Pon Bike
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 7,085
Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 87 Times
in
67 Posts
Pon Bike
This web site is interesting. I didn't know they are leasing and also doing roadside assistance. Take a look at the brands they own.https://pon.bike/
#2
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10965 Post(s)
Liked 7,492 Times
in
4,189 Posts
Pon Holdings owns a handful of quality bike brands, a handful of junk bike brands, has distribution rights in NL to a bunch of high end car brands, and has bought some bike shops recently.
I guess the site is interesting?...you can lease a family commuting ebike in NL or a bike in Germany. Cool, I guess. You can have someone drive to you when you are in NL and have a flat, but cant fix it. Cool, I guess.
The one thing I guess I do appreciate is that Pon hasnt torpedoed any of their quality brands...yet. Cannondale, Santa Cruz, and Cervelo are are still good.
Really though, Pon just directly owns Cervelo, Santa Cruz, some Euro brands, and also owns Dorel Sports. And Dorel then owns Cannondale as well as a bunch of brands that used to be good but were torpedoed in various ways thru the years by being sold and watered down.
I guess the site is interesting?...you can lease a family commuting ebike in NL or a bike in Germany. Cool, I guess. You can have someone drive to you when you are in NL and have a flat, but cant fix it. Cool, I guess.
The one thing I guess I do appreciate is that Pon hasnt torpedoed any of their quality brands...yet. Cannondale, Santa Cruz, and Cervelo are are still good.
Really though, Pon just directly owns Cervelo, Santa Cruz, some Euro brands, and also owns Dorel Sports. And Dorel then owns Cannondale as well as a bunch of brands that used to be good but were torpedoed in various ways thru the years by being sold and watered down.
#3
Must be symmetrical
Required reading on Pon
Even if you're not a fan or regular reader, this is worth it
https://bikesnobnyc.com/2022/10/11/shell-game/
https://bikesnobnyc.com/2022/10/11/shell-game/
Last edited by Frkl; 12-21-23 at 11:30 AM.
Likes For Frkl:
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 7,085
Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 87 Times
in
67 Posts
It appears that Dorel Industries is the parent corporation of Dorel Sports which owns the various brands including Cannondale. https://www.bicycleretailer.com/indu...s-pon-holdings
MONTRÉAL (BRAIN) — Dorel Industries has completed its sale of Dorel Sports — which includes Cannondale, Schwinn, GT, Mongoose and other bike brands — to Pon Holdings, for $810 million. The planned acquisition was announced in October.
Dorel Industries said the sale will return $390 million to shareholders in the form of a special dividend of $12 per share.
“We are very pleased to have completed the sale of Dorel Sports to a great company like Pon. On behalf of the Board of Directors, I again thank the Dorel Sports team for their commitment to Dorel and their great achievements,” said Martin Schwartz, Dorel Industries' President and CEO.
“We believe that with this sale, Dorel has realized full value for Dorel Sports, for the benefit of Dorel and our shareholders,” Schwartz added.
MONTRÉAL (BRAIN) — Dorel Industries has completed its sale of Dorel Sports — which includes Cannondale, Schwinn, GT, Mongoose and other bike brands — to Pon Holdings, for $810 million. The planned acquisition was announced in October.
Dorel Industries said the sale will return $390 million to shareholders in the form of a special dividend of $12 per share.
“We are very pleased to have completed the sale of Dorel Sports to a great company like Pon. On behalf of the Board of Directors, I again thank the Dorel Sports team for their commitment to Dorel and their great achievements,” said Martin Schwartz, Dorel Industries' President and CEO.
“We believe that with this sale, Dorel has realized full value for Dorel Sports, for the benefit of Dorel and our shareholders,” Schwartz added.
#5
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10965 Post(s)
Liked 7,492 Times
in
4,189 Posts
Even if you're not a fan or regular reader, this is worth it
https://bikesnobnyc.com/2022/10/11/shell-game/
https://bikesnobnyc.com/2022/10/11/shell-game/
Seems like an article that expects perfection(Snob's definition of course) and rejects anything less.
Really though, what am I supposed to take away from that? Why isnt is acceptable for a company have the import rights for some car brands and also own some bike brands? Or is the takeaway that if I dislike an oil company sponsoring things, I have to also not use anything from Pon's brands because they have the rights to import some vehicle brands to NL?
...I think the 2nd interpretation is what the take away is supposed to be. If that is the correct takeaway, all I can say is 'meh'. It isnt applicable to anyone that isnt also outraged over an oil company sponsoring something. So given that, the article was far from 'worth it'.
#6
Senior Member
In general, I’m not interested in helping holding companies with my money, if I can help it.
But it is becoming increasingly difficult to avoid these global black holes.
But it is becoming increasingly difficult to avoid these global black holes.
Likes For Alan K:
#7
Deraill this!
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 620
Bikes: 18 Cdale Quick 1, 94 S-Works M2, 98 730 Multitrak, and a few others
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Liked 434 Times
in
251 Posts
I read of the sale months ago - call me crazy but find the idea of a Dutch company purchasing major bike brands a positive thing.
Now we wait...
Now we wait...
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Oahu, HI
Posts: 1,396
Bikes: 89 Paramount OS 84 Fuji Touring Series III New! 2013 Focus Izalco Ergoride
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 285 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 74 Times
in
54 Posts
I dont know what I am supposed to take away from that article. Like really, what was Snob's point? As usual, its some good points mixed in with unrealistic expectations that are formed in Snob's mind and applied to others(companies and people).
Seems like an article that expects perfection(Snob's definition of course) and rejects anything less.
Really though, what am I supposed to take away from that? Why isnt is acceptable for a company have the import rights for some car brands and also own some bike brands? Or is the takeaway that if I dislike an oil company sponsoring things, I have to also not use anything from Pon's brands because they have the rights to import some vehicle brands to NL?
...I think the 2nd interpretation is what the take away is supposed to be. If that is the correct takeaway, all I can say is 'meh'. It isnt applicable to anyone that isnt also outraged over an oil company sponsoring something. So given that, the article was far from 'worth it'.
Seems like an article that expects perfection(Snob's definition of course) and rejects anything less.
Really though, what am I supposed to take away from that? Why isnt is acceptable for a company have the import rights for some car brands and also own some bike brands? Or is the takeaway that if I dislike an oil company sponsoring things, I have to also not use anything from Pon's brands because they have the rights to import some vehicle brands to NL?
...I think the 2nd interpretation is what the take away is supposed to be. If that is the correct takeaway, all I can say is 'meh'. It isnt applicable to anyone that isnt also outraged over an oil company sponsoring something. So given that, the article was far from 'worth it'.
If you follow BSNYC at all you know he likes to skewer Bike Advocates who take a holier-than-thou approach to cycling. Or the constant outrage over obstructions in the bike lane, as if obstructions in general aren't just a fact of life for anyone in NY.
scott s.
.
#9
Must be symmetrical
I dont know what I am supposed to take away from that article. Like really, what was Snob's point? As usual, its some good points mixed in with unrealistic expectations that are formed in Snob's mind and applied to others(companies and people).
Seems like an article that expects perfection(Snob's definition of course) and rejects anything less.
Really though, what am I supposed to take away from that? Why isnt is acceptable for a company have the import rights for some car brands and also own some bike brands? Or is the takeaway that if I dislike an oil company sponsoring things, I have to also not use anything from Pon's brands because they have the rights to import some vehicle brands to NL?
...I think the 2nd interpretation is what the take away is supposed to be. If that is the correct takeaway, all I can say is 'meh'. It isnt applicable to anyone that isnt also outraged over an oil company sponsoring something. So given that, the article was far from 'worth it'.
Seems like an article that expects perfection(Snob's definition of course) and rejects anything less.
Really though, what am I supposed to take away from that? Why isnt is acceptable for a company have the import rights for some car brands and also own some bike brands? Or is the takeaway that if I dislike an oil company sponsoring things, I have to also not use anything from Pon's brands because they have the rights to import some vehicle brands to NL?
...I think the 2nd interpretation is what the take away is supposed to be. If that is the correct takeaway, all I can say is 'meh'. It isnt applicable to anyone that isnt also outraged over an oil company sponsoring something. So given that, the article was far from 'worth it'.
Last edited by Frkl; 12-22-23 at 03:02 AM.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,491
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,479 Times
in
1,836 Posts
I separate riding bikes from the corporate machinations which involve every product which is sold in numbers over several dozen of by companies with more than a few employees.
Eventually Every One of Us supports, indirectly, things we deplore. Who owns which banks, which corporations do those banks fund? The real estate fiasco of 2008 etc showed that even banks couldn't figure out who held deeds or interest in their own properties ....
Just a joke .... people drove to bike races and crapped on the old Sky team for replacing Sky (who was leaving) with Ineos, which is apparently a petrochemical company .... or drive to those races in electric cars, which over a lifetime probably cause more harm than petrochemical cars ... people rant about global warming on computers, which are not all solar-powered ....
The worldwide web of financing and politics and backroom, under-the-table deals .... when I buy peanut butter I might be funding weapons for terrorists ... or weapons for "freedom fighters" .... (In fact, US taxes were funding death squads in central and south America for a while, and missiles for Iran ) With the complexity of all that, we have no idea who or what we might be supporting indirectly .... I just don't worry about it.
Cervelo makes some bikes I lust over but it they go downhill ... well, I will find other bikes over which to lust. So long as I have working bikes in my garage and can go riding .... i just don't care.
But it is a little bit interesting to follow all the connections sometimes ... so thanks to the people who post this stuff, whatever each of us make of it.
Eventually Every One of Us supports, indirectly, things we deplore. Who owns which banks, which corporations do those banks fund? The real estate fiasco of 2008 etc showed that even banks couldn't figure out who held deeds or interest in their own properties ....
Just a joke .... people drove to bike races and crapped on the old Sky team for replacing Sky (who was leaving) with Ineos, which is apparently a petrochemical company .... or drive to those races in electric cars, which over a lifetime probably cause more harm than petrochemical cars ... people rant about global warming on computers, which are not all solar-powered ....
The worldwide web of financing and politics and backroom, under-the-table deals .... when I buy peanut butter I might be funding weapons for terrorists ... or weapons for "freedom fighters" .... (In fact, US taxes were funding death squads in central and south America for a while, and missiles for Iran ) With the complexity of all that, we have no idea who or what we might be supporting indirectly .... I just don't worry about it.
Cervelo makes some bikes I lust over but it they go downhill ... well, I will find other bikes over which to lust. So long as I have working bikes in my garage and can go riding .... i just don't care.
But it is a little bit interesting to follow all the connections sometimes ... so thanks to the people who post this stuff, whatever each of us make of it.
#11
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,328
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3898 Post(s)
Liked 4,836 Times
in
2,229 Posts
Support your local bicycle builder. They can use the business.
Co-Motion, Calfee, Tallerico = my 'new' bikes.
Co-Motion, Calfee, Tallerico = my 'new' bikes.
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
#12
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10965 Post(s)
Liked 7,492 Times
in
4,189 Posts
It is a satire of purists who show outrage at one thing without self-reflection, yet benefit from something analogous (e.g. blissfully riding a bike from a company owned by a holding company that also sells cars) without realizing the analogy; who live in blissful ignorance of the complexity of the world in which they live, and for which they claim to know what's best. his point is not that it is or isn't acceptable, just that the outrage-class is rather selective and self-contradictory (without awareness of it) in their outrage.
He creates a position for others to hols and then he attacks and takes that position down.
That is both complex and basic at the same time.
#13
Senior Member
I’m sure someone will soon be along pointing out where do the local builders buy their tubes for creating their frames and other components.
At least something is better than nothing!
#14
Must be symmetrical
So it's a passive aggressive layered attack piece that likely goes at some of his own readers. And to make it work, he forces others into being simple in thought and understanding.
He creates a position for others to hols and then he attacks and takes that position down.
That is both complex and basic at the same time.
He creates a position for others to hols and then he attacks and takes that position down.
That is both complex and basic at the same time.
How outrageous that he constructs and then takes a position that he doesn't believe in, then so outrageously and exaggeratedly argues it, and in fact so much so that he actually shows the absurdity of the position he has adopted! Wow.
I can only assume that you understand completely what satire is: you do something you disagree with to a level of absurdity that suggests to an intelligent audience that in fact your actions are absurd. And thus, an author indicates that he or she disagrees with what they are arguing for.
Likes For Frkl:
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 7,085
Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 87 Times
in
67 Posts
Gee whiz, I did not realize what this would do.
I just wanted to let you all know about Pon Bike.
I just wanted to let you all know about Pon Bike.
#16
I’m a little Surly
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near the district
Posts: 2,422
Bikes: Two Cross Checks, a Karate Monkey, a Disc Trucker, and a VO Randonneur
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 699 Post(s)
Liked 1,294 Times
in
647 Posts
I dont know what I am supposed to take away from that article. Like really, what was Snob's point? As usual, its some good points mixed in with unrealistic expectations that are formed in Snob's mind and applied to others(companies and people).
Seems like an article that expects perfection(Snob's definition of course) and rejects anything less.
Really though, what am I supposed to take away from that? Why isnt is acceptable for a company have the import rights for some car brands and also own some bike brands? Or is the takeaway that if I dislike an oil company sponsoring things, I have to also not use anything from Pon's brands because they have the rights to import some vehicle brands to NL?
...I think the 2nd interpretation is what the take away is supposed to be. If that is the correct takeaway, all I can say is 'meh'. It isnt applicable to anyone that isnt also outraged over an oil company sponsoring something. So given that, the article was far from 'worth it'.
Seems like an article that expects perfection(Snob's definition of course) and rejects anything less.
Really though, what am I supposed to take away from that? Why isnt is acceptable for a company have the import rights for some car brands and also own some bike brands? Or is the takeaway that if I dislike an oil company sponsoring things, I have to also not use anything from Pon's brands because they have the rights to import some vehicle brands to NL?
...I think the 2nd interpretation is what the take away is supposed to be. If that is the correct takeaway, all I can say is 'meh'. It isnt applicable to anyone that isnt also outraged over an oil company sponsoring something. So given that, the article was far from 'worth it'.
Likes For Germany_chris:
#17
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10965 Post(s)
Liked 7,492 Times
in
4,189 Posts
Yes, you are exactly right, how insightful! He does exactly this!
How outrageous that he constructs and then takes a position that he doesn't believe in, then so outrageously and exaggeratedly argues it, and in fact so much so that he actually shows the absurdity of the position he has adopted! Wow.
I can only assume that you understand completely what satire is: you do something you disagree with to a level of absurdity that suggests to an intelligent audience that in fact your actions are absurd. And thus, an author indicates that he or she disagrees with what they are arguing for.
How outrageous that he constructs and then takes a position that he doesn't believe in, then so outrageously and exaggeratedly argues it, and in fact so much so that he actually shows the absurdity of the position he has adopted! Wow.
I can only assume that you understand completely what satire is: you do something you disagree with to a level of absurdity that suggests to an intelligent audience that in fact your actions are absurd. And thus, an author indicates that he or she disagrees with what they are arguing for.
The article was linked with a claim that it is required reading about Pon. That, to me, suggests the person is claiming Pon is at fault or frames Pon in a negative light. But the article is just a grumpy guy passive aggressively complaining about how some people dislike oil sponsorship while riding a bike made by a company that also imports ICE vehicles.
I just don't see why that is required reading about Pon. What exactly is Pon doing wrong? What is revealed about Pon?
That waswhybinasked what the point of the article was- because the article doesn't seem like required reading about Pon. Figured maybe I missed something. Ends up it just isn't required reading about Pon.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#18
Must be symmetrical
The article was linked with a claim that it is required reading about Pon. That, to me, suggests the person is claiming Pon is at fault or frames Pon in a negative light. But the article is just a grumpy guy passive aggressively complaining about how some people dislike oil sponsorship while riding a bike made by a company that also imports ICE vehicles.
I just don't see why that is required reading about Pon. What exactly is Pon doing wrong? What is revealed about Pon?
That waswhybinasked what the point of the article was- because the article doesn't seem like required reading about Pon. Figured maybe I missed something. Ends up it just isn't required reading about Pon.
I just don't see why that is required reading about Pon. What exactly is Pon doing wrong? What is revealed about Pon?
That waswhybinasked what the point of the article was- because the article doesn't seem like required reading about Pon. Figured maybe I missed something. Ends up it just isn't required reading about Pon.
But again, you are correct that Pon isn't doing anything wrong. That is Bikesnob's point.
Likes For Frkl:
#19
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10965 Post(s)
Liked 7,492 Times
in
4,189 Posts
It's probably not even worth pointing out, but the "required reading" bit was also satirical, because in what world would anyone seriously believe that Bikesnob is actually required reading? Moreover, there is an additional level of irony in the phrase because the idea that something is "required" is in fact anathema to Bikesnob's entire world view, whether it is wearing a helmet, not biking in jorts, never wearing cotton, etc. Indeed, he would probably make the point that just because someone called it required, you should therefore not read it, or, if you do, not take it seriously at all.
But again, you are correct that Pon isn't doing anything wrong. That is Bikesnob's point.
But again, you are correct that Pon isn't doing anything wrong. That is Bikesnob's point.
Some take his comments seriously, some take him ironically, some dismiss him as a waste of words.
I vertaiy didn't think motivation for linking thst article was satirical in nature. Who links an article that isn't required reading and is from years ago, and declares it as required reading? That's such an odd thing to do. I think the poster didn't understand the point of the article. But maybe I am wrong, who knows.
Bikesnob articles, like many 'ironic bordering on serious, depending on how I want to be interpreted at any given moment' articles do this- they create confusion and division due the meta nature of the commentary style.
So to sum this thread up, someone just discovered a global bike holding company exists, is impressed they rent and fix bikes in Europe, and some other person apparently posted an article in irony that paints the holding company in a bad light even though it doesn't paint them in a bad light.
Yep, it's a General forum thread for sure.
Last edited by mstateglfr; 12-23-23 at 09:57 AM.
Likes For mstateglfr:
#20
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,225
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2585 Post(s)
Liked 5,644 Times
in
2,922 Posts
I know this isn’t meant for everyone, and certainly will hear about it; but the prospect of leasing a nice bike, for those without the means to buy one, is an interesting proposition. Considering the number of people who lease cars, this might be a viable option for some. From a business standpoint it would be interesting to look at the numbers. I would think the market would be very limited and marketing costs might be a real concern.
Lease a nice tricked out Cervelo for $20 to $50 a month? Interesting niche.
Lease a nice tricked out Cervelo for $20 to $50 a month? Interesting niche.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
#21
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10965 Post(s)
Liked 7,492 Times
in
4,189 Posts
I know this isn’t meant for everyone, and certainly will hear about it; but the prospect of leasing a nice bike, for those without the means to buy one, is an interesting proposition. Considering the number of people who lease cars, this might be a viable option for some. From a business standpoint it would be interesting to look at the numbers. I would think the market would be very limited and marketing costs might be a real concern.
Lease a nice tricked out Cervelo for $20 to $50 a month? Interesting niche.
Lease a nice tricked out Cervelo for $20 to $50 a month? Interesting niche.
If someone could provide a high end Cervelo to lease for $20-50 per month, that would fundamentally change the entire industry.
Lease it for 4 years at the high end of that range and it would be a steal compared to what the market is right now.
#22
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,225
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2585 Post(s)
Liked 5,644 Times
in
2,922 Posts
What I've seen between Chicago and minneapolis(only 2 I've looked before), road bikes rentals are $250-300 per week and are often multiple years old.
If someone could provide a high end Cervelo to lease for $20-50 per month, that would fundamentally change the entire industry.
Lease it for 4 years at the high end of that range and it would be a steal compared to what the market is right now.
If someone could provide a high end Cervelo to lease for $20-50 per month, that would fundamentally change the entire industry.
Lease it for 4 years at the high end of that range and it would be a steal compared to what the market is right now.
__________________
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
Road 🚴🏾♂️ & Mountain 🚵🏾♂️
#24
ignominious poltroon
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,046
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2241 Post(s)
Liked 3,443 Times
in
1,802 Posts
Likes For Polaris OBark:
#25
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,516
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2747 Post(s)
Liked 3,401 Times
in
2,058 Posts
I thought this was about PORN bikes - disappointed
Likes For dedhed: