Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Guess I *won't* be going tubeless

Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Guess I *won't* be going tubeless

Old 10-06-18, 10:06 AM
  #51  
DrIsotope
Non omnino gravis
 
DrIsotope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: SoCal, USA!
Posts: 8,553

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4905 Post(s)
Liked 1,731 Times in 958 Posts
Originally Posted by cyccommute
Okay smart guy, go google how to clean up sealant and see the efforts that people have to go through to remove it. Do you really think that you can dissolve the coral that sometimes forms inside of tires with just "a damp cloth"? The issue you seem to be missing is that this is dry and has been for a few days now. It's not drips left over from filling the tire.

Here we have a 700x35 Panaracer Gravelking SK, which has been hanging from the ceiling of my workshop for over a year. Note how I have to use special tools and techniques to remove it.



I mean, this isn't conjecture from down at the coop, but I think it goes toward proving a point.
__________________
DrIsotope is offline  
Old 10-06-18, 10:21 AM
  #52  
La Tortue
Full Member
 
La Tortue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 236
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times in 27 Posts
Yep, I get your point. I use the same special tools and solvent as you do and it rolls off the same way.
La Tortue is offline  
Old 10-06-18, 10:57 AM
  #53  
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,385
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,685 Times in 2,509 Posts
one of the guys at the lbs jokingly told me the proper way to mount a tubeless tire was to pump it up until it blew off. Sounds like the OOB bike shop the coop bought out might have used that same technique. Not sure how you get sealant all over everything under normal procedures.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 10-06-18, 11:13 AM
  #54  
MattTheHat 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
MattTheHat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,631

Bikes: 2021 S-Works Turbo Creo SL, 2020 Specialized Roubaix Expert

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 762 Post(s)
Liked 4,024 Times in 1,425 Posts
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
Here we have a 700x35 Panaracer Gravelking SK, which has been hanging from the ceiling of my workshop for over a year. Note how I have to use special tools and techniques to remove it.



I mean, this isn't conjecture from down at the coop, but I think it goes toward proving a point.
kinda looks fun. Reminds me of letting Elmer’s glue dry on our hands in art class in 5th grade and then peeling it off.

-Matt
MattTheHat is offline  
Old 10-06-18, 11:25 AM
  #55  
DrIsotope
Non omnino gravis
 
DrIsotope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: SoCal, USA!
Posts: 8,553

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4905 Post(s)
Liked 1,731 Times in 958 Posts
It’s oddly soothing. While we were supposed to be doing something else, my daughter and I peeled sealant off of the inside of two tires for a solid 20 minutes.
DrIsotope is offline  
Old 10-06-18, 12:50 PM
  #56  
trailangel
Senior Member
 
trailangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 4,848

Bikes: Schwinn Varsity

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1931 Post(s)
Liked 742 Times in 422 Posts
I'm having good luck with Finishline Multiseal on 2.25 MTB tires. Doesn't dry up. I had it in tire for 5 months and still all liquid when I took tire off.
trailangel is offline  
Old 10-07-18, 09:20 AM
  #57  
cyccommute 
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,335

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,192 Times in 2,352 Posts
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
Here we have a 700x35 Panaracer Gravelking SK, which has been hanging from the ceiling of my workshop for over a year. Note how I have to use special tools and techniques to remove it.



I mean, this isn't conjecture from down at the coop, but I think it goes toward proving a point.
I don’t see a “damp cloth” anywhere. And 2 people putting in a “solid” 20 minutes is 40 minutes of pretty hard work.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 10-07-18, 09:44 AM
  #58  
DrIsotope
Non omnino gravis
 
DrIsotope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: SoCal, USA!
Posts: 8,553

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4905 Post(s)
Liked 1,731 Times in 958 Posts
Originally Posted by trailangel
I'm having good luck with Finishline Multiseal on 2.25 MTB tires. Doesn't dry up. I had it in tire for 5 months and still all liquid when I took tire off.
I've been very tempted, as we have this thing with summer heat-- but I've also read, and been told by several people that it simply doesn't work above ~50psi. One of the mechanics at the LBS tried it in 700x25, got a puncture, and it just blew all 2oz right out the hole. I want it to work so, so much, because it would be nice not to go through almost 2 quarts of sealant a year (5 wheelsets!)

Originally Posted by cyccommute
I don’t see a “damp cloth” anywhere. And 2 people putting in a “solid” 20 minutes is 40 minutes of pretty hard work.
Please, please stop editing your posts right after you make them. Beyond that, dude... let it go. You don't know what you're talking about, and the sheer force of your lack of knowledge on the subject keeps generating gifs.



I honestly don't know what your problem is with tubeless. You don't like it, that's fine. But is it absolutely necessary to cloud every single thread in which the word "tubeless" occurs with your own brand of misinformation?
__________________
DrIsotope is offline  
Old 10-07-18, 09:59 AM
  #59  
BlazingPedals
Senior Member
 
BlazingPedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle of da Mitten
Posts: 12,481

Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, Catrike Speed

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1513 Post(s)
Liked 734 Times in 455 Posts
Originally Posted by MattTheHat
Interesting. I weigh 230. LOTS of pressure on every part of that tire when I'm humping it down a hill at a fairly high rate of speed. Even more so when cornering at speed.

Maybe when the tires were put on the original rims the bead could have been damaged. I honestly don't think that's likely, but it's possible. Short of finding some damage on the tires I don't think I'm going to try running tubeless again. Tubes just aren't enough trouble to risk a blow out while riding.

-Matt
A tire with a tube in it could have blown off the same way, given the same... whatever did it. Which is to say there's nothing special about tubed tires that would have prevented a blow-off. I guess you can rule out pinched tube, at least.
BlazingPedals is offline  
Old 10-07-18, 10:05 AM
  #60  
cyccommute 
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,335

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,192 Times in 2,352 Posts
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
Please, please stop editing your posts right after you make them.
To be a bit childish...make me! Honestly, I’m allow to change posts whenever I like. I usually refrain from changing posts after someone has quoted them but up to that point, I can and will make changes as I wish.

Originally Posted by DrIsotope
Beyond that, dude... let it go. You don't know what you're talking about, and the sheer force of your lack of knowledge on the subject keeps generating gifs.

Your implication in your post was that is “easy” and the latex comes off with water. Your gif demonstrates my point. The water does nothing. You could just use a cloth and mechanically remove the dried latex but it’s still a lot of work.

As for my “lack of knowledge”, I do know a thing or two about chemistry. I also know a thing or two about bicycles.

Originally Posted by DrIsotope
I honestly don't know what your problem is with tubeless. You don't like it, that's fine. But is it absolutely necessary to cloud every single thread in which the word "tubeless" occurs with your own brand of misinformation?
I said nothing about having problems with tubeless in my post. I’ve not said anything about tubeless one way or the other in this thread. I was addressing how to remove dried latex. You turned this into an argument about tubeless because you do that just about every time I post something. Your posts have show quite clearly exactly the point I was trying to make. It takes a lot of work to remove dried latex from just about anything.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 10-07-18, 10:09 AM
  #61  
BillyD
Administrator
 
BillyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 32,976

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92

Mentioned: 325 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11950 Post(s)
Liked 6,595 Times in 3,463 Posts
If you guys can't get along then maybe somebody should move along.
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
BillyD is offline  
Old 10-07-18, 01:48 PM
  #62  
u235
Senior Member
 
u235's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,185
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 437 Post(s)
Liked 133 Times in 86 Posts
I've had a lot of dried sealant all over my seat tube, pump, front der cable (bottom pull with pully), rear blinky and under seat bag. Came right off the first time I washed the bike. No different than the dirt and gave it no thought. It was Stan's if that matters. I'd think anyone that ever had a big leak experienced similar. Sticking to a pourous rough rubber tire is not the as smooth painted metal. An example... No one ever has had a hard time cleaning or removing liquid or dried latex sealant from their rim.

Last edited by u235; 10-07-18 at 01:58 PM.
u235 is offline  
Old 10-07-18, 02:07 PM
  #63  
Ferrouscious 
Some Weirdo
 
Ferrouscious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Rexburg, ID
Posts: 502

Bikes: '86 Schwinn Prelude, '91 Scott Sawtooth, '73 Raleigh "Grand 3"

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 223 Post(s)
Liked 141 Times in 92 Posts
I have those tires. Before I got them, I looked them up on the Googles and I got some mixed reviews. The reviewers said they were great right up until fourhundo to sixhundo milés. They would supposedly blow right off the rim. I personally have not ridden 4-6 hundo milés on the tires (they are winter tires only). My 25/28 tires [25 being width, 28 relative volume (that's how Spesh markets them)] say 85-95 psi on the sidewalls.
__________________
Somewhere, a village is missing its idiot.
Ferrouscious is offline  
Old 10-07-18, 02:21 PM
  #64  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18349 Post(s)
Liked 4,501 Times in 3,346 Posts
Originally Posted by BlazingPedals
A tire with a tube in it could have blown off the same way, given the same... whatever did it. Which is to say there's nothing special about tubed tires that would have prevented a blow-off. I guess you can rule out pinched tube, at least.
I've wondered if there is any fundamental difference between running tube tires or tubeless (or tubes in tubeless tires).

Obviously tires remain inflated and stay in place due to a difference between atmospheric pressure outside of the tire, and inflated pressure inside the tire. If somehow one increased the air pressure between the bead and rim, there would be nothing to keep the bead from floating around. Nonetheless, that wouldn't really occur in a properly sealed tire.

And, my experience with tubeless so far (23mm), is that the tire fits tightly on the rim.

There are two factors with tire pressure and tire sizes.

PSI measures the outward pressure of the air on the tire, and is independent of tire size. So, having a bike tire or a truck tire at 100 PSI, the outward pressure is the same.

However, tire size apparently affects the stretch on the sidewall. So, the larger the tire at the same pressure, the more stretching force one puts on the sidewall and the bead.

I can't find the formulas at the moment, but they're on the web somewhere.

Ahh... LaPlace's law.
Pressure

So, as far as I can tell, the surface tension on the tire sidewalls vary with the cross sectional circumference (I think).

Anyway, if one has a 23mm tire at 100 PSI, and a 32mm tire at 100 PSI, then the sidewall tension of the larger tire should be 32/23, or about 1.4 times the sidewall tension. I think Thankfully I'm not an engineer.

This means that the bead interface of the 32mm tire must be 1.4 times stronger than the 23mm tire if the pressure is the same.
CliffordK is offline  
Old 10-07-18, 06:59 PM
  #65  
pvillemasher
Senior Member
 
pvillemasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Austin Texas USA
Posts: 343

Bikes: 1989 Trek 400, 2000 Lemond Buenos Aires, 2013 GT Attack, 2017 Lynskey R250

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 126 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 10 Posts
You guys who run tubeless must get a lot of flats. I get one maybe every 1,000 miles or so max, 3 or 4 times a year.
From what I read in this thread about sealant, and from what I'm seeing in the videos in this thread, ain't no way it's for me. Jeez.
pvillemasher is offline  
Old 10-07-18, 07:44 PM
  #66  
motrheadsroadie
Senior Member
 
motrheadsroadie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Posts: 863

Bikes: stinner cx, paramount track

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 262 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 7 Posts
this is not rocket science. most of yall (esp the op) seem to be the most punishing types of ppl to deal with in the shop environment.

sealant leaves a residue on brake tracks and rotors that will make cantis AND discs sqeal.
motrheadsroadie is offline  
Old 10-07-18, 08:44 PM
  #67  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18349 Post(s)
Liked 4,501 Times in 3,346 Posts
Originally Posted by pvillemasher
You guys who run tubeless must get a lot of flats. I get one maybe every 1,000 miles or so max, 3 or 4 times a year.
From what I read in this thread about sealant, and from what I'm seeing in the videos in this thread, ain't no way it's for me. Jeez.
I don't quite have 1000 miles on the front yet, but so far no flats, no leaks, and haven't re-pumped it yet.

But, yes, that is about what I get, one flat every 1000 miles or so... perhaps a half dozen a year (including a couple of bikes, trailers, etc).

I have to wonder how long until we start seeing some heavy-duty road tires coming out in tubeless.

Perhaps some vendors are waiting for others to shake out the problems before putting their flagship tires out as tubeless.

Perhaps the Gator Hardshell in tubeless?

They're coming. Perhaps in a decade we'll all be asking what tubes are

Very few car tires in the USA from the last 10 years take tubes, and most of those would be very vintage tires.
CliffordK is offline  
Old 10-07-18, 08:55 PM
  #68  
GlennR
On Your Left
 
GlennR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373

Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303

Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times in 1,187 Posts
Originally Posted by MattTheHat
The tire is 32mm. ...

Front at 80 PSI, rear at 100 PSI. Which is probably too much air.

-Matt
I have 32mm Bontrager AW2 tires on Zipp 30 Course and run 60 front and 65 rear.
GlennR is offline  
Old 10-07-18, 08:56 PM
  #69  
DrIsotope
Non omnino gravis
 
DrIsotope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: SoCal, USA!
Posts: 8,553

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4905 Post(s)
Liked 1,731 Times in 958 Posts
Schwalbe Marathon Almotion is a step in that direction. It's a shame they're one of the most expensive non-fat tires you can buy. I paid a fair amount less for the tires on my car.

I don't get the tubeless-resistance of most of the big manufacturers, particularly Continental. Goodyear looks promising, but they're nearly as expensive as Schwalbe, who set the bar for absurdly expensive tires.
__________________
DrIsotope is offline  
Old 10-08-18, 07:58 AM
  #70  
MattTheHat 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
MattTheHat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,631

Bikes: 2021 S-Works Turbo Creo SL, 2020 Specialized Roubaix Expert

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 762 Post(s)
Liked 4,024 Times in 1,425 Posts
Originally Posted by BlazingPedals
A tire with a tube in it could have blown off the same way, given the same... whatever did it. Which is to say there's nothing special about tubed tires that would have prevented a blow-off. I guess you can rule out pinched tube, at least.
You know, that's an excellent point. Pressure is pressure.

-Matt
MattTheHat is offline  
Old 10-08-18, 11:27 AM
  #71  
ericpmoss
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I buy into Mavic's line on tubeless -- it's all about tolerances. Certain Velocity rims are notorious for being a bit undersized, which makes tire installation (too) easy. Slightly undersized tire beads work well in that case, but most tires blow off if run tubeless at pressures above 'soft'. Automobile wheels and tires are far more reliable in this regard, partly because of standards and partly because of much wider, thicker surfaces that seal. The bicycle industry is not nearly picky enough about tolerances between brands, IMO.

I'm not allowed to post URLs, so wind your way to

engineerstalk dot mavic dot com/en/road-ust-tubeless-bike-wheels-easy-safe-fast/
ericpmoss is offline  
Old 10-08-18, 12:24 PM
  #72  
chaadster
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,422

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3125 Post(s)
Liked 1,694 Times in 1,025 Posts
This is a lot of threads for something relatively simple to understand: if the tire did blow off the rim, there was either excessive pressure or a bead/rim failure.

The big question is whether the tire, a 32c Specialized Roubaix Pro 2Bliss, was, in fact, under spec pressure, which @MattTheHat says is indicated as 115psi on the sidewall, but which Specialized publishes as 90psi max. Was the sidewall marking double-checked, Matt? It's curious, because 115psi is the listed pressure max for the Roubaix Road Tubeless 23/25c, so given the silly nomenclature, it seems possible that reading the specs, one might easily mixup the tires' max pressure rating.

If a max pressure mixup ocurred, then overpressurization is the culprit.

If the RP2bliss was not overinflated by 10psi or so, then either the bead failed allowing air to push out, or the rim yielded, allowing the bead to be pushed out. Either way, the tire and rim should go to the LBS for inspection.

It's certainly possible, if unlikely, that Specialized erred by printing the wrong maximum inflation pressure on the 32c RP2bliss, but that just takes us back to the overinflation scenario.
chaadster is offline  
Old 10-08-18, 12:59 PM
  #73  
jimincalif
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Meridian, ID
Posts: 2,333

Bikes: '96 Trek 850, '08 Specialized Roubaix Comp, '18 Niner RLT RDO

Mentioned: 56 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 569 Post(s)
Liked 123 Times in 83 Posts
Originally Posted by chaadster
It's certainly possible, if unlikely, that Specialized erred by printing the wrong maximum inflation pressure on the 32c RP2bliss, but that just takes us back to the overinflation scenario.
Maybe Specialized has recently revised its max pressure spec for these tires? Matt's tire might have been produced prior to this?
jimincalif is offline  
Old 10-08-18, 01:52 PM
  #74  
MattTheHat 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
MattTheHat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,631

Bikes: 2021 S-Works Turbo Creo SL, 2020 Specialized Roubaix Expert

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 762 Post(s)
Liked 4,024 Times in 1,425 Posts
Originally Posted by chaadster
This is a lot of threads for something relatively simple to understand: if the tire did blow off the rim, there was either excessive pressure or a bead/rim failure.

The big question is whether the tire, a 32c Specialized Roubaix Pro 2Bliss, was, in fact, under spec pressure, which @MattTheHat says is indicated as 115psi on the sidewall, but which Specialized publishes as 90psi max. Was the sidewall marking double-checked, Matt? It's curious, because 115psi is the listed pressure max for the Roubaix Road Tubeless 23/25c, so given the silly nomenclature, it seems possible that reading the specs, one might easily mixup the tires' max pressure rating.

If a max pressure mixup ocurred, then overpressurization is the culprit.

If the RP2bliss was not overinflated by 10psi or so, then either the bead failed allowing air to push out, or the rim yielded, allowing the bead to be pushed out. Either way, the tire and rim should go to the LBS for inspection.

It's certainly possible, if unlikely, that Specialized erred by printing the wrong maximum inflation pressure on the 32c RP2bliss, but that just takes us back to the overinflation scenario.
Nope, I definitely made a mistake on the sidewall pressure rating. The 115 PSI number was for the Continental GP4000SII 28mm tire which I put on the bike after the Roubaix Pros. The pressure on the sidewall matched the pressure shown on the Specialized page I quoted earlier: 75:95 PSI. I examined the tire very carefully. I found no damage on the tire at all, not on the top part of the tire, not on the sidewall, not on the bead area, nothing.

So, yes, the tire was run slightly over pressure. But when left over night, the tire was not over pressure. I'm not sure what it would take to blow the tire off the rim, but my gut feel would be something like 150% of the max pressure specification. I'm surprised the tire blew off the rim at all, having not been inflated over 101.5 PSI. I'm definitely surprised it blew off at 90 PSI. And I'm surprised that it blew off just sitting there at a lower pressure than while being ridden under load at the higher inflation. Lots of surprises for me.

I'll retire these Roubaix Pros out of caution. I'll eventually give tubeless another shot when I find some other tire that I want to try.


-Matt
MattTheHat is offline  
Old 10-08-18, 01:54 PM
  #75  
Rayzorx
Junior Member
 
Rayzorx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pvillemasher
You guys who run tubeless must get a lot of flats. I get one maybe every 1,000 miles or so max, 3 or 4 times a year.
From what I read in this thread about sealant, and from what I'm seeing in the videos in this thread, ain't no way it's for me. Jeez.
So I’m one of the “you guys” that is running tubeless, and I beg to differ with getting a lot of flats.
I purchased a new Giant Defy Adv. Pro 1 in March 2018 and it came with Giant’s 25mm Gavia AC1 brand tubeless tires on the SLR wheels. To date, I have put over 3250 miles on the bike.
The original tires were changed out at 1800 miles with not one flat. At that point they were replaced with the same AC1’s but moved up to a 28mm size. I just completed 8 days riding across Utah, and a 3 day/300 mile trip down PCH1 in California. Again, not one flat. I run 100 psi in the rear and 90 psi int the front, and I weigh 145 lbs.(65.77k)

If you’re getting a flat every 1000 miles, maybe you should reconsider the tubeless option.
Rayzorx is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.