Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Hybrid Bicycles
Reload this Page >

Comparing suspensions: Trek Dual Sport 4 vs Sirrus X 4.0

Search
Notices
Hybrid Bicycles Where else would you go to discuss these fun, versatile bikes?

Comparing suspensions: Trek Dual Sport 4 vs Sirrus X 4.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-21, 12:06 AM
  #1  
tony_swift
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Question Comparing suspensions: Trek Dual Sport 4 vs Sirrus X 4.0

The suspension system on the Sirrus, called Future Shock, is supposed to be great because it's lighter. However when compared to what's used on Trek's DS4, it isn't clear to me that it's superior, for the following reasons.
  1. On the DS4, because it's using fork suspension, the whole rider is being protected by the suspension, not just the rider's arms as is the case with the Future Shock.
  2. The suspension on the DS4 can be locked out, I didn't see a lock out feature on the Sirrus.
  3. The DS4 suspension has a longer length of travel.
What do you guys think about these points? Am I missing anything here?
tony_swift is offline  
Old 02-12-21, 06:57 AM
  #2  
DorkDisk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,212

Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 576 Post(s)
Liked 1,001 Times in 488 Posts
In the early 90s, MTBs were very popular. The skinny light steel bikes were very similar at that point to road bikes but the riding was evolving. Suspension was an obvious development and eventually two philosophies emerged at this early stage:

1/ suspend the rider
2/ suspend the bike

Suspend the bike used a fork; the advantage is that the wheel tracks the ground and improves traction. The disadvantage is weight and mechanical complexity.

Suspend the rider used a suspension stem; the advantage is comfort and simplicity but zero traction

For MTB, wheel traction is a huge asset. Suspension allows one to stay seated and roll over everything; greatly reducing fatigue and improving speed as one can focus on the fastest line.

Lately, suspension stems are coming back to the market for road and gravel bikes. This industry likes to rehash old ideas. FWIW, Hank D won 3 XC world championships with an Allsop stem for Team Ritchey before suspension forks took over.


DorkDisk is offline  
Old 02-12-21, 09:10 AM
  #3  
travbikeman
Senior Member
 
travbikeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Martinsburg WV Area
Posts: 1,704

Bikes: State 4130 Custom, Giant Trance 29

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 422 Post(s)
Liked 182 Times in 123 Posts
While I see the new Sirrus with the new suspension as really cool, I am always worried about proprietary parts. We had a recent thread on this forum (don't feel like looking for it) asking if regular Sirrus could be upgraded to this new suspension.

Looking at the schematics of this suspension, it involves replacing not just the headset, but the fork is a specific fork to the new suspension. Meaning to me, that you can't just change out one part for various upgrades with out changing the whole system.

Most likely not a big deal for anyone really wanting these bikes. But just food for thought if something breaks in the future and well, suspension does wear out and possibly break.

The fork suspensions are easily changed out for a better suspension or non suspension forks in the future.
travbikeman is offline  
Likes For travbikeman:
Old 02-12-21, 10:33 AM
  #4  
DorkDisk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,212

Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 576 Post(s)
Liked 1,001 Times in 488 Posts
Originally Posted by tony_swift
Am I missing anything here?
They're different bikes for different types of riding; I'd start there instead before comparing suspension systems.
DorkDisk is offline  
Old 02-12-21, 12:19 PM
  #5  
badger1
Senior Member
 
badger1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 5,124
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1581 Post(s)
Liked 1,189 Times in 605 Posts
Originally Posted by DorkDisk
They're different bikes for different types of riding; I'd start there instead before comparing suspension systems.
This. The comparison in the OP apples and oranges.
badger1 is online now  
Old 02-12-21, 12:27 PM
  #6  
badger1
Senior Member
 
badger1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 5,124
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1581 Post(s)
Liked 1,189 Times in 605 Posts
Originally Posted by travbikeman
While I see the new Sirrus with the new suspension as really cool, I am always worried about proprietary parts. We had a recent thread on this forum (don't feel like looking for it) asking if regular Sirrus could be upgraded to this new suspension.

Looking at the schematics of this suspension, it involves replacing not just the headset, but the fork is a specific fork to the new suspension. Meaning to me, that you can't just change out one part for various upgrades with out changing the whole system.

Most likely not a big deal for anyone really wanting these bikes. But just food for thought if something breaks in the future and well, suspension does wear out and possibly break.

The fork suspensions are easily changed out for a better suspension or non suspension forks in the future.
True, the FS system is frame-specific and completely proprietary. Normally, that would have been a deal-breaker for me; heck, I don't even like press-fit b/bs.

However, I knew that going in and, for me, the FS worked exactly as advertised, and did exactly what Specialized claims it does. I was comparing my older Sirrus with a new FS one; same tires/pressure/fit (I have a great LBS) -- I bought the bike (2019 X Comp, now the X 5.0). For me, the benefits were/are real and outweighed the drawbacks of proprietary stuff.
badger1 is online now  
Likes For badger1:
Old 02-15-21, 09:04 AM
  #7  
Speedway2
Senior Member
 
Speedway2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Thornhill, Canada
Posts: 754

Bikes: United Motocross BMX, Specialized Langster, Giant OCR, Marin Muirwoods, Globe Roll2, VROD:)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 238 Post(s)
Liked 404 Times in 245 Posts
tony_swift.....are you asking because you're thinking about buying a bike with either system? If yes....I'm wondering why you feel the need to.
I'm in the KISS camp and not a fan of budget suspension systems. They add weight, expense, potentially more maintenance/repair, etc.
Speedway2 is offline  
Old 03-14-21, 11:26 PM
  #8  
tony_swift
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Speedway2
tony_swift.....are you asking because you're thinking about buying a bike with either system? If yes....I'm wondering why you feel the need to.
I'm in the KISS camp and not a fan of budget suspension systems. They add weight, expense, potentially more maintenance/repair, etc.
I don't think that I need suspension, I just think that maybe it smooths out the ride and makes it easier.

Anyway after reading lots of posts about how suspension isn't good or required for the kind of riding I'm interested in, I decided to get an FX4.
tony_swift is offline  
Old 03-15-21, 07:40 AM
  #9  
Speedway2
Senior Member
 
Speedway2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Thornhill, Canada
Posts: 754

Bikes: United Motocross BMX, Specialized Langster, Giant OCR, Marin Muirwoods, Globe Roll2, VROD:)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 238 Post(s)
Liked 404 Times in 245 Posts
Originally Posted by tony_swift
I don't think that I need suspension, I just think that maybe it smooths out the ride and makes it easier.

Anyway after reading lots of posts about how suspension isn't good or required for the kind of riding I'm interested in, I decided to get an FX4.
Congrats on the FX4! It should give you many miles of enjoyment.

If you want to smooth out the ride a bit adjust the tire pressure(within specs). If you need a smoother ride then do your research on a different set of tires.

Post some pics. We love pics
Speedway2 is offline  
Old 03-15-21, 07:51 AM
  #10  
Mojo31
-------
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Tejas
Posts: 12,795
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9653 Post(s)
Liked 6,365 Times in 3,505 Posts
Originally Posted by tony_swift
I don't think that I need suspension, I just think that maybe it smooths out the ride and makes it easier.

Anyway after reading lots of posts about how suspension isn't good or required for the kind of riding I'm interested in, I decided to get an FX4.
Nice choice.

Suspensions do smooth out the ride, but they don't make it any easier from a cardio perspective. I have a Sirrus 4.0, and cross-shopped it with the FX4 last summer. Might have gone with the FX4, but couldn't find one. I found that the suspension on that type of bike is not needed.
Mojo31 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.