ring. Should I buy another rear cog and lock ring? Or should I buy a new 52t chain ring?
#2
Senior Member
Okay it might be great for someone who doesn't want to ever go near 30mph but it doesn't work for me. I had to replace my rear cog(15t) a few days ago to a 16t(already had it). It's a dura ace cog and lock ring. Should I buy another rear cog and lock ring? Or should I buy a new 52t chain ring?
Likes For seau grateau:
#4
Senior Member
In addition to what bmwjoe said, combining odd and even toothed cogs and chainrings gives you more skid patches if thats something that you get up to. So if you like to stick around 85 gear inches then I'd say 48/15 is better than 52/16.
If you use brakes then I think its actually the opposite (?). I think even toothed setups put more even stresses on the chain (or something like that, somebody help me out here).
In any case it shouldnt make a huge difference in practice.
Also yeah, 85 is uncomfortably high of you ask me. Maybe I'm just a wimp though .
If you use brakes then I think its actually the opposite (?). I think even toothed setups put more even stresses on the chain (or something like that, somebody help me out here).
In any case it shouldnt make a huge difference in practice.
Also yeah, 85 is uncomfortably high of you ask me. Maybe I'm just a wimp though .
#5
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
48x15 (or 16 for that matter) might work for someone super crazy strong, or more likely, someone who only mashes.
30mph? I can top that with my 46x18.
30mph? I can top that with my 46x18.
#6
Full Member
Thread Starter
Likes For ryan_rides:
#7
Full Member
Thread Starter
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 536
Bikes: Vilano Urbana, DownTube FS9, Montaque paratrooper, Nano mini-velo, Motobecane CX, Raleigh 20, MIFA folder, ROG Pony, Iverson Grand Touring folder, Exclusiv German folder
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 168 Post(s)
Liked 191 Times
in
119 Posts
You need to find your "sweet spot" in terms of Gear Inches.
Use the calculator https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
From experience, my sweet spot is around 60-65, any lower I'm spinning, any higher I'm mashing.
Good luck.
Use the calculator https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
From experience, my sweet spot is around 60-65, any lower I'm spinning, any higher I'm mashing.
Good luck.
Likes For mirfi:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,906
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,929 Times
in
2,554 Posts
The ancient rule was that you never used a gear that was an integer ratio for a fix gear. 48/16 = 3; an integer. This means that the relationship between your chainring and cog comes up exactly the same every pedal stroke. 48:15, o issues. 49:16 is OK. 52:17 is virtually exactly the same gear as 48:16; just far enough off to be not exact.
I haven't ridden a gear that high since I was a first year racer 40 years ago. Listened to the club vets and moved it down the next year and got serious. So I have very l;imited experience on intrger ratios. A little on a 42:21 but that was virtually all on major climbs. Harmonic issues at those RPMs wasn't happening!
Ben
I haven't ridden a gear that high since I was a first year racer 40 years ago. Listened to the club vets and moved it down the next year and got serious. So I have very l;imited experience on intrger ratios. A little on a 42:21 but that was virtually all on major climbs. Harmonic issues at those RPMs wasn't happening!
Ben
#10
Senior Member
No use arguing over how someone likes to ride their bike. If a gear ratio that high works for you and you enjoy it then more power to you. That said, larger gear ratios don't necessarily mean that you go faster; and from my experience, faster is not always better.
In my case, I actually changed my gear ratio around quite a bit when I first started riding. I lived in Pittsburgh at the time (crazy hilly) and I wasn't a very strong rider so I went down from the stock 46/16 of my first bike. By the time I moved to Chicago (flat as a pancake), I was a much stronger rider so I initially thought my ratio was too low. However, winter came and the wind killed me on my commute (which was much further here than in pittsburgh). I ended up gearing down again just to get through the winter. I felt like an absolute slug at first, honestly. But by the time spring came I was making record time to work on like low 60s gear inches. I almost didn't even gear back up. Weirdly, it took until I tried that ratio, even after years of comfortably riding higher ratios, to find a cadence and rhythm that really made me feel one with the bike rather than just riding it (if that makes sense). Since then I've geared up again to the mid 70s but can still click into that magic rythm!
Long story short, changing your gearing always feels weird if you only ever ride one ratio. I think exploring smaller ratios can be super beneficial as a rider though, if only temporarily.
TLDR:
In my case, I actually changed my gear ratio around quite a bit when I first started riding. I lived in Pittsburgh at the time (crazy hilly) and I wasn't a very strong rider so I went down from the stock 46/16 of my first bike. By the time I moved to Chicago (flat as a pancake), I was a much stronger rider so I initially thought my ratio was too low. However, winter came and the wind killed me on my commute (which was much further here than in pittsburgh). I ended up gearing down again just to get through the winter. I felt like an absolute slug at first, honestly. But by the time spring came I was making record time to work on like low 60s gear inches. I almost didn't even gear back up. Weirdly, it took until I tried that ratio, even after years of comfortably riding higher ratios, to find a cadence and rhythm that really made me feel one with the bike rather than just riding it (if that makes sense). Since then I've geared up again to the mid 70s but can still click into that magic rythm!
Long story short, changing your gearing always feels weird if you only ever ride one ratio. I think exploring smaller ratios can be super beneficial as a rider though, if only temporarily.
TLDR:
Likes For PeopleAreIdiots:
#11
It's the little things
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 781
Bikes: Too many, yet not enough
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 279 Post(s)
Liked 326 Times
in
147 Posts
No way 85 gear inches is faster unless totally flat and never any wind. I picked up speed on one of my fixed gear bikes by going from mid 70s to just under 70 just this past summer. Spin to win!
When you are young or not experienced mashing a big gi feels faster but never is. Perhaps the op doesn't ride for distance or in the wind often so this setup works for him?
When you are young or not experienced mashing a big gi feels faster but never is. Perhaps the op doesn't ride for distance or in the wind often so this setup works for him?
Likes For Senrab62:
#12
Full Member
Thread Starter
No way 85 gear inches is faster unless totally flat and never any wind. I picked up speed on one of my fixed gear bikes by going from mid 70s to just under 70 just this past summer. Spin to win!
When you are young or not experienced mashing a big gi feels faster but never is. Perhaps the op doesn't ride for distance or in the wind often so this setup works for him?
When you are young or not experienced mashing a big gi feels faster but never is. Perhaps the op doesn't ride for distance or in the wind often so this setup works for him?
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hotel CA / DFW
Posts: 1,732
Bikes: 83 Colnago Super, 87 50th Daccordi, 79 & 87 Guerciotti's, 90s DB/GT Mtn Bikes, 90s Colnago Master and Titanio, 96 Serotta Colorado TG, 95/05 Colnago C40/C50, 06 DbyLS TI, 08 Lemond Filmore FG SS, 12 Cervelo R3, 20/15 Surly Stragler & Steamroller
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 601 Post(s)
Liked 779 Times
in
497 Posts
The ancient rule was that you never used a gear that was an integer ratio for a fix gear. 48/16 = 3; an integer. This means that the relationship between your chainring and cog comes up exactly the same every pedal stroke. 48:15, o issues. 49:16 is OK. 52:17 is virtually exactly the same gear as 48:16; just far enough off to be not exact.
I haven't ridden a gear that high since I was a first year racer 40 years ago. Listened to the club vets and moved it down the next year and got serious. So I have very l;imited experience on intrger ratios. A little on a 42:21 but that was virtually all on major climbs. Harmonic issues at those RPMs wasn't happening!
Ben
I haven't ridden a gear that high since I was a first year racer 40 years ago. Listened to the club vets and moved it down the next year and got serious. So I have very l;imited experience on intrger ratios. A little on a 42:21 but that was virtually all on major climbs. Harmonic issues at those RPMs wasn't happening!
Ben
For sure need some other gears if Im doing any hills.
The SS forces me to get off the saddle often which my @@$ really enjoys.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,906
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,929 Times
in
2,554 Posts
QUOTE=ryan_rides;21289015]Okay it might be great for someone who doesn't want to ever go near 30mph but it doesn't work for me. I had to replace my rear cog(15t) a few days ago to a 16t(already had it). It's a dura ace cog and lock ring. Should I buy another rear cog and lock ring? Or should I buy a new 52t chain ring?[/QUOTE]
A lockring is a lockring. Cog doesn't matter. It just needs to match your hub threads. No need to get another. (Exception - if you are going to very small cogs, ie 12 teeth; then you need a bell shaped lockring so the chain doesn't ride up on it.)
Eur-Asian cogs are just as good as Dura Ace and might be cheaper or easier to get.
Ben
A lockring is a lockring. Cog doesn't matter. It just needs to match your hub threads. No need to get another. (Exception - if you are going to very small cogs, ie 12 teeth; then you need a bell shaped lockring so the chain doesn't ride up on it.)
Eur-Asian cogs are just as good as Dura Ace and might be cheaper or easier to get.
Ben
#17
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
48/16 would suck for me as well, but for different reasons. I just prefer the way a smaller gear spins up faster after stopping at an intersection. Which I do nearly every time, like a lame normie.
#20
my nice bike is at home
really depends on where you are riding....48 x 17 here, it's hilly where I have been riding lately and I am old.. If it was flat as a pancake I would go 15/16 Have done 600 +miles on the fixie this year.
__________________
BMC Race Machine / BMC Team Machine / Rossin Record / 80's Pinarello Traviso / Merlin MTB / Raleigh "Folding 20" / Ti-Swift (!)
Erikson w/C&C couplers / Trek's: 2300, 1200, 990 / Jamis 'Sputnik'
BMC Race Machine / BMC Team Machine / Rossin Record / 80's Pinarello Traviso / Merlin MTB / Raleigh "Folding 20" / Ti-Swift (!)
Erikson w/C&C couplers / Trek's: 2300, 1200, 990 / Jamis 'Sputnik'
#21
Senior Member
If you can’t spin @30mph with 48:16, you don’t know how to pedal. Your problem is not your gear ratio, it’s your poor spinning technique.
Likes For mihlbach:
#22
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 30
Bikes: Pure Cycles SS 48:16. w/ some mods
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
Hello mihlbach!
could you please explain “If you can’t spin @30mph with 48:16, you don’t know how to pedal. Your problem is not your gear ratio, it’s your poor spinning technique.”
I don’t understand how “spinning” is efficient? I think I understand ryan_rides desire is like mine, to increase average speed. I ride to commute to work, 20 miles round trip and for exercise, 8 - 25 miles. And like ryan_rides, I too ride the flats of Florida. Our biggest challenge is wind and drawbridge approaches.
thanks!
H
could you please explain “If you can’t spin @30mph with 48:16, you don’t know how to pedal. Your problem is not your gear ratio, it’s your poor spinning technique.”
I don’t understand how “spinning” is efficient? I think I understand ryan_rides desire is like mine, to increase average speed. I ride to commute to work, 20 miles round trip and for exercise, 8 - 25 miles. And like ryan_rides, I too ride the flats of Florida. Our biggest challenge is wind and drawbridge approaches.
thanks!
H
#23
bill nyecycles
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 3,328
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 789 Post(s)
Liked 350 Times
in
190 Posts
Dang, total n00b here running 46/17. My lil legs would probably have a hard time starting from stop signs and lights at 46/16 or 15.
I've got a 48t Sugino RD2 I just took off another bike but I'm saving it for another SS/fixed build.
I've got a 48t Sugino RD2 I just took off another bike but I'm saving it for another SS/fixed build.
Last edited by the sci guy; 05-03-20 at 07:55 PM.
#24
Senior Member
Hello mihlbach!
could you please explain “If you can’t spin @30mph with 48:16, you don’t know how to pedal. Your problem is not your gear ratio, it’s your poor spinning technique.”
I don’t understand how “spinning” is efficient? I think I understand ryan_rides desire is like mine, to increase average speed. I ride to commute to work, 20 miles round trip and for exercise, 8 - 25 miles. And like ryan_rides, I too ride the flats of Florida. Our biggest challenge is wind and drawbridge approaches.
thanks!
H
could you please explain “If you can’t spin @30mph with 48:16, you don’t know how to pedal. Your problem is not your gear ratio, it’s your poor spinning technique.”
I don’t understand how “spinning” is efficient? I think I understand ryan_rides desire is like mine, to increase average speed. I ride to commute to work, 20 miles round trip and for exercise, 8 - 25 miles. And like ryan_rides, I too ride the flats of Florida. Our biggest challenge is wind and drawbridge approaches.
thanks!
H
Most experienced FG riders are going to recommend a gear ratio in the low-mid 70s for average riding conditions, with some small deviation from that range for exceptional conditions (hills, rough terrain, etc.). The ratio of 48:16 mentioned by the OP is approaching 80 gear inches. Its on the high side of the normal range for street riding. Any decent cyclist ought to be able to easily spin that gear @30 mph. Even at my physical prime when I could hang with the fastest of roadies, I never ran a gear higher than 80 gear inches, and most often rode 49:17 (which is about 75-76 inches depending on the tire size). Higher gears, while great for short bouts of speed, did not increase my cruising speed and they had a diminishing effect on my average speeds, again because I could not accelerate as quickly and could not maintain speed on steep hills.
No normal human is going to be cruising along at 30 MPH, except, as I said, in situations where the cyclist is intending to go fast for short distances. So if someone feels this gear is too low (as the OP has bragged), it is not an indication of strength. It is an indication that they don't know how to pedal.
Last edited by mihlbach; 05-07-20 at 10:58 AM.
Likes For mihlbach:
#25
Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 30
Bikes: Pure Cycles SS 48:16. w/ some mods
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
Thanks! mihlbach!
Thanks for taking the time to reply. I appreciate your knowledge and I can now apply this to my riding technique.
Cheers! H
Thanks for taking the time to reply. I appreciate your knowledge and I can now apply this to my riding technique.
Cheers! H
Likes For HLaudio: