"Looks like your fork is bent."
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,674
Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,751 Times
in
938 Posts
But seriously - suppose I was a seller and wanted to prove with pictures my frame/fork weren't bent, how would I do that?
In my case, I eyeball the fork from both sides and square on from the front. A center line, drawn through the head tube and extended down the fork blade will help to determine bent or unbent. Hard to explain how to do this but easy enough to do. If the center line of the head tube extends down the center line of the fork, you are OK for that part of the gauging.
Looking directly square on at the front, does the wheel evenly split the distance between fork blades? If you, that is another positive suggesting no fork damage. If the wheel does not evenly split the distance, the problem could be either a bent fork or an out of true wheel (just turn the wheel around and install to see if the even split thing changes - if not, the wheel is probably OK...
Cracks in the paint are an immediate indicator of frame or fork trauma. When you see these cracks, you better know what you are doing to make them go away and get everything true and good to go.
Riding the bike will also help to indicate a bent something or other. If the bike pulls to one side or the other, suspect head set issues or a bent frame or fork.
Other than that, just ask us and we will all tell you what we think. In my case, I suggest a problem only if I really see something that raises red flags. Often times, it is picture distortion. Those other times - pooey stinko!
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
Likes For randyjawa:
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,103
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 329 Times
in
160 Posts
I have come to the conclusion that a straight fork/head tube looks slightly bent backwards to the eye/in photos. I don’t know why this is the case. It often seems more pronounced in larger frames.
I don’t think most people would notice if they were riding a bike with a mildly bent fork.
The fork on the Miyata looks slightly bent to me. Perhaps it was built slightly off. I’ll bet it rides fine.
In any case, if you bend the fork on a Miyata slightly backwards you just get a Colnago. The seller should this quadruple his asking price.
I don’t think most people would notice if they were riding a bike with a mildly bent fork.
The fork on the Miyata looks slightly bent to me. Perhaps it was built slightly off. I’ll bet it rides fine.
In any case, if you bend the fork on a Miyata slightly backwards you just get a Colnago. The seller should this quadruple his asking price.
Last edited by jethin; 09-21-20 at 08:15 AM.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,038
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4511 Post(s)
Liked 6,378 Times
in
3,667 Posts
You would have to figure out how to vet a buyer which may or may not be easier than proving the fork is or is not bent.
#29
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,395 Times
in
2,092 Posts
#30
Senior Member
1) "Proof" would require in-person inspection(not limited to buckled tubes/lugs/paint or steerer) , disassembly/reassembly, and test riding.
2) Photos commonly have distortion, and an accurate in-plane side or frontal shot can be difficult to achieve.
That said., overlaid traces to mark out the geometry can give a starting point.
Apologies for the rough qualty of the drawing using a cheap photo editor on a tablet with my finger for a stylus.
But I think you can get the idea:
The lines could be finer, as well as extended longer so that they cross (or align).
Likes For chainwhip:
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Berkeley CA
Posts: 2,536
Bikes: 1981 Ron Cooper, 1974 Cinelli Speciale Corsa, 2000 Gary Fisher Sugar 1, 1986 Miyata 710, 1982 Raleigh "International"
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 1,291 Times
in
487 Posts
I think this thread is bent.
Likes For davester:
#32
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
A good question.
In my case, I eyeball the fork from both sides and square on from the front. A center line, drawn through the head tube and extended down the fork blade will help to determine bent or unbent. Hard to explain how to do this but easy enough to do. If the center line of the head tube extends down the center line of the fork, you are OK for that part of the gauging.
Looking directly square on at the front, does the wheel evenly split the distance between fork blades? If you, that is another positive suggesting no fork damage. If the wheel does not evenly split the distance, the problem could be either a bent fork or an out of true wheel (just turn the wheel around and install to see if the even split thing changes - if not, the wheel is probably OK...
In my case, I eyeball the fork from both sides and square on from the front. A center line, drawn through the head tube and extended down the fork blade will help to determine bent or unbent. Hard to explain how to do this but easy enough to do. If the center line of the head tube extends down the center line of the fork, you are OK for that part of the gauging.
Looking directly square on at the front, does the wheel evenly split the distance between fork blades? If you, that is another positive suggesting no fork damage. If the wheel does not evenly split the distance, the problem could be either a bent fork or an out of true wheel (just turn the wheel around and install to see if the even split thing changes - if not, the wheel is probably OK...
Likes For canklecat:
#33
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26415 Post(s)
Liked 10,380 Times
in
7,208 Posts
Originally Posted by Johnny Cochrane
...if the fork is bent, you must repent !
Originally Posted by Mike Tyson
...everyone thinks his fork is straight, until he gets punched in the face.
Likes For 3alarmer:
#34
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26415 Post(s)
Liked 10,380 Times
in
7,208 Posts
The lowrider guys here do it on purpose...
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 7,922
Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.
Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 630 Times
in
356 Posts
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
Last edited by Lascauxcaveman; 09-20-20 at 12:57 AM.
#36
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
Because in the photo, it actually looks like the fork is bent? Like that blue and pink Miyata in post #11 . Or is it blue and purple? Hell, I can't tell
Some years ago i bought a frame from a seller who is, I think, generally well regarded. He sells a lot of good old bike parts at reasonable prices, well described, good photos. It was not a cheap frame, and shipping was not cheap either. Total cost to me was around $400 IIRC. The frame turned out to be bent. Once it was pointed out to the seller, he argued the damage was very slight. He also suggested the frame was bent in shipping, or I'd bent it myself. Seriously? It had the kind of damage that can only happen in a head-on crash.
Well, that was a pain in the ass to resolve, and an expensive lesson, namely that it's easy to miss a bent frame or fork, even for someone with a lot of experience. So, on these forums, when i see someone making what might be an expensive mistake, i try to point it out.
Sure, it's a meme. And sometimes a joke, about as funny as "send it to me for proper disposal," which we also see every day or two. But most often, if someone suggests a fork might be bent, it's because it looks bent. And in some cases it will turn out to be bent.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
www.rhmsaddles.com.
#37
Senior Member
40-50+ years is a long time for someone to potentially ride into a curb, especially considering the condition most of our bikes show up in.
#38
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
612 Posts
I should post a picture of my bike. I think the fork is bent. I raced and crashed a few times it decades ago, and have massive wheel-toe overlap.
Although, I built it to be a tight criterium racer, so overlap was expected.
Although, I built it to be a tight criterium racer, so overlap was expected.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,749
Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 702 Post(s)
Liked 672 Times
in
420 Posts
Be humble my friend, and keep learning.
......................
Last edited by branko_76; 09-20-20 at 01:11 PM.
Likes For branko_76:
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,038
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4511 Post(s)
Liked 6,378 Times
in
3,667 Posts
I recall you starting numerous threads earlier this year asking some very newbie type questions. Many here have years and years of experience riding and working on bikes and have seen much more than I and much, much more than you apparently have. I'm not a pro mechanic, but have been restoring vintage bikes for quite a while but when someone points something out that I have not noticed, I take a closer look. Even if they are wrong, I usually learn something anyway.
Be humble my friend, and keep learning.
......................
Be humble my friend, and keep learning.
......................
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,038
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4511 Post(s)
Liked 6,378 Times
in
3,667 Posts
And while it doesn't happen very often we don't want you or anybody else to be the one that eventually sells a bike that hurts or kills someone.
There have been instances where something was pointed out, many others say "I don't see it", it gets taken apart to find a cracked steerer tube, stem, crown or some other anomaly that could have been catastrophic had it been undiscovered.
Like the majority of what we do, we have best interests at heart albeit sometimes very spiritedly if not annoyingly, sometimes.
Likes For merziac:
#43
Used to be Conspiratemus
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,512
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times
in
163 Posts
...I tried to bring to bring a little science and optics to this topic in this other thread. But the Bent Forkers shouted me down. Now I just .
This effect is immediately apparent to anyone who has tried to photograph anything like a building taller than one story or a statue of a general on horseback. When you tilt the camera back “to get it all in”, you invariably find that the building or statue looks like it is falling over backwards in your picture (maybe that is the point with the statue...). Vertical parallel lines no longer look parallel and measuring with a ruler on the print will show them to be not parallel. But we know the building is standing perfectly vertically: the photo of it is not a true image. This effect, and measures to adjust for it, are described in introductory photography texts. The optical characteristics of different lenses are added to this, especially at large apertures.
Curved, raked structures like forks are even more difficult to assess in casual photographs. Perspective of curved things like a bend in the road or the graceful ellipse of a Spitfire’s wing are challenging to draw properly from an oblique view.
Last edited by conspiratemus1; 09-20-20 at 01:56 PM.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,038
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4511 Post(s)
Liked 6,378 Times
in
3,667 Posts
I recall you starting numerous threads earlier this year asking some very newbie type questions. Many here have years and years of experience riding and working on bikes and have seen much more than I and much, much more than you apparently have. I'm not a pro mechanic, but have been restoring vintage bikes for quite a while but when someone points something out that I have not noticed, I take a closer look. Even if they are wrong, I usually learn something anyway.
Be humble my friend, and keep learning.
......................
Be humble my friend, and keep learning.
......................
Also should have noted that the newbie questions are a cornerstone of what goes on here, if they ever stop, we're all in big trouble, keep em coming.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,749
Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 702 Post(s)
Liked 672 Times
in
420 Posts
I totally agree, I learn quite a bit from newbie threads, not only from other more experienced members, but when I respond to a question, I often double check my answer before hitting "enter"
Likes For branko_76:
#46
Passista
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,597
Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 866 Post(s)
Liked 721 Times
in
396 Posts
If there isn't an app to check fork straightness on a photo already, I'm sure it will come out soon.
Likes For Reynolds:
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: The Urban Shores Of Michigami
Posts: 1,749
Bikes: ........................................ .....Holdsworth "Special"..... .......Falcon "Special".......... .........Miyata 912........... ........................................
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 702 Post(s)
Liked 672 Times
in
420 Posts
#48
Used to be Conspiratemus
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,512
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times
in
163 Posts
^^^ Do people really say things like that to acquaintances? If I did, I would probably conclude it was the explanation for why I don’t have many friends. It sounds gratuitously hurtful. I do have an acquaintance whom I run into every few years. He went through a period where he would say, “You’re looking great! Have you lost weight?” I knew he was being glib and insincere but at least not hurtful.
”Fork is bent,” as a supposedly good-natured jibe seems particularly malicious if said publicly and indelibly when the fork’s owner is trying honestly to sell an undamaged bike.
”Fork is bent,” as a supposedly good-natured jibe seems particularly malicious if said publicly and indelibly when the fork’s owner is trying honestly to sell an undamaged bike.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,373
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2482 Post(s)
Liked 2,953 Times
in
1,678 Posts
Complaining about someone pointing out that a fork is bent is called "killing the messenger."
#50
Used to be Conspiratemus
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hamilton ON Canada
Posts: 1,512
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times
in
163 Posts
If the messenger brought news to the King that he knew was false, or was recklessly careless about its veracity, and knew the King was not in a position to be sure about the true state of affairs, the King probably would kill that messenger.