Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Critique this wheel spec if you will

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Critique this wheel spec if you will

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-17, 01:54 PM
  #1  
tyrion
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tyrion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times in 972 Posts
Critique this wheel spec if you will

Front wheel (for commuting 220# Clyde, easy trails, maybe touring):

* VELOCITY DYAD 700c 36 spokes
* Shutter Precision PV8 dynamo hub
* SAPIM RACE J BEND SILVER DOUBLE BUTTED 14 X 15 X 14G OR 2.0 X 1.8 X 2.0MM SPOKES
* 4 cross lacing pattern

I arrived at this build by the prowheelbuilder.com building guide tool that walks you through component selection (pick a rim, pick a hub, pick spokes, pick lacing pattern). The tool seems well thought out and seems to limit component selections to things that work together.

The recommended Sapim spokes were the Race (2.0 - 1.8 - 2.0), the Leader (straight 2.0), and the Strong (2.3 - 2.0). (The Sapim Force (2.18 - 1.8 - 2.0) seems like it might be the best choice here but prowheelbuilder.com doesn't offer it.)

So my main questions are

1) Sapim Race spokes or Sapim Strong spokes? (I'm assuming the Race spokes would provide a slight flex/comfort over the Strong spokes, for which I'd sacrifice maximum strength)

2) 4-cross lacing was recommended over 3-cross - does this make sense?
tyrion is offline  
Old 12-30-17, 02:02 PM
  #2  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
well, a 36 hole 4 cross , the chance the spoke will pull out thru the hub flange is pretty much Zero..


I doubt you will feel any difference riding , 1 spoke vs the other.. DT alpine has offered the 13-15-14 spoke for a long time..
I have been fine with straight 14 / 2.0.... but you all sweat 'Best' over adequate..

seeking comfort.. there your tire choice is that factor .. fatter=lower pressure.





.....

Last edited by fietsbob; 12-30-17 at 02:14 PM.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 12-30-17, 02:09 PM
  #3  
tyrion
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tyrion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times in 972 Posts
Originally Posted by fietsbob
well, a 36 hole 4 cross , the chance the spoke will pull out thru the hub flange is Zero..
Yeah from internet reading my impression was that there were these issues with 4 cross, but the wheel building guide recommended 4 cross. 3 cross was "approved" but not "recommended". 2 cross and 1 cross and radial were "not approved".
tyrion is offline  
Old 12-30-17, 02:24 PM
  #4  
Bill Kapaun
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,873

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1795 Post(s)
Liked 1,269 Times in 876 Posts
For a front wheel, 32 spokes should be plenty.
That hub has rather large (2.7mm) spoke holes. For that reason, I would use the Strong to help better "fill the hole".
3X is more than strong enough and would save about the weight of 1 spoke.

My next front wheel will be a 32 X2 and I have 20 lbs. on you.
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Old 12-30-17, 02:31 PM
  #5  
tyrion
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tyrion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times in 972 Posts
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun
That hub has rather large (2.7mm) spoke holes. For that reason, I would use the Strong to help better "fill the hole".
Good tip, thanks.
tyrion is offline  
Old 12-30-17, 02:39 PM
  #6  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
4 x the spoke path, at a tangent ..1st cross is the opposing spoke, to the opposite side of the rim..

I have 3 Schmidt.. 2, 32 hole 3 cross 26, 1, 20".. 1, 28 spoke radial but its a Hub designed to be no other way, brompton rim..

& 1 shimano brompton wheel .. they used 1 cross. the 2 28 spoke wheels are 16"..




have several other bikes , i built the wheels .... you are jobbing it out.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 12-30-17, 02:54 PM
  #7  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,716

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5787 Post(s)
Liked 2,580 Times in 1,430 Posts
There's very little material difference between 4x and 3x on a 36h wheel.

However, whatever benefits or drawbacks one might factor, argue for 3x over 4x on a front wheel.

The logic is simple and straight forward. 4x offers more torsional rigidity, but that's moot for a front wheel. Of course it might matter a bit for a disc brake wheel, but, even there we're back to how much we're talking about.

On the flip side, the longer spokes and shallower bracing angle of 4x work to reduce lateral rigidity, which is highly desirable in front wheels.

The difference though small argues for 3x, but keep in mind that it's probably not material enough to fret over in the real world.

BTW and FWIW, the historic rational for 4x 36h wasn't mechanical, it was economic. Full tangent (4x/36h, 3x/28h) minimizes the effect of flange size on spoke length. In practice the difference for front and rear hubs with typical differences in flange diameter is near zero. This saves time and money by allowing manufacturers to use the same spokes in front and rear wheels. This may be a consideration for a bicycle tourist, because it means that he has emergency spokes in the other wheel in case a situation arises.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

Last edited by FBinNY; 12-30-17 at 03:05 PM.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 12-30-17, 03:04 PM
  #8  
Bill Kapaun
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,873

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1795 Post(s)
Liked 1,269 Times in 876 Posts
Originally Posted by tyrion
Good tip, thanks.
I'm ignorant about dynamo hubs, but is 2.4W enough?
My question is basically- do you have to "overdrive" your headlight in order to produce enough power to have a headlight?
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Old 12-30-17, 03:17 PM
  #9  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun
I'm ignorant about dynamo hubs, but is 2.4W enough?
My question is basically- do you have to "overdrive" your headlight in order to produce enough power to have a headlight?
Dyno-driven headlights are usually 2.4W, and hubs are usually 3.0W, so that they can also power a 0.6W taillight. 2.4W hubs are becoming more popular for those of us who don't mind sticking to a battery taillight.

P.S. These hubs do produce a full 3.0W when used on small-wheeled bikes, their original purpose.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498

Last edited by ThermionicScott; 12-30-17 at 03:40 PM.
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 12-30-17, 03:46 PM
  #10  
tyrion
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tyrion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times in 972 Posts
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun
I'm ignorant about dynamo hubs, but is 2.4W enough?
My question is basically- do you have to "overdrive" your headlight in order to produce enough power to have a headlight?
I'm just learning this stuff but I think the new LED lights need less power than the older incandescent lights. And the PV8 dynamo is "StVZO approved" FWIW.
tyrion is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NYCDahon
Bicycle Mechanics
5
07-25-18 12:00 PM
bikerbobbbb
Bicycle Mechanics
30
04-13-16 04:49 PM
migrantwing
Bicycle Mechanics
27
06-24-15 06:10 PM
Retro Grouch
General Cycling Discussion
11
02-21-15 05:03 PM
BoSoxYacht
Bicycle Mechanics
1
08-14-13 05:43 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.