Strava to remove Bluetooth and ANT+ from app
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,163
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times
in
18 Posts
Strava to remove Bluetooth and ANT+ from app
https://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/l...ant-app-440643
Since I'm not a Strava geek, could someone please explain to me why this may or may not be a good idea. I have always thought this was a great way to share data with fellow cyclist and make it a more interesting tool for riders.
Since I'm not a Strava geek, could someone please explain to me why this may or may not be a good idea. I have always thought this was a great way to share data with fellow cyclist and make it a more interesting tool for riders.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,794
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
204 Posts
I'm not sure anyone understands why they are doing this. They say it is causing the app to become unstable (I've never had an issue although I don't often use my phone directly), but rather than fix it (which should be possible given that it works fine for many 3rd party apps), they are simply removing the functionality.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
They made this move months back - I'm not sure why the news is suddenly gaining traction.
In any event, they're just removing the ability to pair with external sensors when you're recording your ride with your phone - this has no bearing on data collected via a dedicated bike computer. They said that sensor pairing functionality was causing stability issues with the app and that they felt they were better off without it.
In any event, they're just removing the ability to pair with external sensors when you're recording your ride with your phone - this has no bearing on data collected via a dedicated bike computer. They said that sensor pairing functionality was causing stability issues with the app and that they felt they were better off without it.
#4
Senior Member
I use a Garmin 820 edge or a Forerunner 735xt for data collection and am not negatively impacted by this. I will say though, I find Strava's reasoning to be quite dumb, to be perfectly frank (as was previously mentioned) if third party apps can do it, they should have no trouble doing it as well. A move like this really does make me question the savvyness of the software engineers they have, kinda makes me cast some doubt on their whole system...
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,190
Bikes: Ti, Mn Cr Ni Mo Nb, Al, C
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 942 Post(s)
Liked 526 Times
in
349 Posts
If your dead set on using your phone as a computer and need to pair sensors. Download the Wahoo Fitness app. You can pair your sensors to that and then link it/authorize to Strava (in your profile). You can also link RWGPS, TrainingPeaks, MapMyFitness, etc, etc... When you are done riding, it automatically uploads to Strava and any other app you have linked.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
If your dead set on using your phone as a computer and need to pair sensors. Download the Wahoo Fitness app. You can pair your sensors to that and then link it/authorize to Strava (in your profile). You can also link RWGPS, TrainingPeaks, MapMyFitness, etc, etc... When you are done riding, it automatically uploads to Strava and any other app you have linked.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,190
Bikes: Ti, Mn Cr Ni Mo Nb, Al, C
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 942 Post(s)
Liked 526 Times
in
349 Posts
This is what I need to do. I found out about the Strava news a month ago when I tried to pair my sensors in the app as a fall-back when/if my Bolt runs out of juice (for some reason, my auto-off keeps getting turned off, it'll drain after a ride and I'll find it dead just before the next ride); I'll try this with the Wahoo Fitness app instead - thanks!
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
I use a Garmin 820 edge or a Forerunner 735xt for data collection and am not negatively impacted by this. I will say though, I find Strava's reasoning to be quite dumb, to be perfectly frank (as was previously mentioned) if third party apps can do it, they should have no trouble doing it as well. A move like this really does make me question the savvyness of the software engineers they have, kinda makes me cast some doubt on their whole system...
#9
Full Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 466
Bikes: Trek Domane 4.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 193 Post(s)
Liked 50 Times
in
35 Posts
They made this move months back - I'm not sure why the news is suddenly gaining traction.
In any event, they're just removing the ability to pair with external sensors when you're recording your ride with your phone - this has no bearing on data collected via a dedicated bike computer. They said that sensor pairing functionality was causing stability issues with the app and that they felt they were better off without it.
In any event, they're just removing the ability to pair with external sensors when you're recording your ride with your phone - this has no bearing on data collected via a dedicated bike computer. They said that sensor pairing functionality was causing stability issues with the app and that they felt they were better off without it.
Anyway, I haven't had a reliability issue, but I assume Strava decided to focus instead on being just a collector of ride/run data, given that so many people have bike computers or running watches, etc.
That said, it's a bit annoying for those times you might want to track an activity but don't have a separate means (e.g., going for a ride while traveling)
#10
Senior Member
#11
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
Strava have only hinted at some unspecified stability issues, but I'm betting their primary concern is security. A number of articles this year have discussed Bluetooth vulnerabilities. Strava may have experienced some attempts by hackers to exploit Bluetooth to swamp the system, steal data or probe for future exploits.
I'd already been recording directly to other apps anyway, then uploading to Strava, so this won't affect my habits. Since 2016 I've used Cyclemeter or iPhone and Wahoo Fitness for both iPhone and Android, and settled on Wahoo Fitness because it's reliable (one glitch in three years), with low resource and power demands. If I decide to run it with the display visible it's easier to read at a glance than Strava -- although nowadays I only use the display on the trainer for intervals.
I didn't get any Bluetooth or ANT+ devices until this year and was already accustomed to Wahoo Fitness. The transition was easy.
My only complaint is that, at least at the freebie level, Strava doesn't display or make much use of some data, especially cadence. There doesn't appear to be any easy way to figure out my cadence for specific segments. But I mostly use the cadence sensor for indoor sessions and it's right in front of me. Outdoors, I know from occasionally using the Wahoo Fitness display on the handlebar, my cadence is pretty much 90 rpm like clockwork, other than steep climbs and downhills when I'm trying for a PR.
I'd already been recording directly to other apps anyway, then uploading to Strava, so this won't affect my habits. Since 2016 I've used Cyclemeter or iPhone and Wahoo Fitness for both iPhone and Android, and settled on Wahoo Fitness because it's reliable (one glitch in three years), with low resource and power demands. If I decide to run it with the display visible it's easier to read at a glance than Strava -- although nowadays I only use the display on the trainer for intervals.
I didn't get any Bluetooth or ANT+ devices until this year and was already accustomed to Wahoo Fitness. The transition was easy.
My only complaint is that, at least at the freebie level, Strava doesn't display or make much use of some data, especially cadence. There doesn't appear to be any easy way to figure out my cadence for specific segments. But I mostly use the cadence sensor for indoor sessions and it's right in front of me. Outdoors, I know from occasionally using the Wahoo Fitness display on the handlebar, my cadence is pretty much 90 rpm like clockwork, other than steep climbs and downhills when I'm trying for a PR.
#12
Senior Member
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 2,112
Bikes: SL8 Pro, TCR beater
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 987 Post(s)
Liked 584 Times
in
439 Posts
I'm not impacted by this decision - my Wahoo computer is connected to the Wahoo ELEMNT app on my phone who automatically transfers data to Strava.
Seems to me like a decision from upper management to save $ which is not a bad idea. It's also most likely because the majority of users are using a third party app instead of connecting their devices directly on Strava.
Seems to me like a decision from upper management to save $ which is not a bad idea. It's also most likely because the majority of users are using a third party app instead of connecting their devices directly on Strava.
Last edited by eduskator; 10-19-19 at 10:44 AM.
#14
Asleep at the bars
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA and Treasure Island, FL
Posts: 1,743
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 234 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times
in
135 Posts
I don't Strava much (I'm more of an rwgps person) but it's pretty clear that as a business they make money from Summit subscriptions. And I'd venture to say the vast majority of Summit subscribers don't track using the app but have a computer - this is trivial data for them to check and consider. In fact, maybe their app is used very little in general for sensor tracking even among non-paying users. So their app developers get tied up competing with dedicated computers for little to no benefit, constantly fixing obscure connectivity bugs on a plethora of systems, while to Strava important business features like better social interaction and in-app planning/routing are buried in the backlog. It just looks to me like they paused, lifted their heads to look forward past their nose, and gave a good think to what their business really is; then came to the conclusion the value of the app bike computer features aren't worth their utility to funnel users towards subscription, or retention. In fact, buggy features may be a net negative.
#15
Senior Member
I don't Strava much (I'm more of an rwgps person) but it's pretty clear that as a business they make money from Summit subscriptions. And I'd venture to say the vast majority of Summit subscribers don't track using the app but have a computer - this is trivial data for them to check and consider. In fact, maybe their app is used very little in general for sensor tracking even among non-paying users. So their app developers get tied up competing with dedicated computers for little to no benefit, constantly fixing obscure connectivity bugs on a plethora of systems, while to Strava important business features like better social interaction and in-app planning/routing are buried in the backlog. It just looks to me like they paused, lifted their heads to look forward past their nose, and gave a good think to what their business really is; then came to the conclusion the value of the app bike computer features aren't worth their utility to funnel users towards subscription, or retention. In fact, buggy features may be a net negative.
I'm in an beta test group for a bike computer and I can't begin to tell you the myriad of problems with each new sensor added - there isn't enough adherence to standards to make them all automatically work to the ANT+ profiles and many require tweaks (power meters are a special class of offender). And then they can break when either side goes through a software rev.
Good decision on Strava's perspective. Work on making it easier for their bike computer and app partners to integrate their features and spend the money on adding features and capability to the platform.
So now we'll probably listen to the vocal 1% ( if it's even that high) go nuts over this until it dies out.
#16
Junior Member
They made this move months back - I'm not sure why the news is suddenly gaining traction.
In any event, they're just removing the ability to pair with external sensors when you're recording your ride with your phone - this has no bearing on data collected via a dedicated bike computer. They said that sensor pairing functionality was causing stability issues with the app and that they felt they were better off without it.
In any event, they're just removing the ability to pair with external sensors when you're recording your ride with your phone - this has no bearing on data collected via a dedicated bike computer. They said that sensor pairing functionality was causing stability issues with the app and that they felt they were better off without it.
Last edited by audiomagnate; 10-19-19 at 02:03 PM.