Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Living Car Free
Reload this Page >

Why Ride-Sharing Increases Congestion

Notices
Living Car Free Do you live car free or car light? Do you prefer to use alternative transportation (bicycles, walking, other human-powered or public transportation) for everyday activities whenever possible? Discuss your lifestyle here.

Why Ride-Sharing Increases Congestion

Old 07-27-18, 09:52 AM
  #1  
tandempower
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Why Ride-Sharing Increases Congestion

This article explains that ride-sharing increases traffic congestion instead of decreasing it, as forecasted.

The explosive growth of Uber and Lyft has created a new traffic problem for major U.S. cities and ride-sharing options such as UberPool and Lyft Line are exacerbating the issue by appealing directly to customers who would otherwise have taken transit, walked, biked or not used a ride-hail service at all, according to a new study.

https://9to5mac.com/2018/07/27/uber-lyft-social-impact/
I think the reason for this is only partly because some people prefer a private ride over other modes. I think the bigger reason is that people like not having to worry about parking and other responsibilities that come with driving your own car, but they still aren't satisfied with transit and biking because of various reasons, including infrastructure and cultural norms/aesthetics. In fact, in another thread I posted an article claiming that Uber sees its bike-shares being preferred over its ride-sharing where the bikes are available.


I think the overall problem with congestion is that no matter what options people have for transportation, there will be other people who flood the roads to take up whatever slack is left by those of us using alternative transportation. Ultimately that means as many motor-vehicles on the roads as can fit before congestion deters people from using them. The ride-sharing still reduces the need for parking spots, but it doesn't reduce congestion. Hopefully the dockless bike/scooter sharing will solve the last mile problem and give people an option to bypass the congestion altogether.


What is your opinion? Is there any solution to congestion? Will ride-sharing, autonomous and otherwise, continue to grow the total amount of traffic on the roads? If ride-sharing could somehow be cut back to the levels it was at before the advent of ride-sharing apps like Uber and Lyft, would that reduce congestion or would people just drive and/or take traditional taxis? Do you think congestion will always be an impetus for LCF, rather than LCF being a way to relieve and prevent congestion?
tandempower is offline  
Old 07-30-18, 11:40 AM
  #2  
TheLibrarian
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Hudson Valley, New York
Posts: 481

Bikes: 2014 Giant Roam

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think the only people using uber instead of their own car is if they plan on getting sloppy drunk or where parking is more expensive than a ride like at an airport.
TheLibrarian is offline  
Old 07-30-18, 12:35 PM
  #3  
indyfabz
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,198
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18391 Post(s)
Liked 15,465 Times in 7,306 Posts
Originally Posted by TheLibrarian
I think the only people using uber instead of their own car is if they plan on getting sloppy drunk or where parking is more expensive than a ride like at an airport.
Nope. These services have lured people into car trips they would not have otherwise taken. Living here in the big city I know several people who now Uber it when they used to walk or take public transit. Another side effect is that Uber, etc., drivers are far less courteous than cabs when it comes to picking up and dropping off people. Many of them just stop wherever its convenient without even attempting to pull over. One Lyft driver this morning stopped diagonally at a corner and was basically obstructing both crosswalks. Also, the much more common way to get a cab is to hail one. The cab stops, the passenger gets in and the cab pulls away. In downtown Philly, people order rides while still in their offices. The car shows up before they do and just sits there, often blocking a travel lane and/or crosswalk, until the passenger arrives. That can be minutes. See it all the time while unlocking my bike and preparing leave after work. That sort of thing happens even in my residential neighborhood with its relatively narrow, one-lane streets. Finally, since many drivers come from out of town they don't know how to get around. My neighborhood consists of nearly all one-way streets. A few doors down from my house there is a small street. It's one way south until you get to my block then it turns one way north, which means if you are going south you have to make a right onto my street. Lost count of the number of Uber and Lyft, drivers I have seen blatantly ignore the two large "Do Not Enter" signs and continue north.
indyfabz is offline  
Old 07-31-18, 12:37 PM
  #4  
tandempower
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by indyfabz
Nope. These services have lured people into car trips they would not have otherwise taken. Living here in the big city I know several people who now Uber it when they used to walk or take public transit. Another side effect is that Uber, etc., drivers are far less courteous than cabs when it comes to picking up and dropping off people. Many of them just stop wherever its convenient without even attempting to pull over. One Lyft driver this morning stopped diagonally at a corner and was basically obstructing both crosswalks. Also, the much more common way to get a cab is to hail one. The cab stops, the passenger gets in and the cab pulls away. In downtown Philly, people order rides while still in their offices. The car shows up before they do and just sits there, often blocking a travel lane and/or crosswalk, until the passenger arrives. That can be minutes. See it all the time while unlocking my bike and preparing leave after work. That sort of thing happens even in my residential neighborhood with its relatively narrow, one-lane streets. Finally, since many drivers come from out of town they don't know how to get around. My neighborhood consists of nearly all one-way streets. A few doors down from my house there is a small street. It's one way south until you get to my block then it turns one way north, which means if you are going south you have to make a right onto my street. Lost count of the number of Uber and Lyft, drivers I have seen blatantly ignore the two large "Do Not Enter" signs and continue north.
In many cases, the Uber driver is probably someone who would like to drive a taxi but can't because high prices keep demand down, and thus there aren't that many taxi driving jobs.
tandempower is offline  
Old 07-31-18, 01:27 PM
  #5  
wphamilton
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
So the reasoning here is ... out of the 0.1 % of the trips people take by bicycle, some small fraction of that tiny percentage takes an Uber instead and that causes traffic congestion?
wphamilton is offline  
Old 07-31-18, 01:41 PM
  #6  
tandempower
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by wphamilton
So the reasoning here is ... out of the 0.1 % of the trips people take by bicycle, some small fraction of that tiny percentage takes an Uber instead and that causes traffic congestion?
What you're saying is focused on the reality of the situation. Their focus in on making a rhetorical argument that attacks ride-sharing as a threat to transportation biking. It's just supposed to turn you against ride-sharing as a cyclist, not to actually explain traffic congestion. Doing that would involve blaming the vast numbers of individual car owner-operators, who fund the auto industry out of pocket, so blaming them is biting the hand that feeds you.
tandempower is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JoeyBike
Living Car Free
46
12-31-21 06:37 PM
Equinox
Advocacy & Safety
47
08-23-14 04:42 PM
Artkansas
Living Car Free
98
12-13-13 10:40 AM
gerv
Living Car Free
55
02-19-11 07:26 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.