BookFinder 

I have been following the rambling debate over department store bikes vs., for lack of a better term, “proline” bikes for a while.

With the stated assumption that everyone will assume the proline (Giant, Trek, other et al ad nauseum) frames are the best quality, the following question remains:

”Which frames are considered the best among the entry and mid-line bikes found at the big box stores?”

Please note in my signature that I own several bikes that cover the gamut. All of them work fine if the maintenance is kept up. I’m just curious about the nuances of the stated question related to frame quality. Thanks!

fietsbob

Look around... does the store have a bike service department ?

BookFinder 

There are four “LBS” shops in a neighboring town that carry various brands.

Of the so-called big-box stores, Dick’s is the only one with an in-house workbench.

Otherwise, help me understand how your question sheds light on the frame quality of the “non-proline” bikes?

Darth Lefty 

There are levels of quality in frames all across the spectrum, and have been forever. Two things about it, tubing and joinery. One result - more expensive frames are lighter while not giving up strength.

Even before the bike boom there were different levels of tube sets, "gas pipe" bikes at department stores and house brands of hi-tensile and straight gauge chromoly before you got to butted Reynolds or whatever. Nicer frames got forged pieces at the ends which are pretty stout without being heavy, while cheap frames get stamped ends that bend easily so they need to be pretty big.

And then there's the joinery, and that can vary a lot... Walmart bikes have terrible looking welds, but old electro-forged Schwinns were not exactly fancy but their welds look great because of the process. The people here who like old fancy Raleighs are often bemused by the brazing. But in general a nicer bike should have nicer joinery. A nice brazed bike has lugs with filed points, and upper level Cannondales have the welds smoothed out, for instance.

Leisesturm

The question as asked is unanswerable. Literally it depends. And it depends on a lot more than the 'brand' with these types of bikes. It depends on the day of the week, the phase of the moon ... seriously. Pick two department store brands and chances are good both were made at the same factory! So the only difference is what kind of day the guy who spot welded the bottom bracket was having. If not so good your frame may fail there one day. Or not. If you want to buy a cheap bike or bike frame buy the one that appeals to your eye the most. Call it good. Why make it any more complicated than that?

Cyclist0108

Any of the other frames that correspond to the other 19 naturally-occurring L-amino acids found in proteins should also work.

Are we talking about trans-proline or cis?

Phil_gretz

So, this assumption has several flaws that render the discussion useless. One is that the term "quality" corresponds in some way to "value" to its rider. The top professional frames have certain characteristics that are reflected in the performance of the frame when integrated to the top-level componentry and fitted to the rider's physique that can produce an impressive rider-bicycle system that performs at the very top tier of the sport. Top professional frames also have a consistent set of quality metrics that relate to precision of the dimensioning, finish, reliability/longevity for the intended use, etc.

Inexpensive frames also have a lesser expression of these very same characteristics, but at lower levels of expectation. Frankly, the riders who buy these bicycles likely have quite a bit lower ability to perceive the differences in any meaningful way. So, it all works out.

But the basic question is unanswerable unless you define your terms with greater precision.

Kedosto

In order to answer the question, one would be required to be thoroughly experienced with big box bicycles; experienced enough to appreciate the subtleties which could be assumed to exist between brands. I suspect few here carry such knowledge as the vast majority spend their time and money on the "proline" cycles. No doubt you'll receive plenty of responses, the bulk of which will be condescending or outright bashing -- few will be helpful.

I've been around cycling long enough to have been around big box bikes (BBB), but only in the context of repair or assistance for a neighbor or friend. I cannot provide a meaningful opinion on the frame quality as it has never been an issue. Recalling my BBB experiences, never has there been an issue with the frame. Sure, they are heavy, but they're built to a price point so in that regard the goal is met. I don't ever recall being shocked by ugly or obvious poor welds, but then again I don't expect to see $5k titanium bike weld quality either -- BBB are price point bikes.

I'm no expert, but I'd bet that BBB frames are made in the same factories as the "proline" bikes but with cheaper (heavier) materials.


-Kedosto

fietsbob

Remember Taipei Taiwan is not the same government, city and country as Beijing /Shanghai China...

but there has been a consolidation the many brands coming out of Taiwan, an Island,

are made by just a few very large manufacturers,,

and undoubtedly something similar has taken place on The Mainland , one party state..

Leisesturm

Nice work, bashing the efforts of other posters you didn't bother to read. Had you done so you might have noticed that none contained any 'bashing' or 'condescension'. Characterizing a question as vague or unanswerable without more qualification is not normally considered 'bashing'.

Leisesturm

I may have misspoke earlier. This answer was not helpful. Indicative of some erudition on behalf of the poster, possibly. Entertaining ... possibly. Alas, ultimately unhelpful, however.

Darth Lefty 

I’m confused, I thought we were talking about R/C car bodies and which tires are better for blue groove tracks

burnthesheep

REI..........they have their own in-store brand these days from greenway cruisers all the way up to pretty expensive stuff. They also have a workshop in the store.

Then again, a brand new low-end Trek or Giant is still probably in the long run going to cost less than a department store bike after you have to toss the department store one in the trash when one of the crap hard-to-replace components fail.

There's a reason the Giants and Treks and such use the components they use. They can be maintained and replaced.

Department stores put parts on that the expectation is you will toss the entire bike in the trash before you need a new cassette, chain, brake pads, or shift cables. Shoot, I don't know of anyone I've ever know who owned a Walmart style BSO who even ever needed to lube the chain! The most common failure being a popped tire and a shock at the price of a tire and change at a LBS. I'd bet even then the owner is 2 seconds from considering tossing it in the dumpster behind the shop.

It's not necessarily about being "fancy" or "racy", it's about practicality and reliability. A Walmart or other "BSO" isn't meant to go 1000 to 10000 miles per year. It's meant to go maybe 1000 to 2000 miles......once, ever, over the course of maybe 10 years of a person riding for 15 minutes a time in the neighborhood. It's disposable in nearly entirely.

With the exception of some DA components, 105 and then Ultegra carry an expectation of some big miles per year on those groupsets. The cost per mile possibly cheaper than if you tried to force a BSO to go 6000 miles in a year.

Remember, you can always buy someone else's mistake. A new Giant Contend is like $650. I'd suspect used could be had for $400.

All that to say..........the frame on a department store BSO won't matter when it's in the trash anyway after less than 1000 miles of use.

shelbyfv

I doubt a cyclist with any ability to judge gives much thought to frame quality of BSOs from box stores. What would be the point? A competent and knowledgeable cyclist on a budget will go used. There are folks who buy bikes from box stores, cycling enthusiasts aren't among them.

BookFinder 

Well, I appreciate the feedback. Reading back over my question and the responses, the question might have been phrased more concisely by asking, "What physical clues does one look for to identify a solidly built frame?"

Either way, the feedback is informative. Thanks again.

ramzilla

Since about 1950, the best cheap bikes wear the Fuji brand.

BookFinder 

mstateglfr 

mstateglfr 

- the frame should be straight and aligned. All brazeons(bottle holders, rack holders, etc) should be properly chased and square for proper fit. The dropouts should be square and the rear wheel should sit in the middle of the rear triangle. The head tube should be on the same plane as the seat tube.

Thats about it from a frame perspective. You cant tell if welds are good or bad based just on how they look. If the frame is square, it will ride as nicely as it has the ability to and thats really what is important in the end.

Kedosto

Nailed it.
/thread


-Kedosto

Wilfred Laurier

I have seen some darn ugly welds and joints on box store bikes - Huffy comes to mind in particular, as they used to have dropouts connected by crimping the chain and seat stays and spot welding.

Raleigh Canada made a lot of cheap steel frames for box stores, sold as Raleighs, and as Triumphs, among others. These had quite possibly the ugliest welds I have ever seen on a bike, but I do not recall seeing a failed frame, aside from some needing the rear triangle aligned.

But Raleigh doesn't make any of their own bikes now. All the box store bikes are made by contract manufacturers in Asia, and they are not great, but probable more than strong enough for regular riding. I believe they use cheaper materials but with much thicker tubes to make up for the material's lack of strength and for less precise QA during production... imagine a Giant brand aluminum frame, with engineers skilled at structural analysis and welding processes able to have strong frames made with thin walled, differentially butted and profiled members... now compare that to a company producing box store bikes - they will use much thicker aluminum to make up for the less-carefully welded and shaped tubes... the frame might weigh 2X or 3X more, but has the same likelihood of failure as the Giant.

Some things to look for that are indicative of poor quality are one-piece 'Ashtabula' cranksets and bottom brackets - these have never been put on good quality bikes AFAIK, and frame dropouts that are just cut or stamped from a flat plate, compared to dropouts that are forged or have an otherwise more complicated shape.

Phil_gretz

Um. Schwinn Super Sport?

BookFinder 

Thank you. This is the answer that gets to what I intended to ask.
Looking at the precision of the welds on my most recent bikes, I'm thinking the frames are welded using an automated process on a line.

ramzilla

I've got an old Schwinn "Sidewinder" (26" wheeled 7 speed mountainbike) that I've been riding up & down the beach for the last ten years. I usually hose it down after a beach ride if enough sand and salt water get splashed on it. I bought it at WalMart. It's a steel bike that weighs a ton. I've changed the grip shifters to thumbies. Replaced shift & brake cables, brake calipers, seat, chain, freewheel, tires, tubes, etc., etc., etc.. Never had any problems getting brand new replacement parts or doing repairs. (Parts for it are cheap). Of course, being born in post WW2 1950's I learned how to repair my own bike by the time I was around 10 years old. My god, life was so different in the 60's than it is now. It's sad to see young kids now a days that don't even know how to operate a screwdriver. There's absolutely nothing wrong with most of the inexpensive Wally World bikes. (Of course, some of them really are trash). We're just living in a time when most people have no idea how to maintain and repair simple machines.

Last ride 76 

Yup.