Comparing suspensions: Trek Dual Sport 4 vs Sirrus X 4.0
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Comparing suspensions: Trek Dual Sport 4 vs Sirrus X 4.0
The suspension system on the Sirrus, called Future Shock, is supposed to be great because it's lighter. However when compared to what's used on Trek's DS4, it isn't clear to me that it's superior, for the following reasons.
- On the DS4, because it's using fork suspension, the whole rider is being protected by the suspension, not just the rider's arms as is the case with the Future Shock.
- The suspension on the DS4 can be locked out, I didn't see a lock out feature on the Sirrus.
- The DS4 suspension has a longer length of travel.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,212
Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 576 Post(s)
Liked 1,001 Times
in
488 Posts
In the early 90s, MTBs were very popular. The skinny light steel bikes were very similar at that point to road bikes but the riding was evolving. Suspension was an obvious development and eventually two philosophies emerged at this early stage:
1/ suspend the rider
2/ suspend the bike
Suspend the bike used a fork; the advantage is that the wheel tracks the ground and improves traction. The disadvantage is weight and mechanical complexity.
Suspend the rider used a suspension stem; the advantage is comfort and simplicity but zero traction
For MTB, wheel traction is a huge asset. Suspension allows one to stay seated and roll over everything; greatly reducing fatigue and improving speed as one can focus on the fastest line.
Lately, suspension stems are coming back to the market for road and gravel bikes. This industry likes to rehash old ideas. FWIW, Hank D won 3 XC world championships with an Allsop stem for Team Ritchey before suspension forks took over.
1/ suspend the rider
2/ suspend the bike
Suspend the bike used a fork; the advantage is that the wheel tracks the ground and improves traction. The disadvantage is weight and mechanical complexity.
Suspend the rider used a suspension stem; the advantage is comfort and simplicity but zero traction
For MTB, wheel traction is a huge asset. Suspension allows one to stay seated and roll over everything; greatly reducing fatigue and improving speed as one can focus on the fastest line.
Lately, suspension stems are coming back to the market for road and gravel bikes. This industry likes to rehash old ideas. FWIW, Hank D won 3 XC world championships with an Allsop stem for Team Ritchey before suspension forks took over.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Martinsburg WV Area
Posts: 1,704
Bikes: State 4130 Custom, Giant Trance 29
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 422 Post(s)
Liked 182 Times
in
123 Posts
While I see the new Sirrus with the new suspension as really cool, I am always worried about proprietary parts. We had a recent thread on this forum (don't feel like looking for it) asking if regular Sirrus could be upgraded to this new suspension.
Looking at the schematics of this suspension, it involves replacing not just the headset, but the fork is a specific fork to the new suspension. Meaning to me, that you can't just change out one part for various upgrades with out changing the whole system.
Most likely not a big deal for anyone really wanting these bikes. But just food for thought if something breaks in the future and well, suspension does wear out and possibly break.
The fork suspensions are easily changed out for a better suspension or non suspension forks in the future.
Looking at the schematics of this suspension, it involves replacing not just the headset, but the fork is a specific fork to the new suspension. Meaning to me, that you can't just change out one part for various upgrades with out changing the whole system.
Most likely not a big deal for anyone really wanting these bikes. But just food for thought if something breaks in the future and well, suspension does wear out and possibly break.
The fork suspensions are easily changed out for a better suspension or non suspension forks in the future.
Likes For travbikeman:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,212
Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 576 Post(s)
Liked 1,001 Times
in
488 Posts
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 5,124
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1581 Post(s)
Liked 1,189 Times
in
605 Posts
While I see the new Sirrus with the new suspension as really cool, I am always worried about proprietary parts. We had a recent thread on this forum (don't feel like looking for it) asking if regular Sirrus could be upgraded to this new suspension.
Looking at the schematics of this suspension, it involves replacing not just the headset, but the fork is a specific fork to the new suspension. Meaning to me, that you can't just change out one part for various upgrades with out changing the whole system.
Most likely not a big deal for anyone really wanting these bikes. But just food for thought if something breaks in the future and well, suspension does wear out and possibly break.
The fork suspensions are easily changed out for a better suspension or non suspension forks in the future.
Looking at the schematics of this suspension, it involves replacing not just the headset, but the fork is a specific fork to the new suspension. Meaning to me, that you can't just change out one part for various upgrades with out changing the whole system.
Most likely not a big deal for anyone really wanting these bikes. But just food for thought if something breaks in the future and well, suspension does wear out and possibly break.
The fork suspensions are easily changed out for a better suspension or non suspension forks in the future.
However, I knew that going in and, for me, the FS worked exactly as advertised, and did exactly what Specialized claims it does. I was comparing my older Sirrus with a new FS one; same tires/pressure/fit (I have a great LBS) -- I bought the bike (2019 X Comp, now the X 5.0). For me, the benefits were/are real and outweighed the drawbacks of proprietary stuff.
Likes For badger1:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Thornhill, Canada
Posts: 754
Bikes: United Motocross BMX, Specialized Langster, Giant OCR, Marin Muirwoods, Globe Roll2, VROD:)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 238 Post(s)
Liked 404 Times
in
245 Posts
tony_swift.....are you asking because you're thinking about buying a bike with either system? If yes....I'm wondering why you feel the need to.
I'm in the KISS camp and not a fan of budget suspension systems. They add weight, expense, potentially more maintenance/repair, etc.
I'm in the KISS camp and not a fan of budget suspension systems. They add weight, expense, potentially more maintenance/repair, etc.
#8
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
tony_swift.....are you asking because you're thinking about buying a bike with either system? If yes....I'm wondering why you feel the need to.
I'm in the KISS camp and not a fan of budget suspension systems. They add weight, expense, potentially more maintenance/repair, etc.
I'm in the KISS camp and not a fan of budget suspension systems. They add weight, expense, potentially more maintenance/repair, etc.
Anyway after reading lots of posts about how suspension isn't good or required for the kind of riding I'm interested in, I decided to get an FX4.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Thornhill, Canada
Posts: 754
Bikes: United Motocross BMX, Specialized Langster, Giant OCR, Marin Muirwoods, Globe Roll2, VROD:)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 238 Post(s)
Liked 404 Times
in
245 Posts
If you want to smooth out the ride a bit adjust the tire pressure(within specs). If you need a smoother ride then do your research on a different set of tires.
Post some pics. We love pics
#10
-------
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Tejas
Posts: 12,795
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9653 Post(s)
Liked 6,365 Times
in
3,505 Posts
Suspensions do smooth out the ride, but they don't make it any easier from a cardio perspective. I have a Sirrus 4.0, and cross-shopped it with the FX4 last summer. Might have gone with the FX4, but couldn't find one. I found that the suspension on that type of bike is not needed.